Translation of 2-Dimensional Wrist Radiographic Measurements to 3-Dimensional CT Scans

Background: Anatomical structure affects function. The morphology of articulations dictates the way forces will travel through the joint. A better understanding of the structure and function of the wrist will enhance our ability to diagnose and treat wrist conditions. Two wrist types have been described based on the morphology of the midcarpal joint. Biomechanically it is important to see if these 2-dimensional (2D) observations reflect articular contact areas. Our purpose was to assess the correlation between measurements performed on wrist radiographs (2D) to measurements performed on 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT).

Methods: Retrospective review of a database of normal wrist radiographs and corresponding normal CT scans. Only imaging pairs with normal carpal alignment and technically optimal imaging were included. Evaluations included lunate, capitate and wrist type, capitate circumference, percent capitate circumference and volume that articulates with the lunate, scapholunate ligament, scaphoid, hamate, trapezoid, base of the index and middle and ring metacarpal bones.

Results: Midcarpal joint radiographic measurements were positively correlated with measurements on CT scans. Correlations were 0.51 for capitate type and 0.71 for lunate type with both p < 0.001. Percent contact of the lunate with the hamate: r was 0.74 p < 0.001. Using logistic regression analysis, percent lunate-hamate contact on CT was a significant predictor of radiographic lunate type 2 p < 0.001. Percent contact area between lunate and hamate > 7.8% on CT scan achieved a sensitivity of 100% and specificity 79.4% for a type 2 lunate.

Conclusions: 1) Good correlations found between CT and plain radiographs in lunate type, capitate type, and midcarpal joint contact support the use of plain radiographs to describe contact between the carpal bones in the clinical setting. 2) The retrospective nature of this study limited the technical quality of the measurements. Volumetric analysis may aid in a more exact evaluation of surface contact area.