Disease Risk and Market Structure in Salmon Aquaculture
Abstract
We develop a model of a multi-national firm producing commodities for a global market in multiple locations with location-specific risks and different regulatory standards. Salmon aquaculture and disease outbreaks provide an empirically relevant example. We specifically examine details of the infectious salmon anemia outbreak in Chile in the late 2000s, the multi-national nature of some firms operating in Chile, and the overall market structure of the salmon farming industry as motivation for our theoretical model. In the model, market structure and the regulatory environments in multiple countries interact to influence how intensively firms use aquatic ecosystems. Downward-sloping market demand can lead to a perverse outcome in which high environmental standards in one country both lower the provision of disease management in the other country and reduce industry-wide output. We extend this model to consider additional locations, types of firms, and within-location risk spillovers. We find that the risk of outbreak in a given location is decreasing with greater firm concentration within the location, increasing with the outside production of operators within the location, and increasing with lower risk (or more regulation) in other locations where the operators produce. We suggest other applications of multi-national risk management.
References
- Abolofia, JN (2014). The bioeconomics of a common property pest: Parasitic sea lice and farmed salmonids. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis. Google Scholar
- 2002] Aquaculture and the future: Why fisheries economists should care. Marine Resource Economics, 17, 133–151. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2008] Farming the sea, Marine Resource Economics 23, 527–547. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1999] Environmental problems, productivity and innovations in Norwegian salmon aquaculture, Aquaculture Economics and Management 3 (1), 19–29. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2010] The salmon disease crisis in Chile, Marine Resource Economics 24 (4). Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2013] Salmon aquaculture: Larger companies and increased production, Aquaculture Economics & Management 17 (3), 322–339. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2015a] Fair enough? Food security and the international trade of seafood. World Development 67, 151–160. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2015b] Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity. Food Policy 53, 82–93. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2015c] Trade intervention: Not a silver bullet to address environmental externalities in global aquaculture, Marine Policy (in press). doi: 10.1016/j.morpol.2015.06.021. Google Scholar [
- 1994] Strategic environmental policy and international trade, Journal of Public Economics 54 (3), 325–338. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1969] External diseconomies, corrective taxes, and market structure, American Economic Review 59 (1), 174–177. Google Scholar [
- 2015] Bioeconomics of marine disease, Marine Resource Economics 30 (4), 393–416. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Cook, R (2014). Trends in the Marketing of Fresh Produce and Fresh-Cut/Value-Added Produce. Davis, CA: University of California, Davis, online presentation, Available at: http://arefiles.ucdavis.edu/uploads/filer_public/2014/07/14/freshcut2013update 140620.pdf. Google Scholar
- 1993] Market structure for farmed salmon, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 (1), 227–233. Crossref, Google Scholar [
-
FAO , State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2014). Google Scholar - 2008] Measuring oligopsony power of UK salmon retailers, Marine Resource Economics 485–506. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Intrafish (2009). World’s 30 biggest salmon producers in 2009. Industry report. Google Scholar
- 2003] Testing for market power in the UK salmon retail sector, Aquaculture Economics and Management 7, 293–308. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2000] Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405, 1017–1024. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2010a] Genetically modified salmon and full impact assessment. Science 330, 1052–1053. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2010b] Sustainability and global seafood. Science 327, 784–786. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1999] Testing for market power using a dynamic oligopoly model, International Journal of Industrial Organization 17 (2), 147–177. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2008] Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 285, 146–158. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Thorud, K and T Håstein (2003). Experiences with regulatory responses to infectious salmon anemia in Norway. In International Response to Infectious Salmon Anemia: Prevention, Control, and Eradication: Proceedings of a Symposium, O Miller and RC Cipriano (eds.), pp. 155–159. 3–4 September 2002, New Orleans, LA. Tech.Bull.No.1902. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; U.S. Department of the Interior; U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Department of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service. Google Scholar
- 1988] The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar [
- 2010] Market interactions between aquaculture and common-property fisheries: Recent evidence from the Bristol Bay sockeye salmon fishery in Alaska, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (2), 115–128. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Vike, S (2014). Infectious salmon anaemia in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. in Chile: Transmission routes and prevention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Norway. Google Scholar
- 2009] ISA virus in Chile: Evidence of vertical transmission, Archives of Virology 154 (1), 1–8. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2014] Imperfect competition and structural changes in the US salmon import market, Marine Resource Economics 29 (4), 375–389. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2009] Demand elasticities for farmed salmon in world trade, European Review of Agricultural Economics 36 (3), 425–445. Crossref, Google Scholar [