Endocrine Tests and/or Testicular Volume are Not Predictive of Successful Sperm Retrieval by Conventional Multiple Testicular Sperm Extraction in Nonobstructive Azoospermia
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the role of presurgical markers in the prediction of sperm retrieval by conventional Multiple Testicular Sperm Extraction in infertile Vietnamese men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).
Patients and Methods: Retrospective descriptive analysis of 136 infertile men with azoospermia, examined from August 2014 to July 2018. Patients underwent stepwise surgical sperm retrieval via percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration, testicular sperm aspiration, then conventional multiple testicular sperm extraction in up to three locations, and procedures stopped as soon as sperm were detected. Factors were analyzed to determine the prediction of the likelihood of successful sperm retrieval, in men with NOA.
Results: The overall success rate of sperm retrieval in men with azoospermia was 49.3%, but it was only 18.4% in NOA group. The difference in testicular volume between men with successful sperm retrieval and unsuccessful sperm retrieval was not statistically significant in NOA group (5.68 ± 2.37 vs. 4.46 ± 2.83, p = 0.138). The differences in the endocrine tests between the two groups were also not significant in terms of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone (p 0.05). Multivariable analysis of predictive factors of sperm retrieval in NOA groups found no significant difference, except testicular density (p = 0.015).
Conclusions: In infertile men with NOA, neither an endocrine test nor testicular volume should be used for predicting the results of surgical sperm retrieval by conventional multiple testicular sperm extraction.
- The importance of semen analysis in the context of azoospermia. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013; 68 :35–8. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- A predictive score for testicular sperm extraction quality and surgical ICSI outcome in non-obstructive azoospermia: a retrospective study. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26 :3215–21. Crossref, Google Scholar,
- Severe testicular atrophy does not affect the success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction. J Urol. 2014; 191 :175–8. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Appropriate cut-off value for follicle-stimulating hormone in azoospermia to predict spermatogenesis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010; 8 :108. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Prediction model for obtaining spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31 :1934–41. Crossref, Google Scholar,
- Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Andrology. 2013; 2(1) :20–4. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Sonography of the Scrotum. Radiology. 2003; 227 :18–36. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Predictive factors of successful sperm retrieval on microdissection testicular sperm extraction in Japanese men. Reprod Med Biol. 2015; 15 :29–33. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Sperm retrieval techniques for assisted reproduction. Int Braz J Urol. 2011; 7 :570–83. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Transl Androl Urol. 2017; 6(4) :745–52. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Testicular histopathology, semen analysis and FSH, predictive value of sperm retrieval: supportive counseling in case of reoperation after testicular sperm extraction (TESE). BMC Urol. 2018; 18(1). Crossref, Google Scholar,
- Distinguish non-obstructive azoospermia from obstructive azoospermia in Taiwanese patients by hormone profile and testis size. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018; 81 :531–5. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Surgical recovery of sperm in non-obstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl. 2012; 14 :109–15. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Incidence of varicoceles in men with primary and secondary infertility. Urology. 1996; 47 :73–6. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- European Association of Urology guidelines on Male Infertility: the 2012 update. Eur Urol. 2012; 62 :324–32. Crossref, Google Scholar,
- The correlation between Ultrasound testicular volume and conventional semen parameters in Albanian subfertile males. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2014; 2 :464–6. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Mutations of follicle stimulating hormone-beta and its receptor in human and mouse: genotype/phenotype. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000; 161 :9–17. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- FSH gene mutations in a female with partial breast development and a male sibling with normal puberty and azoospermia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87 :3702–7. Google Scholar.
- Testicular and epididymal percutaneous sperm aspiration in men with either obstructive or non-obstructive azoospermia. Urology. 2003; 62 :328. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Predictive value of FSH, testicular volume, and histopathological findings for the sperm retrieval rate of microdissection TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2018; 20 :30–6. Crossref, Google Scholar,
- Endocrinology of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis with particular reference to the hormonal control of spermatogenesis. Baillieres Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987; 1 :71–87. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Scrotal US for evaluation of infertile men with azoospermia. Radiology. 2006; 239 :168–73. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Overweight men with nonobstructive azoospermia have worse pregnancy outcomes after microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99 :372–6. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Age does not adversely affect sperm retrieval in men undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101 :653–5. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology. 2005; 65; 1190–4. Crossref, Google Scholar.
Male infertility. In: Wein AKavousi L (editors). Campbell – Walsh Urology, Saunders, Elsevier; 2012, pp. 616–47. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Testicular volume measurement: comparison of ultrasonography, orchidometry, and water displacement. Urology. 2007; 69 :152–7. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Factors influencing sperm retrieval following testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia patients. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017; 44 :22–7. Crossref, Google Scholar,
- Lo studio del varicocele con eco-color-Doppler. G Ital Ultrasonologia. 1993; 4 :43–9. Google Scholar.
- The role of testicular biopsy in the modern management of male infertility. J Urol. 2002; 167 :197–200. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Schwarzer JU, Steinfatt H, Schleyer M, et al. Microdissection TESE is superior to conventional TESE in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia caused by Y chromosome microdeletions, 2015. Google Scholar
Anatomy, vasculature, innervation and fluids of the male reproductive ract. In: Knobil and Neill’s Physiology of Reproduction. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2006. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Assessment of testicular volume in correlation with Spermiogram of Infertile males in South India. Adv Stud Biol. 2013; 5 :327–35. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Correlation of testicular volume and reproductive hormone level with the result of testicular sperm aspiration in non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Nat J Androl. 2012; 18 :48–51. Google Scholar,
- World Health Organization (2010) In: Organization WH (editor). WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. Geneva: World Health Organization. Google Scholar
- Obstructive azoospermia. Urol Clin North Am. 2014; 41 :83–95. Crossref, Google Scholar.
- Follicle-stimulating hormone as a predictor for sperm retrieval rate in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2015; 17 :218–4. Google Scholar,
- Prediction of successful sperm retrieval in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Urol J. 2006 :392–6. Google Scholar.