The Ex-Ante Economic Analysis of Investments in Large Dams: A Brief History

References

• Aleseyed, M, T Rephann and A Isserman. [1998] The local effects of large dam reservoirs: U.S. experience. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 10(2), 91–108. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ansar, A, B Flyvbjerg, A Budzier, Daniel Lunn. [2014] Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energy Policy, 69: 43–56. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baecher, B Gregory, M Elizabeth Pate and R De Neufville [1980] Risk of dam failure in benefit-cost analysis. Water Resources Research, 3, 449–456. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, HS [2009] Objective or multi-objective? Two historically competing visions for benefit cost analysis. Land Economics, 85, 3–23. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, HS (2018). Difference-in-Differences Hedonics unpublished paper Georgia State University, April. Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, JC and JB Loomis [2017] Economic valuation of river restoration: An analysis of the valuation literature and its uses in decision-making. Water Resources and Economics, 17, 9–19. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bishop, KC, NV Kuminoff, HS Banzhaf, KJ Boyle, K von Gravenitz, JC Pope, VK Smith and CD Timmins [2020] Best practices in using hedonic property value models for welfare measurement. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 14, 260–281. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Biswas, A [1970] History of Hydrology. North Holland: American Elsevier. Google Scholar
• Boardman, G, Vining and Weimer [2011] Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Fourth Edition, Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
• Borgomeo, E, M Mortazavi-Naeini, JW Hall and BP Guillod [2018] Robustness and water resources planning under uncertainty. Earth’s Future, 6, 468–487, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000730. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Browning, M, PA Chiappori and Y Weiss [2014] Economics of the Family. New York: Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson, R, WM Hanemann and D Whittington [2020] The existence value of a distinctive Native American culture: Survival of the hopi reservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00412-5. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Castle, E, NMM Kelso, JB Stevens and HH Stoevener [1981] Natural resource economics, 1946-75, in A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, edited by LR Martin. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
• Chiappori, PA and I Ekeland [2009] The Economics and Mathematics of Aggregation: Formal Models of Efficient Group Behavior, Foundation and Trends in Microeconomics, Vol. 5. Boston: Now Publishers. Google Scholar
• Choe, KA, D Whittington and DT Lauria [1996] The economic benefits of surface water quality improvements in developing countries: A case study of davao, Philippines. Land Economics, 72(4), 519–537. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, CJ, RK Davis, SH Hanke and RH Haveman [1973] Evaluating federal water projects; A critiques of proposed standards. Science, 181, 723–728. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, CJ, VK Smith and J Carson [1975] An economic analysis of water resource investments and regional economic growth. Water Resources Research, 11(1), 1–6. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clawson, M and JL Knetsch [1966] Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future. Google Scholar
• Clawson, M (1959). Methods for measuring the demand for and value of outdoor recreation, Report No. 10, Resources for the Future, Inc. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
• Cohon, JL [1978] Multi-objective Programming and Planning. Academic Press. Google Scholar
• Congressional Research Service (2019). Dam Safety Overview and the Federal Role CRS Report R45981, October 24, 2019. Google Scholar
• Cox, FT, CW Grover and B Siskin [1971] Effects of water resource investment on economic growth. Water Resources Research, 7(1), 32–38. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox, PT, W Grower and B Seskin [1971] Effect of water resource investment on economic growth. Water Resources Research, 8(1), 32–39. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dadson, S, JW Hall, D Garrick, C Sadoff, D Grey and D Whittington [2017] Water security, risk and economic growth: Insights from a dynamical systems model. Water Resources Research, 53, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020640. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P, A Sen and S Marglin (1972). Guidelines for Project Evaluation. United Nations Development Programme. Google Scholar
• Davis, RK [1968] The Range of Choice in Water Management: A Study of Dissolved Oxygen in the Potomac Estuary. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future. Google Scholar
• Dinar, A and M Hogarth [2015] Game theory and water resources: Critical review of its contributions, progress and remaining challenges. Foundations & Trends in Microeconomics, 11(1–2), 1–139. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duflo, E and R Pande [2007] Dams. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 601–646. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dufournaud, CM [1982] On the mutually beneficial cooperative scheme: Dynamic change in the payoff matrix of international river basin schemes. Water Resources Research, 18, 764–772. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckstein, O [1958] Water Resources Development: The Economics of Project Evaluation. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
• Eckstein, O (1961). A survey of the theory of public expenditure criteria in Public Finances: Needs, Sources and Utilization A Conference of the Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, pp. 439–494. Google Scholar
• Ekelund, RB Jr. [1968] Jules dupuit and the early theory of marginal cost pricing. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 462–471. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Espinosa, JA and VK Smith [1995] Measuring the environmental consequences of trade policy: A non-market CGE analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(3), 772–777. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher, AC, JV Krutilla and CJ Cicchetti [1972] The economics of environmental preservation: A theoretical and empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 62, 605–619. Google Scholar
• Freeman, AM III [1966] Adjusted benefit-cost ratios for six recent reclamation projects. Journal of Farm Economics, 48, 1002–1012. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaupp, F, J Hall and S Dadson [2015] The role of storage capacity in coping with intra- and inter-annual water variability in large river basins. Environmental Research Letters, 10, 125001. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goeller BF, SC Abraham, A Abrahamse, JH Bigelow, J Bolten, JC DeHaven, DL Jaquette, NA Katz, TF Kirkwood, R Petruschell, T Repnau, JP Stucker, W Walker, LH Wegner and ME Vaiana (1983). Policy Analysis of Water Management for the Netherlands, Vol. 1, Summary Report. Google Scholar
• Greenstone, M [2009] Toward a culture of persistent regulatory experimentation and evaluation. New Perspectives on Regulation, edited by David Moss and John Cisternino (Cambridge, Ma.: The Tobin Project), pp. 11–126. Google Scholar
• Grey, D and C Sadoff [2007] Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy, 9(6), 545–571. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall, JW, D Grey, D Garrick, F Fung, C Brown, SJ Dadson and CW Sadoff [2014] Coping with the curse of freshwater variability. Science, 346, 429–430, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257890. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann, WM [2006] The Economic Conception of Water, in Water Crisis: Myth or Reality? Edited by PO Rogers, MR Llamas and I Martinez-Cortina. London: Taylor Francis, pp. 61–91. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harberger, AC [1971] Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: An interpretive essay. Journal of Economic Literature, 9(3), 785–797. Google Scholar
• Harou, JJ, MA Pulido, DE Rosenberg, J Medellín-Azuara, JR Lund and RE Howitt [2009] Hydro-economic models: Concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. Journal of Hydrology, 375. Google Scholar
• Harrison, GW, TF Rutherford and I Wooton (1989). The economic impact of the European community. Amer. Econ. Rev. Pap. and Proceed., 79, 288–294. Google Scholar
• Haveman, RH [1965] Water Resource Investment and the Public Interest: An Analysis of Federal Expenditures in Ten Southern States. Nashville, Tn: Vanderbilt University Press. Google Scholar
• Haveman, RH [1972] The Economic Performance of Public Investments: An Ex Post Evaluation of Water Resource Investments. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
• Hazilla, M and RJ Kopp [1990] Social cost of environmental quality regulations: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 853–873. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H (1947). Letter to the National Park Service, reprinted in An Economic Study of the Monetary Evaluation of Recreation in the National Parks (1949) U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service and Recreational Planning Division. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
• Howe, CW [1968] Water resources and regional economic growth in the United States, 1950–1960. Southern Economic Journal, 34, 477–499. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe, CW [1971] Benefit Cost Analysis for Water System Planning, Water Resource Monograph 2 (Washington, D.C.: American Geophysical Union). Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howe, CW [1987] Project benefits and costs from national and regional viewpoints: Methodological issues and case study of the Colorado-Big Thompson project. Natural Resources Journal, 27, 5–20. Google Scholar
• Hufschmidt, MM [2000] Benefit Cost Analysis: 1933–1985. Water Resource Updates, 116, 42–49. Google Scholar
• Jeuland, M and D Whittington [2014] Water resources planning under climate change: Assessing the robustness of real options for the blue nile. Water Resources Research, 50, 2014. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeuland, M [2020] The Economics of Dams. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36, 45–68. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson, EL [1967] A study in the economics of water quality management. Water Resources Research, 3, 291–305. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnston, RJ, KJ Boyle, W Adamowicz, J Bennett, R Brouwer, TA Cameron and R Tourangeau [2017] Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(2), 319–405. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Just, RE, DL Hueth and A Schmitz [2004] The Welfare Economics of Public Policy; A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation. Cheltenham: U.K. Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D and A Tversky [1979] Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahsay, TN, O Kuik, R Brouwer and P van der Zaag [2015] Estimation of the transboundary economic impacts of the Grand Ethiopia Renaissance Dam: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Water Resources and Economics, 10, 14–30. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahsay, TN, D Arjoon, O Kuik, R Brouwer, A Tilmant and P van der Zaag [2019] A hybrid partial and general equilibrium modeling approach to assess the hydro-economic impacts of large dams — The case of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam in the Eastern Nile River basin. Environmental Modelling and Software, 117, 76–88. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keeney, RL and H Raiffa [1993] Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Cambridge University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kline, P and E Moretti [2014] Local economic development, agglomeration economies, and the big push: 100 years of evidence from the Tennessee valley authority. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), 275–332. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kneese, AV and BT Bower [1968] Managing Water Quality: Economics, Technology, and Institutions (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future). Google Scholar
• Knetsch, JL, YE Riyanto and J Zong [2012] Gain and loss domains and the choice of welfare measure of positive and negative changes. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 3(4), 1–18. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knetsch, JL [1964] The influence of reservoir projects on land values. Journal of Farm Economics, 46, 231–243. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knetsch, JL [2010] Values of gains and losses: reference states and choice of measure. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46, 179–188. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kokoski, MF and VK Smith [1987] A general equilibrium analysis of partial-equilibrium welfare measures: The case of climate change. American Economic Review, 77(3), 331–341. Google Scholar
• Krutilla, JV and O Eckstein [1958] Multiple Purpose River Development: Studies in Applied Economic Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press for Resources for the Future. Google Scholar
• Krutilla, J [1967] Conservation Reconsidered. American Economic Review, 57, 777–786. Google Scholar
• Kuminoff, N, VK Smith and C Timmins [2013] The new economics of equilibrium sorting and policy evaluation using housing markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 1–57. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lane, N (2006). Dam Removal: Issues, Considerations and Controversies, CRS Report for Congress, RL33480, November 20. Google Scholar
• Lempert, RJ, SW Popper and SC Bankes (2003). Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis. The Rand Pardee Center. Santa Monica, Ca. 187 pages. Google Scholar
• Levine, DK (2019). Global Warming: What Sort of Mess Have We Made? Unpublished paper. Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. 21 pages. Google Scholar
• Loomis, JB [1996] Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha River: Results of a contingent valuation survey. Water Resources Research, 32(2), 441–447. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomis, J [2011] Recreational benefits of removing dams and restoring free-flowing rivers: An example micro-meta-analysis of the contingent visitation benefits of removing dams. Modern Cost-benefit Analysis of Hydropower Conflicts, 22. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maass, A, MM Hufschmidt, R Dorfman, HA Thomas, SA Marglin and GM Fair [1962] Design of Water Resource Systems: New Techniques for Relating Economic Objectives, Engineering Analysis, and Government Planning. Harvard University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Major, DJ (1977). Multi-objective Water Resources Planning. American Geophysical Union. Water Resources Monograph 4, Washington D.C. 81 pages. Google Scholar
• Maler, KG and JR Vincent [2005] Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vols. 1–3 (Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.) Google Scholar
• Martin, J and D Meyerson [1988] Organizational cultures and the denial, channeling and acknowledgement of ambiguity. Managing Ambiguity and Change, 93, 126. Google Scholar
• Milly, P, J Betancourt, M Falkenmark, R Hirsch, Z Kundzewicz, D Lettenmaier and R Stouffer [2008] Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 319(5863), 573–574. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan, MG et al., [1999] Why conventional tools for policy analysis are often inadequate for problems of global change. Climate Change, 41(3), 271–281. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phaneuf, DJ and T Requate [2017] A Course in Environmental Economics: Theory, Policy and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Phaneuf, DJ and VK Smith [2005] Recreation demand models. Handbook of Environmental Economics, Karl Goran Maler and Jeffrey R. Vincent, editors, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., pp. 672–761. Google Scholar
• Robinson, S, K Strzepek, M El-Said and H Lofgren [2008] The high dam at Aswan. Indirect Impact of Dams: Case Studies from India, Egypt, and Brazil, Ramesh Bhatia, Rita Cestti, Monica Scatasta and R. P. S. Malik, editors (Washington, DC, and New Delhi, India: World Bank and Academic Foundation), pp. 227–273. Google Scholar
• Rogers, P [1969] A game theory approach to the problems of international river basins. Water Resources Research, 5, 749–760. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuelson, PA [1954] The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlee, EE and VK Smith [2019] The welfare cost of uncertainty in policy outcomes. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 98, 254. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Severnini, ER (2014). The power of hydroelectric dams: Agglomeration spillovers. IZA discussion paper March No. 8082. Google Scholar
• Smith, VK and EM Moore [2010] Behavioral economics and benefit cost analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 217–234. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith, VK and MQ Zhao [2020] Economy wide modeling, environmental macro-economics, and benefit cost analysis. Land Economics, 96(3), 305–332. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith, VK, GV Houtven and SK Pattanayak [2002] Benefit transfer via preference calibration: ‘prudential algebra’ for policy. Land Economics, 78(1), 132–152. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steinschneider, S and C Brown [2012] Dynamic reservoir management with real-option risk hedging as a robust adaptation to nonstationary climate. Water Resources Research, 48, W05524. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strzepek, KM, GW Yohe, RSJ Tol and MW Rosegrant [2008] The value of the high Aswan Dam to the Egyptian economy. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 117–126. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strzepek, K, B Boehlert, J Willwerth and J Neumann (2016). The Contribution of Water Resources Development and Environmental Management to Uganda’s Economy. Prepared for the Uganda Ministry of Water and Environment, 12 October 2016. Google Scholar
• United States Federal Interagency River Basin Committee, Subcommittee on Benefits and Costs. (1950). Proposed Practices for Economic Analysis of River Basin Projects. Washington D.C, United States Government Printing Office, May. Google Scholar
• United States National Resources Planning Board (1934). A Report on National Planning and Public Works in Relation to Natural Resources Including Land Use and Water Resources with Findings and Recommendations. December 1. Washington D.C: United States Government Printing Offices. Google Scholar
• Wagner, G and ML Weitzman [2015] Climate Shock: The Economic Consequences of a Hotter Planet. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang, T and R de Neufville. (2006). Identification of Real Options ‘in’ projects. Paper presented at 16th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE), Orlando, Fla. Google Scholar
• Wheeler, K, M Jeuland, JW Hall, E Zagona and D Whittington [2020] Understanding and managing new risks on the nile with the grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Nature, 11, 5222, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19089-x. Google Scholar
• Whittington, D and X Wu [2013] Water resources development on the Ganges: Moving beyond ambiguity. Water Policy, 15, 1–8. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittington, D, X Wu and C Sadoff [2005] Water resources management in the Nile Basin: The economic value of cooperation. Water Policy, 7, 227–252. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whittington, D, WM Hanemann, C Sadoff and M Jeuland [2009] The challenge of improving water and sanitation services in less developed countries. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 4, 469–609. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu, X and D Whittington [2006] Incentive compatibility and conflict resolution in international river basins: A case study of the Nile Basin. Water Resources Research, 42, W02417. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yang, Z [2020] The Environment and Externality: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Young, RA [1978] Economic analysis and federal irrigation policy: A reappraisal. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 24, 257–267. Google Scholar
• Zeleny, M [1982] Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill: New York. Google Scholar