HOW MUCH CARBON PRICING IS IN COUNTRIES’ OWN INTERESTS? THE CRITICAL ROLE OF CO-BENEFITS

References

• Bento, A, M Jacobsen and AA Liu (2012). Environmental policy in the presence of an informal sector. Discussion paper, Cornell University. Google Scholar
• Burnett, RT, C Arden Pope, M Ezzati, C Olives, SS Lim, S Mehta, HH Shin et al. (2013). An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Unpublished, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Google Scholar
• Clements, BD CoadyS FabrizioS GuptaT AlleyeneC Sdralevich (eds.) [2013] Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Google Scholar
• Dahl, C [2012] Measuring global gasoline and diesel price and income elasticities. Energy Policy 41, 2–13. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fann, N, CM Fulcher and BJ Hubbell [2009] The influence of location, source and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution. Air Quality Atmosphere and Health 2, 169–176. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldstein, M [1995] The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: A panel study of the 1986 tax reform act. Journal of Political Economy 103, 551–572. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldstein, M [1999] Tax avoidance and the deadweight loss of the income tax. Review of Economics and Statistics LXXXI, 674–680. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goulder, LH, IWH Parry, RC Williams and D Burtraw [1999] The cost-effectiveness of alternative instruments for environmental protection in a second-best setting. Journal of Public Economics 72, 329–360. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groosman, B, NZ Muller and E O’Neill [2011] The ancillary benefits of climate change policy in the United States. Environmental and Resource Economics 50, 585–603. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harberger, AC [1964] The measurement of waste. American Economic Review 54, 58–76. Google Scholar
• IEA (2014). World energy statistics and balances. International Energy Agency, Paris, France. Google Scholar
• Krupnick, AJ, M Walls, I Pary, T Knowles and K Hayes [2010] Toward a New National Energy Policy: Assessing the Options. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future and National Energy Policy Institute. Google Scholar
• Levy, JI, LK Baxter and J Schwartz [2009] Uncertainty and variability in health-related damages from coal-fired power plants in the United States. Risk Analysis 29, 1000–1014. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu, G (2004). Estimating energy demand elasticities for OECD countries: A dynamic panel data approach. Discussion Paper No. 373, Statistics Norway. Google Scholar
• Lohwasser, R and R Madlener [2011] Economics of CCS for coal plants: Impact of investment costs and efficiency on market diffusion in Europe. Energy Economics 34, 850–863. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, RO [1986] Regulating heterogeneous emissions. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13, 301–312. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller, NZ [2012] The design of optimal climate policy with air pollution co-benefits. Resource and Energy Economics 34, 696–722. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muller, NZ and RO Mendelsohn [2009] Efficient pollution regulation: Getting the prices right. American Economic Review 99, 1714–1739. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nemet, GF, T Holloway and P Meier [2010] Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environmental Research Letters 5, 1–9. Crossref, Google Scholar
• NRC (2009). The Hidden Costs of Energy. Washington, DC: National Research Council. Google Scholar
• OECD (2010). Taxation, innovation and the environment. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France. Google Scholar
• Parry, IWH [1995] Pollution taxes and revenue recycling Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, S64–S77. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parry, IWH and AM Bento [2000] Tax deductions, environmental policy, and the “double dividend” hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39, 67–96. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parry, IWH and R Williams [2010] What are the costs of meeting distributional objectives for climate policy? B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 10 (2), 9. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parry, IWH, D Heine, S Li and E Lis [2014a] Getting Energy Prices Right: From Principle to Practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Google Scholar
• Parry, IWH, C Veung and D Heine (2014b). How Much carbon pricing is in countries’ own interests? The critical role of co-benefits. Working Paper 14174, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
• Saez, E, J Slemrod and SH Giertz [2012] The elasticity of taxable income with respect to marginal tax rates: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 50, 3–50. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Salehi-Isfahani, D (2011). Iran: Subsidy reform amid regional turmoil. Available at: www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/03/03-iran-salehi-isfahani. Google Scholar
• Sheeran, KA [2006] Who should abate carbon emissions? A note. Environmental and Resource Economics 35, 89–98. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sterner, T [2007] Fuel taxes: An important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy 35, 3194–3202. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trüby, J and P Moritz (2011). Market structure scenarios in international steam coal trade. Working Paper 11/02, Institute for Energy Economics at the University of Cologne. Google Scholar
• US IAWG (2013). Technical support document: Technical update of the social cost of carbon for regulatory impact analysis under executive order 12866. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon, United States Government, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
• West, JJ and et al. [2013] Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health. Nature Climate Change 3, 885–889. Crossref, Google Scholar
• WHO (2014). Public health, environmental and social determinants of health. World Health Organization. Available at: www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/en/. Google Scholar
• Woodcock, J and et al. [2009] Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Urban land transport. The Lancet 374, 1930–1943. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y, JI Levy, JS Evans and JK Hammitt [2006] The influence of geographic location on population exposure to emissions from power plants throughout China. Environment International 32, 365–373. Crossref, Google Scholar