World Scientific
  • Search
    Quick Search in Journals
    Access type:
    Quick Search anywhere
    Access type:
    Advanced Search
  • My Cart
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.
No Access

Critical Lines of Action for Vulnerability and Resilience Research and Practice: Lessons from the 2017 Hurricane Season

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S234573761850015XCited by:16
    Previous

    Abstract

    The unprecedented number of devastating disasters recently experienced in the United States is a clarion call to revisit how we understand our vulnerability in the face of global change, and what we are prepared to do about it. We focus on the case of Hurricane María’s impact in Puerto Rico to underscore five critical concerns in addressing vulnerability and adaptation planning: (i) vulnerability as a product of flows; (ii) how our beliefs about the capacities of ourselves and others affect local vulnerability; (iii) the role uncertainty, politics, and information access play in amplifying vulnerability and complicating adaptation; (iv) the need for a better distribution of risk and responsibility in adaptation; (v) and the challenge of seizing the opportunity of disasters for transformative change. These five issues of concern were particularly evident in the case of Puerto Rico where Hurricane María’s 155 mph winds exposed existing infrastructural vulnerabilities, institutional incapacities, and socio-economic disparities. We argue that addressing these issues requires fundamental shifts in how we prepare for environmental change and disasters in the 21st century. We discuss promising approaches that may assist researchers and practitioners in addressing some of the underlying drivers of vulnerability, stemming from cross-scalar dynamics, systemic interdependencies, and the politics and social relations associated with knowledge, decision-making and action. We argue that society needs to broach the difficult topic of the equity in the distribution of risk in society and the burden of adaptation. Addressing these challenges and response imperatives is a central task of this century; the time to act is now.

    References

    • AccuWeather (2017). AccuWeather predicts economic cost of Harvey, Irma to be $290 Billion, Accuweather.com, 11 September 2017, https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/accuweather-predicts-economic-cost-of-harvey-irma-to-be-290-billion/70002686 (accessed 14 September 2017). Google Scholar
    • Adger, WN, Eakin H and Winkels A [2009] Nested and networked vulnerabilities to global environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7 (3): 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1890/070148. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Berrang-Ford, L, Ford JD and Paterson J [2011] Are we adapting to climate change? Global Environmental Change, 21 (1): 25–33. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Biagini, B, Bierbaum R, Stults M, Dobardzic S and McNeeley SM [2014] A typology of adaptation actions: A global look at climate adaptation actions financed through the Global Environment Facility. Global Environmental Change, 25: 97–108. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Birkmann, J, Cutter SL, Rothman DS, Welle T, Garschagen M, van Ruijven B, O’Neill B, Preston BL, Kienberger S, Cardona OD, Siagian T, Hidayati D, Setiadi N, Binder CR, Hughes B and Pulwarty R [2015] Scenarios for vulnerability: Opportunities and constraints in the context of climate change and disaster risk. Climatic Change, 133: 53–68. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Bloomberg View After Irma, America Should Scrap the Jones Act. 13 September, 2017, https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-09-13/after-irma-america-should-scrap-the-jones-act (accessed 14 September 2018). Google Scholar
    • Brundiers, K and Eakin H [2018] Leveraging post-disaster windows of opportunities for change towards sustainability: A framework. Sustainability, 10 (5): 1390. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Burby, RJ [2006] Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604: 171–191. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Challies, E, Newig J and Lenschow A [2014] What role for social–ecological systems research in governing global teleconnections? Global Environmental Change, 27: 32–40. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Coetzee, C, Van Niekerk D and Raju E [2016] Disaster resilience and complex adaptive systems theory: Finding common grounds for risk reduction. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 25: 196–211. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Cole, A [2016] All of us are vulnerable, but some are more vulnerable than others: The political ambiguity of vulnerability studies, an ambivalent critique. Critical Horizons, 17 (2): 260–277. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Cook, EM, Hall SJ and Larson KL [2012] Residential landscapes as social-ecological systems: A synthesis of multi-scalar interactions between people and their home environment. Urban Ecosystems, 15 (1): 19–52. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Eakin, H, Lemos MC and Nelson DR [2014] Differentiating capacities as a means to sustainable climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 27: 1–8. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Eakin, H [2010] What is vulnerable?, In Ingram JEricksen PJLiverman D (eds.), Food Security and Global Environmental Change (London, Earthscan, 2010). Google Scholar
    • Eakin, H and Bojórquez-Tapia LA [2008] Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 18: 112–127. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Eakin, H, Bojórquez-Tapia LA, Janssen MA, Georgescu M, Manuel-Navarrete D, Vivoni ER, Escalante AE, Baeza-Castro A, Mazari-Hiriart M and Lerner AM [2017] Opinion: Urban resilience efforts must consider social and political forces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (2): 186–189. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Eakin, H, Wightman PM, Hsu D, Gil Ramón VR, Fuentes-Contreras E, Cox MP, Hyman T-AN, Pacas C, Borraz F, González-Brambila C, Ponce de León Barido D and Kammen DM [2014] Information and communication technologies and climate change adaptation in Latin America and the Caribbean: A framework for action. Climate and Development, 7: 208–222. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Engle, N and Lemos MC [2010] Unpacking governance: Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global Environmental Change, 20 (1): 4–13. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Gall, M, Nguyen KH and Cutter SL [2015] Integrated research on disaster risk: Is it really integrated? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12: 255–267. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Glantz, M and Jamieson D [2000] Societal response to Hurricane Mitch and intra- versus intergenerational equity issues: Whose norms should apply? Risk Analysis, 20 (6): 869–882. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Grothmann, T and Patt A [2005] Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15 (3): 199–213. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Haasnoot, M, Kwakkel JH, Walker WE and ter Maat J [2013] Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change, 23 (2): 485–498. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Heeks, R and Ospina AV [2018] Conceptualising the link between information systems and resilience: A developing country field study. Information Systems Journal, 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12177. Google Scholar
    • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) [2012] Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (Cambridge, UK, 2012). Google Scholar
    • Kimmelman, M (2017). Lessons from Hurricane Harvey: Houston’s struggle is America’s tale. The New York Times [online] 11 November, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/11/climate/houston-flooding-climate.html (accessed 14 September 2018). Google Scholar
    • Lim-Camacho, L, Plagányi ÉE, Crimp S, Hodgkinson JH, Hobday AJ, Howden SM and Loechel B [2017] Complex resource supply chains display higher resilience to simulated climate shocks. Global Environmental Change, 46: 126–138. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Loreto, ID, Mora S and Divitini, M [2012] Collaborative serious games for crisis management: An overview. Proceedings from the 2012 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, 25–27 June 2012, pp. 352–357. Google Scholar
    • Luers, AL [2005] The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework for examining environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 15 (3): 214–223. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Milken Institute of Public Health (2018). Ascertainment of the estimated excess mortality from Hurricane María in Puerto Rico. George Washington University, 28 August 2018, https://publichealth.gwu.edu/content/gw-report-delivers-recommendations-aimed-preparing-puerto-rico-hurricane-season (accessed 14 September 2018). Google Scholar
    • Miller, CA and Muñoz-Erickson TA [2018] The rightful place of science: Designing knowledge, Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes. Google Scholar
    • Milman, A and Warner BP [2016] The interfaces of public and private adaptation: Lessons from flooding in the Deerfield river watershed. Global Environmental Change, 36: 46–55. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Murray, AT [2013] An overview of network vulnerability modeling approaches. GeoJournal, 78: 209–221. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Palttala, P, Boano C, Lund R and Vos M [2012] Communication gaps in disaster management: Perceptions by experts from governmental and non-governmental organizations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Mangement, 20: 2–12. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Park, M and Hanna J (2017). Puerto Rico suffering humanitarian crisis after María, San Juan mayor says. CNN.com, 22 December, 2017, http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/26/us/puerto-rico-maria-recovery/index.html (accessed 14 September 2018). Google Scholar
    • Pelling, M [2011] Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
    • Plumer, B (2017). Why Hurricane Irma could hurt, a lot: Much lies in harm’s way. The New York Times [online] 7 September, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/climate/florida-hurricane-irma-damage.html?_r=0 (accessed 14 September 2018). Google Scholar
    • Preston, BL, Yuen EJ and Westaway RM [2011] Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: A review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustainability Science, 6: 177–202. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Puerto Rico Energy Resiliency Working Group [2017] Build back better: Reimagining and strengthening the power grid of Puerto Rico (New York, 2017): 63 pp. Google Scholar
    • Saaty, TL [2005] Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Google Scholar
    • Seeger, M [2006] Best practices in crisis communication: An expert panel process. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34: 232–244. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Synapse Energy Associates [2016] Expert Report: State of PREPA’s System, Load Forecast, Capital Budget, Fuel Budget, Purchased Power Budget, Operations Expense Budget, Puerto Rico Energy Commission Puerto Rico (San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2016). Google Scholar
    • Tompkins, EL and Eakin H [2012] Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 22: 3–11. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Torres Gotay, B (2017). Irretrivable losses: María leaves thousands homeless and there are few options for those affected, 16 October, 2017, https://www.elnuevodia.com/english/english/nota/irretrievablelosses-2366395/ (accessed 14 September 2018). Google Scholar
    • Tschakert, P, Tutu R and Alcaro A [2013] Embodied experiences of environmental and climatic changes in landscapes of everyday life in Ghana. Emotion, Space and Society, 7: 13–25. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Wellstead, AM, Howlett M and Rayner J [2013] The neglect of governance in forest sector vulnerability assessments: Structural-functionalism and “Black Box” problems in climate change adaptation planning. Ecology and Society, 18 (3): art 18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05685-180323. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Wise, RM, Fazey I, Stafford Smith M, Park SE, Eakin H, Archer Van Garderen ERM and Campbell B [2014] Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response, Global Environmental Change, 28: 325–336. Crossref, Google Scholar