World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Black phosphorus: A novel nanoplatform with potential in the field of bio-photonic nanomedicine

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545818300033Cited by:76 (Source: Crossref)

    Abstract

    Single- or few-layer black phosphorus (FLBP) has attracted great attentions in scientific community with its excellent properties, including biodegradability, unique puckered lattice configuration, attractive electrical properties and direct and tunable band gap. In recent years, FLBP has been widely studied in bio-photonic fields such as photothermal and photodynamic therapy, drug delivery, bioimaging and biosensor, showing attractive clinical potential. Because of the marked advantages of FLBP nanomaterials in bio-photonic fields, this review article reviews the latest advances of biomaterials based on FLBP in biomedical applications, ranging from biocompatibility, medical diagnosis to treatment.

    1. Introduction

    Two-dimensional (2D) materials, such as graphene,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,89 transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs, e.g., MoS2,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,1819 WS2,20,21,22,23,24,25 TiS2) and black phosphorus (BP), have been applied in various fields because of their distinctive physicochemical properties,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39 including easy surface modification, electrical conductivity and strong light response.40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50 Especially, 2D materials own more advantages in bio-photonic applications such as biosensing,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61 cancer imaging62,63,64,65,66,67,68 and drug delivery platform.69,70,71,72,73 However, each 2D material has its own shortcoming which hinders its clinical applications.74,75,76,77 Graphene displays an extremely high carrier mobility, but it has no bandgap,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88 which limits its applications in biosensing and bioimaging. In spite of possessing a finite bandgap,17,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96 the low carrier mobility of TMDs prevents their practical applications.97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107 Taken together, it is important to find a new 2D material with a well-balanced performance.

    BP is a novel nanoplatform with potential applications in such as energy storage,35 sensor108 and bio-photonic because of its excellent properties.109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120 The bandgap of BP is tunable in a large range (from 0.3eV to 2eV) under different thicknesses.121,122,123,124 As the result of the direct and tunable bandgap, few-layer black phosphorus (FLBP) processes a widely light absorption indicating a great potential in photothermal and photodynamic therapy. FLBP also shows high carrier mobility125,126,127,128,129,130 while preserving large ON/OFF ratio.131,132,133,134,135,136,137 Due to the balance of these features, BP is often occurred in biosensing and bioimaging field. FLBP, with the unique puckered lattice configuration, possesses much larger surface area-to-volume ratio than other 2D materials, which results in extremely high drug loading capacity.138 Furthermore, FLBP displays negligible toxicity and outstanding biodegradability in the biological environment which distinguishes it from other common 2D materials. FLBP is completely degradable in vivo, and the products, such as phosphite ions, phosphate ions and other PxOy, are nontoxic and can be easily exhibited a desire renal filtration. In addition, FLBP possesses attractive electrical characteristics, unique band structure and natural biocompatibility, indicating that FLBP has a great potential for biomedical field.37

    BP has aroused more and more research interest on its biomedicine applications with its unique physical and chemical properties. However, there is still a lot of problems needs to be solved to achieve the requirements of clinical applications, such as stability,139,140,141,142,143,144in vivo toxicity,145 biodegradation,146 excretion,147 etc. In order to meet the urgent demand for the novel 2D materials used in biomedical field, it is necessary to summarize the latest achievement of BP in bio-photonic fields. In this paper, we mainly review the biomedical research of BP in biological diagnosis and therapy.

    2. Biocompatibility of BP

    Latiff et al.145 established human lung carcinoma cancer epithelial cells (A549) model to study the toxicity of FLBP. To ensure the credibility of the results, graphene and MoS2 are used as comparison and two similar methods based on similar principles were used to assess cell viabilities. In this work, the toxicity of FLBP increases with increasing concentration, when the concentration of FLBP is below 50ppm. They found that toxicity of FLBP is lower than that of graphene but higher than that of MoS2. Due to the limitations of the test method and the size of FLBP used in the paper, there are still a lot of toxicity assessments to do before the clinical applications of FLBP. Zhang et al.148 studied the dependence of FLBP toxicity on size, concentration, exposure time and cell type, as presented in Fig. 1. FLBP was fabricated in oxygen-free Millipore water, and centrifugation at different speeds was used to obtain FLBP with three different sizes, named BP-1, BP-2 and BP-3, from large to small. The results of this paper indicate that FLBP with the BP-3 dimensions is appropriate for biomedical applications. They proposed and verified two possible mechanisms of the cytotoxicity of FLBP: (1) FLBP produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) to kill cells and (2) FLBP destroys cell membrane integrity. The cytotoxicity of BP-1 is much higher than that of BP-3. Fortunately, the size of BP-3 happens to be the most widely used size of FLBP nanosheets in the biomedical field. The results of this paper indicate that FLBP is appropriate for biomedical applications. Mu et al.149 explored toxicological studies on BP quantum dots (BPQDs), which underwent faster renal filtration than BP nanosheets, systemically with cell and animal model. Comparing the cells viability and the endocellular ROS levels in experimental group with different concentrations of BPQDs and the control group, they found that the cytotoxicity of BPQDs is mainly derived from ROS produced by itself. The results of in vivo assays indicated that catalase activity in liver will reduce 24h after injection, but there was no obvious adverse effect after a week without recurrence after a month. Song et al.150 studied the dependence of FLBP cytotoxicity on dose and time. When the concentration exceeded 4ppm, FLBP showed significant cytotoxicity, which conflicts with other works probably for the reason of the difference in the size of FLBP. The percentage of live cells was detected within 12h at a dose of 10ppm and was significantly reduced after 6h, indicating the need for effective modification before BP achieves clinical applications.

    Fig. 1.

    Fig. 1. The dependence of cell viability on size, concentration of BP, exposure time and cell lines. Cell lines: NIH 3T3 (a–c), HCoEpiC (d–f) and 293T cells (g–i). Exposure time: 12h (a, d, g), 24h (b, e, h) and 48h (c, f, i).

    3. Medical Diagnosis

    3.1. Biomolecular biosensors

    With a high carrier mobility and large switching ratios, FLBP has great applications potential on highly sensitive and selective biosensors.151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160 Chen et al.161 investigated FLBP for human immunoglobulin G (IgG) detection. FLBP was fabricated by a mechanical exfoliation method and passivated with Al2O3. The FLBP-based device showed rapid response performances and excellent sensitivity (10ngmL1) to human IgG. Furthermore, the FLBP-based device exhibited good stability without obvious changes in performance. Mayorga-Martinez et al.162 obtained FLBP with the size of 40200nm by electrochemical exfoliation. The as-fabricated FLBP showed active electrocatalytic performances for the hydrogen evolution reaction and IgG detection. In addition, FLBP with poly-L-lysine (PLL) displays a great potential in label-free detection of myoglobin (Mb), which is an important signal of cardiovascular events.163 FLBP was created by liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) with an aqueous surfactant solution in argon atmosphere, and PLL was used to functionalize FLBP in order to accelerate binding with anti-Mb DNA aptamers. The PLL-BP dispersed stability in aqueous medium and showed a stable detection performance in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and serum samples, indicating successful surface modification. The FLBP-based device possesses a high sensitivity (36μApg1mLcm2) and a low detection limit (0.524pgmL1), with a widely dynamic response range (1pgmL1 to 16μgmL1).

    In addition to excellent electrical properties, the unique fluorescence properties of FLBP were also applied to biological detection. Gu et al.164 investigated BPQDs with a sonication-assisted solvothermal method for the applications of acetylcholinesterase activity sensing probes. The BPQDs showed strong green fluorescence at 497nm and an extremely high quantum yield (8.4%). Furthermore, pH relevant fluorescence property with reliable photostability had been observed in this work. Lee et al.165 prepared BPQDs with a strong visible blue-emitting performance by LPE in various organic solvents. They used catechol-grafted poly(ethylene glycol) (CA-PEG) to functionalize BPQDs in basic buffer to achieve a stable dispersible in water and an extremely low cytotoxicity. The photoluminescence emission centered of PEG-BPQDs is 428nm and the photoluminescence quantum yield is 5% when the excitation wavelength is 365nm. Yew et al.166 demonstrated FLBP as a platform in fluorescence-based DNA biosensors. BP crystals transformed from red phosphorus allotrope in the high pressure, and FLBP was synthesized by share force milling at 17,000rpm. FLBP showed an obvious photoluminescence emission centered at 527nm with an excitation wavelength of 200 nm, indicating potential applications as fluorescent sensing platform. This biosensor shows a low detection limit (5.9pM) and quantification limit (19.7pM). In addition, an excellent linearity (r=0.91) and a widely dynamic response range (4–4000pM) were observed in this work.

    3.2. Tumor imaging

    Cancer is a malignant disease that kills millions of people every year.38,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177 With the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188 FLBP can be passively enriched to the tumor site, so the tumor imaging based on FLBP has received extensive attention. Shao et al.147 investigated that BPQDs, which manufactured by the simple liquid exfoliation method, with poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) were used to modify BPQDs in order to enhance the stability and solubility of BPQDs in water. As-fabricated BP-PLGA can effectively passively accumulate to the tumor region with tail vein injection because of the EPR effect. Figure 2(a) demonstrates the infrared thermographic images of the mice irradiated by near-infrared (NIR) laser 24h after injection. Drawing a comparison between the tumor temperature of the test groups and of the control groups under the same power irradiation, it is obvious that the tumor temperature of the test groups (26.3C of BP-PLGA) increased much more than that of the control groups (6.2C, 7.8C and 10.8C of PBS, PLGA and bare BPQDs, respectively), indicating the excellent photothermal performance of BP-PLGA. In addition, many other researchers also have achieved extremely good photothermal imaging by different modifications of FLBP.189,190

    Fig. 2.

    Fig. 2. (a) Infrared thermographic images in the nude mice bearing MCF7 breast tumor under NIR laser irradiation (808nm, 1Wcm2) after intravenous injection at 24h with different treatments. (b) PA maps of PEGylated BP nanoparticles dispersions with different concentrations (first column), and time-lapsed PA images of liver, kidney and tumor of female BALB/c mice after intravenous injection with PEGylated BP nanoparticles (200mL, 2mgmL1).

    Sun et al.191 investigated BPQDs with excellent photostability for the applications of photoacoustic (PA) imaging, as shown in Fig. 2(b). The PEGylated BPQDs with a uniform size were fabricated by a simple high energy mechanical milling method. When the concentration of the PEGylated BPQDs is in the range of 0–250μgmL1, the intensity of the PA signal rises linearly as the concentration increases. Furthermore, the PA signal intensity in tumor was still higher than that of liver and kidney, 24h after injection, representing a long retention time and EPR effect. Sun et al.192 reported BPQDs loaded with titanium ligand (TiL4) as PA imaging agent. Dispersibility and stability of TiL4@BPQDs in water are much better than those of bare BPQDs. With increasing wavelength of the irradiation, the intensity of the PA signal decreased because the optical absorption of wavelength range from 680nm to 808nm reduces.

    Yang et al.193 prepared FLBP coated with Au nanoparticles for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) imaging. BP–Au NSs were fabricated with a facile reflux method, and mPEG-SH was added to improve the dispersion and stability in water. The molecular mechanism of photothermal therapy (PTT) was investigated by SERS analysis. The SERS analysis illustrates that PTT damages the membrane microstructure in tumor, and some BP–Au NSs appear in the nucleus region.

    4. Medical Therapy

    4.1. Phototherapy

    Phototherapy, mainly including PTT194,195 and photodynamic therapeutic (PDT),196,197 has become a potential alternative to traditional cancer therapy with its advantages of little double consequences,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205 excellent targeting206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215 and intelligent controllability.216,217,218,219,220,221,222 The principle of PTT is based on the heat energy generated by the photothermal agent under irradiation to achieve the therapeutic effect. PDT agent can generate ROS to kill cancer cells under laser irradiation. FLBP has broadband absorption characteristics because of its tunable direct band gap, indicating great potential for the applications of cancer phototherapy.

    4.1.1. PTT

    Sun et al.223 fabricated BPQDs by liquid exfoliation method as photothermal agent. BPQDs were functionalized with PEG to prevent BPQDs from aggregating in PBS. As-fabricated PEG-BPQDs possessed a large extinction coefficient (14.8Lg1cm1 at 808nm), which is much more larger than that of Au nanorods. In addition, PEG-BPQDs showed a high photothermal conversion efficiency (28.4%) and favorable photostability. The aqueous solutions of PEG-BPQDs rise 31.5C in 10min at the concentration of 50ppm when the power density of NIR laser irradiation is 1.0Wcm2, indicating an excellent photothermal performance. The percentage of live cells had no significant decrease even with a high incubation concentration of PEG-BPQDs (200ppm) without NIR laser. The PEG-BPQDs killed the most of the cancer cells with a low concentration after the NIR irradiation for 10min, as shown in Fig. 3. The results of this work illustrate the good biocompatibility and photothermal performance of BPQDs.

    Fig. 3.

    Fig. 3. The dependence of cell viability on concentration of BPQDs and cell lines. The irradiation time is 10min and power density of 808nm laser is 1.0Wcm2. (a) Fluorescence images of cancer cells incubated with BPQDs after irradiation of 808nm laser. (b) C6 cells viability after treatments with different concentrations of BPQDs. (c) MCF7 cells viability after treatments with different concentrations of BPQDs.

    Shao et al.147 demonstrated BPQDs coated with PLGA for PTT. PLGA enhanced the stability of BPQDs and adjusted the degradation rate of nanoparticles by adjusting the chemical composition. PLGA-BPQDs maintained stable photothermal properties within 8 days, and it degraded by almost 80% after 8 weeks, indicating a balance of therapeutic and biodegradable. In vitro experiments showed that PLGA-BPQDs killed the most of cancer cells at an extremely low concentration (10ppm). What’s more, the final degradation products of PLGA-BPQDs are carbon dioxide, water, phosphate and phosphonate, which normally exist both in vivo and in vitro and result in little side effects. Fu et al.224 prepared three types of FLBP with average size of 394±75nm, 118±22nm and 4.5±0.6nm by LPE method, named as L-BP, M-BP and S-BP. The temperature of L-BP solution with a concentration of 25ppm was able to rise by 24C under NIR laser irradiation for 10min, whereas temperatures of M-BP and S-BP solutions with the equal concentration could only rise by 21.8C and 19.2C, indicating that L-BP has the best photothermal performance. In addition, there are some studies dedicated to improving the photothermal stability of FLBP.225,226,227 Some researchers explored new applications for the thermal performance of BP, such as post-surgical treatment of cancer, 3D-printed scaffolds and neuroprotective nanomedicine.189,228,229

    4.1.2. PDT

    FLBP for PDT was fabricated by LPE in an aqueous solvent.230 At a wavelength of 530nm, the quantum yield of FLBP producing singlet oxygen is very high (0.91). In vitro and in vivo FLBP experiments showed good PDT effects, as shown in Fig. 4. BPQDs were synthesized by LPE in N-methyl pyrrolidone and coated with PEG to achieve enhanced stability in water. Guo et al.231 used BP dispersion to incubate cancer cells under 670nm laser irradiation and researched the dependence of cell survival rate on BPQD concentrations, illumination time and laser intensity. The ROS generated by FLBP was able to kill the cancer cells efficiently at very low concentration (1.6ppm) and at very weak laser power (160mWcm2). Furthermore, 65% of BPQDs was found excreted with urine within 8h, probably for the reason of the ultra-small hydrodynamic size of BPQDs, indicating that BPQDs have a good biocompatibility. Chen et al.232 found that the bleaching signal of BPQDs is built up rapidly (<2ns) and lasts a long time (100μs). The triplet generation attributed to intersystem crossing was observed and may be the reason of the highly efficient singlet oxygen generation of BPQDs. Tan et al.233 achieved in situ disinfection with PDT based on FLBP. FLBP was modified with poly(4-pyridonemethylstyrene) endoperoxide (PPMS-EPO). PPMS not only enhances the stability of FLBP, but also stores singlet oxygen. The PPMS-EPO/BPS showed good photodynamic performance even in the absence of light, indicating a good clinical potential.

    Fig. 4.

    Fig. 4. In vivo PDT. (a) Tumor volume of different time post-injections. (b) Tumor pictures of experimental group and control group after treatments. (c) PCNA and TUNEL analysis of tumor tissues.

    4.2. Therapeutic agent delivery

    Chemotherapy is an effective cancer treatment,234,235 but the high toxicity,236 low targeting237,238 and drug resistance239 limit its therapeutic effect. In order to solve the aforementioned problems, researchers load therapeutic agents onto drug delivery systems (DDSs) to enhance chemotherapeutic effect. With large surface area-to-volume radio, unique pleated structure and excellent light response characteristics, FLBP has great potential for DDSs. Tao et al.240 first applied FLBP to DDSs, as shown in Fig. 5. PEG-FA/Cy7-functionalized FLBP exhibited good biocompatibility, obvious tumor targeting and strong fluorescence signal and was loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) via electrostatic adsorption. In addition, the endocytosis pathway of the FLBP nanoparticle had also been screened. Chen et al.138 prepared a drug loading platform with a pH/photo response based on FLBP. Their results showed that FLBP has a very high DOX loading (980%) due to its puckered lattice configuration, large interlay distance 0.524nm and negative charge. They used the therapeutic system to achieve synergistic treatment of PTT/PDT/chemotherapy and achieved good anti-tumor effects. Wang et al.241 used one-pot method to prepare HSA-modified FLBP, which can effectively load paclitaxel by hydrophobic interactions. Qiu et al.190 fabricated a BP@hydrogel-based DDS. The DDSs enable intelligent light-controlled drug release and degradation, and the degradation products are completely nontoxic and easily metabolized. Yin et al.242 fabricated FLBP loaded with interfering RNA as the applications of gene delivery systems. Compared with the commercial delivery reagents, the BPQDs exhibited a higher transfection efficiency and low toxicity.

    Fig. 5.

    Fig. 5. (a) Schematic representation of the FLBP nanoparticle. 1: PEG-NH2 (surface modification), 2: DOX (therapeutic agents), 3: Cy7-NH2 (NIR imaging agents), 4: FA-PEG-NH2 (targeting agents), 5: FITC-PEG-NH2 (fluorescent imaging agents). (b) The endocytosis pathway of the FLBP nanoparticle.

    5. Summary

    This paper summarizes the latest progress in FLBP research from three aspects, including biocompatibility of BP, medical diagnosis and medical therapeutic based on BP. Various factors such as size, concentration and test cell line can affect the toxicity of FLBP, but overall, FLBP shows relatively low toxic at effective dosing dose. Due to its attractive electrical properties, fluorescence characteristics and large surface area-to-volume ratio, FLBP shows a great potential for biosensors and imaging. In terms of biological therapy, FLBP mainly achieves therapeutic effects through its excellent optical response characteristics and as a drug delivery platform.

    Although studies on the biomedical applications of FLBP have made a lot of progress, there are still some problems that need to be solved before its clinical translation. First of all, because the size of the FLBP has a great impact on toxicity and treatment effects, it is very important to find a novel method to fabricate FLBP with uniform size and high production. Secondly, other treatments such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, etc. could be combined with BP to achieve synergistic effect. Finally, the targeted treatments based on FLBP should be developed for specific diseases to achieve smaller side effects and better therapeutic effects. This requires multidisciplinary researchers to work together. FLBP has great potential in biomedicine. To promote the clinical applications of FLBP, we summarized the progress of FLBP in biomedical field.

    Abbreviations

    FLBP few-layer black phosphorus
    2D two-dimensional
    BP black phosphorus
    TMDs transition metal dichalcogenides
    ROS reactive oxygen species
    QDs quantum dots
    IgG immunoglobulin G
    PLL poly-L-lysine
    Mb myoglobin
    PBS Phosphate-buffered saline
    CA-PEG catechol-grafted poly (ethylene glycol)
    EPR enhanced permeability and retention
    PLGA poly lactic-co-glycolic acid
    NIR near-infrared
    PA Photoacoustic
    HEMM high energy mechanical milling
    TiL4 titanium ligand
    SERS surface-enhanced Raman scattering
    PTT photothermal therapy
    PDT photodynamic therapeutic
    PEG poly (ethylene glycol)
    NMP N-methyl pyrrolidone
    PPMS-EPOpoly(4-pyridonemethylstyrene) endoperoxide
    DDSs drug delivery systems
    DOX Doxorubicin

    Acknowledgments

    We acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61435010 and 61575089, H. Z.), the Science and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen (KQTD2015032416270385 and JCYJ20150625103619275, H. Z.), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M610540, 2018T110892, M. Q.), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2016BB33, M. Q.) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (2018A030310500, M. Q.).

    References

    • 1. A. R. Akhmerov, C. W. J. Beenakker, “Boundary conditions for Dirac fermions on a terminated honeycomb lattice,” Physics 77, 439–446 (2008). Google Scholar
    • 2. D. M. Basko, “Boundary problems for Dirac electrons and edge-assisted Raman scattering in graphene,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 79, 205428 (2009). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 3. W. Beugeling, J. C. Everts, C. M. Smith, “Topological phase transitions driven by next-nearest-neighbor hopping in two-dimensional lattices,” Phys. Rev. B 86, 1721–1725 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 4. K. I. Bolotin, K. J. Sikes, Z. Jiang, M. Klima, G. Fudenberg, J. Hone, P. Kim, H. L. Stormer, “Ultrahigh electron mobility in suspended graphene,” Solid State Commun. 146, 351–355 (2008). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 5. A. Girit, J. C. Meyer, R. Erni, M. D. Rossell, C. Kisielowski, Y. Li, C. H. Park, M. F. Crommie, M. L. Cohen, S. G. Louie, “Graphene at the edge: Stability and dynamics,” Science 323, 1705–1708 (2009). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 6. X. Li, D. Geng, Y. Zhang, X. Meng, R. Li, X. Sun, “Superior cycle stability of nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets as anodes for lithium ion batteries,” Electrochem. Commun. 13, 822–825 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 7. B. Shen, J. Chen, X. Yan, Q. Xue, “Synthesis of fluorine-doped multi-layered graphene sheets by arc-discharge,” Rsc Adv. 2, 6761–6764 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 8. H. W. Yoon, Y. H. Cho, H. B. Park, “Graphene-based membranes: Status and prospects,” Philos. Trans. 374, 20150024 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 9. J. Zhang, Z. Xie, W. Li, S. Dong, M. Qu, “High-capacity graphene oxide/graphite/carbon nanotube composites for use in Li-ion battery anodes,” Carbon 74, 153–162 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 10. S. De Jong, A. Haas, J. Qian, G. Blazey, D. Hedin, A. Sanchezhernandez, A. Heinson, J. G. Lima, R. Madaras, A. Duperrin, “Atomically thin MoS2: A new direct-gap semiconductor,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136805 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 11. G. Eda, H. Yamaguchi, D. Voiry, T. Fujita, M. Chen, M. Chhowalla, “Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2,” Nano Lett. 11, 5111–5116 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Q. He, Z. Zeng, Z. Yin, H. Li, S. Wu, X. Huang, H. Zhang, “Fabrication of flexible MoS2 thin–film transistor arrays for practical gas–sensing applications,” Small 8, 2994–2999 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 13. D. Jariwala, V. K. Sangwan, D. J. Late, J. E. Johns, V. P. Dravid, T. J. Marks, L. J. Lauhon, M. C. Hersam, “Band-like transport in high mobility unencapsulated single-layer MoS2 transistors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 699 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 14. J. Liu, Z. Zeng, X. Cao, G. Lu, L. H. Wang, Q. L. Fan, W. Huang, H. Zhang, “Preparation of MoSâ,-polyvinylpyrrolidone nanocomposites for flexible nonvolatile rewritable memory devices with reduced graphene oxide electrodes,” Small 8, 3517–3522 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 15. B. Radisavljevic, A. Radenovic, J. Brivio, V. Giacometti, A. Kis, “Single-layer MoS2 transistors,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 147–150 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 16. B. Radisavljevic, M. B. Whitwick, A. Kis, “Integrated circuits and logic operations based on single-layer MoS2,” ACS Nano 5, 9934–9938 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 17. A. Splendiani, L. Sun, Y. Zhang, T. Li, J. Kim, C. Y. Chim, G. Galli, F. Wang, “Emerging photoluminescence in monolayer MoS2,” Nano Lett. 10, 1271–1275 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 18. H. Wang, L. Yu, Y. H. Lee, Y. Shi, A. Hsu, M. L. Chin, L. J. Li, M. Dubey, J. Kong, T. Palacios, “Integrated circuits based on bilayer MoS2 transistors,” Nano Lett. 12, 4674 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 19. Z. Yin, H. Li, H. Li, L. Jiang, Y. Shi, Y. Sun, G. Lu, Q. Zhang, X. Chen, H. Zhang, “Single-layer MoS2 phototransistors,” ACS Nano 6, 74–80 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 20. C. Cong, J. Shang, X. Wu, B. Cao, N. Peimyoo, C. Qiu, L. Sun, T. Yu, “Synthesis and optical properties of large area single crystalline 2D semiconductor WS2 monolayer from chemical vapor deposition,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 2, 131–136 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 21. A. L. Elías, N. Perealópez, A. Castrobeltrán, A. Berkdemir, R. Lv, S. Feng, A. D. Long, T. Hayashi, Y. A. Kim, M. Endo, “Controlled synthesis and transfer of large-area WS2 sheets: From single layer to few layers,” ACS Nano 7, 5235–5242 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 22. K. M. Mccreary, A. T. Hanbicki, S. Simranjeet, R. K. Kawakami, G. G. Jernigan, I. Masa, N. Amy, T. H. Brintlinger, R. M. Stroud, B. T. Jonker, “The effect of preparation conditions on Raman and photoluminescence of monolayer WS2,” Sci. Rep. 6, 35154 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 23. M. Okada, T. Sawazaki, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguch, H. Hibino, H. Shinohara, R. Kitaura, “Direct chemical vapor deposition growth of WS2 atomic layers on hexagonal boron nitride,” ACS Nano 8, 8273–8277 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 24. N. Peimyoo, J. Shang, C. Cong, X. Shen, X. Wu, E. K. Yeow, T. Yu, “Nonblinking, intense two-dimensional light emitter: Monolayer WS2 triangles,” ACS Nano 7, 10985–10994 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 25. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Ji, J. Ju, H. Yuan, J. Shi, T. Gao, D. Ma, M. Liu, Y. Chen, “Controlled growth of high-quality monolayer WS2 layers on sapphire and imaging its grain boundary,” ACS Nano 7, 8963–8971 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 26. H. Huang, M. Qiu, Q. Li, S. Liu, X. Zhang, Z. Wang, N. Fu, B. Zhao, R. Yang, W. Huang, “Donor–acceptor conjugated polymers based on thieno[3,2-b]indole (TI) and 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole (BT) for high efficiency polymer solar cells,” J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 5448–5460 (2016). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 27. S. Han, D. Wu, S. Li, F. Zhang, X. Feng, “ChemInform abstract: Porous graphene materials for advanced electrochemical energy storage and conversion devices,” Adv. Mater. 26, 849–864 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Z. Jiang, B. Pei, A. Manthiram, “Randomly stacked holey graphene anodes for lithium ion batteries with enhanced electrochemical performance,” J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 7775–7781 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 29. M. Qiu, S. Long, B. Li, L. Yan, W. Xie, Y. Niu, X. Wang, Q. Guo, A. Xia, “Toward an understanding of how the optical property of water-soluble cationic polythiophene derivative is altered by the addition of salts: The Hofmeister effect,” J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 21870–21878 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 30. W. C. Ren, L. B. Gao, L. P. Ma, H. M. Cheng, “Preparation of graphene by chemical vapor deposition,” Carbon 49, 2881 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 31. D. Zhu, Q. Zhu, C. Gu, D. Ouyang, M. Qiu, X. Bao, R. Yang, “Alkoxyl side chain substituted thieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione to enhance photovoltaic performance with low steric hindrance and high dipole moment,” Macromolecules 49, 5788–5795 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 32. M. Qiu, D. Zhu, X. Bao, J. Wang, X. Wang, R. Yang, “WO3 with surface oxygen vacancies as an anode buffer layer for high performance polymer solar cells,” J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 894–900 (2016). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 33. M. Qiu, D. Zhu, L. Yan, N. Wang, L. Han, X. Bao, Z. Du, Y. Niu, R. Yang, “Strategy to manipulate molecular orientation and charge mobility in D-A type conjugated polymer through rational fluorination for improvements of photovoltaic performances,” J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 22757–22765 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 34. M. Qiu, R. G. Brandt, Y. Niu, X. Bao, D. Yu, N. Wang, L. Han, L. Yu, S. Xia, R. Yang, “Theoretical study on the rational design of cyano-substituted P3HT materials for OSCs: Substitution effect on the improvement of photovoltaic performance,” J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 8501–8511 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Y. Zhang, Y. Zheng, K. Rui, H. H. Hng, K. Hippalgaonkar, J. Xu, W. Sun, J. Zhu, Q. Yan, W. Huang, “2D black phosphorus for energy storage and thermoelectric applications,” Small 13, 1700661 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 36. W. Lei, G. Liu, J. Zhang, M. Liu, “Black phosphorus nanostructures: Recent advances in hybridization, doping and functionalization,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 3492 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 37. M. Qiu, W. X. Ren, T. Jeong, M. Won, G. Y. Park, D. K. Sang, L.-P. Liu, H. Zhang, J. S. Kim, “Omnipotent phosphorene: A next-generation, two-dimensional nanoplatform for multidisciplinary biomedical applications,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 5588–5601 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 38. Y. Lin, Y. Wu, R. Wang, G. Tao, P. F. Luo, X. Lin, G. Huang, J. Li, H. H. Yang, “Two-dimensional tellurium nanosheets for photoacoustic imaging-guided photodynamic therapy,” Chem. Commun. 54, 8579–8582 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 39. T. Guo, Y. Lin, Z. Li, S. Chen, G. Huang, H. Lin, J. Wang, G. Liu, H. H. Yang, “Gadolinium oxysulfide-coated gold nanorods with improved stability and dual-modal magnetic resonance/photoacoustic imaging contrast enhancement for cancer theranostics,” Nanoscale 9, 56–61 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 40. Z. Chen, X. Liu, Y. Liu, S. Gunsel, J. Luo, “Ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets with superior extreme pressure property as boundary lubricants,” Sci. Rep. 5, 12869 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 41. L. Cizaire, B. Vacher, T. L. Mogne, J. M. Martin, L. Rapoport, A. Margolin, R. Tenne, “Mechanisms of ultra-low friction by hollow inorganic fullerene-like MoS 2 nanoparticles,” Surf. Coat. Technol. 160, 282–287 (2002). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 42. J. J. Hu, J. E. Bultman, J. S. Zabinski, “Microstructure and lubrication mechanism of multilayered MoS 2/Sb 2 O 3 thin films,” Tribol. Lett. 21, 169–174 (2006). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 43. B. Huard, N. Stander, J. A. Sulpizio, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, “Evidence of the role of contacts on the observed electron-hole asymmetry in graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 78, 121402 (2008). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 44. W. J. Liu, H. Y. Yu, J. Wei, M. F. Li, “Impact of process induced defects on the contact characteristics of Ti/graphene devices,” Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 14, K67 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 45. K. Nagashio, T. Nishimura, K. Kita, A. Toriumi, “Contact resistivity and current flow path at metal/graphene contact,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 1068 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 46. T. Xian, W. Liang, J. Zhao, Z. Li, Q. Meng, T. Fan, C. S. Luo, Z. Ye, L. Yu, Z. Guo, “Fluorinated phosphorene: Electrochemical synthesis, atomistic fluorination, and enhanced stability,” Small 13, 1702739 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 47. Z. Xie, D. Wang, T. Fan, C. Xing, Z. Li, W. Tao, L. Liu, S. Bao, D. Fan, H. Zhang, “Black phosphorus analogue tin sulfide nanosheets: Synthesis and application as near-infrared photothermal agents and drug delivery platforms for cancer therapy,” J. Mater. Chem. B 6, 4747–4755 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 48. C. Xing, W. Huang, Z. Xie, J. Zhao, D. Ma, T. Fan, W. Liang, Y. Ge, B. Dong, J. Li, “Ultra-small bismuth quantum dots: Facile liquid-phase exfoliation, characterization, and application in high-performance UV-Vis photo-detector,” ACS Photon. 5, 621–629 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 49. Y. Song, Z. Liang, X. Jiang, Y. Chen, Z. Li, L. Lu, Y. Ge, K. Wang, J. Zheng, S. Lu, “Few-layer antimonene decorated microfiber: Ultra-short pulse generation and all-optical thresholding with enhanced long term stability,” 2d Mater. 4, 045010 (2017). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 50. Y. Ge, Z. Zhu, Y. Xu, Y. Chen, S. Chen, Z. Liang, Y. Song, Y. Zou, H. Zeng, S. Xu, “Ultrafast photonics: Broadband nonlinear photoresponse of 2D TiS2 for ultrashort pulse generation and alloptical thresholding devices (Advanced Optical Materials 4/2018),” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6, 1870014 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 51. H. Dong, J. Zhang, H. Ju, H. Lu, S. Wang, S. Jin, K. Hao, H. Du, X. Zhang, “Highly sensitive multiple microRNA detection based on fluorescence quenching of graphene oxide and isothermal strand-displacement polymerase reaction,” Anal. Chem. 84, 4587–4593 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 52. P. Hu, C. Zhu, L. Jin, S. Dong, “An ultrasensitive fluorescent aptasensor for adenosine detection based on exonuclease III assisted signal amplification,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 34, 83–87 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 53. B. Li, X. Li, M. Wang, Z. Yang, H. Yin, S. Ai, “Photoelectrochemical biosensor for highly sensitive detection of microRNA based on duplex-specific nuclease-triggered signal amplification,” J. Solid State Electrochem. 19, 1301–1309 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 54. Y. Lu, P. Wu, Y. Yin, H. Zhang, C. Cai, “Aptamer-functionalized graphene oxide for highly efficient loading and cancer cell-specific delivery of antitumor drug,” J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 3849–3859 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 55. Y. Ohno, K. Maehashi, K. Matsumoto, “Label-free biosensors based on aptamer-modified graphene field-effect transistors,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 18012–18013 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 56. J. Z. Ou, A. F. Chrimes, Y. Wang, S. Y. Tang, M. S. Strano, K. Kalantarzadeh, “Ion-driven photoluminescence modulation of quasi-two-dimensional MoS2 nanoflakes for applications in biological systems,” Nano Lett. 14, 857 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 57. D. Sarkar, W. Liu, X. Xie, A. C. Anselmo, S. Mitragotri, K. Banerjee, “MoS2 field-effect transistor for next-generation label-free biosensors,” ACS Nano 8, 3992 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 58. P. Wu, Y. Qian, P. Du, H. Zhang, C. Cai, “Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene for measuring the releasing process of hydrogen peroxide from living cells,” J. Mater. Chem. 22, 6402–6412 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 59. Q. Xi, D. M. Zhou, Y. Y. Kan, J. Ge, Z. K. Wu, R. Q. Yu, J. H. Jiang, “Highly sensitive and selective strategy for microRNA detection based on WS2 nanosheet mediated fluorescence quenching and duplex-specific nuclease signal amplification,” Anal. Chem. 86, 1361 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 60. X. H. Zhao, Q. J. Ma, X. X. Wu, X. Zhu, “Graphene oxide-based biosensor for sensitive fluorescence detection of DNA based on exonuclease III-aided signal amplification,” Anal. Chim. Acta 727, 67–70 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 61. C. Zhu, Z. Zeng, H. Li, F. Li, C. Fan, H. Zhang, “Single-layer MoS2-based nanoprobes for homogeneous detection of biomolecules,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5998 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 62. L. Cheng, J. Liu, X. Gu, H. Gong, X. Shi, T. Liu, C. Wang, X. Wang, G. Liu, H. Xing, “PEGylated WS(2) nanosheets as a multifunctional theranostic agent for in vivo dual-modal CT/photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy,” Adv. Mater. 26, 1886–1893 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 63. T. Liu, S. Shi, C. Liang, S. Shen, L. Cheng, C. Wang, X. Song, S. Goel, T. E. Barnhart, W. Cai, “Iron oxide decorated MoS2 nanosheets with double PEGylation for chelator-free radiolabeling and multimodal imaging guided photothermal therapy,” ACS Nano 9, 950–960 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 64. T. Liu, C. Wang, W. Cui, H. Gong, C. Liang, X. Shi, Z. Li, B. Sun, Z. Liu, “Combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy delivered by PEGylated MoS2 nanosheets,” Nanoscale 6, 11219–11225 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 65. X. Qian, S. Shen, T. Liu, L. Cheng, Z. Liu, “Two-dimensional TiSâ, nanosheets for in vivo photoacoustic imaging and photothermal cancer therapy,” Nanoscale 7, 6380–6387 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 66. L. V. Wang, S. Hu, “Photoacoustic tomography: In vivo imaging from organelles to organs,” Science 335, 1458–1462 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 67. S. Wang, X. Li, Y. Chen, X. Cai, H. Yao, W. Gao, Y. Zheng, X. An, J. Shi, H. Chen, “A facile one-pot synthesis of a two-dimensional MoS2/Bi2 S3 composite theranostic nanosystem for multi-modality tumor imaging and therapy,” Adv. Mater. 27, 2775–2782 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 68. Y. Yong, L. Zhou, Z. Gu, L. Yan, G. Tian, X. Zheng, X. Liu, X. Zhang, J. Shi, W. Cong, “WS2 nanosheet as a new photosensitizer carrier for combined photodynamic and photothermal therapy of cancer cells,” Nanoscale 6, 10394–10403 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 69. W. Tao, X. Ji, X. Xu, M. A. Islam, Z. Li, S. Chen, P. E. Saw, H. Zhang, Z. Bharwani, Z. Guo, “Inside cover: Antimonene quantum dots: Synthesis and application as near infrared photothermal agents for effective cancer therapy (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39/2017),” Angew. Chem. 56, 11896 (2017). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 70. T. Liu, C. Wang, X. Gu, H. Gong, L. Cheng, X. Shi, L. Feng, B. Sun, Z. Liu, “Drug delivery with PEGylated MoS2 nano-sheets for combined photothermal and chemotherapy of cancer,” Adv. Mater. 26, 3433–3440 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 71. Y. Ma, H. Wang, Y. Dan, Y. Wei, Y. Cao, P. Yi, H. Zhang, Z. Deng, J. Dai, X. Liu, “Magnetic resonance imaging revealed splenic targeting of canine parvovirus capsid protein VP2,” Sci. Rep. 6, 23392 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 72. N. Shadjou, M. Hasanzadeh, “Graphene and its nanostructure derivatives for use in bone tissue engineering: Recent advances,” J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 104, 1250–1275 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 73. C. Wang, C. Wu, X. Zhou, T. Han, X. Xin, J. Wu, J. Zhang, S. Guo, “Enhancing cell nucleus accumulation and DNA cleavage activity of anti-cancer drug via graphene quantum dots,” Sci. Rep. 3, 2852 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 74. Z. Xie, C. Xing, W. Huang, T. Fan, Z. Li, J. Zhao, Y. Xiang, Z. Guo, J. Li, Z. Yang, “Ultrathin 2D nonlayered tellurium nanosheets: Facile liquidphase exfoliation, characterization, and photoresponse with high performance and enhanced stability,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1705833 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 75. C. Xing, Z. Xie, Z. Liang, W. Liang, T. Fan, J. S. Ponraj, S. C. Dhanabalan, D. Fan, H. Zhang, “Selenium nanosheets: 2D nonlayered selenium nanosheets: Facile synthesis, photoluminescence, and ultrafast photonics (Advanced Optical Materials 24/2017),” Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1700884 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 76. L. Wu, Z. Xie, L. Lu, J. Zhao, Y. Wang, X. Jiang, Y. Ge, F. Zhang, S. Lu, Z. Guo, “Few layer tin sulfide: A promising black phosphorus analogue 2D material with exceptionally large nonlinear optical response, high stability, and applications in all optical switching and wavelength conversion,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 6, 1700985 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 77. L. Lu, Z. Liang, L. Wu, Y. X. Chen, Y. Song, S. C. Dhanabalan, J. S. Ponraj, B. Dong, Y. Xiang, F. Xing, “Few layer bismuthene: Sonochemical exfoliation, nonlinear optics and applications for ultrafast photonics with enhanced stability,” Laser Photon. Rev. 12, 1700221 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 78. R. Balog, B. Jørgensen, L. Nilsson, M. Andersen, E. Rienks, M. Bianchi, M. Fanetti, E. Lægsgaard, A. Baraldi, S. Lizzit, “Bandgap opening in graphene induced by patterned hydrogen adsorption,” Nat. Mater. 9, 315 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 79. C. Coletti, C. Riedl, D. S. Lee, B. Krauss, L. Patthey, K. Von Klitzing, J. H. Smet, U. Starke, “Charge neutrality and band-gap tuning of epitaxial graphene on SiC by molecular doping,” Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 81, 136–138 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 80. X. Deng, Y. Wu, J. Dai, D. Kang, D. Zhang, “Electronic structure tuning and band gap opening of graphene by hole/electron codoping,” Phys. Lett. A 375, 3890–3894 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 81. P. A. Denis, “Band gap opening of monolayer and bilayer graphene doped with aluminium, silicon, phosphorus, and sulfur,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 492, 251–257 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 82. X. Fan, Z. Shen, A. Q. Liu, J. L. Kuo, “Band gap opening of graphene by doping small boron nitride domains,” Nanoscale 4, 2157–2165 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 83. H. Gao, L. Wang, J. Zhao, F. Ding, J. Lu, “Band gap tuning of hydrogenated graphene: H coverage and configuration dependence,” J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 3236–3242 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 84. C. Lin, Y. Feng, Y. Xiao, M. Dürr, X. Huang, X. Xu, R. Zhao, E. Wang, X. Z. Li, Z. Hu, “Direct observation of ordered configurations of hydrogen adatoms on graphene,” Nano Lett. 15, 903 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 85. P. Rani, V. K. Jindal, “Designing band gap of graphene by B and N dopant atoms,” RSC Adv. 3, 802–812 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 86. J. O. Sofo, “Graphane: A two-dimensional hydrocarbon,” Phys. Rev. B 75, 153401 (2007). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 87. J. W. Yang, G. Lee, J. S. Kim, K. S. Kim, “Gap opening of graphene by dual FeCl3-acceptor and K-donor doping,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2577–2581 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 88. I. Zanella, S. Guerini, S. B. Fagan, J. M. Filho, A. G. S. Filho, “Chemical doping-induced gap opening and spin polarization in graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 77, 033404 (2008). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 89. A. S. George, Z. Mutlu, R. Ionescu, R. J. Wu, J. S. Jeong, H. H. Bay, Y. Chai, K. A. Mkhoyan, M. Ozkan, C. S. Ozkan, “Wafer scale synthesis and high resolution structural characterization of atomically thin MoS2 layers,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 7461–7466 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 90. K. K. Liu, W. Zhang, Y. H. Lee, Y. C. Lin, M. T. Chang, C. Y. Su, C. S. Chang, H. Li, Y. Shi, H. Zhang, “Growth of large-area and highly crystalline MoS2 thin layers on insulating substrates,” Nano Lett. 12, 1538–1544 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 91. G. Li-Yong, Z. Qingyun, C. Yingchun, S. G. Udo, “Photovoltaic heterojunctions of fullerenes with MoS2 and WS2 monolayers,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1445–1449 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 92. K. S. Novoselov, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, T. J. Booth, V. V. Khotkevich, S. V. Morozov, A. K. Geim, T. M. Rice, “Two-dimensional atomic crystals,” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10451–10453 (2005). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 93. N. Perealópez, Z. Lin, N. R. Pradhan, A. Iñiguezrábago, A. L. Elías, A. Mccreary, J. Lou, P. M. Ajayan, H. Terrones, L. Balicas, “CVD-grown monolayered MoS2 as an effective photosensor operating at low-voltage,” 2d Mater. 1, 011004 (2014). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 94. Y. Shi, W. Zhou, A. Y. Lu, W. Fang, Y. H. Lee, A. L. Hsu, S. M. Kim, K. K. Kim, H. Y. Yang, L. J. Li, “van der Waals epitaxy of MoSâ, layers using graphene as growth templates,” Nano Lett. 12, 2784–2791 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 95. S. Walia, S. Balendhran, H. Nili, S. Zhuiykov, G. Rosengarten, Q. H. Wang, M. Bhaskaran, S. Sriram, M. S. Strano, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, “Transition metal oxides — Thermoelectric properties,” Prog. Mater. Sci. 58, 1443–1489 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 96. M. Ye, D. Winslow, D. Zhang, R. Pandey, Y. K. Yap, “Recent advancement on the optical properties of two-dimensional molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) thin films,” Photonics 2, 288–307 (2015). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 97. M. Chen, H. Nam, S. Wi, G. Priessnitz, I. M. Gunawan, X. Liang, “Multibit data storage states formed in plasma-treated MoS2 transistors,” ACS Nano 8, 4023–4032 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 98. S. Chuang, C. Battaglia, A. Azcatl, S. Mcdonnell, J. S. Kang, X. Yin, M. Tosun, R. Kapadia, H. Fang, R. M. Wallace, “MoS2 P-type transistors and diodes enabled by high workfunction MoOx contacts,” Nano Lett. 14, 1337 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 99. J. N. Coleman, M. Lotya, A. O’Neill, S. D. Bergin, P. J. King, U. Khan, K. Young, A. Gaucher, S. De, R. J. Smith, “Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials,” Science 42, 568–571 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 100. J. Kang, W. Liu, K. Banerjee, “High-performance MoS2 transistors with low-resistance molybdenum contacts,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 093106-5 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 101. H. Li, Q. Zhang, C. C. R. Yap, B. K. Tay, T. H. T. Edwin, A. Olivier, D. Baillargeat, “From bulk to monolayer MoS2: Evolution of Raman scattering,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 1385–1390 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 102. B. Liu, L. Chen, G. Liu, A. N. Abbas, M. Fathi, C. Zhou, “High-performance chemical sensing using Schottky-contacted chemical vapor deposition grown monolayer MoS2 transistors,” ACS Nano 8, 5304–5314 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 103. L. Yang, K. Majumdar, H. Liu, Y. Du, H. Wu, M. Hatzistergos, P. Y. Hung, R. Tieckelmann, W. Tsai, C. Hobbs, “Chloride molecular doping technique on 2D materials: WS2 and MoS2,” Nano Lett. 14, 6275 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 104. Z. Zeng, Z. Yin, X. Huang, H. Li, Q. He, G. Lu, F. Boey, H. Zhang, “Single layer semiconducting nanosheets: High yield preparation and device fabrication,” Angew. Chem. 50, 11093–11097 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 105. W. Huang, C. Xing, Y. Wang, Z. Li, L. Wu, D. Ma, X. Dai, Y. Xiang, J. Li, D. Fan, “Facile fabrication and characterization of two-dimensional bismuth-(iii) sulfide nanosheets for high-performance photodetector applications under ambient conditions,” Nanoscale 14, 1702082 (2018). Google Scholar
    • 106. X. Jiang, S. Liu, W. Liang, S. Luo, Z. He, Y. Ge, H. Wang, R. Cao, F. Zhang, Q. Wen, “Broadband nonlinear photonics in few layer MXene Ti3C2Tx (T = F, O, or OH),” Laser Photon. Rev. 12, 1700229 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 107. D. Ma, Y. Li, J. Yang, H. Mi, S. Luo, L. Deng, C. Yan, P. Zhang, Z. Lin, X. Ren, “Atomic layer deposition-enabled ultrastable freestanding carbon-selenium cathodes with high mass loading for sodium-selenium battery,” Nano Energy 43, 317–325 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 108. H. Liu, K. Hu, D. Yan, R. Chen, Y. Zou, H. Liu, S. Wang, “Recent advances on black phosphorus for energy storage, catalysis, and sensor applications,” Adv. Mater. 30, 1800295 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 109. H. Liu, A. T. Neal, Z. Zhu, Z. Luo, X. Xu, D. Tománek, P. D. Ye, “Phosphorene: An unexplored 2D semiconductor with a high hole mobility,” ACS Nano 8, 4033–4041 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 110. A. Manjanath, A. Samanta, T. Pandey, A. K. Singh, “Semiconductor to metal transition in bilayer phosphorene under normal compressive strain,” Nanotechnology 26, 075701 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 111. X. Peng, Q. Wei, A. Copple, “Strain-engineered direct-indirect band gap transition and its mechanism in two-dimensional phosphorene,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 085402 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 112. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 113. E. Scalise, M. Houssa, G. Pourtois, V. Afanas’Ev, A. Stesmans, “Strain-induced semiconductor to metal transition in the two-dimensional honeycomb structure of MoS 2,” Nano Res. 5, 43–48 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 114. C. D. Zhang, J. C. Lian, W. Yi, Y. H. Jiang, L. W. Liu, H. Hu, W. D. Xiao, S. X. Du, L. L. Sun, H. J. Gao, “Surface structures of black phosphorus investigated with scanning tunneling microscopy,” J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 18823–18826 (2009). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 115. J. R. Choi, K. W. Yong, J. Y. Choi, A. Nilghaz, Y. Lin, J. Xu, X. Lu, “Black phosphorus and its biomedical applications,” Theranostics 8, 1005–1026 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 116. X. Chen, G. Xu, X. Ren, Z. Li, X. Qi, K. Huang, H. Zhang, Z. Huang, J. Zhong, “A black/red phosphorus hybrid as an electrode material for high-performance Li-ion batteries and supercapacitors,” J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 6581–6588 (2017). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 117. S. C. Dhanabalan, J. S. Ponraj, Z. Guo, S. Li, Q. Bao, H. Zhang, “Emerging trends in phosphorene fabrication towards next generation devices,” Adv. Sci. 4, 1600305 (2017). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 118. J. Du, M. Zhang, Z. Guo, J. Chen, X. Zhu, G. Hu, P. Peng, Z. Zheng, H. Zhang, “Phosphorene quantum dot saturable absorbers for ultrafast fiber lasers,” Sci. Rep. 7, 42357 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 119. Y. Ge, S. Chen, Y. Xu, Z. He, Z. Liang, Y. Chen, Y. Song, D. Fan, K. Zhang, H. Zhang, “Few-layer selenium-doped black phosphorus: Synthesis, nonlinear optical properties and ultrafast photonics applications,” J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 6129–6135 (2017). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 120. Z. Guo, S. Chen, Z. Wang, Z. Yang, F. Liu, Y. Xu, J. Wang, Y. Yi, H. Zhang, L. Liao, “Metalion modified black phosphorus with enhanced stability and transistor performance,” Adv. Mater. 29, 1703811 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 121. J. Shi, Z. Li, D. K. Sang, Y. Xiang, J. Li, S. Zhang, H. Zhang, “THz photonics in two dimensional materials and metamaterials: Properties, devices and prospects,” J. Mater. Chem. C 6, 1291–1306 (2018). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 122. J. Sotor, G. Sobon, W. Macherzynski, P. Paletko, K. M. Abramski, “Black phosphorus saturable absorber for ultrashort pulse generation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 440–449 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 123. X. H. Wang, J. L. Xu, S. F. Gao, Y. J. Sun, Z. J. Zhu, H. P. Xia, Z. Y. You, H. Zhang, C. Y. Tu, “Frequency stabilization of a dual-frequency Yb3+:GdAl3(BO3)4 laser via nonlinear loss modulation in black phosphorus,” Laser Phys. Lett. 14, 065802 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 124. Y. Xu, X. F. Jiang, Y. Ge, Z. Guo, Z. Zeng, Q. H. Xu, H. Zhang, X. F. Yu, D. Fan, “Size-dependent nonlinear optical properties of black phosphorus nanosheets and their applications in ultrafast photonics,” J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 3007–3013 (2017). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 125. J. W. Jiang, H. S. Park, “Mechanical properties of single-layer black phosphorus,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 47, 385304 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 126. Y. Poya, K. Bijandra, F. Tara, W. Canhui, A. Mohammad, T. David, I. J. Ernesto, R. F. Klie, S. K. Amin, “High-quality black phosphorus atomic layers by liquid-phase exfoliation,” Adv. Mater. 27, 1887–1892 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 127. S. Sugai, I. Shirotani, “Raman and infrared reflection spectroscopy in black phosphorus,” Solid State Commun. 53, 753–755 (1985). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 128. X. Wang, A. M. Jones, K. L. Seyler, V. Tran, Y. Jia, H. Zhao, H. Wang, L. Yang, X. Xu, F. Xia, “Highly anisotropic and robust excitons in monolayer black phosphorus,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 517–521 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 129. Q. Wei, X. Peng, “Superior mechanical flexibility of phosphorene and few-layer black phosphorus,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 372–398 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 130. Z. Yang, J. Hao, S. Yuan, S. Lin, H. M. Yau, J. Dai, S. P. Lau, “Field-effect transistors based on amorphous black phosphorus ultrathin films by pulsed laser deposition,” Adv. Mater. 27, 3748–3754 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 131. Y. Xu, W. Wang, Y. Ge, H. Guo, X. Zhang, S. Chen, Y. Deng, Z. Lu, H. Zhang, “Stabilization of black phosphorous quantum dots in PMMA nanofiber film and broadband nonlinear optics and ultrafast photonics application,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702437 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 132. Y. Xu, J. Yuan, K. Zhang, Y. Hou, Q. Sun, Y. Yao, S. Li, Q. Bao, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, “Field-induced n-doping of black phosphorus for CMOS compatible 2D logic electronics with high electron mobility,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1702211 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 133. H. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Chu, Z. Guo, “2μm passively Q-switched laser based on black phosphorus,” Opt. Mater. Expr. 6, 2374 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 134. M. C. Duch, G. R. S. Budinger, T. L. Yu, S. Soberanes, D. Urich, S. E. Chiarella, L. A. Campochiaro, A. Gonzalez, N. S. Chandel, M. C. Hersam, “Minimizing oxidation and stable nanoscale dispersion improves the biocompatibility of graphene in the lung,” Nano Lett. 11, 5201 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 135. J. Zheng, X. Tang, Z. Yang, Z. Liang, Y. Chen, K. Wang, Y. Song, Y. Zhang, J. Ji, Y. Liu, “Few-layer phosphorene-decorated microfiber for all-optical thresholding and optical modulation,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1700026 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 136. J. Zheng, Z. Yang, S. Chen, Z. Liang, X. Chen, R. Cao, Z. Guo, K. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Ji, “Black phosphorus based all-optical-signal-processing: Towards high performances and enhanced stability,” ACS Photon. 4, 1466–1476 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 137. Y. Zhou, M. Zhang, Z. Guo, L. Miao, S. T. Han, Z. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. Peng, “Recent advances in black phosphorus-based photonics, electronics, sensors and energy devices,” Mater. Horizons 4, 997–1019 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 138. W. Chen, J. Ouyang, H. Liu, M. Chen, K. Zeng, J. Sheng, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Wang, J. Li, L. Deng, Y. N. Liu, S. Guo, “Black phosphorus nanosheet-based drug delivery system for synergistic photodynamic/photothermal/chemotherapy of cancer,” Adv. Mater. 29, 1603864 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 139. C. R. Dean, A. F. Young, I. Meric, C. Lee, L. Wang, S. Sorgenfrei, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Kim, K. L. Shepard, “Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 722–726 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 140. A. Favron, E. Gaufrès, F. Fossard, A. L. Phaneufl’Heureux, N. Y. Tang, P. L. Lévesque, A. Loiseau, R. Leonelli, S. Francoeur, R. Martel, “Photooxidation and quantum confinement effects in exfoliated black phosphorus,” Nat. Mater. 14, 826–832 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 141. G. H. Lee, Y. J. Yu, C. Lee, C. Dean, K. L. Shepard, P. Kim, J. Hone, “Electron tunneling through atomically flat and ultrathin hexagonal boron nitride,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 666 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 142. Y. Wang, J. Z. Ou, S. Balendhran, A. F. Chrimes, M. Mortazavi, D. D. Yao, M. R. Field, K. Latham, V. Bansal, J. R. Friend, “Electrochemical control of photoluminescence in two-dimensional MoS(2) nanoflakes,” ACS Nano 7, 10083–10093 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 143. J. D. Wood, S. A. Wells, D. Jariwala, K. S. Chen, E. Cho, V. K. Sangwan, X. Liu, L. J. Lauhon, T. J. Marks, M. C. Hersam, “Effective passivation of exfoliated black phosphorus transistors against ambient degradation,” Nano Lett. 14, 6964–6970 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 144. Z. Zeng, T. Sun, J. Zhu, X. Huang, Z. Yin, G. Lu, Z. Fan, Q. Yan, H. H. Hng, H. Zhang, “An effective method for the fabrication of few-layer-thick inorganic nanosheets,” Angew. Chem. 124, 9186–9190 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 145. N. M. Latiff, W. Z. Teo, Z. Sofer, A. C. Fisher, M. Pumera, “The cytotoxicity of layered black phosphorus,” Chemistry 21, 13991–13995 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 146. Kenry, C. T. Lim, “Biocompatibility and nanotoxicity of layered two-dimensional nanomaterials,” ChemNanoMat 3, 5–16 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 147. J. Shao, H. Xie, H. Huang, Z. Li, Z. Sun, Y. Xu, Q. Xiao, X. F. Yu, Y. Zhao, H. Zhang, H. Wang, P. K. Chu, “Biodegradable black phosphorus-based nanospheres for in vivo photothermal cancer therapy,” Nat. Commun. 7, 12967 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 148. X. Zhang, Z. Zhang, S. Zhang, D. Li, W. Ma, C. Ma, F. Wu, Q. Zhao, Q. Yan, B. Xing, “Size effect on the cytotoxicity of layered black phosphorus and underlying mechanisms,” Small 13, 1701210 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 149. X. Mu, J. Y. Wang, X. Bai, F. Xu, H. Liu, J. Yang, Y. Jing, L. Liu, X. Xue, H. Dai, Q. Liu, Y. M. Sun, C. Liu, X. D. Zhang, “Black phosphorus quantum dot induced oxidative stress and toxicity in living cells and mice,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 9, 20399–20409 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 150. S.-J. Song, Y. Shin, H. Lee, B. Kim, D.-W. Han, D. Lim, “Dose- and time-dependent cytotoxicity of layered black phosphorus in fibroblastic cells,” Nanomaterials 8, 408 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 151. J. Homola, “Surface plasmon resonance sensors for detection of chemical and biological species,” Chem. Rev. 39, 462–493 (2008). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 152. H. Im, H. Shao, I. P. Yong, V. M. Peterson, C. M. Castro, R. Weissleder, H. Lee, “Label-free detection and molecular profiling of exosomes with a nano-plasmonic sensor,” Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 490–495 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 153. R. Jha, A. K. Sharma, “Chalcogenide glass prism based SPR sensor with Ag-Au bimetallic nanoparticle alloy in infrared wavelength region,” J. Opt. A Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 045502 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 154. A. Lahav, M. Auslender, I. Abdulhalim, “Sensitivity enhancement of guided-wave surface-plasmon resonance sensors,” Opt. Lett. 33, 2539–2541 (2008). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 155. C. F. Mandenius, R. Wang, A. Aldén, M. G. Bergström, S. Thébault, C. Lutsch, S. Ohlson, “Monitoring of influenza virus hemagglutinin in process samples using weak affinity ligands and surface plasmon resonance,” Anal. Chim. Acta 623, 66–75 (2008). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 156. E. Mauriz, A. Calle, J. J. Manclús, A. Montoya, L. M. Lechuga, “Multi-analyte SPR immunoassays for environmental biosensing of pesticides,” Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387, 1449–1458 (2007). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 157. M. Piliarik, L. Párová, J. Homola, “High-throughput SPR sensor for food safety,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 24, 1399–1404 (2009). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 158. V. Shpacovitch, V. Temchura, M. Matrosovich, J. Hamacher, J. Skolnik, P. Libuschewski, D. Siedhoff, F. Weichert, P. Marwedel, H. Müller, “Application of surface plasmon resonance imaging technique for the detection of single spherical biological submicrometer particles,” Anal. Biochem. 486, 62–69 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 159. A. Turner, “Biosensors: Then and now,” Trends Biotechnol. 31, 119–120 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 160. A. W. Wark, H. J. Lee, R. M. Corn, “Long-range surface plasmon resonance imaging for bioaffinity sensors,” Anal. Chem. 77, 3904–3907 (2005). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 161. Y. Chen, R. Ren, H. Pu, J, Chang, S. Mao, J. Chen, “Field-effect transistor biosensors with two-dimensional black phosphorus nanosheets,” Biosens. Bioelectron. 89, 505–510 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 162. C. C. Mayorga-Martinez, N. Mohamad Latiff, A. Y. Eng, Z. Sofer, M. Pumera, “Black phosphorus nanoparticle labels for immunoassays via hydrogen evolution reaction mediation,” Anal. Chem. 88, 10074–10079 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 163. V. Kumar, J. R. Brent, M. Shorie, H. Kaur, G. Chadha, A. G. Thomas, E. A. Lewis, A. P. Rooney, L. Nguyen, X. L. Zhong, M. G. Burke, S. J. Haigh, A. Walton, P. D. McNaughter, A. A. Tedstone, N. Savjani, C. A. Muryn, P. O’Brien, A. K. Ganguli, D. J. Lewis, P. Sabherwal, “Nanostructured aptamer-functionalized black phosphorus sensing platform for label-free detection of myoglobin, a cardiovascular disease biomarker,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 8, 22860–22868 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 164. W. Gu, Y. Yan, X. Pei, C. Zhang, C. Ding, Y. Xian, “Fluorescent black phosphorus quantum dots as label-free sensing probes for evaluation of acetylcholinesterase activity,” Sens. Actuat. B: Chem. 250, 601–607 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 165. M. Lee, Y. H. Park, E. B. Kang, A. Chae, Y. Choi, S. Jo, Y. J. Kim, S.-J. Park, B. Min, T. K. An, J. Lee, S.-I. In, S. Y. Kim, S. Y. Park, I. In, “Highly efficient visible blue-emitting black phosphorus quantum dot: Mussel-inspired surface functionalization for bioapplications,” ACS Omega 2, 7096–7105 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 166. Y. T. Yew, Z. Sofer, C. C. Mayorga-Martinez, M. Pumera, “Black phosphorus nanoparticles as a novel fluorescent sensing platform for nucleic acid detection,” Mater. Chem. Front. 1, 1130–1136 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 167. T. D. Craggs, “Green fluorescent protein: Structure, folding and chromophore maturation,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 2865–2875 (2009). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 168. J. R. Enterina, L. Wu, R. E. Campbell, “Emerging fluorescent protein technologies,” Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 27, 10–17 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 169. Y. Hong, J. W. Lam, B. Z. Tang, “Aggregation-induced emission: Phenomenon, mechanism and applications,” ChemInform 40, 4332–4353 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 170. J. Mei, N. L. Leung, R. T. Kwok, J. W. Lam, B. Z. Tang, “Aggregation-induced emission: Together we shine, united we soar!,” Chem. Rev. 115, 11718–11940 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 171. J. Qian, D. Wang, F. Cai, Q. Zhan, Y. Wang, S. He, “Photosensitizer encapsulated organically modified silica nanoparticles for direct two-photon photodynamic therapy and in vivo functional imaging,” Biomaterials 33, 4851–4860 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 172. T. Sun, Y. S. Zhang, B. Pang, D. C. Hyun, M. Yang, Y. Xia, “Engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer therapy,” Angew. Chem. 53, 12320–12364 (2015). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 173. D. Wang, J. Qian, S. He, J. S. Park, K. S. Lee, S. Han, Y. Mu, “Aggregation-enhanced fluorescence in PEGylated phospholipid nanomicelles for in vivo imaging,” Biomaterials 32, 5880–5888 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 174. D. Wang, J. Qian, W. Qin, A. Qin, B. Z. Tang, S. He, “Biocompatible and photostable AIE dots with red emission for in vivo two-photon bioimaging,” Sci. Rep. 4, 4279 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 175. X. D. Wang, O. S. Wolfbeis, R. J. Meier, “Luminescent probes and sensors for temperature,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7834–7869 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 176. Y. Zhang, J. Qian, D. Wang, Y. Wang, S. He, “Multifunctional gold nanorods with ultrahigh stability and tunability for in vivo fluorescence imaging, SERS detection, and photodynamic therapy,” Angew. Chem. 125, 1186–1189 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 177. Z. Zhao, B. He, B. Z. Tang, “Aggregation-induced emission of siloles,” Chem. Sci. 6, 5347–5365 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 178. P. P. Adiseshaiah, R. M. Crist, S. S. Hook, S. E. McNeil, “Nanomedicine strategies to overcome the pathophysiological barriers of pancreatic cancer,” Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 13, 750–765 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 179. V. P. Chauhan, R. K. Jain, “Strategies for advancing cancer nanomedicine,” Nat. Mater. 12, 958–962 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 180. X. B. Cheng, K. Shiro, K. Atsuhiro, H. Keiji, S. Norihiro, “Hyaluronan stimulates pancreatic cancer cell motility,” Oncotarget 7, 4829–4840 (2016). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 181. P. Couvreur, “Nanoparticles in drug delivery: Past, present and future,” Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 21–23 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 182. B. Diop-Frimpong, V. P. Chauhan, S. Krane, Y. Boucher, R. K. Jain, “Losartan inhibits collagen I synthesis and improves the distribution and efficacy of nanotherapeutics in tumors,” Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2909–2914 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 183. R. Guo, J. Gu, Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, C. Gu, “MicroRNA-410 functions as a tumor suppressor by targeting angiotensin II type 1 receptor in pancreatic cancer,” IUBMB Life 67, 42–53 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 184. R. M. Hoffman, M. Bouvet, “Nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel: A limited improvement under the current therapeutic paradigm of pancreatic cancer,” Exp. Opin. Pharmacother. 16, 943–947 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 185. S. Lunardi, R. J. Muschel, T. B. Brunner, “The stromal compartments in pancreatic cancer: Are there any therapeutic targets?,” Cancer Lett. 343, 147–155 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 186. E. R. Manuel, J. Chen, M. D’Apuzzo, M. G. Lampa, T. I. Kaltcheva, C. B. Thompson, T. Ludwig, V. Chung, D. J. Diamond, “Salmonella-based therapy targeting indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase coupled with enzymatic depletion of tumor hyaluronan induces complete regression of aggressive pancreatic tumors,” Cancer Immunol. Res. 3, 1096 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 187. C. J. Whatcott, H. Hanl, D. D. V. Hoff, “Orchestrating the tumor microenvironment to improve survival for patients with pancreatic cancer normalization, not destruction,” Cancer J. 21, 299–306 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 188. G. Yin, J. Haendeler, C. Yan, B. C. Berk, “GIT1 functions as a scaffold for MEK1-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 activation by angiotensin II and epidermal growth factor,” Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 875–885 (2004). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 189. J. Shao, C. Ruan, H. Xie, Z. Li, H. Wang, P. K. Chu, X.-F. Yu, “Black-phosphorus-incorporated hydrogel as a sprayable and biodegradable photothermal platform for postsurgical treatment of cancer,” Adv. Sci. 5, 1700848 (2018). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 190. M. Qiu, D. Wang, W. Liang, L. Liu, Y. Zhang, X. Chen, D. K. Sang, C. Xing, Z. Li, B. Dong, F. Xing, D. Fan, S. Bao, H. Zhang, Y. Cao, “Novel concept of the smart NIR-light-controlled drug release of black phosphorus nanostructure for cancer therapy,” Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 501–506 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 191. C. Sun, L. Wen, J. Zeng, Y. Wang, Q. Sun, L. Deng, C. Zhao, Z. Li, “One-pot solventless preparation of PEGylated black phosphorus nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy of cancer,” Biomaterials 91, 81–89 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 192. Z. Sun, Y. Zhao, Z. Li, H. Cui, Y. Zhou, W. Li, W. Tao, H. Zhang, H. Wang, P. K. Chu, X. F. Yu, “TiL4 -coordinated black phosphorus quantum dots as an efficient contrast agent for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of cancer,” Small 13, 1602896 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 193. G. Yang, Z. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Hou, X. Fei, C. Su, S. Wang, Z. Zhuang, Z. Guo, “Facile synthesis of black phosphorus-Au nanocomposites for enhanced photothermal cancer therapy and surface-enhanced Raman scattering analysis,” Biomater. Sci. 5, 2048–2055 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 194. G. Huang, X. Zhu, H. Li, L. Wang, X. Chi, J. Chen, X. Wang, Z. Chen, J. Gao, “Facile integration of multiple magnetite nanoparticles for theranostics combining efficient MRI and thermal therapy,” Nanoscale 7, 2667–2675 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 195. M. Zhou, R. Zhang, M. Huang, W. Lu, S. Song, M. P. Melancon, M. Tian, D. Liang, C. Li, “A chelator-free multifunctional [64Cu]CuS nanoparticle platform for simultaneous micro-PET/CT imaging and photothermal ablation therapy,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 15351–15358 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 196. H. Abrahamse, M. R. Hamblin, “New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy,” Biochem. J. 473, 347 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 197. B. N. And, M. A. Elsayed, “Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method,” Chem. Mater. 15, 1957–1962 (2003). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 198. A. A. Bhirde, V. Patel, J. Gavard, G. Zhang, A. A. Sousa, A. Masedunskas, R. D. Leapman, R. Weigert, J. S. Gutkind, J. F. Rusling, “Targeted killing of cancer cells in vivo and in vitro with EGF-directed carbon nanotube-based drug delivery,” ACS Nano 3, 307 (2009). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 199. F. Bryden, A. Maruani, J. Rodrigues, M. Cheng, H. Savoie, A. Beeby, V. Chudasama, R. W. Boyle, “Assembly of high-potency photosensitizer-antibody conjugates through application of dendron multiplier technology,” Bioconj. Chem. 29, 176 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 200. S. S. Chou, B. Kaehr, J. Kim, B. M. Foley, M. De, P. E. Hopkins, J. Huang, C. J. Brinker, V. P. Dravid, “Chemically exfoliated MoS2 as near-infrared photothermal agents,” Angew. Chem. 125, 4254–4258 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 201. T. A. Debele, S. L. Mekuria, H. C. Tsai, “A pH-sensitive micelle composed of heparin, phospholipids, and histidine as the carrier of photosensitizers: Application to enhance photodynamic therapy of cancer,” Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 98, 125 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 202. P. Drake, H. J. Cho, P. S. Shih, C. H. Kao, K. F. Lee, C. H. Kuo, X. Z. Lin, Y. J. Lin, “Gd-doped iron-oxide nanoparticles for tumour therapy via magnetic field hyperthermia,” J. Mater. Chem. 17, 4914–4918 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 203. N. R. Gemmell, A. Mccarthy, M. M. Kim, I. Veilleux, T. C. Zhu, G. S. Buller, B. C. Wilson, R. H. Hadfield, “A compact fiber-optic probe-based singlet oxygen luminescence detection system,” J. Biophoton. 10, 320 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 204. X. Huang, S. Tang, X. Mu, Y. Dai, G. Chen, Z. Zhou, F. Ruan, Z. Yang, N. Zheng, “Freestanding palladium nanosheets with plasmonic and catalytic properties,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 28–32 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 205. D. Jaque, L. M. Martínez, B. R. Del, P. Harogonzalez, A. Benayas, J. L. Plaza, E. R. Martín, J. S. García, “Nanoparticles for photothermal therapies,” Nanoscale 6, 9494–9530 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 206. H. Koo, H. Lee, S. Lee, K. H. Min, M. S. Kim, D. S. Lee, Y. Choi, I. C. Kwon, K. Kim, S. Y. Jeong, “ In vivo tumor diagnosis and photodynamic therapy via tumoral pH-responsive polymeric micelles,” Chem. Commun. 46, 5668–5670 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 207. F. G. Le, V. Sol, C. Ouk, P. Arnoux, C. Frochot, T. S. Ouk, “Enhanced photobactericidal and targeting properties of a cationic porphyrin following attachment of B. Polymyxin,” Bioconj. Chem. 28, 2493–2506 (2018). Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 208. D. Li, L. Li, P. Li, Y. Li, X. Chen, “Apoptosis of HeLa cells induced by a new targeting photosensitizer-based PDT via a mitochondrial pathway and ER stress,” Oncotargets Therapy 8, 703–711 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 209. J. Li, F. Jiang, B. Yang, X. R. Song, Y. Liu, H. H. Yang, D. R. Cao, W. R. Shi, G. N. Chen, “Topological insulator bismuth selenide as a theranostic platform for simultaneous cancer imaging and therapy,” Sci. Rep. 3, 1998 (2013). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 210. Z. Liu, K. Rakhra, S. Sherlock, A. Goodwin, X. Chen, Q. Yang, D. W. Felsher, H. Dai, “Supramolecular stacking of doxorubicin on carbon nanotubes for in vivo cancer therapy,” Angew. Chem. 121, 7804–7808 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 211. K. K. Lo, C. K. Chung, N. Zhu, “Synthesis, photophysical and electrochemical properties, and biological labeling studies of cyclometalated iridium-(III) bis(pyridylbenzaldehyde) complexes: Novel luminescent cross-linkers for biomolecules,” Chemistry 9, 475–483 (2010). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 212. A. Nakagawa, Y. Hisamatsu, S. Moromizato, M. Kohno, S. Aoki, “Synthesis and photochemical properties of pH responsive tris-cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes that contain a pyridine ring on the 2-phenylpyridine ligand,” Inorg. Chem. 53, 409–422 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 213. C. A. Poland, R. Duffin, I. Kinloch, A. Maynard, W. A. Wallace, A. Seaton, V. Stone, S. Brown, W. Macnee, K. Donaldson, “Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 423–428 (2008). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 214. N. K. Prasad, K. Rathinasamy, D. Panda, D. Bahadur, “Mechanism of cell death induced by magnetic hyperthermia with nanoparticles of γ-MnxFe2–xO3 synthesized by a single step process,” J. Mater. Chem. 17, 5042–5051 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 215. G. Rahmathulla, P. F. Recinos, K. Kamian, A. M. Mohammadi, M. S. Ahluwalia, G. H. Barnett, “MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy in neuro-oncology: A review of its current clinical applications,” Oncology 87, 67–82 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 216. V. Rapozzi, D. Ragno, A. Guerrini, C. Ferroni, P. E. Della, D. Cesselli, G. Castoria, D. M. Di, E. Saracino, V. Benfenati, “Androgen receptor targeted conjugate for bimodal photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer in vitro,” Bioconj. Chem. 26, 1662 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 217. K. Yang, L. Feng, X. Shi, Z. Liu, “Nano-graphene in biomedicine: Theranostic applications,” Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 530–547 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 218. Z. Yu, Q. Sun, W. Pan, N. Li, B. Tang, “A near-infrared triggered nanophotosensitizer inducing Domino effect on mitochondrial reactive oxygen species burst for cancer therapy,” ACS Nano 9, 11064–11074 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 219. A. Yuan, J. Wu, X. Tang, L. Zhao, F. Xu, Y. Hu, “Application of near-infrared dyes for tumor imaging, photothermal, and photodynamic therapies,” J. Pharmaceut. Sci. 102, 6–28 (2012). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 220. Z. Hu, Y. Sim, O. L. Kon, W. H. Ng, A. J. Ribeiro, M. J. Ramos, P. A. Fernandes, R. Ganguly, B. Xing, F. García, E. K. Yeow, “Unique triphenylphosphonium derivatives for enhanced mitochondrial uptake and photodynamic therapy,” Bioconj. Chem. 28, 590 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 221. P. Zhang, C. Hu, W. Ran, J. Meng, Q. Yin, Y. Li, “Recent progress in light-triggered nanotheranostics for cancer treatment,” Theranostics 6, 948–968 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 222. H. Zhao, D. Xing, Q. Chen, “New insights of mitochondria reactive oxygen species generation and cell apoptosis induced by low dose photodynamic therapy,” Eur. J. Cancer 47, 2750–2761 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 223. Z. Sun, H. Xie, S. Tang, X. F. Yu, Z. Guo, J. Shao, H. Zhang, H. Huang, H. Wang, P. K. Chu, “Ultrasmall black phosphorus quantum dots: Synthesis and use as photothermal agents,” Angewandte Chemie 54, 11526–11530 (2015). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 224. H. Fu, Z. Li, H. Xie, Z. Sun, B. Wang, H. Huang, G. Han, H. Wang, P. K. Chu, X.-F. Yu, “Different-sized black phosphorus nanosheets with good cytocompatibility and high photothermal performance,” RSC Adv. 7, 14618–14624 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 225. C. Xing, S. Chen, M. Qiu, X. Liang, Q. Liu, Q. Zou, Z. Li, Z. Xie, D. Wang, B. Dong, L. Liu, D. Fan, H. Zhang, “Conceptually novel black phosphorus/cellulose hydrogels as promising photothermal agents for effective cancer therapy,” Adv. Healthcare Mater. 7, 1701510 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 226. C. Xing, G. Jing, X. Liang, M. Qiu, Z. Li, R. Cao, X. Li, D. Fan, H. Zhang, “Graphene oxide/black phosphorus nanoflake aerogels with robust thermo-stability and significantly enhanced photothermal properties in air,” Nanoscale 9, 8096–8101 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 227. Y. Zhao, L. Tong, Z. Li, N. Yang, H. Fu, L. Wu, H. Cui, W. Zhou, J. Wang, H. Wang, P. K. Chu, X.-F. Yu, “Stable and multifunctional dye-modified black phosphorus nanosheets for near-infrared imaging-guided photothermal therapy,” Chem. Mater. 29, 7131–7139 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 228. B. Yang, J. Yin, Y. Chen, S. Pan, H. Yao, Y. Gao, J. Shi, “2D-black-phosphorus-reinforced 3D-printed scaffolds: A stepwise countermeasure for osteosarcoma,” Adv. Mater. 30, 1705611 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 229. W. Chen, J. Ouyang, X. Yi, Y. Xu, C. Niu, W. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Sheng, L. Deng, Y. N. Liu, S. Guo, “Black phosphorus nanosheets as a neuroprotective nanomedicine for neurodegenerative disorder therapy,” Adv. Mater. 30, 1703458 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 230. H. Wang, X. Yang, W. Shao, S. Chen, J. Xie, X. Zhang, J. Wang, Y. Xie, “Ultrathin black phosphorus nanosheets for efficient singlet oxygen generation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11376–11382 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 231. T. Guo, Y. Wu, Y. Lin, X. Xu, H. Lian, G. Huang, J. Z. Liu, X. Wu, H. H. Yang, “Black phosphorus quantum dots with renal clearance property for efficient photodynamic therapy,” Small 14, 1702815 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 232. L. Chen, C. Zhang, L. Li, H. Wu, X. Wang, S. Yan, Y. Shi, M. Xiao, “Ultrafast carrier dynamics and efficient triplet generation in black phosphorus quantum dots,” J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 12972–12978 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 233. L. Tan, J. Li, X. Liu, Z. Cui, X. Yang, K. W. K. Yeung, H. Pan, Y. Zheng, X. Wang, S. Wu, “In situ disinfection through photoinspired radical oxygen species storage and thermal-triggered release from black phosphorous with strengthened chemical stability,” Small 14, 1703197 (2018). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 234. X. Tang, Y. Liang, Y. Zhu, C. Xie, A. Yao, L. Chen, Q. Jiang, T. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Qian, “Anti-transferrin receptor-modified amphotericin B-loaded PLA-PEG nanoparticles cure Candidal meningitis and reduce drug toxicity,” Int. J. Nanomed. 10, 6227–6241 (2015). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 235. S. Tortorella, T. C. Karagiannis, “Transferrin receptor-mediated endocytosis: A useful target for cancer therapy,” J. Membr. Biol. 247, 291–307 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 236. S. Gao, J. Li, C. Jiang, B. Hong, B. Hao, “Plasmid pORF-hTRAIL targeting to glioma using transferrin-modified polyamidoamine dendrimer,” Drug Des. Develop. Therapy 10, 1–11 (2016). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 237. J. A. Loureiro, B. Gomes, M. A. Coelho, C. P. M. Do, S. Rocha, “Targeting nanoparticles across the blood–brain barrier with monoclonal antibodies,” Nanomedicine 9, 709–722 (2014). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 238. M. Porru, S. Zappavigna, G. Salzano, A. Luce, A. Stoppacciaro, M. L. Balestrieri, S. Artuso, S. Lusa, G. D. Rosa, C. Leonetti, “Medical treatment of orthotopic glioblastoma with transferrin-conjugated nanoparticles encapsulating zoledronic acid,” Oncotarget 5, 10446–10459 (2014). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 239. T. R. Daniels, T. Delgado, G. Helguera, M. L. Penichet, “The transferrin receptor part II: Targeted delivery of therapeutic agents into cancer cells,” Clin. Immunol. 121, 159–176 (2006). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 240. W. Tao, X. Zhu, X. Yu, X. Zeng, Q. Xiao, X. Zhang, X. Ji, X. Wang, J. Shi, H. Zhang, L. Mei, “Black phosphorus nanosheets as a robust delivery platform for cancer theranostics,” Adv. Mater. 29, 1603276 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 241. S. Wang, J. Weng, X. Fu, J. Lin, W. Fan, N. Lu, J. Qu, S. Chen, T. Wang, P. Huang, “Black phosphorus nanosheets for mild hyperthermia-enhanced chemotherapy and chemo-photothermal combination therapy,” Nanotheranostics 1, 208–216 (2017). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 242. F. Yin, K. Hu, S. Chen, D. Wang, J. Zhang, M. Xie, D. Yang, M. Qiu, H. Zhang, Z.-G. Li, “Black phosphorus quantum dot based novel siRNA delivery systems in human pluripotent teratoma PA-1 cells,” J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 5433–5440 (2017). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar