World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

Optimal trading: The importance of being adaptive

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S242478632050022XCited by:3 (Source: Crossref)

    We compare optimal static and dynamic solutions in trade execution. An optimal trade execution problem is considered where a trader is looking at a short-term price predictive signal while trading. When the trader creates an instantaneous market impact, it is shown that transaction costs of optimal adaptive strategies are substantially lower than the corresponding costs of the optimal static strategy. In the same spirit, in the case of transient impact, it is shown that strategies that observe the signal a finite number of times can dramatically reduce the transaction costs and improve the performance of the optimal static strategy.

    References

    • Almgren, A [2012] Optimal trading with stochastic liquidity and volatility, SIAM Journal of Financial Mathematics, 3, 163–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Almgren, R and N Chriss [2000] Optimal execution of portfolio transactions, Journal of Risk, 3(2), 5–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bacry, E, A Luga, M Lasnier and CA Lehalle [2015] Market impacts and the life cycle of investors orders, Market Microstructure and Liquidity, 1(2), 1550009. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Belak, C J Muhle-Karbe and K Ou (2018). Optimal trading with general signals and liquidation in target zone models, arXiv:1808.00515. Google Scholar
    • Bertsimas, D and AW Lo [1998] Optimal control of execution costs, Journal of Financial Markets, 1(1), 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Brigo, D and C Piat [2018] Static vs adapted optimal execution strategies in two benchmark trading models, in Innovations in Insurance, Risk- and Asset Management K. Glau, D. Linders, M. Scherer, L. Schneider and R. Zagst (eds.), World Scientific Publishing, Munich, pp. 239–274. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Lehalle, CA and E Neuman (2018). Incorporating signals into optimal trading, to appear in Finance and Stochastics, 23, 275–311. Google Scholar
    • Forsyth, P, J Kennedy, TS Tse and H Windclif [2012] Optimal trade execution: A mean-quadratic–variation approach, Journal of Economics, Dynamics and Control, 36, 1971–1991. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Gatheral, J and A Schied [2011] Optimal trade execution under geometric Brownian motion in the Almgren and Chriss framework, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 14, 353–368. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • Gatheral, J, A Schied and A Slynko [2011] Exponential resilience and decay of market impact, in Econophysycs of Order driven Markets, F. Aberger, B. Chakrabarti, A. Cakraborti and M. Mitra (eds.), pp. 225–236. Springer Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Labadie, M and C-A Lehalle (2013). Optimal starting times, stopping times and risk measures for algorithmic trading: Target Close and Implementation Shortfall, Working paper. Google Scholar
    • Lipton, A U Pesavento and MG Sotiropoulos (2013). Trade arrival dynamics and quote imbalance in a limit order book. Google Scholar
    • Obizhaeva, AA and J Wang [2013] Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics, Journal of Financial Markets, 16(1), 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Pham, H [2009] Continuous-Time Stochastic Control and Optimization with Financial Applications, Vol. 61, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Schied, A [2013] A control problem with fuel constraint and Dawson–Watanabe superprocesses, Annals Applied Probability, 23(6), 2472–2499. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Tse, ST, PA Forsyth, JS Kennedy and H Windcliff [2013] Comparison between the mean-variance optimal and the mean-quadratic-variation optimal trading strategies, Application of Mathematics and Finance, 20(5), 415–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Tucci, GH and MV Vega [2016] Optimal trading trajectories for algorithmic trading, The Journal of Investment Strategies, 5(2), 57–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar