Mapping the State of the Art to Envision the Future of Large-Scale Citizen Science Projects: An Interpretive Review

References

• Alessi, J., Bruccoleri, F. and Cafaro, V. [2019] How citizens can encourage scientific research: The case study of bottlenose dolphins monitoring. Ocean and Coastal Management, 167: 9–19. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altwegg, R. and Nichols, J. D. [2019] Occupancy models for citizen-science data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 1: 8–21. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrows, A. P., Christiansen, K. S., Bode, E. T. and Hoellein, T. J. [2018] A watershed-scale, citizen science approach to quantifying microplastic concentration in a mixed land-use river. Water Research, 147: 382–392. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birkin, L. and Goulson, D. [2015] Using citizen science to monitor pollination services. Ecological Entomology, 40, 1: 3–11. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bodilis, P., Louisy, P., Draman, M., Arceo, H. O. and Francour, P. [2014] Can citizen science survey non-indigenous fish species in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea? Environmental Management, 53: 172–180. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bois, S. T., Silander, J. A. and Mehrhoff, L. J. [2011] Invasive Plant Atlas of New England: The role of citizens in the science of invasive alien species detection. BioScience, 61, 10: 763–770. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borzee, A., Baek, H. J., Lee, C. H., Kim, D. Y., Song, J. Y., Suh, J. H., Jang, Y. W. and Min, M. S. [2019] Scientific publication of georeferenced molecular data as an adequate guide to delimit the range of Korean Hynobius salamanders through citizen science. Acta Herpetologica, 14, 1: 27–33. Google Scholar
• Chiou, W. T. [2019] What roles can lay citizens play in the making of public knowledge? East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 13, 2: 257–277. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cornwell, M. L. and Campbell, L. M. [2012] Co-producing conservation and knowledge: Citizen-based sea turtle monitoring in North Carolina, USA. Social Studies of Science, 42, 1: 101–120. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox, T. E., Philippoff, J., Baumgartner, E. and Smith, C. M. [2012] Expert variability provides perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of citizen-driven intertidal monitoring program. Ecological Applications, 22, 4: 1201–1212. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crain, R., Cooper, C. and Dickinson, J. L. [2014] Citizen science: A tool for integrating studies of human and natural systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39: 641–665. Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Coster, G., De Laet, J., Vangestel, C., Adriaensen, F. and Lens, L. [2015] Citizen science in action — Evidence for long-term, region-wide house sparrow declines in flanders, Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134: 139–146. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. G., Sperling, C. D., Adams, C. S. and Leung, B. [2008] Marine invasive species: Validation of citizen science and implications for national monitoring networks. Biological Invasions, 10: 117–128. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis, E. B., Morgan, B. J., Freeman, S. N., Ridout, M. S., Brereton, T. M., Fox, R., Powney, G. D. and Roy, D. B. [2017] Efficient occupancy model-fitting for extensive citizen-science data. PLoS One, 12, 3: e0174433. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B. and Bonter, D. N. [2010] Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41: 149–172. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., Rousseau, R. and Wolfram, D. [2016] Measuring Scholarly Impact. Springer, Cham. Google Scholar
• Dunham, K. M. and du Toit, A. J. [2013] Using citizen-based survey data to determine densities of large mammals: A case study from Mana Pools National Park, Zimbabwe. African Journal of Ecology, 51, 3: 431–440. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eitzel, M. V., Cappadonna, J. L., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R. E., Virapongse, A., West, S. E., Kyba, C. C. M., Bowser, A., Cooper, C. B., Sforzi, A., Metcalfe, A. N., Harris, E. S., Thiel, M., Haklay, M., Ponciano, L., Roche, J., Ceccaroni, L., Shilling, F. M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Kiessling, T., Davis, B. Y. and Jiang, Q. [2017] Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2, 1: 1–20. Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013). Green paper on citizen science. Citizen science for Europe towards a better society of empowered citizens and enhanced research. Socientize Consortium, Brussels. Google Scholar
• Farhadinia, M. S., Moll, R. J., Montgomery, R. A., Ashrafi, S., Johnson, P. J., Hunter, L. T. and Macdonald, D. W. [2018] Citizen science data facilitate monitoring of rare large carnivores in remote montane landscapes. Ecological Indicators, 94, 1: 283–291. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferretti, G. [2019] Mapping do-it-yourself science. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 15, 1: 1–23. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Follett, R. and Strezov, V. [2015] An analysis of citizen science based research: Usage and publication patterns. PLoS One, 10, 11: e014368. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Franzoni, C. and Sauermann, H. [2014] Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43, 1: 1–20. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fukuda, K. [2020] Science, technology and innovation ecosystem transformation toward society 5.0. International Journal of Production Economics, 220: 107460. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, M. [2018] Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 37, 4: 47–50. Google Scholar
• Ganzevoort, W., van den Born, R. J., Halffman, W. and Turnhout, S. [2017] Sharing biodiversity data: Citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26: 2821–2837. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garbarino, J. and Mason, C. E. [2016] The power of engaging citizen scientists for scientific progress. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 17, 1: 7–12. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gladden, M. E. [2019] Who will be the members of society 5.0? Towards an anthropology of technologically post humanized future societies. Social Sciences, 8, 5: 148. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goczal, J., Rossa, R., Sweeney, J. and Tofilski, A. [2017] Citizen monitoring of invasive species: Wing morphometry as a tool for detection of alien Tetropium species. Journal of Applied Entomology, 141, 6: 496–506. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gouraguine, A., Moranta, J., Ruiz-Frau, A., Hinz, H., Renones, O., Ferse, S. C., Jompa, J. and Smith, D. J. [2019] Citizen science in data and resource-limited areas: A tool to detect long-term ecosystem changes. PLoS One, 14, 1: e0210007. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadj-Hammou, J., Loiselle, S., Ophof, D. and Thornhill, I. [2017] Getting the full picture: Assessing the complementarity of citizen science and agency monitoring data. PLoS One, 12, 12: e0188507. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heigl, F., Horvath, K., Laaha, G. and Zaller, J. G. [2017] Amphibian and reptile road-kills on tertiary roads in relation to landscape structure: Using a citizen science approach with open-access land cover data. BMC Ecology, 17: 24. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hermoso, M. I., Martin, V. Y., Stotz, W., Gelcich, S. and Thiel, M. [2019] How does the diversity of divers affect the design of citizen science projects? Frontiers in Maritime Science, 6: 239. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hielscher, S. and Jaeger-Erben, M. [2021] From quick fixes to repair projects: Insights from a citizen science project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278: 123875. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hiller, T. and Haelewaters, D. [2019] A case of silent invasion: Citizen science confirms the presence of Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae) in Central America. PLoS One, 14, 7: e0220082. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hod, Y., Sagy, O. and Kali, Y. [2018] The opportunities of networks of research-practice partnerships and why CSCL should not give up on large-scale educational change. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13: 457–466. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoover, E. [2016] We’re not going to be guinea pigs; Citizen Science and Environmental Health in a Native American Community. Journal of Science Communication, 15, 1: A05. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huddart, J. E., Thompson, M. S., Woodward, G. and Brooks, S. J. [2016] Citizen science: From detecting pollution to evaluating ecological restoration. Wires Water, 3, 3: 287–300. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jiguet, F., Devictor, V., Julliard, R. and Couvet, D. [2012] French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences. Acta Oecologica, 44, 58–66. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jimenez, M., Triguero, I. and John, R. [2019] Handling uncertainty in citizen science data: Towards an improved amateur-based large-scale classification. Information Sciences, 479: 301–320. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. F., Hannah, C., Acton, L., Popovici, R., Karanth, K. K. and Weinthal, E. [2014] Network environmentalism: Citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy. Global Environmental Change, 29: 235–245. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Just, M. G. and Frank, S. D. [2019] Evaluation of an easy-to-install, low-cost dendrometer band for citizen-science tree research. Journal of Forestry, 117, 4: 317–322. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaartinen, R., Hardwick, B. and Roslin, T. [2013] Using citizen scientists to measure an ecosystem service nationwide. Ecology, 94, 11: 2645–2652. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasperowski, D. and Hillman, T. [2018] The epistemic culture in an online citizen science project: Programs, antiprograms and epistemic subjects. Social Studies of Science, 48, 4: 564–588. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Huerta, E. A., Wang, S. B., Gruendl, R., Jennings, E. and Zheng, H. H. [2019] Deep learning at scale for the construction of galaxy catalogs in the Dark Energy Survey. Physics Letters B, 795: 248–258. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khoi, N. G. and Casteleyn, S. [2018] Analyzing spatial and temporal user behavior in participatory sensing. International Journal of Geo-Information, 7, 9: 344. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., Petrovan, S. O. and Cunningham, A. A. [2015] Citizen science and wildlife disease surveillance. EcoHealth, 12: 693–702. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, L., Steventon, J., Brahman, I., Benadie, K., Minye, J., Langwane, H. and Xhukwe, Q. [2017] Smartphone icon user interface design for non-literate trackers and its implications for an inclusive citizen science. Biological Conservation, 208: 155–162. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. P., Deng, D. P., Lin, W. C., Lemmens, R., Crossman, N. D., Henle, K. and Schmeller, D. S. [2019] Uncertainty analysis of crowd-sourced and professionally collected field data used in species distribution models of Taiwanese moths. PLoS One, 14, 7: e0220082. Google Scholar
• Lintott, C. [2020] Citizen science: The past 200 years. Astronomy and Geophysics, 61, 2: 20–23. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Little, K. E., Hayashi, M. and Liang, S. [2016] Community-based groundwater monitoring network using a citizen-science approach. Groundwater, 54, 3: 317–324. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Locke, C. M., Anhalt-Depies, C. M., Frett, S., Stenglein, J. L., Cameron, S., Malleshappa, V., Peltier, T., Zuckerberg, B. and Townsend, P. A. [2019] Managing a large citizen science project to monitor wildlife. Wildlife Society Bullettin, 43, 1: 4–10. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loss, S. R., Loss, S. S., Will, T. and Marra, P. P. [2015] Linking place-based citizen science with large-scale conservation research: A case study of bird-building collisions and the role of professional scientists. Biological Conservation, 184: 439–445. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahr, D. and Dickel, S. [2019] Citizen science beyond invited participation: Nineteenth century amateur naturalists, epistemic autonomy, and big data approaches avant la lettre. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 41: 1–19. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malecki, E. J. [2017] Real people, virtual places, and the spaces in between. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 58: 3–12. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martay, B., Pearce-Higgins, J. W., Harris, S. J. and Gillings, S. [2018] Monitoring landscape-scale environmental changes with citizen scientists: Twenty years of land use change in Great Britain. Journal for Nature Conservation, 44, 1: 33–42. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Martin, V. Y. and Greig, E. I. [2019] Young adults’ motivations to feed wild birds and influences on their potential participation in citizen science: An exploratory study. Biological Conservation, 235: 295–307. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meehan, T. D., Michel, N. L. and Rue, H. [2019] Spatial modeling of Audubon Christmas Bird Counts reveals fine-scale patterns and drivers of relative abundance trends. Ecosphere, 10, 4: e02707. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller, D. A., Nichols, J. D., Gude, J. A., Rich, L. N., Podruzny, K. M., Hines, J. E. and Mitchell, M. S. [2013] Determining occurrence dynamics when false positives occur: Estimating the range dynamics of wolves from public survey data. PLoS One, 8, 6: e65808. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller-Rushing, A., Primack, R. and Bonney, R. [2012] The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 6: 285–290. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nascimento, S., Guimarães Pereira, A. and Ghezzi, A. [2014] From Citizen Science to do it Yourself Science: An Annotated Account of an On-Going Trend, European Commission Joint Research Center, Luxembourg. Google Scholar
• Newson, S. E., Evans, H. E. and Gillings, S. [2015a] A novel citizen science approach for large-scale standardised monitoring of bat activity and distribution, evaluated in eastern England. Biological Conservation, 191: 38–49. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. [2012] Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton University Press, Woodstock. Google Scholar
• Ogie, R. I. [2016] Adopting incentive mechanisms for large-scale participation in mobile crowdsensing: From literature review to a conceptual framework. Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences, 6: 24–54. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Palmatier, R. W., Houston, M. B. and Hulland, J. [2018] Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 1: 1–5. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Panofsky, A. and Donovan, J. [2019] Genetic ancestry testing among white nationalists: From identity repair to citizen science. Social Studies of Science, 49, 5: 653–681. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul, J. and Criado, A. R. [2020] The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29, 4: 101717. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W. and Bresciani, S. [2021] Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR-4-SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45, 4: 1–16. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peters, M. and Besley, T. [2020] Citizen science and ecological democracy in the global science regime. The need for openness and participation. The Methodology and Philosophy of Collective Writing, eds. Peters, M. A., Besley, T., Tesar, M., Jackson, L., Jandric, P., Arndt, S. and Sturm, S. Routledge, Abingdon, pp. 124–131. Google Scholar
• Pillay, R., Miller, D. A., Hines, J. E., Joshi, A. A. and Madhusudan, M. D. [2014] Accounting for false positives improves estimates of occupancy from key informant interviews. Diversity and Distribution, 20, 2: 223–235. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raddick, M. J., Prather, E. E. and Wallace, C. S. [2019] Galaxy zoo: Science content knowledge of citizen scientists. Public Understanding of Science, 28, 6: 636–651. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rahm, J., Martel-Reny, M.-P. and Moore, J. C. [2005] The role of afterschool and community science programs in the lives of urban youth. School Science & Mathematics, 105, 6: 283–291. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R. and Ruíz-Navarro, J. [2004] Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 10: 981–1004. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Randhawa, K., Wilden, R. and Hohberger, J. [2016] A bibliometric review of open innovation: Setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33, 6: 750–772. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Requier, F., Andersson, G. K., Oddi, F. J. and Garibaldi, L. A. [2020] Citizen science in developing countries: How to improve volunteer participation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18, 2: 101–108. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ries, L. and Mullen, S. P. [2008] A rare model limits the distribution of its more common mimic: A twist on frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Evolution, 62, 7: 1798–1803. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roe, S. M. [2021] A way forward for citizen science. Taking advice from a Madman. Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays, eds. Bschir, K. and Shaw, J. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 213–230. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Gutierrez, V., Hooten, M. B. and Grant, E. H. [2016] Uncertainty in biological monitoring: A framework for data collection and analysis to account for multiple sources of sampling bias. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 8: 900–909. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ryan, W. H., Gornish, E. S., Christenson, L., Halpern, S., Henderson, S., LeBuhn, G. and Miller, T. E. [2016] Initiating & managing long-term data with amateur scientists. The American Biology Teacher, 79, 1: 28–34. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santangeli, A., Arroyo, B., Millon, A. and Bretagnolle, V. [2015] Identifying effective actions to guide volunteer-based and nationwide conservation efforts for a ground-nesting farmland bird. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 4: 1082–1091. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmitz, H., Howe, C. L., Armstrong, D. G. and Subbian, V. [2018] Leveraging mobile health applications for biomedical research and citizen science: A scoping review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25, 12: 1685–1695. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scyphers, S. B., Powers, S. P., Akins, J. L., Drymon, J. M., Martin, C. W., Schobernd, Z. H., Schofield, P. J., Shipp, R. L. and Switzer, T. S. [2015] The role of citizens in detecting and responding to a rapid marine invasion. Conservation Letters, 8, 4: 242–250. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., Greaves, S., Siddharthan, A., Anderson, H. B., Robinson, A., Colucci-Gray, L., Wibowo, A. T., Bostock, H., Salisbury, A., Roberts, S., Slawson, D. and van der Wal, R. [2019] From citizen science to citizen action: Analysing the potential for a digital platform to cultivate attachments to nature, Journal of Science Communication, 18, 1: A07. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silvertown, J. [2009] A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 9: 467–471. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith, M. L. [2014] Citizen science in archaeology. American Antiquity, 79, 4: 749–762. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spitzer, W. and Fraser, J. [2020] Advancing community science literacy. Journal of Museum Education, 45, 1: 5–15. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steininger, M. S., Hulcr, J., Sigut, M. and Lucky, A. [2015a] Simple and efficient trap for bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to facilitate invasive species monitoring and citizen involvement. Journal of Economic Entomology, 108, 3: 1115–1123. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steininger, S., Storer, C., Hulcr, J. and Lucky, A. [2015b] Alternative preservatives of insect DNA for citizen science and other low-cost applications. Invertebrate Systematics, 29, 5: 468–472. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J. and Wilsdon, J. [2014] Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science, 23, 1: 4–15. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swan, M. [2012a] Crowdsourced health research studies: An important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, 2: e46. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swan, M. [2012b] Scaling crowdsourced health studies: The emergence of a new form of contract research organization. Future Medicine, 9, 2: 223–234. Google Scholar
• Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., Lintott, C., Simpson, R., Smith, A. and Packer, C. [2015] Snapshot serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African savanna. Scientific Data, 2, 1: 150026. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., Lintott, C. and Packer, C. [2016] A generalized approach for producing, quantifying, and validating citizen science data from wildlife images. Conservation Biology, 30, 3: 520–531. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. D., Meiners, J. M., Riemer, K., Orr, M. C. and White, E. P. [2019] Comparison of large-scale citizen science data and long-term study data for phenology modeling. Ecology, 100, 2: e02568. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tinati, R., Luczak-Roesch, M., Simperl, E. and Hall, W. [2017] An investigation of player motivations in Eyewire, a gamified citizen science project. Computers in Human Behavior, 73: 527–540. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. and Smart, P. [2003] Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 3: 207–222. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsukahara, T. [2017] New currents in science: The challenge of quality, examining the discrepancies and incongruities between Japanese techno-scientific policy and the citizens’ science movement in post-3/11 Japan. Futures, 91, 1: 84–89. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tuttle, N., Mentzer, G. A., Strickler, L., Bloomquist, D., Hapgood, S., Molitor, S., Kaderavek, J. and Czerniak, C. M. [2015] Exploring how families do science together: Adult-child interactions at community science events. School Science & Mathematics, 117, 15: 175–182. Google Scholar
• van Brussel, S. and Huyse, H. [2019] Citizen science on speed? Realising the triple objective of scientific rigour, policy influence and deep citizen engagement in a large-scale citizen science project on ambient air quality in Antwerp. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62, 3: 534–551. Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. and Waltman, L. [2010] Software survey: VOS viewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 2: 523–538. Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Strien, A. J., van Swaay, C. A. and Termaat, T. [2013] Opportunistic citizen science data of animal species produce reliable estimates of distribution trends if analysed with occupancy models. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50, 6: 1450–1458. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vermeiren, P., Munoz, C., Zimmer, M. and Sheaves, M. [2016] Hierarchical toolbox: Ensuring scientific accuracy of citizen science for tropical coastal ecosystems. Ecological Indicators, 66: 242–250. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagenknecht, K., Woods, T., García Sanz, F., Gold, M., Bowser, A., Rüfenacht, S., Ceccaroni, L. and Piera, J. [2021] EU-Citizen. Science: A platform for mainstreaming citizen science and open science in Europe. Data Intelligence, 3, 1: 136–149. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. [2014] Crowdsourcing as a method of transdisciplinary research-Tapping the full potential of participants. Futures, 60, 1: 14–22. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiggins, A. and Wilbanks, J. [2019] The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19, 8: 3–14. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wildschut, D. [2017] The need for citizen science in the transition to a sustainable peer-to-peer-society. Futures, 91, 1: 46–52. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woolley, J. P., McGowan, M. L., Teare, H. J. A., Coathup, V., Fishman, J. R., Settersten, R. A., Sterckx, S., Kaye, J. and Juengstm E. T. [2016] Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives, BMC Medical Ethics, 17, 33 Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yadav, P., Charalampidis, I., Cohen, J., Darlington, J. and Grey, F. [2019] A collaborative citizen science platform for real-time volunteer computing and games. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 5, 1: 9–19. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zapponi, L., Cini, A., Bardiani, M., Hardersen, S., Maura, M., Maurizi, E., De Zan, L. R., Audisio, P., Bologna, M. A., Carpaneto, G. M., Roversi, P. F., Peverieri, G. S., Mason, F. and Campanaro, A. [2017] Citizen science data as an efficient tool for mapping protected saproxylic beetles. Biological Conservation, 208: 139–145. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zilli, D., Parson, O., Merrett, G. V. and Rogers, A. [2014] A hidden Markov model-based acoustic cicada detector for crowdsourced smartphone biodiversity monitoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 51, 1: 805–827. Crossref, Google Scholar