World Scientific
  • Search
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Mapping of b-Value Anomalies Along the Strike-Slip Fault System on the Thailand–Myanmar Border: Implications for Upcoming Earthquakes

    In order to determine the prospective areas of the forthcoming earthquake sources, the b-values of the frequency-magnitude earthquake distributions were analyzed spatially and mapped along the strike-slip fault system at the Thailand–Myanmar border. In order to constrain the relationship between the variation of b and the following hazardous earthquake, the completeness of earthquake catalogue was manipulated into two datasets for (i) 1980–2000 and (ii) 1980–2005 and the b-values mapped. Utilizing the suitable assumption of 30 fixed earthquake events, the following Mw5.0 earthquakes illustrate a significant relation between their epicenter and the areas showing relatively low b-values. By utilizing the most recent earthquake data (1980–2015), five areas exhibiting low b-values (implying prospective earthquake sources) can be identified along the strike-slip fault system. Compared with earthquake activities evaluated previously along the strike-slip fault system, the data reveal that these five areas may potentially generate earthquakes up to 7.0Mw within the coming 50 years; the recurrence of the Mw-5.0 earthquake is about 10 years and the probabilities of the Mw-5.0 earthquake are about 40–95%, respectively. Since these prospective hazardous seismic zones are located close to cities, population centers and hydropower dams, an effective mitigation plan should be developed.

    References

    • Gardner, J. K. and Knopoff, L. [1974] “ Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 64(1), 363–367. Google Scholar
    • Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F. [1942] “ Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy and acceleration,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 32, 163–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Habermann, R. E. [1983] “ Teleseismic detection in the Aleutian Island Arc,” J. Geophys. Res. 88, 5056–5064. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Habermann, R. E. [1987] “ Man-made changes of seismicity rates,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 141–159. ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Nishikawa, T. and Ide, S. [2014] “ Earthquake size distribution in subduction zones linked to slab buoyancy,” Nat. Geosci. 7, 904–908. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Nuannin, P., Kulhánek, O. and Persson, L. [2005] “ Spatial and temporal b-value anomalies preceding the devastating off coast of NW Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L11307. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Nutalaya, P., Sodsri, S. and Arnold, E. P. [1985] “Series on seismology-volume II-Thailand,” ed. E. P. Arnold, Technical Report, Southeast Asia Association of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, p. 402. Google Scholar
    • Pailoplee, S. [2013] “ Mapping asperities along the Sagiang fault zone, Myanmar using b-value anomalies,” J. Earthq. Tsunami 7(5), 1371001-1–1371001-12. Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Pailoplee, S. [2014] “ Earthquake activities along the strike-slip fault system on the Thailand–Myanmar border,” Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 25(4), 483–490. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Pailoplee, S. and Choowong, M. [2013] “ Probabilities of earthquake occurrences in mainland Southeast Asia,” Arab. J. Geosci. 6, 4993–5006. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Pailoplee, S., Channarong, P. and Chutakositkanon, V. [2013a] “ Earthquake activities in the Thailand–Laos–Myanmar border region: A statistical approach,” Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 24(4), Part II, 721–730. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Pailoplee, S., Sugiyama, Y. and Charusiri, P. [2009] “ Deterministic and probabilistic seismic hazard analyses in Thailand and adjacent areas using active fault data,” Earth Planets Space 61, 1313–1325. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Pailoplee, S., Surakiatchai, P. and Charusiri, P. [2013b] “ b-value anomalies along the Northern segment of Sumatra–Andaman subduction zone: Implication for the upcoming earthquakes,” J. Earthq. Tsunami 7(4), 1350030-1–1350030-8. Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S. and Wyss, M. [2005] “ Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes,” Nature 437(22), 539–542. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wiemer, S. [2001] “ A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP,” Seismol. Res. 72, 373–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Woessner, J. and Wiemer, S. [2005] “ Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues: Estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95(2), 684–698. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Wyss, M. [1991] “ Reporting history of the central Aleutians seismograph network and the quiescence preceding the 1986 Andrean of Island earthquake,” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81, 1231–1254. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Zuniga, F. R. and Wiemer, S. [1999] “ Seismicity patterns: Are they always related to natural causes?,” Pageoph 155, 713–726. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar