Research ArticleOpen Access

The Noether–Bessel-Hagen symmetry approach for dynamical systems

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ludvíka Podéště 1875/17, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Francesco Bajardi

Dipartimento di Fisica “Ettore Pancini”, Universitá degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’Angelo, 80126 Napoli, Italy

INFN Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’Angelo, Edificio G, Via Cinthia, I-80126 Napoli, Italy

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Salvatore Capozziello

Dipartimento di Fisica “Ettore Pancini”, Universitá degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’Angelo, 80126 Napoli, Italy

INFN Sezione di Napoli, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’Angelo, Edificio G, Via Cinthia, I-80126 Napoli, Italy

Gran Sasso Science Institute, Viale Francesco Crispi 7, I-67100 L’Aquila, Italy

Tomsk State Pedagogical University, ul. Kievskaya, 60, 634061 Tomsk, Russia

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887820502151Cited by:17 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

The Noether–Bessel-Hagen theorem can be considered a natural extension of Noether Theorem to search for symmetries. Here, we develop the approach for dynamical systems introducing the basic foundations of the method. Specifically, we establish the Noether–Bessel-Hagen analysis of mechanical systems where external forces are present. In the second part of the paper, the approach is adopted to select symmetries for a given systems. In particular, we focus on the case of harmonic oscillator as a testbed for the theory, and on a cosmological system derived from scalar–tensor gravity with unknown scalar-field potential $V (φ)$ . We show that the shape of potential is selected by the presence of symmetries. The approach results particularly useful as soon as the Lagrangian of a given system is not immediately identifiable or it is not a Lagrangian system.

Keywords:

AMSC: 70H33, 58E30, 58D19, 53A15

References

1. S. Capozziello, R. De Ritis, C. Rubano and P. Scudellaro , Noether symmetries in cosmology, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 19(4) (1996) 1. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. K. F. Dialektopoulos and S. Capozziello , Noether symmetries as a geometric criterion to select theories of gravity, Int. J. Geom. Methods Modern Phys. 15(Supp. 01) (2018) 1840007. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. E. Bessel-Hagen , Uber die Erhaltungssatze der Electrodynamik, Math. Ann. 84 (1921) 258–276. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. Y. Kossmann-Schwarzbach , The Noether Theorems (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2011). Crossref, Google Scholar
5. D. Krupka , Introduction to Global Variational Geometry, Atlantis Studies in Variational Geometry, Vol. 1 (Atlantis Press, Amsterdam–Beijing–Paris, 2015). Crossref, Google Scholar
6. J. Brajerčík and D. Krupka , Variational principles for locally variational forms, J. Math. Phys. 46 (2005) 052903. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. J. Brajerčík and D. Krupka , Cohomology and local variational principles, in Proc. Conf. XV Int. Workshop Geometry and Physics, Puerto de la Cruz, Canary Islands, Spain, 11–16 September 2006, Publ. de la RSME, 2007, pp. 119–124. Google Scholar
8. Z. Urban and J. Brajerčík , The fundamental Lepage form in variational theory for submanifolds, Int. J. Geom. Methods Modern Phys. 15(6) (2018) 1850103. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. F. Cattafi, M. Palese and E. Winterroth , Variational derivatives in locally Lagrangian field theories and Noether–Bessel-Hagen currents, Int. J. Geom. Methods Modern Phys. 13(8) (2016) 1650067. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. M. Palese and E. Winterroth , Topological obstructions in Lagrangian field theories, with an application to 3D Chern–Simons gauge theory, J. Math. Phys. 58 (2017) 023502. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. M. Francaviglia, M. Palese and E. Winterroth , Variationally equivalent problems and variations of Noether currents, Int. J. Geom. Methods Modern Phys. 10(1) (2013) 1220024. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. D. Bashkirov et al., Noether’s second theorem in a general setting: Reducible gauge theories, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 (2005) 5329. Crossref, Google Scholar
13. E. Noether , Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr. Konig. Gessell. Wissen. Gottingen, Math.-Phys. Kl. 1918 (1918) 235–257. Google Scholar
14. D. Krupka , Invariant variational structures on fibered manifolds, Int. J. Geom. Methods Modern Phys. 12 (2015) 1550020. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. A. Trautman, Invariance of Lagrangian systems, in General Relativity, Papers in Honour of J. L. Synge (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1972), pp. 85–99. Google Scholar
16. A. Trautman , Noether equations and conservation laws, Comm. Math. Phys. 6 (1967) 248–261. Crossref, Google Scholar
17. D. Krupka , A geometric theory of ordinary first order variational problems in fibered manifolds. II. Invariance, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 49 (1975) 469–476. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. G. Sardanashvily , Noether’s Theorems, Applications in Mechanics and Field Theory, Atlantis Studies in Variational Geometry, Vol. 3 (Atlantis Press, Amsterdam, 2016). Crossref, Google Scholar
19. P. J. Olver , Applications of Lie Groups to Differential Equations, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 107 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986). Crossref, Google Scholar
20. G. W. Bluman and S. Kumei , Symmetries and Differential Equations (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989). Crossref, Google Scholar
21. D. Krupka , Variational forces, Lepage Research Institute Library 6 (2018) 1–38. Google Scholar
22. N. Chien, T. Honein and G. Herrmann , Dissipative systems, conservation laws and symmetries, Internat. J. Solids Structures 33(20–22) (1996) 2959–2968. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
23. T. Honein, N. Chien and G. Herrmann , On conservation laws for dissipative systems, Phys. Lett. A 155 (1991) 223–224. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
24. S. Capozziello, A. Stabile and A. Troisi , Spherically symmetric solutions in $f (R)$ -gravity via Noether Symmetry Approach, Class. Quantum Grav. 24 (2007) 2153. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. A. Paliathanasis, S. Basilakos, E. N. Saridakis, S. Capozziello, K. Atazadeh, F. Darabi and M. Tsamparlis , New Schwarzschild-like solutions in $f (T)$ gravity through Noether symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 104042. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. F. Bajardi, K. F. Dialektopoulos and S. Capozziello , Higher dimensional static and spherically symmetric solutions in extended Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Symmetry 12(3) (2020) 372. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. S. Capozziello, N. Frusciante and D. Vernieri , New spherically symmetric solutions in $f (R)$ -gravity by Noether symmetries, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 44 (2012) 1881. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
28. S. Capozziello and A. De Felice , $f (R)$ cosmology by Noether’s symmetry, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0808 (2008) 016. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
29. S. Capozziello, G. Marmo, C. Rubano and P. Scudellaro , Noether symmetries in Bianchi universes, Int. J. Modern Phys. D 6 (1997) 491. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and S. D. Odintsov , Hamiltonian dynamics and Noether symmetries in extended gravity cosmology, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2068. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
31. K. Atazadeh and F. Darabi , $f (T)$ cosmology via Noether symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2016. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
32. D. Krupka, Z. Urban and J. Volná , Variational submanifolds of Euclidean spaces, J. Math. Phys. 59(3) (2018) 032903. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. Z. Urban and J. Volná , On a global Lagrangian construction for ordinary variational equations on 2-manifolds, J. Math. Phys. 60(9) (2019) 092902. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
34. J. Volná and Z. Urban , First-order variational sequences in field theory, in The Inverse Problem of the Calculus of Variations, Local and Global Theory, ed. D. Zenkov (Atlantis Press, Amsterdam–Beijing–Paris, 2015), pp. 215–284. Crossref, Google Scholar
35. D. Krupka, O. Krupková and D. Saunders , Cartan–Lepage forms in geometric mechanics, Internat. J. Non-Linear Mech. 47 (2012) 1154–1160. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz , Mechanics, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1969). Google Scholar
37. M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten , Superstring Theory. Vol. 1: Introduction, Cambridge Monographs On Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1987). Google Scholar
38. M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz and E. Witten , Superstring Theory. Vol. 2: Loop Amplitudes, Anomalies and Phenomenology, Cambridge Monographs On Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1987). Google Scholar
39. J. Polchinski , String Theory. Vol. 1: An Introduction to the Bosonic String (Cambridge University Press, 1998). Google Scholar
40. J. Polchinski , String Theory. Vol. 2: Superstring Theory and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, 1998). Google Scholar
41. K. Becker, M. Becker and J. H. Schwarz , String Theory and M-theory: A Modern Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 2006). Crossref, Google Scholar
42. T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis , Modified gravity and cosmology, Phys. Rep. 513 (2012) 1. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. T. Han, J. D. Lykken and R. J. Zhang , On Kaluza–Klein states from large extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 105006. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto , Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity: An Elementary Introduction to Quantum Gravity and Spinfoam Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2014). Crossref, Google Scholar
45. A. Ashtekar and P. Singh , Loop quantum cosmology: A status report, Class. Quantum. Grav. 28 (2011) 213001. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
46. C. Rovelli , Loop quantum gravity, Living Rev. Relativ. 1 (1998) 1. Crossref, Google Scholar
47. E. Kiritsis and G. Kofinas , Horava–Lifshitz cosmology, Nuclear Phys. B 821 (2009) 467. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
48. R. G. Cai, L. M. Cao and N. Ohta , Topological black holes in Horava–Lifshitz gravity, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 024003. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
49. T. P. Sotiriou , Horava–Lifshitz gravity: A status report, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 283 (2011) 012034. Crossref, Google Scholar
50. S. Mukohyama , Horava–Lifshitz cosmology: A review, Class. Quantum Grav. 27 (2010) 223101. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
51. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali and G. Gabadadze, Nonlocal modification of gravity and the cosmological constant problem, preprint (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0209227. Google Scholar
52. L. Modesto and S. Tsujikawa , Non-local massive gravity, Phys. Lett. B 727 (2013) 48. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
53. L. Modesto , Super-renormalizable gravity, in The Thirteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, eds. R. T. Jantzen, K. Rosquist and R. Ruffini , Proc. Conf. MG13 Meeting on General Relativity, 1–7 July 2012, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (World Scientific, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814623995_0098 Link, Google Scholar
54. T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni , $f (R)$ theories of gravity, Rev. Modern Phys. 82 (2010) 451. Crossref, Google Scholar
55. A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa , $f (R)$ theories, Living Rev. Relativ. 13 (2010) 3. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
56. Y. F. Cai, S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and E. N. Saridakis , $f (T)$ teleparallel gravity and cosmology, Rep. Progr. Phys. 79(10) (2016) 106901. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
57. R. T. Hammond , Torsion gravity, Rep. Progr. Phys. 65 (2002) 599. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
58. H. I. Arcos and J. G. Pereira , Torsion gravity: A reappraisal, Int. J. Modern Phys. D 13 (2004) 2193. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
59. S. Capozziello and F. Bajardi , Gravitational waves in modified gravity, Int. J. Modern Phys. D 28(5) (2019) 1942002. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
60. S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis , Extended theories of gravity, Phys. Rep. 509 (2011) 167. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
61. S. Capozziello and M. Francaviglia , Extended theories of gravity and their cosmological and astrophysical applications, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40 (2008) 357. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
62. A. H. Guth, The inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347. [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 139]. Google Scholar
63. A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi , Fluctuations in the new inflationary universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 1110. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
64. A. D. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389. [Adv. Ser. Astrophys. Cosmol. 3 (1987) 149]. Google Scholar
65. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa , Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Modern Phys. D 15 (2006) 1753. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
66. F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov , The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton, Phys. Lett. B 659 (2008) 703. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
67. S. Capozziello and R. de Ritis , Relation between the potential and nonminimal coupling in inflationary cosmology, Phys. Lett. A 177 (1993) 1. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
68. S. Capozziello and R. de Ritis , Noether’s symmetries and exact solutions in flat nonminimally coupled cosmological models, Class. Quantum Grav. 11 (1994) 107. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
69. A. Paliathanasis, M. Tsamparlis, S. Basilakos and S. Capozziello , Scalar–tensor gravity cosmology: Noether symmetries and analytical solutions, Phys. Rev. D 89(6) (2014) 063532. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
70. S. Capozziello, R. de Ritis and P. Scudellaro , Noether’s symmetries in $(n + 1)$ -dimensional nonminimally coupled cosmologies, Int. J. Modern Phys. D 2 (1993) 463. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
71. A. Borowiec, S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, F. S. N. Lobo, A. Paliathanasis, M. Paolella and A. Wojnar , Invariant solutions and Noether symmetries in hybrid gravity, Phys. Rev. D 91(2) (2015) 023517. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
72. E. Piedipalumbo, M. De Laurentis and S. Capozziello , Noether symmetries in interacting quintessence cosmology, Phys. Dark Univ. 27 (2020) 100444. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar

Vol. 17, No. 14

Metrics

History

Received 26 August 2020

Accepted 30 September 2020

Published: 20 October 2020

Information

This is an Open Access article published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) License. Further distribution of this work is permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

PDF download

The Noether–Bessel-Hagen symmetry approach for dynamical systems

Abstract

References

Recommended