SME Knowledge Commercialization Through Public Sector Partnerships

References

• Adobor, H. [2005] Trust as sensemaking: The microdynamics of trust in interfirm alliances. Journal of Business Research, 58, 3: 330–337. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E. and Fiol, C. M. [1994] Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 4: 645–670. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H. E. and Ruef, M. [2006] Organizations Evolving, 2nd edn. Sage, London. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arundel, A. and Geuna, A. [2004] Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13, 6: 559–580. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/1043859092000234311. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ayres, R. U. and Williams, E. [2004] The digital economy: Where do we stand? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, 4: 315–339. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bercovitz, J. E. L. and Feldman, M. P. [2007] Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances. Research Policy, 36, 7: 930–948. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.002. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S. and Sandén, B. A. [2008] “Legitimation” and “development of positive externalities”: Two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 5: 575–592. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292768. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bettig, R. V. [1996] Copyrighting Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property. Westview Press, Chicago. Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, T. [2009] Universities-industry collaboration strategies: A micro-level perspective. European Journal of Innovation Management, 12, 2: 161–176. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1108/14601060910953951. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boulding, W., Morgan, R. and Staelin, R. [1997] Pulling the plug to stop the new product drain. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 1: 164–176. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bouncken, R. B. and Kraus, S. [2013] Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition. Journal of Business Research, 66, 10: 2060–2070. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. [2004] Public–private partnerships: From contested concepts to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70, 2: 199–215. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. [1993] Understanding the roots of publicness. The Legitimate Corporation, ed. B. Bozeman. Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 63–81. Google Scholar
• Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. and Mezias, S. J. [2012] The quest for cognitive legitimacy: Organizational identity crafting and internal stakeholder support. Journal of Change Management, 12, 2: 1–19. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2011.645053. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown, A.-K. [2012] Trapped by Narcissism: A disillusioned dutch society. Macalester International, 30, 1: 7. Google Scholar
• Brunetto, Y. and Farr-Wharton, R. [2007] The moderating role of trust in SME owner/managers’ decision-making about collaboration. Journal of Small Business Management, 45, 3: 362–387. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2007.00218.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlaw, K., Oxley, L., Walker, P., Thorns, D. and Nuth, M. [2006] Beyond the hype: Intellectual property and the knowledge society/knowledge economy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20, 4: 633–690. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chappin, M. M. H., Meeus, M. T. H., Hekkert, M. P. and Vermeulen, W. J. V. [2007] Dynamic perspective on the relation between environmental policy and eco-efficiency: The case of wastewater treatment, waste and energy efficiency in the Dutch paper and board industry. Progress in Industrial Ecology, An International Journal, 4, 1/2: 19. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheng, H.-L. [2010] Seeking knowledge or gaining legitimacy? Role of social networks on new practice adoption by OEM suppliers. Journal of Business Research, 63, 8: 824–831. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi, T. [1994] Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 4: 271–290. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y. H. and Hung, K. P. [2010] Exploring open search strategies and perceived innovation performance from the perspective of interorganizational knowledge flows. R&D Management, 40, 3: 292–299. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chollet, B., Géraudel, M. and Mothe, C. [2014] Generating business referrals for SMEs: The contingent value of CEOs’ social capital. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 1: 79–101. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12034. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C. and Kornberger, M. [2007] Desperately seeking legitimacy: Organizational identity and emerging industries. Organization Studies, 28, 4: 495–513. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067995. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., Laursen, K., Magnusson, M. and Rossi-Lamastra, C. [2012] Introduction: Small business and networked innovation: Organizational and managerial challenges. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 2: 181–190. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00349.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. [2008] The evolution of biotechnology in bioregions and their globalisation. International Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 5: 476–495. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L. and McFarland, D. A. [2013] Ties that last tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 1: 69–110. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dallimore, G. (2009). European patent applications filed and patents granted from 1997 to 2008. Annual Report 2009. European Patent Office. Google Scholar
• David, R. J., Sine, W. D. and Haveman, H. A. [2012] Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: How institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organization Science, 7039: 1–22. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0745. Google Scholar
• de Lange, D. E. [2016] Legitimation strategies for clean technology entrepreneurs facing institutional voids in emerging economies. Journal of International Management, 22, 4: 403–415. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.06.002. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dee, N., Ford, S. J. and Garnsey, E. [2008] Obstacles to commercialization of clean technology innovations from UK ventures. Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New Perspectives in Research on Corporate Sustainability, eds. R. Wustenhagen, J. Hamschmidt, S. Sharma and M. Starik, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 97–118. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeds, D. L., Mang, P. Y. and Frandsen, M. L. [2004] The influence of firms’ and industries’ legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. Strategic Organization, 2, 1: 9–34. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., Malerba, F., Ramello, G. B. and Silva, F. [2006] Information, appropriability, and the generation of innovative knowledge four decades after Arrow and Nelson: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 6: 891–901. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dowling, J., Pfeffer, J. and Press, C. [1975] Organizational legitimacy social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 1: 122–136. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H. and Chu, W. [2003] The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14, 1: 57–68. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K. D. K. and Sutton, R. I. [1992] Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 4: 699–738. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Emfel, M., Kratt, L., van den Berg, W. and van der Slot, A. [2011] Enabling the Transition Climate Innovation Systems for a Low-Carbon Future, World Wildlife Foundation (WWF), Washington, DC. Google Scholar
• Erden, Z., Klang, D., Sydler, R. and von Krogh, G. [2014] Knowledge-flows and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1: 2777–2785. Crossref, Google Scholar
• European Patent Office. [2016] European Patent Convention. Munich, Germany. Google Scholar
• Fabrizio, K. R. [2009] Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38, 2: 255–267. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farla, J., Alkemade, F. and Suurs, R. A. A. [2010] Analysis of barriers in the transition toward sustainable mobility in the Netherlands. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 8: 1260–1269. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fenton, P. and Kanda, W. [2016] Barriers to the diffusion of renewable energy: Studies of biogas for transport in two European cities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60, 4: 1–18. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1176557. Google Scholar
• Fontana, R., Geuna, A. and Matt, M. [2006] Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35, 2: 309–323. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R. and Hannan, M. T. [1983] The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48, 5: 692–710. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. and Kemp, R. [2007] Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29, 4: 441–455. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. and Verhees, B. [2011] Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945–1986). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 6: 910–930. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Giovannetti, G. T. and Morrison, S. W. (2000). Convergence: The Biotechnology Industry Report. Palo Alto, Ernst and Young, CA. Google Scholar
• Gosens, J., Lu, Y. and Coenen, L. [2015] The role of “Technological Innovation Systems” for cleantech in emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86: 378–388. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.029. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant, R. [1996] Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109–122. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gronum, S., Verreynne, M.-L. and Kastelle, T. [2012] The role of networks in small and medium-sized enterprise innovation and firm performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 2: 257–282. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00353.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. [1993] Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 5: 371–385. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. [2002] Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31, 4: 477–492. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall, J., Matos, S., Silvestre, B. and Martin, M. [2011] Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: The evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78, 7: 1147–1157. Available at: http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.02.005. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. and Carroll, G. R. [1992] Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition. Oxford University Press, New York. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hannan, M. T. and Freeman, J. [1977] The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 5: 929–964. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., Harmsen, R. and de Jong, A. [2007] Explaining the rapid diffusion of Dutch cogeneration by innovation system functioning. Energy Policy, 35, 9: 4677–4687. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hill, C. W. L. and Rothaermel, F. T. [2003] The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28, 2: 257–274. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Human, S. E. and Provan, K. G. [2000] Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 2: 327–365. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyra, C. D. (2010). How to stop your inventions from being stolen: The three-step invention protection plan. Retrieved from http://hyraip.com/2009/11/three-step-invention-protection-plan/. Report, Reston Virginia Attorneys. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A. C. and Tsang, E. W. K. [2005] Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30: 146–165. Available at: http://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281445. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, S. and Johnson, A. [2000] The diffusion of renewable energy technology: An analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy, 28, 9: 625–640. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaganer, E., Pawlowski, S. D. and Wiley-Patton, S. [2010] Building legitimacy for IT innovations: The case of computerized physician order entry systems. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 11, 1: 1–33. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kale, P., Singh, H. and Perlmutter, H. [2000] Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 1: 217–237. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S. and Martin, B. R. [1997] What is research collaboration. Research Policy, 26, 1: 1–18. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keupp, M. M. and Gassmann, O. [2009] Determinants and archetype users of open innovation. R&D Management, 39, 4: 331–341. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkels, Y. and Duysters, G. [2010] Brokerage in SME networks. Research Policy, 39, 3: 375–385. Available at: http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.005. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lasagni, A. [2012] How can external relationships enhance innovation in SMEs? New evidence for Europe. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 2: 310–339. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00355.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laursen, K. and Salter, A. [2004] Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33, 8: 1201–1215. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lavie, D. [2007] Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 1187–1212. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1002/smj. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Park, G., Yoon, B. and Park, J. [2010] Open innovation in SMEs — An intermediated network model. Research Policy, 39, 2: 290–300. Available at: http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner, J., Shane, H. and Tsai, A. [2003] Do equity financing cycles matter? Evidence from biotechnology alliances. Journal of Financial Economics, 67, 3: 411–446. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li, D., Eden, L., Hitt, M. A. and Ireland, R. D. [2008] Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 2: 315–334. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1002/smj. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Low, B. and Johnston, W. J. [2010] Organizational network legitimacy and its impact on knowledge networks: The case of China’s TD-SCDMA mobility technology. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 25, 6: 468–477. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maes, J. and Sels, L. [2014] SMEs’ radical product innovation: The role of internally and externally oriented knowledge capabilities. Journal of Small Business Management, 52, 1: 141–163. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12037. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malcomson, J. M. [1997] Contracts, hold-up, and labor markets. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 4: 1916–1957. Google Scholar
• Mangematin, V., Lemarié, S., Boissin, J.-P., Catherine, D., Corolleur, F., Coronini, R. and Trommetter, M. [2003] Development of SMEs and heterogeneity of trajectories: The case of biotechnology in France. Research Policy, 32, 4: 621–638. Available at: http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00045-8. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mauri, A. J. and Michaels, M. P. [1998] Firm and industry effects within strategic management: An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 211–219. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<211:AID-SMJ947>3.0.CO;2-T. Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P. [1980] Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 42, 2: 109–142. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer-Krahmer, F. and Schmoch, U. [1998] Science-based technologies: University–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, 8: 835–851. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. [1977] Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 2: 340–363. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moehrle, M. G. and Walter, L. [2008] Risk and uncertainty in R&D management. R&D Management, 38, 5: 449–451. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00536.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P. and Hoareau, C. [2003] What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and government labs? Evidence from CIS 2. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 2–3: 133–145. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Montalvo, C. [2008] General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: A survey 1990–2007. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1: 7–13. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.002. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moors, E., Smits, R., Enzing, C. and van der Giessen, A. [2003] User–producer interactions in functional genomics innovations. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 5, 2–3: 120–143. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, D., Gaur, A. S., Gaur, S. S. and Schmid, F. [2013] External and internal influences on R&D alliance formation: Evidence from German SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 66, 11: 2178–2185. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narula, R. [2004] R&D collaboration by SMEs: New opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation. Technovation, 24, 2: 153–161. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niedergassel, B. and Leker, J. [2011] Different dimensions of knowledge in cooperative R&D projects of university scientists. Technovation, 31, 4: 142–150. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niosi, J. [1993] Strategic partnerships in Canadian advanced materials. R&D Management, 23, 1: 17–28. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1993.tb01211.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niosi, J. and Bas, T. G. [2001] The competencies of regions — Canada’s clusters in biotechnology. Small Business Economics, 17, 1–2: 31–42. Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, A. R. [2009] The Emergence of Cleantech. Yale University, New Haven. Google Scholar
• Parad, M., Henningsson, S., Currás, T. and Youngman, R. [2014] The Global Cleantech Innovation Index 2014. Report, Cleantech Group and WWF. Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
• Parkhe, A. [1993] Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 4: 794–829. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M. and Walsh, K. [2007] University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 4: 259–280. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raspe, O., van den Berge M., Brandes, L., van der Esch S., Notenboom, J. and Reudink, M. [2014] Green Gains — In Search of Opportunities for the Dutch Economy. The Hague, Netherlands. Google Scholar
• Rennings, K. [2000] Redefining innovation — Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32, 2: 319–332. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rese, A. and Baier, D. [2011] Success factors for innovation management in networks of small and medium enterprises. R&D Management, 41, 2: 138–155. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson, W. P. [1992] Contractual solutions to the hold-up problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 59, 4: 777–793. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roper, S. and Hewitt-Dundas, N. [2013] Catalysing open innovation through publicly-funded R&D: A comparison of university and company-based research centres. International Small Business Journal, 31, 3: 275–295. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612454671. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T. and Deeds, D. L. [2004] Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 3: 201–221. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.376. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R. and Dodgson, M. [1992] European technology policy evolution: Convergence towards SMEs and regional technology transfer. Technovation, 12, 4: 223–238. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sawers, J. L., Pretorius, M. W. and Oerlemans, L. A. G. [2008] Safeguarding SMEs dynamic capabilities in technology innovative SME-large company partnerships in South Africa. Technovation, 28, 4: 171–182. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.09.002. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Raven, R. P. J. M. and Van Venrooij, A. [2010] From riches to rags: Biofuels, media discourses, and resistance to sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy, 38, 9: 5013–5027. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Silverman, A. B. [2001] Can publishing your U.S. patent application reveal confidential information? JOM, 53, 9: 64. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J. and House, R. J. [1986] Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 2: 171–193. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smink, M. M., Hekkert, M. P. and Negro, S. O. [2013] Keeping sustainable innovation on a leash? Exploring incumbents’ institutional strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24, 2: 86–101. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1808. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starr, J. and MacMillan, I. C. [1990] Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 79–92. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stinchcombe, A. L. [1965] Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations, Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 142–193. Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. [1995] Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 3: 571–610. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suurs, R. A. A. and Hekkert, M. P. [2009] Competition between first and second generation technologies: Lessons from the formation of a biofuels innovation system in the Netherlands. Energy, 34, 5: 669–679. Available at: http://doi.org/DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2008.09.002. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. [1986] Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 6: 285–305. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thompson, N. A., Herrmann, A. M. and Hekkert, M. P. [2015] How sustainable entrepreneurs engage in institutional change: Insights from biomass torrefaction in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106: 608–618. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.011. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorgren, S., Wincent, J. and Boter, H. [2012] Small firms in multipartner R&D alliances: Gaining benefits by acquiescing. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29, 4: 453–467. Crossref, Google Scholar
• van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J., Vanhaverbeke, W. and de Rochemont, M. [2009] Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29, 6–7: 423–437. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001. Crossref, Google Scholar
• van den Berg, W. and van der Slot, A. [2009] Clean Economy, Living Planet: Building the Dutch Clean Energy Technology Industry. Amsterdam. Google Scholar
• van der Slot, A., van den Berg, W. and Berkhout, G. [2011] Clean Economy, Living Planet. Roland Berger. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
• van Koophandel, K. [2005] BIK Boekje. Report, Chamber of Commerce. Amsterdam, NL. Google Scholar
• Vergne, J. P. [2010] Toward a new measure of organizational legitimacy: Method, validation, and illustration. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 3: 484–502. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109359811. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsh, V., Niosi, J. and Mustar, P. [1995] Small-firm formation in biotechnology: A comparison of France, Britain and Canada. Technovation, 15, 5: 303–327. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(95)96602-P. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winch, G. M. and Courtney, R. [2007] The organization of innovation brokers: An international review. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19, 6: 747–763. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701711223. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeng, S. X., Xie, X. M. and Tam, C. M. [2010] Relationship between cooperation networks and innovation performance of SMEs. Technovation, 30, 3: 181–194. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. A. and Zeitz, G. J. [2002] Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27, 3: 414–431. Available at: http://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.7389921. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. [1989] Combining institutional theory and population ecology: No legitimacy, no history. American Sociological Review, 54, 4: 542–545. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. and Armstrong, J. [1998] Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets? Economic Inquiry, 36, 1: 65–86. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R. and Armstrong, J. S. [2002] Commercializing knowledge: University science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science, 48, 1: 138–153. Crossref, Google Scholar