World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Mon, Jun 21st, 2021 at 1am (EDT)

During this period, the E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 6 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.
Special Issue on Implementing Climate Policies in the Major Economies: An Assessment of Durban Platform Architectures — Results from the LIMITS ProjectNo Access

CLIMATE POLICY IN PRACTICE: A TYPOLOGY OF OBSTACLES AND IMPLICATIONS FOR INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT MODELING

    The implementation of mitigation policies will be complicated by several real-world imperfections ("second-best conditions") and constraints typically not included in the more idealized economies assumed in Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), based on which such policies are derived. But which of these numerous imperfections found in real economies are actually relevant in this context? And how could they — in principle — be taken into account by IAMs? Based on a literature review, we propose a typology of three categories of obstacles inhibiting "first-best" conditions and outcomes: first, obstacles impeding the setting of least-cost abatement incentives; second, obstacles limiting the supply and exploitation of abatement options; and, third, obstacles creating distortions between the price and marginal costs of abatement. By reviewing the implementation of energy policy in China, we put our typology into practice and identify specific empirical evidence for each category. IAMs in principle can (and in practice often do) incorporate several relevant obstacles by means of additional cost or quantity constraints. However, the nature of some obstacles relating to strategic interactions between economic agents appears to be incompatible with the standard representative agent social-planner framework often employed in IAMs, suggesting a need for complementary analysis with decentralized "Integrated Policy Assessment Models".

    References

    • D. Acemogluet al., American Economic Review 102(1), 131 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F. Ackermanet al., Climate Change 95, 297 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F. Ackerman, E. A. Stanton and R. Bueno, Environmental and Resource Economics 56(1), 73 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Alcamo, J, R Leemans and GJJ Kreileman (1998). Global Change Scenarios of the 21st Century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 Model. London: Pergamon & Elsevier Science . Google Scholar
    • K.   Anderson et al. , Decarbonising the UK: Energy for a Climate Conscious Future ( The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research , Manchester , 2005 ) . Google Scholar
    • K. J. Arrow and G. Debreu, Econometrica 22, 265 (1954). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. Backlundet al., Energy Policy 51(C), 392 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F. Beck and E. Martinot, Encyclopedia of Energy, ed. C. J. Cleveland (Academic Press/Elsevier Science, London, 2004) pp. 365–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • C. Böhringeret al., Energy Economics 31, S295 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • C. Böhringer, T. F. Rutherford and R. S. J. Tol, Energy Economics 31, S268 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Boselli, M (2011). IEA warns of ballooning world fossil fuel subsidies. Reuters. 4 October 2011. Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/04/us-iea-idUSTRE7931CF20111004 [Accessed on 24 January 2013] . Google Scholar
    • Bosetti, V, C Carraro, M Galeotti, E Massetti and M Tavoni (2006). WITCH: A world induced technical change hybrid model. The Energy Journal, Special Issue: Hybrid Modeling of Energy-Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom-up and Top-down . Google Scholar
    • V. Bosettiet al., Energy Economics 30, 2912 (2008). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. Bowen, E. Campiglio and M. Tavoni, Climate Change Economics 5(1), 1440005 (2013). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • S. Brunner, C. Flachsland and R. Marschinski, Climate Policy 12(2), 255 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Calvin, K (2011). GCAM Wiki Documentation. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Joint Global Change Research Institute, College Park, MD, USA. Available at https://wiki.umd.edu/gcam/ . Google Scholar
    • J. Chaiet al., Energy Policy 37, 5717 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • E. H.   Chamberlin , The Theory of Monopolistic Competition ( Harvard University Press , Cambridge, MA , 1933 ) . Google Scholar
    • Y. Chang and N. Wang, Energy Policy 38, 3356 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. H. Coase, Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1 (1960). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • K. S. Corts, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(3), 219 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Corts, KS (2011). Flex-fuel vehicles and alternative-fuel infrastructure: A chicken-or-egg question. Available at http://www.rff.org/Publications/WPC/Pages/Flex-Fuel-Vehicles-and-Alternative-Fuel-Infrastructure-A-Chicken-or-Egg-Question.aspx/ [Accessed on 20 December 2012] . Google Scholar
    • H. Cremer, P. De Donder and F. Gahvari, Journal of Public Economics 92(4), 532 (2008). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. J. DeCanio, Energy Policy 21(9), 906 (1993). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Dlugolecki, A et al. (2009). Coping with Climate Change: Risks and Opportunities for Insurers. Cll_3112, Chartered Insurance Institute, London . Google Scholar
    • EC (2010). Technical Annex to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Report on progress in creating the internal gas and electricity market. Report of the European Commission SEC(2010)251 final. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SEC:2010:0251:FIN:EN:PDF [Accessed on 21 December 2012] . Google Scholar
    • J. Edmondset al., Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 7(3), 175 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • T. Ekholmet al., Energy Policy 59, 562 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • D. A.   Ellerman , F. J.   Convery and C.   De Perthuis , Pricing Carbon — The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme ( Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , 2010 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F. Ferioli, K. Schoots and B. C. C. van der Zwaan, Energy Policy 37, 2525 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • B.   Fine and Z.   Rustomjee , The Political Economy of South Africa: From Minerals–Energy Complex to Industrialization ( C. Hurst , London , 1996 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. H. Frank, American Economic Review 95(2), 137 (2005). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • C. García, Energy Policy 39, 8046 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F. W. Geels, Research Policy 31(9), 1257 (2002). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F. W. Geels, Journal of Transport Geography 24, 471 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • G.   Gigerenzer , Gut Feelings: Short Cuts to Better Decision Making ( Penguin Books , London , 2008 ) . Google Scholar
    • GNESD (2007). Renewable energy technologies and poverty alleviation: Overcoming barriers and unlocking potentials. Global Network on Energy and Sustainable Development (GNESD), Roskilde, Denmark . Google Scholar
    • Golosov, M, J Hassler, P Krusell and A Tsyvinski (2011). Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 17348 . Google Scholar
    • L. H. Goulder, International Tax and Public Finance 2(2), 157 (1995). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • L. H. Goulder and I. W. H. Parry, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(2), 152 (2008). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • L. H. Goulder, I. W. H. Parry and D. Burtraw, The RAND Journal of Economics 28(4), 708 (1997). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Greenpeace (2011). Claims versus reality: How the European car lobby proved itself wrong. Available at http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/en/Publications/2011/car-myths/ [Accessed on 19 December 2012] . Google Scholar
    • G. E.   Grossman and E.   Helpman , Special Interest Politics ( MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • S. J. Grossman and J. E. Stiglitz, The American Economic Review 70(3), 393 (1980). Google Scholar
    • R. W. Hahn, Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(4), 753 (1984). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Han, G, M Olsson, K Hallding and D Lunsford (2012). China's carbon emission trading: An overview of current development. SEI, Stockholm. Available at http://www.sei-international.org/mediamanager/documents/Publications/china-cluster/SEI-FORES-2012-China-Carbon-Emissions.pdf [Accessed on 21 December 2012] . Google Scholar
    • B. Harstad and G. S. Eskeland, Journal of Public Economics 94(10), 749 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Hassler and P. Krusell, Journal of the European Economic Association 10(5), 974 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. Hausmann and D. Rodrik, Journal of Development Economics 72(2), 603 (2003). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F.   Hirsch , The Social Limits to Growth ( Routledge & Kegan Paul , London , 1977 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • E. Hirst and M. Brown, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 3, 267 (1990). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. B. Howarth, Society, Behaviour and Climate Change Mitigation, eds. E. Jochemet al. (Kluwer, Amsterdam, 2000) pp. 191–206. Google Scholar
    • IEA (2011). World Energy Outlook 2011. Paris: The International Energy Agency (IEA) . Google Scholar
    • A. B. Jaffe, The American Economic Review 76(5), 984 (1986). Google Scholar
    • A. B. Jaffe, R. G. Newell and R. N. Stavins, Ecological Economics 54(3), 164 (2005). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. B. Jaffe and R. N. Stavins, Energy Policy 22(10), 804 (1994). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Jewellet al., Climate Change Economics 4(4), 1340011 (2013). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • B. Jiang, Z. Sun and M. Liu, Energy 35, 4257 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • P. Jiang and N. K. Tovey, Energy Policy 37, 4949 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • D. Kahneman, American Economic Review 93(5), 1449 (2003). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • D.   Kahneman , Thinking, Fast and Slow ( Penguin Books , London , 2012 ) . Google Scholar
    • F. Kahrlet al., Energy Policy 39, 4032 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M.   Kainuma , Y.   Matsuoka and T.   Morita (eds.) , Climate Policy Assessment: Asia-Pacific Integrated Modeling ( Springer , 2003 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M. Kalkuhl, O. Edenhofer and K. Lessmann, Resource and Energy Economics 34(1), 1 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Kanget al., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16, 1907 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • T. J. Kehoe, D. K. Levine and P. M. Romer, Economic Theory 2(1), 43 (1992). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. Kemp, Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(5), 673 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • B. Klagge, Z. Liu and P. Campos Silva, Energy Policy 50, 370 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • T. Kober, B. C. C. van der Zwaan and H. Rösler, Climate Change Economics 5(1), 1440001 (2013). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • I. Keppo and B. van der Zwaan, Environmental Modeling & Assessment 17(2), 177 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • E. Kriegleret al., Global Environmental Change 22(4), 807 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J.   Laffont and J.   Tirole , A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation ( MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 1993 ) . Google Scholar
    • Larsen, J and R Heilmayr (2009). Emission reductions under cap-and-trade proposals in the 111th congress. World Resources Institute. Available at http://pdf.wri.org/usclimatetargets_2009-06-25.pdf [Accessed on 18 December 2012] . Google Scholar
    • M. Leimbach and L. Baumstark, Ecological Economics 69, 2341 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Li and X. Wang, Energy Policy 41, 519 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. G. Lipsey and K. Lancaster, The Review of Economic Studies 24(1), 11 (1956). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. Y. Lo, Nature Climate Change 2, 765 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. Lorenzet al., Environmental Modeling & Assessment 17(2), 163 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Luderer, G, M Leimbach, N Bauer and E Kriegler (2011). Description of the ReMIND-R model. Technical Report. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research . Google Scholar
    • G. Ludereret al., Climatic Change 114(1), 9 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Ma, Energy Policy 39, 2633 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • K. Maréchal, Energy Policy 35, 5181 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • G. Marland, Nature Climate Change 2, 645 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. Marschinski and O. Edenhofer, Energy Policy 38(9), 5048 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. Mathy and C. Guivarch, Energy Policy 38, 1519 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • McKinsey (2009). Pathways to a low-carbon economy: Version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. McKinsey & Company . Google Scholar
    • Messner, S and M Strubegger (1995). User's guide for MESSAGE III. Working Paper WP-95-069. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) . Google Scholar
    • Mitchell, D (2008). A note on rising food prices. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4682 . Google Scholar
    • W. D. Nordhaus, Science 258, 1315 (1992). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • B. A. Olken and R. Pande, Annual Review of Economics 4, 479 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M.   Olson , The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities ( Yale University Press , New Haven and London , 1982 ) . Google Scholar
    • A. D. Owen, Energy Policy 34, 632 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. Pegels, Energy Policy 38, 4945 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. C.   Pigou , The Economics of Welfare ( Macmillan , London , 1920 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. Pycroftet al., Economics — The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 5(22), 1 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • N. D. Rao, Energy for Sustainable Development 16(1), 35 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. Reddy and J. P. Painuly, Renewable Energy 29, 1431 (2004). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • REN21 (2012). Renewables 2012 Global Status Report. Paris, France. Available at http://www.ren21.net/Portals/0/documents/activities/gsr/GSR2012.pdf [Accessed on 16 January 2013] . Google Scholar
    • T. Requate, Journal of Economics 58(3), 255 (1993). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J.   Robinson , The Economics of Imperfect Competition ( Macmillan , London , 1933 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. C. Schmidt and R. Marschinski, Ecological Economics 69(2), 435 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. W. Schot and F. W. Geels, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 17(5), 605 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. W. Schwanitz, Environmental Software and Modelling 50, 120 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • SEI (2012). China's carbon emission trading: An experiment to watch closely. Policy Brief, Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Stockholm. Available at http://www.sei-international.org/publications?pid=2097 [Accessed on 23 January 2013] . Google Scholar
    • H. Simon, Quarterly Journal of Economics 69, 99 (1955). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F. Song and X. Zheng, Energy Policy 51, 445 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Sorrell, S, A Mallett and S Nye (2011). Barriers to industrial energy efficiency: A literature review. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Working Paper 10/2011. Available at http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media/Services/Research_and_Statistics/WP102011_Ebook.pdf [Accessed on 14 January 2013] . Google Scholar
    • Sorrell, S, J Schleich, S Scott, E O'Malley, F Trace, U Boede, K Ostertag and P Radgen (2000). Reducing barriers to energy efficiency in public and private organisations. SPRU Environment and Energy Programme. Available at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/reports/barriers/final.html [Accessed on 21 January 2013] . Google Scholar
    • B. K. Sovacool, Energy Policy 37, 1529 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • E. A. Stanton, F. Ackerman and S. Kartha, Climate and Development 1(2), 166 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • D. I. Stern and F. Jotzo, Energy Policy 38(11), 6776 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. E.   Stiglitz , Whither Socialism? ( MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 1996 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. E. Stiglitz, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(4), 1441 (2000). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Transparency International (2012). Corruption perception index. Available at http://www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results [Accessed on 14 January 2013] . Google Scholar
    • J. H. Ulmanen, G. P. Verbong and R. P. Raven, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12(6), 1406 (2009). Google Scholar
    • UN-Energy (2009). Policies and measures to realize industrial energy efficiency and mitigate climate change. United Nations. Available at http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media/Services/Energy_and_Climate_Change/EPU/UN%20Energy%202009%20Policies%20and%20Measures%20to%20realise%20Industrial%20Energy%20Efficiency%20and%20mitigate%20Climate%20Change_small.pdf [Accessed on 28 January 2013] . Google Scholar
    • UNEP (2006). Barriers to energy efficiency in industry in Asia — Review and policy guidance. Division of Technology, Industry and Economics. Available at http://www.energyefficiencyasia.org/docs/Barriers%20to%20Energy%20Efficiency%20review%20and%20policy%20guidance.pdf [Accessed on 13 January 2013] . Google Scholar
    • UNIDO (2011). Industrial Development Report 2011: Industrial energy efficiency for sustainable wealth creation. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Vienna. Available at http://www.unido.org/fileadmin/user_media/Publications/IDR/2011/UNIDO_FULL_REPORT_EBOOK.pdf [Accessed on 21 December 2012] . Google Scholar
    • G. H. Unruh, Energy Policy 28, 817 (2000). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • D. van der Horst, Energy Policy 35(5), 2705 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • B. van der Zwaan and A. Seebregts, International Journal of Energy Technology and Policy 2(1), 130 (2004). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • B. J. van Ruijvenet al., Energy Economics 34, S459 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • van Sluisveld, MAE, DEHJ Gernaat, AAC Otto, M Isaac, DP van Vuuren, I Mouratiadou, S Ashina, A Garg, PR Shukla, K Calvin, S Rao, P Lucas and J van Vliet (2013). A multi-model analysis of post-2020 mitigation efforts of five major economies. To appear in Climate Change Economics, LIMITS special issue . Google Scholar
    • O. van Vlietet al., Energy Economics 34, S470 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • D. P. van Vuurenet al., Global Environmental Change 21(2), 575 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Q. Wang, Nature 493(7432), 273 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Q. Wang and X. Chen, Energy Policy 51, 143 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Y. Wang, A. Gu and A. Zhang, Energy Policy 39, 6745 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F. Wang, H. Yin and S. Li, Energy Policy 38, 1872 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Z. Wang, H. Qin and J. I. Lewis, Energy Policy 51, 80 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Z. Wanget al., Energy Policy 39, 3550 (2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • L. Weber, Energy Policy 25(10), 833 (1997). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • WGBU (2012). Financing the global Energy System transformation. Policy Paper No. 7, WGBU German Advisory Council on Global Change, Berlin . Google Scholar
    • Willems, S and K Baumert (2003). Institutional capacity and climate actions. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Environment Directorate, Paris. Available at http://www.oecd.org/env/cc/21018790.pdf [Accessed on 18 December 2012] . Google Scholar
    • M. Wiseet al., Science 324(5931), 1183 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • X. Zhanget al., Energy 35, 4392 (2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Zoellner, P. Schweizer-Ries and C. Wemheuer, Energy Policy 36(11), 4136 (2008). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    Published: 4 June 2014
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Be inspired by these New titles in Energy, Resource & Environmental Economics today.
    Featuring authors from Princeton, Columbia University, Imperial College Business School and many more!