This paper examines carbon tax design options in the United States using an intertemporal computable general equilibrium model of the world economy called G-Cubed. In this paper, we discuss four policy scenarios that explore two overarching issues: (1) the effects of a carbon tax under alternative assumptions about the use of the resulting revenue, and (2) the effects of a system of import charges on carbon-intensive goods (“border carbon adjustments” or BCAs).

Consistent with earlier studies, we find that the carbon tax raises considerable revenue and reduces CO₂ emissions significantly relative to baseline, no matter how the revenue is used. Gross annual revenue from the carbon tax with lump sum rebating and no BCA begins at $110 billion in 2020 and rises gradually to $170 billion in 2040. By 2040, annual CO₂ emissions fall from 5.5 billion metric tons (BMT) under the baseline to 2.4 BMT, a decline of 3.1 BMT, or 57%. Cumulative emissions over 2020 to 2040 fall by 48 BMT.

Also consistent with earlier studies, we find that the carbon tax has very small overall impacts on gross domestic product (GDP), wages, employment, and consumption. Different uses of the revenue from the carbon tax result in slightly different levels and compositions of GDP across consumption, investment and net exports. Overall, using carbon tax revenue to reduce the capital income tax rate results in better macroeconomic outcomes than using the revenue for lump sum transfers.

Counter to their purported purpose of protecting U.S. trade strength, for a given revenue policy, BCAs tend to produce lower net exports than the carbon taxes alone. This is generally because the BCAs raise the value of the dollar relative to other currencies, thus lowering exports more than they lower imports. This is consistent with standard results in the international trade literature on the effects of import tariffs and export subsidies on real exchange rates, a result that is often overlooked in the discussion of domestic carbon policy.

In a finding new to the literature, our results show that BCAs can have strikingly different effects depending on the use of the revenue. Under a lump sum rebate, BCAs exacerbate the impact of the carbon tax by lowering domestic output further than it would fall under the carbon tax alone. Under a capital tax swap, however, BCAs have a moderating effect: they reduce the impact of the tax on most industries.

Keywords:

References

Aldy, JE and P William (2009). The Competitiveness Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Policies. Arlington, VA: Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. Available at: http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/competitiveness-impacts-report.pdf. Google Scholar
Böhringer, C, J Carbone and T Rutherford [2012] Unilateral climate policy design: Efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage. Energy Economics: Supplement 2, 34, S208–S217. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.011. Crossref, Google Scholar
Branger, F and P Quirion [2014] Would border carbon adjustments prevent carbon leakage and heavy industry competitiveness losses? Insights from a meta-analysis of recent economic studies. Ecological Economics, 99, 29–39. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.12.010. Crossref, Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office [2011] Reducing the Deficit: Spending and Revenue Options. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office. Available at: http://www.cbo.gov/publication/22043. Google Scholar
Congressional Budget Office [2013] Border Adjustments for Economy-wide Policies That Impose a Price on Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office. Available at: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/113th-congress-2013-2014/reports/44971-GHGandTrade.pdf. Google Scholar
Condon, M and A Ignaciuk [2013] Border Carbon Adjustment and International Trade: A Literature Review. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Trade and Environment Working Papers. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k3xn25b386c-en. Crossref, Google Scholar
Cosbey, A [2008] Border Carbon Adjustment. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development. Available at: https://www.iisd.org/pdf/2008/cph_trade_climate_border_carbon.pdf. Google Scholar
Elmendorf, DW (2009). Statement to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. In The Distribution of Revenues from a Cap-and-Trade Program for CO2 Emissions: Hearing Before the Committee on Finance, 3rd Cong., 1st session, May 7, 2009. Washington: U.S. G.P.O. Available at: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/111th-congress-2009-2010/reports/05-07-cap_and_trade_testimony.pdf. Google Scholar
Fischer, C and AK Fox [2012a] Climate policy and fiscal constraints: Do tax interactions outweigh carbon leakage? Energy Economics: Supplement 2, 34, S218–S227. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.004. Google Scholar
Fischer, C and AK Fox [2012b] Comparing policies to combat emissions leakage: Border tax adjustments versus rebates. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64 (2), 199–216. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1345928. Crossref, Google Scholar
Fischer, C, R Morgenstern and N Richardson [2015] Carbon taxes and energy-intensive trade-exposed industries. In Implementing A US Carbon Tax, Ian ParryAC MorrisRC Williams III(eds.), pp. 159–177, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
Goulder, LH [1995] Environmental taxation and the double taxation: A reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2 (2), 157–183. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00877495. Crossref, Google Scholar
Jorgenson, DW, RJ Goettle, MS Ho and PJ Wilcoxen [2013] Double Dividend: Environmental Taxes and Fiscal Reform in the United States. MIT Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027090.001.0001. Crossref, Google Scholar
Jorgenson, DW, RJ Goettle, MS Ho and PJ Wilcoxen [2015] Carbon taxes and fiscal reform in the United States. National Tax Journal, 68 (1), 121–138. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.1.05. Crossref, Google Scholar
Kortum, SS and DA Weisbach (2017). The design of border adjustments to carbon prices. National Tax Journal, 70(2), 421–446, Working paper. Available at: http://www.rff.org/files/document/file/RFF-DP-16-09.pdf. Google Scholar
McKibbin, WJ, AC Morris and PJ Wilcoxen (2012a). Pricing carbon in the United States: A model-based analysis of power sector only approaches. Resource and Energy Economics, 36, 130–150. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/ $\sim$ /media/research/files/papers/2012/10/05-pricing-carbon-morris/05-pricingcarbon-morris.pdf. Google Scholar
McKibbin, WJ, AC Morris, PJ Wilcoxen and Y Cai (2012b). The Potential Role of a Carbon Tax in U.S. Fiscal Reform, Climate and Energy Economics Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/carbon-tax-mckibbin-morris-wilcoxen.pdf. Google Scholar
McKibbin, WJ, AC Morris, PJ Wilcoxen and Y Cai [2015] Carbon taxes and U.S. fiscal reform. The National Tax Journal, 68 (1), 139–156. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.1.06. Crossref, Google Scholar
McKibbin, WJ, D Pearce and A Stegman [2009] Climate change scenarios and long term projections. Climate Change, 97 (1), 23–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9621-3. Crossref, Google Scholar
McKibbin, WJ and PJ Wilcoxen [1999] The theoretical and empirical structure of the G-Cubed model. Economic Modelling, 16 (1), 123–148. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/bdp118.pdf. Crossref, Google Scholar
McKibbin, WJ and PJ Wilcoxen [2009] The economic and environmental effects of border tax adjustments for climate policy. In Climate Change, Trade and Competitiveness, L BrainerdI Sorkin (eds.), pp. 1–34. The Brookings Institution. Google Scholar
McKibbin, WJ and PJ Wilcoxen [2013] A global approach to energy and environment: The G-Cubed model. In Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, pp. 995–1068, Elsevier. Crossref, Google Scholar
OECD [2016] Effective Carbon Rates: Pricing CO2 Through Taxes and Emissions Trading Systems, Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/taxation/effective-carbon-rates_9789264260115-en#.Wk1D4vlSypo#page1. Crossref, Google Scholar
Parry, IWH, C Veung and D Heine [2015] How much carbon pricing is in. countries’ own interests? The critical role of co-benefits. Climate Change Economics, 06, 04. Link, Google Scholar
Parry, I and R Williams [2012] Moving US climate policy forward: Are carbon taxes the only good alternative?, In Climate Change and Common Sense: Essays in Honour of Tom Schelling, R HahnA Ulph (eds.). Oxford University Press. Available at: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692873.001.0001/acprof-9780199692873-chapter-10. Crossref, Google Scholar
Rausch, S and J Reilly [2015] Carbon taxes, deficits, and energy policy interactions. National Tax Journal, 68 (1), 157–178. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.1.07. Crossref, Google Scholar
Sakai, M and J Barrett [2016] Border carbon adjustments: Addressing emissions embodied in trade. Energy Policy, 92, 102–110. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.038. Crossref, Google Scholar
Trachtman, JP (2016). WTO law constraints on border tax adjustment and tax credit mechanisms to reduce the competitive effects of carbon taxes. Discussion Paper RFF DP 16-03. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. Available at: http://www.rff.org/research/publications/wto-law-constraints-border-taxadjustment-and-tax-credit-mechanisms-reduce. Google Scholar
Tuladhar, SD, WD Montgomery and N Kaufman [2015] Environmental policy for fiscal reform: Can a carbon tax play a role?” National Tax Journal, 68 (1), 179–194. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.1.08. Crossref, Google Scholar
World Bank, Ecofys and Vivid Economics (2017). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2017 (November). Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/28510/wb_report_171027.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y. Google Scholar

Published: 20 March 2018

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!
Be inspired by these New titles in Energy, Resource & Environmental Economics today. Featuring authors from Princeton, Columbia University, Imperial College Business School and many more!

Vol. 09, No. 01

Metrics

Downloaded 1,168 times

History

Received 11 August 2017

Revised 22 December 2017

Accepted 3 January 2018

Information

This is an Open Access article published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) License. Further distribution of this work is permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

PDF download

System Upgrade on Mon, Jun 21st, 2021 at 1am (EDT)

THE ROLE OF BORDER CARBON ADJUSTMENTS IN A U.S. CARBON TAX

Abstract

References

Recommended