World Scientific
  • Search
    Quick Search in Journals
    Access type:
    Quick Search anywhere
    Access type:
    Advanced Search
  • My Cart
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Open Access

WHAT THE FUTURE MIGHT HOLD: DISTRIBUTIONS OF REGIONAL SECTORAL DAMAGES FOR THE UNITED STATES — ESTIMATES AND MAPS IN AN EXHIBITION

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007820400023Cited by:5 (Source: Crossref)
    Previous
    Next
    This article is part of the issue:
    Special Issue: Commemoration of Nobel Prize for William Nordhaus
    Co-Editor: Robert Mendelsohn

    Abstract

    The text and associated Supplemental Materials contribute internally consistent and therefore entirely comparable regional, temporal, and sectoral risk profiles to a growing literature on regional economic vulnerability to climate change. A large collection of maps populated with graphs of Monte-Carlo simulation results support a communication device in this regard — a convenient visual that we hope will make comparative results tractable and credible and resource allocation decisions more transparent. Since responding to climate change is a risk-management problem, it is important to note that these results address both sides of the risk calculation. They characterize likelihood distributions along four alternative emissions futures (thereby reflecting the mitigation side context); and they characterize consequences along these transient trajectories (which can thereby inform planning for the iterative adaptation side). Looking across the abundance of sectors that are potentially vulnerable to some of the manifestations of climate change, the maps therefore hold the potential of providing comparative information about the magnitude, timing, and regional location of relative risks. This is exactly the information that planners who work to protect property and public welfare by allocating scarce resources across competing venues need to have at their disposal — information about relative vulnerabilities across time and space and contingent on future emissions and future mitigation. It is also the type of information that integrated assessment researchers need to calibrate and update their modeling efforts — scholars who are exemplified by Professor Nordhaus who created and exercised the Dynamic Integrated Climate-Economy and Regional Integrated Climate-Economy models.

    References

    • Auffhammer, M [2018] Quantifying economic damages from climate change. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32, 33–52. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Carey, L (2020). Donald Trump is right. We need ‘BIG & BOLD’ infrastructure spending. Center for Strategic and International Studies. April 6. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/donald-trump-right-we-need-big-bold-infrastructure-spending. Google Scholar
    • Chambwera, M, G Heal, C Dubeux, S Hallegatte, L Leclerc, A Markandya, B McCarl, R Mechler and J Neumann [2014] Economics of adaptation. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Chap. 17, CB Field, VR Barros, DJ Dokken, KJ Mach, MD Mastrandrea, TE Bilir, M Chatterjee, KL Ebi, YO Estrada, RC Genova, B Girma, ES Kissel, AN Levy, S MacCracken, PR Mastrandrea and LL White (eds.), pp. 945–977. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Collins, WJ, N Bellouin, M Doutriaux-Boucher, N Gedney, P Halloran, T Hinton, J Hughes, CD Jones, M Joshi, S Liddicoat, G Martin, F O’Connor, J Rae, C Senior, S Sitch, I Totterdell, A Wiltshire and S Woodward [2011] Development and evaluation of an Earth system model–HadGEM2. Geoscience Model Development, 4, 1051–1075. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Donner, LJ et al., [2011] The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component of the GFDL global coupled model CM3. Journal of Climate, 24, 3484–3519. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3955.1 Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Fawcett, A, G Iyer, L Clarke, J Edmonds, N Hultman, H McJeon, J Rogelj, R Schuler, J Alsalam, G Asrar, J Creason, M Jeong, J McFarland, A Mundra and W Shi [2015] Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change? Science, 350, 1168–1169. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Gent, PR, G Danabasoglu, LJ Donner, MM Holland, E Hunke, S Jayne, D Lawrence, RB Neale, PJ Rasch, M Vertenstein and PH Worley [2011] The community climate system model version 4. Journal of Climate, 24, 4973–4991. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Hsiang, S, R Kopp, A Jina, J Rising, M Delgado, S Mohan, D Rasmussen, R Muir-Wood, P Wilson, M Oppenheimer, L Larsen and T Houser [2017] Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science, 356, 1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4369 Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [2000] Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. www.IPCC.ch Google Scholar
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [2007] Synthesis Report of the Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. www.IPCC.ch Google Scholar
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [2008] Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies, p. 132. Geneva: IPCC. www.IPCC.ch Google Scholar
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [2014] Synthesis Report of the Fifth Assessment Report. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. www.IPCC.ch Google Scholar
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018a). Special report on Global Warming of 1.5∘C. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, www.IPCC.ch. Google Scholar
    • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018b). Summary for policymakers. In Global Warming of1.5∘C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of1.5∘C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, H-O Pörtner, D Roberts, J Skea, PR Shukla, A Pirani, W Moufouma-Okia, C Péan, R Pidcock, S Connors, JBR Matthews, Y Chen, X Zhou, MI Gomis, E Lonnoy, T Maycock, M Tignor and T Waterfield (eds.), p. 32. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization. Google Scholar
    • Kopp, RE, RM Horton, CM Little, JX Mitrovica, M Oppenheimer, DJ Rasmussen, BH Strauss and C Tebaldi [2014] Probabilistic 21st and 22nd century sea-level projections at a global network of tide-gauge sites. Earth’s Future, 2(8), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014EF000239 Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Kossin, J, R Knapp, T Olander and C Velden [2020] Global increase in major tropical cyclone exceedance probability over the past four decades. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 117(22), 11975–11980. https://www.pnas.org/content/117/22/11975 Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Lorie, M, JE Neumann, MC Sarofim, R Jones, RM Horton, RE Kopp, C Fant, C Wobus, J Martinich, M O’Grady, LE Gentile [2020] Modeling coastal flood risk and adaptation response under future climate conditions. Climate Risk Management, 29, 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2020.100233 Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Martinich, J and A Crimmins [2019] Climate damages and adaptation potential across diverse sectors of the United States. Nature Climate Change, 9, 397–404. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Mastrandrea, MD, CB Field, TF Stocker, O Edenhofer, KL Ebi, DJ Frame, H Held, E Kriegler, KJ Mach, PR Matschoss, G-K Plattner, GW Yohe and FW Zwiers (2010). Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on consistent treatment of uncertainties. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at http://www.ipcc.ch. Google Scholar
    • National Research Council (NRC) [2010] Climate Stabilization Targets—Emissions, Concentrations, and Impacts over Decades to Millennia. Washington DC, USA: National Academies Press. Google Scholar
    • Neumann, JE, J Willwerth, J Martinich, J McFarland, MC Sarofim and G Yohe [2020] Climate damage functions for estimating the economic impacts of climate change in the United States. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 14(1), 25–43. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Neumann, JE, P Chinowsky, J Helman, M Black, C Fant, K Strzepek and J Martinich (2020). Climate effects on US infrastructure: The economics of adaptation for rail, roads, and coastal development. Working Paper available at www.indecon.com/projects/benefits-of-global-action-on-climate-change/. Google Scholar
    • Nordhaus, W [1994] Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
    • Nordhaus, W and J Boyer [2000] Warming the World: Economic Modeling of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Nordhaus, W [2008] A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Nordhaus, W (2018). Climate change: The ultimate challenge for economics. Prize Lecture, NobelPrize.org, Nobel Media AB 2020. 24 June. Available at https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2018/nordhaus/lecture/. Google Scholar
    • Sarofim, MC, J Martinich, JE Neumann, J Willwerth, Z Kerrich, M Kolian, C Fant and C Hartin (2020). A temperature-binning approach for multi-sector climate impact analysis. Working Paper available at www.indecon.com/projects/benefits-of-global-action-on-climate-change/ Google Scholar
    • Schmidt, GA, R Ruedy, JE Hansen, I Aleinnov, N Bell, M Bauer, S Bauer, B Cairns, V Canuto, Y Cheng and A Del Genio [2006] Present-day atmospheric simulations using GISS ModelE: Comparison to in situ, satellite, and reanalysis data. Journal of Climate, 19, 153–192. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Sweet, WV, RE Kopp, CP Weaver, J Obeysekera, RM Horton, ER Thieler and C Zervas (2017). Global and regional sea level rise scenarios for the United States. NOAA Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 083. NOAA/NOS Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services. Google Scholar
    • United States Global Change Research Program (NCA3) (2014). Third National Climate Assessment, www.nca2014.globalchange.gov. Google Scholar
    • United States Global Change Research Program (NCA4) (2018). Fourth National Climate Assessment, www.nca2018.globalchange.gov. Google Scholar
    • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2017). Multi-model framework for quantitative sectoral impacts analysis: A technical report for the Fourth National Climate Assessment. EPA 430-R-17-001. Available at https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=OAP&dirEntryId=335095. Google Scholar
    • von Salzen, K, JF Scinocca, NA McFarlane, J Li, JN Cole, D Plummer, D Verseghy, MC Reader, X Ma, M Lazare and L Solheim [2013] The Canadian fourth generation atmospheric global climate model (CanAM4). Part I: Representation of physical processes. Atmosphere-Ocean, 51, 104–125. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Watanabe, M, T Suzuki, R O’ishi, Y Komuro, S Watanabe, S Emori, T Takemura, M Chikira, T Ogura, M Sekiguchi and K Takata [2010] Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: Mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. Journal of Climate, 23, 6312–6335. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Yohe, G [2017] Characterizing transient temperature trajectories for assessing the value of achieving alternative temperature targets. Climatic Change, 145, 469–479. www.gyohe.faculty.wesleyan.edu. Crossref, Google Scholar