ASSESSING PREFERENCES FOR COMPENSATION PACKAGES USING THE DISCRETE CHOICE METHOD: THE CASE OF THE BOLSA FLORESTA PROGRAM IN AMAZONAS, BRAZIL
Abstract
Natural ecosystems, including forest ecosystems, continue to be degraded or converted at an alarming rate. To complement or substitute regulatory approaches to ecosystem management, market-based instruments such as "payments for ecosystem services" (PES) have been introduced and are gaining popularity. One of the prominent PES schemes in the world is the Bolsa Floresta Program (BFP) in the State of Amazonas, Brazil. The BFP was established by the Government of the State of Amazonas through its Secretariat for Environment and Sustainable Development in 2006 and is implemented by the Amazonas Sustainable Foundation. The BFP, which is a voluntary program to reduce deforestation and promote sustainable development by rewarding the communities for changing their land use practices, has four main components: the Bolsa Floresta Income; Bolsa Floresta Social; Bolsa Floresta Family; and Bolsa Floresta Association. A study was conducted to assess the preferences of the participating households in three reserves, namely: Rio Negro, Juma, and Uatumã, for different payment packages with varying combinations of the bolsas relative to the status quo option. The discrete choice method and an open ended question format were used to elicit the preferences of the participant households. The discrete choice model results showed that the majority of the respondents (about 80 per cent) in the three reserves chose an alternative which offered a 20 per cent increase in direct cash payments to households as their most preferred alternative. On the other hand, the majority of respondents who were subjected to open question stated that they would like to see an increase in benefits that fall under the Bolsa Floresta Social category.
References
- Alpizar, F, F Carlsson and P Martinsson (2001). Using choice experiments for non-market valuation. Working Papers in Economics no. 52, Department of Economics, Göteborg University . Google Scholar
- Ecological Economics 43, 185 (2002), DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00210-0. Crossref, Google Scholar
- Carson, KS, SM Chilton and W George Hutchinson (2010). Bias in choice experiments for public goods. Newcastle Discussion Papers in Economics no. 2010/05 . Google Scholar
- Cassola, R (2010). TEEB case: Conserving forests through grants, Brazil. Available at: TEEBweb.org . Google Scholar
- Agribusiness 27(1), 114 (2011), DOI: 10.1002/agr.20252. Crossref, Google Scholar
- deBekker-Grob, EW, M Ryan and K Gerard (2012), Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ., 21: 145–172. doi: 10.1002/hec.1697 . Google Scholar
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44(1), 123 (2002), DOI: 10.1006/jeem.2001.1199. Crossref, Google Scholar
- FAS (2008). The Juma Sustainable Development Reserve Project: Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation in the State of Amazonas, Brazil. PDD, FAS, Brazil . Google Scholar
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44, 309 (2002), DOI: 10.1006/jeem.2001.1203. Crossref, Google Scholar
- Frost, PGH and I Bond (2006). CAMPFIRE and payments for environmental services. Markets for Environmental Services Report Number 9. IIED, London . Google Scholar
- Grieg-Gran, M (2012). Choosing incentives to protect ecosystems. Reflect & Act, IIED, London . Google Scholar
- Johnson, N, HM Ravnborg, O Westermann and K Probst (2001). User participation in watershed management and research. CAPRi working paper No. 19 . Google Scholar
- Journal of Consumer Research 35, 360 (2008), DOI: 10.1086/586913. Crossref, Google Scholar
- Mohammed, EY (2011). Pro-poor benefit distribution in REDD+: who gets what and why does it matter? REDD Working Papers. IIED, London . Google Scholar
-
C. Parker and M. Cranford , The Little Biodiversity Finance Book: A Guide to Proactive Investment in Natural Capital (PINC) ( Global Canopy Programme , Oxford , 2010 ) . Google Scholar - Porras, I, M Grieg-Gran, N Neves (2008). All That Glitters: A Review of Payments for Watershed Services in Developing Countries. Natural Resource Issues No. 11. IIED, London . Google Scholar
- , Choice Experiments in Developing Countries: Implementation, Challenges and Policy Implications , eds.
J. Bennett and E. Birol ( Edward Elgar Publishing Limited , Glos, UK , 2010 ) . Google Scholar -
N. Robertson and S. Wunder , Fresh Tracks in the Forest: Assessing Incipient Payments for Environmental Services Initiatives in Bolivia ( CIFOR , Bogor, Indonesia , 2005 ) . Google Scholar - Schechter, L (2009). The apple and your eye: Visual and taste rank-ordered probit analysis with correlated errors. Available online: https://www.msu.edu/∼las/apples.pdf, accessed at: 14 September 2010 . Google Scholar
- United Nations, (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Available at: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm, accessed on 21 March 2013 . Google Scholar
- Viana, VM (2006). Draft version of the "Amazonas Initiative for Forest Conservation and Ecosystem Services". Presented at UNFCCC COP 12 at Nairobi, Kenya, on November 6–17th, 2006. Available at: http://www.idesam.org.br/documentos/04_PaperNairobi25.pdf . Google Scholar
- Estud. av. 22(64), 143 (2008), DOI: 10.1590/S0103-40142008000300009. Crossref, Google Scholar
- Viana, VM (2009). Zona Franca Verde, Bolsa Floresta e Envolvimento Sustentável no Amazonas: novos paradigmas para o futuro da Amazônia. In: Amazônia, responsabilidade de todos!/Cícero Amâncio de Oliveira, Jemima Gonçalves Pinto (orgs.) — Manaus: Editora da Universidade Federal do Amazonas, 2009. pgs 23–40 . Google Scholar
- Viana, VM, M Grieg-Gran, R Della Mea and G Ribenboim (2009). The costs of REDD: lessons from Amazonas. IIED briefing, IIED, London . Google Scholar
- Viana, V (2010). Sustainable Development in Practice: Lessons Learned from Amazonas Environmental Governance No. 3. IIED, London . Google Scholar
- Wertz-Kanounnikov, S, M Kongphan-Apirak and S Wunder (2008). Reducing forest emissions in the Amazon BasinA review of drivers of land-use change and how payments for environmental services (PES) schemes can affect them. Working Paper No. 40, CIFOR, Bogor . Google Scholar
