World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Mon, Jun 21st, 2021 at 1am (EDT)

During this period, the E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 6 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.
Special Issue on "The EMF28 Study on Scenarios for Transforming the European Energy System"Open Access

BEYOND 2020 — STRATEGIES AND COSTS FOR TRANSFORMING THE EUROPEAN ENERGY SYSTEM

    The Energy Modeling Forum 28 (EMF28) study systematically explores the energy system transition required to meet the European goal of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 80% by 2050. The 80% scenario is compared to a reference case that aims to achieve a 40% GHG reduction target. The paper investigates mitigation strategies beyond 2020 and the interplay between different decarbonization options. The models present different technology pathways for the decarbonization of Europe, but a common finding across the scenarios and models is the prominent role of energy efficiency and renewable energy sources. In particular, wind power and bioenergy increase considerably beyond current deployment levels. Up to 2030, the transformation strategies are similar across all models and for both levels of emission reduction. However, mitigation becomes more challenging after 2040. With some exceptions, our analysis agrees with the main findings of the "Energy Roadmap 2050" presented by the European Commission.

    This is an Open Access article published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC-BY) License. Further distribution of this work is permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

    References

    • Aalbers, R and J Bollen (2014). EU Energy Roadmap: Learning and intermittency. To appear in Climate Change Economics . Google Scholar
    • Anandarajah, G, S Pye, F Kesicki, W Usher and C McGlade (2011). TIAM-UCL Global Model Documentation. UK Energy Research Centre, London, UK. Available at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/energy-models/models/tiam-ucl/tiam-ucl-manual. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • C. Azaret al., Climatic Change 74(3), 47 (2006), DOI: 10.1007/s10584-005-3484-7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • G. J. Blanford, R. G. Richels and T. F. Rutherford, Energy Economics 31(), S82 (2009), DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.003. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M. Bleslet al., Climate Policy 12(3), 301 (2012), DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2011.637815. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Böhringer, C and A Lange (2003). Efficiency, compensation, and discrimination: What is at stake when implementing the EU emissions trading scheme? ZEW Discussion Paper No. 03-73, Mannheim, Germany . Google Scholar
    • C. Böhringer and A. Löschel, The Energy Journal 123 (2006). Google Scholar
    • C. Böhringeret al., Energy Economics 31(2), 295 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • V. Bosettiet al., Energy Journal 27(2), 13 (2006). Google Scholar
    • K. Calvinet al., Energy Economics 34(), S251 (2012), DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.09.003. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Capros, P, N Kouvaritakis, L Paroussos, P Karkatsoulis, K Fragkiadakis, D Van Regemorter, V Zaporozhets, Q Gharbi, P Le Mouel and K Delkis (2010). Description of GEM-E3 model improvements. Available at www.gem-e3.net. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • P. Caproset al., Energy Strategy Reviews 1, 85 (2012), DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2012.06.001. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Capros, P, D Van Regemorter, L Paroussos and P Karkatsoulis (forthcoming). The GEM-E3 model. To appear in IPTS' Scientific and Technical Report. Available at www.gem-e3.net. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • Clarke, L, C Böhringer and TF Rutherford, eds. (2009). International, U.S. and E.U. climate change control scenarios: Results from EMF 22 [Special Issue]. Enegy Economics, 31(Supplement 2), S63–S306 . Google Scholar
    • P. Criqui and S. Mima, Energy Policy 41, 827 (2012), DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.061. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • E. De Cian, V. Bosetti and M. Tavoni, Climatic Change 114(1), 121 (2012). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • E. De Cianet al., Climate Change Economics 4(Supplement 1), 1340002 (2013), DOI: 10.1142/S2010007813400022. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • E3Mlab (2010). PRIMES Model version used for the 2010 scenarios for the European commission including new sub-models. Available at http://www.e3mlab.ntua.gr/e3mlab/PRIMESManual/The_PRIMES_MODEL_2010.pdf. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • Edenhofer, O, L Hirth, B Knopf, M Pahle, S Schloemer, E Schmid and F Ueckerdt (forthcoming). On the economics of renewable energy sources. Energy Economics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.09.015 . Google Scholar
    • O. Edenhoferet al., The Energy Journal 31(1), 223 (2010). Google Scholar
    • O. Edenhoferet al., The Energy Journal 57 (2006). Google Scholar
    • EEA (2012). Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2010 and inventory report 2012. Available at http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-union-greenhouse-gas-inventory-2012. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • Eurelectric (2009). Power choices — pathways to carbon-neutral electricity in Europe by 2050. Available at www.eurelectric.org/powerchoices2050 . Google Scholar
    • European Climate Foundation (2011). Roadmap 2050. Available at http://www.roadmap2050.eu/downloads. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2011a). Commission staff working document: Impact assessment. Accompanying the communication: A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SEC:2011:0288:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2011b). Commission staff working paper: Final report of the Advisory Group on the Energy Roadmap 2050, Summary record of the PRIMES peer review meeting, results of the public consultation on the Energy Roadmap 2050. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy2020/roadmap/doc/sec_2011_1569_1.pdf. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2011c). Commission staff working paper: Impact assessment. Accompanying the document Energy Roadmap 2050. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=SEC:2011:0288:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2011d). Communication: A Roadmap for moving towards a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0112:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2011e). Communication: Energy Roadmap 2050. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0885:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2011f). White paper: Roadmap to a single European transport area — towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0144:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2012). Communication: Renewable energy: Progressing towards the 2020 target. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0031:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2013a). A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0169:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Commission (2013b). Renewable energy progress report. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0175:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Council (2009). Presidency conclusions of the Brussels European Council. Available at http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/09/st15/st15265.en09.pdf. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Council (2011). Conclusions of 4 February 2011. Available at http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/119175.pdf. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • European Parliament and the European Council (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 140/16 . Google Scholar
    • European Parliament and the European Council (2012). Directive 2012/27/EU. Official Journal of the European Union, L 315/1 . Google Scholar
    • Eurostat (2012a). Electricity production and supply statistics. Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Electricity_production_and_supply_statistics. Accessed on 31 January 2013 . Google Scholar
    • Eurostat (2012b). Energy production and imports. Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Energy_production_and_imports. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • Eurostat (2012c). Gross inland energy consumption by fuel. Available at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tsdcc320&plugin=1. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • H. Försteret al., Climate Change Economics 4(), 1340004 (2013). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • F. Holz and C. von Hirschhausen, Climate Change Economics 4(), 1340006 (2013), DOI: 10.1142/S201000781340006X. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • M. Hübler and A. Löschel, Energy Policy 55, 190 (2013). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kanudia, A and M Gargiulo (2009). The Pan European TIMES Model . Google Scholar
    • Klein, D, G Luderer, E Kriegler, J Strefler, N Bauer, M Leimbach, A Popp, J-P Dietrich, F Humpenöder, H Lotze-Campen and O Edenhofer (forthcoming). The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: An assessment using ReMIND-MAgPIE. Climatic Change, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0940-z . Google Scholar
    • B. Knopfet al., Climate Change Economics 4(), 1340005 (2013), DOI: 10.1142/S2010007813400058. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • B. Knopfet al., The Energy Journal 31, 223 (2010), DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol31-NoSI-9. Google Scholar
    • T. Koljonen and A. Lehtilä, Energy Economics 34(), S410 (2012), DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.05.003. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. Lempert, Social Science Computer Review 20(4), 420 (2002), DOI: 10.1177/089443902237320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Luderer, G, C Bertram, K Calvin, E De Cian and E Kriegler (forthcoming). Implications of weak near-term climate policies on long-term climate mitigation pathways. To appear in Climatic Change, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9. Accessed on 1 November 2013 . Google Scholar
    • G. Ludereret al., Climatic Change 114(1), 9 (2012), DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0105-x. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. Paltsev and P. Capros, Climate Change Economics 4(Supplement 1), 1340003 (2013), DOI: 10.1142/S2010007813400034. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • S. Paltsevet al., Energy Policy 39(9), 5309 (2011), DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.033. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Paltsev, S, J Reilly, H Jacoby, R Eckaus, J McFarland, M Sarofim, M Asadoorian and M Babiker (2005). The MIT emissions prediction and policy analysis (EPPA) model: Version 4. MIT Joint Program Report 125. Available at http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Rpt125.pdf. Accessed on 15 October 2013 . Google Scholar
    • Sands, RD, H Förster, K Schumacher and CA Jones (2013). Bio-electricity and land use in the future agricultural resources model (FARM). Climatic Change (EMF27 Special Issue), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0943-9 . Google Scholar
    • Schroeder, A (2012). An electricity market model with generation capacity expansion under uncertainty, international workshop. Stochastic Programming for Implementation and Advanced Applications, July 3–6, 2012, Neringa, Lithuania . Google Scholar
    • Traber, T and C Kemfert (2012). German nuclear phase-out policy effects on European electricity wholesale prices, emission prices, conventional power plant investments and electricity trade., DIW Discussion Papers 1219 . Google Scholar
    • D. P. van Vuurenet al., Climatic Change 81(2), 119 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Weyant, J ed. (2004). EMF 19 alternative technology strategies for climate change policy [Special Issue]. Energy Economics, 26(6), 501–756 . Google Scholar
    Published: 5 December 2013
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Be inspired by these New titles in Energy, Resource & Environmental Economics today.
    Featuring authors from Princeton, Columbia University, Imperial College Business School and many more!