Analyzing Funding Patterns and Their Evolution in Two Medical Research Topics

References

• Andersen, J. P., Bøgsted, M., Dybkær, K., Mellqvist, U. H., Morgan, G. J., Goldschmidt, H., Dimopoulos, M. A., Einsele, H., San Miguel, J., Palumbo, A., Sonneveld, P. and Hans Erik Johnsen, H. E. [2015] Global myeloma research clusters, output, and citations: A bibliometric mapping and clustering analysis. PLoS ONE, 10, 1: 1–15. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barreto Lang, P., Castro Gouveia, F. and Leta, J. [2013] Cooperation in health: Mapping collaborative networks on the web. PLoS ONE, 8, 8: 1–7. Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S. and Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs and Social Media, North America, March 2009. Available at: $⟨$http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154/1009$⟩$ [accessed on 21 February 2015]. Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Johnson, J. C. [2013] Analyzing Social Networks. Sage Publications Ltd., London, UK. Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. [2000] Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research. Research Policy, 29, 4/5: 627–655. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brickman, R. and Rip, A. [1979] Science policy advisory councils in France, the Netherlands, and the United States, 1957–1977: A comparative analysis. Social Studies of Science, 9, 2: 167–198. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Catalá-López, F., Alonso-Arroyo, A., Hutton, B., Aleixandre-Benavent, R. and Moher, D. [2014] Global collaborative networks on meta-analyses of randomized trials published in high impact factor medical journals: A social network analysis. BMC Medicine, 12, 15: 1–17. Google Scholar
• Chakravarthy, R., Cotter, K., DiMasi, J., Milne, C. P. and Wendel, N. (2015). Public and private sector contributions to the research and development of the most transformational drugs of the last 25 years. A tufts center for the study of drig development white paper. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. Google Scholar
• Chalmers, I., Bracken, M. B., Djulbegovic, B., Garattini, S., Grant, J., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Howells, D. W., Ioannidis, J. P. A. and Oliver, S. [2014] How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet, 383, 9912: 156–165. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F. [2011] Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62, 7: 1382–1402. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. [1991] Tortoises and hares: Choice among technologies of unknown merit. The Economic Journal, 101, 407: 801–814. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S. W. [2009] A comparative political theory of national science provision. Atlanta Conf. Science and Technology Policy, Atlanta, GA. Google Scholar
• Cunningham, S. W. and Werker, C. [2012] Proximity and collaboration in European nanotechnology. Papers in Regional Science, 91, 4: 723–742. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. [1994] Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, 5: 487–521. Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A. and Batagelj, V. [2012] Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
• Doel, R. E. [2003] Constituting the post-war earth sciences: The military’s influence on the environmental sciences in the USA after 1945. Social Studies of Science, 33, 5: 635–666. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Esterle, L. and Picard, J. F. [2011] Between clinical medicine and the laboratory: Medical research funding in France from 1945 to the present. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 66, 4: 546–570. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feng, F., Zhang, L., Du, Y. and Wang, W. [2015] Visualization and quantitative study in bibliographic databases: A case in the field of university–industry cooperation. Journal of Informetrics, 9: 118–134. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A. and Riddle, M. [2011] Concepts and measures for basic network analysis. The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, Sage Publications Ltd., UK, pp. 340–369. Google Scholar
• Kim, H. D., Lee, D. H., Choe, H. and Seo, I. W. [2014] The evolution of cluster network structure and firm growth: A study of industrial software clusters. Scientometrics, 99: 77–95. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolaczyk, E. D. [2009] Statistical Analysis of Network Data. Springer, New York. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. and Jan, J. M. [2013] Mapping research collaborations in the business and management field in Malaysia, 1980–2010. Scientometrics, 97: 491–517. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lassman, T. C. [2005] Government science in post-war America: Henry A. Wallace, Edward U. Condon, and the transformation of the National Bureau of Standards, 1945–1951. ISIS, 96, 1: 25–51. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lewison, G. [1998] Gastroenterology research in the United Kingdom: Funding sources and impact. GUT, 43, 2: 288–293. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. and Zaal, R. [1988] Co-words and citations relations between document sets and environments. Informetrics, 87/88: 105–119. Google Scholar
• Light, R. P., Polley, D. E. and Börner, K. [2014] Open data and open code for big science of science studies. Scientometrics, 101: 1535–1551. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moses, H., Matheson, D. H. M., Cairns-Smith, S., George, B. P., Palisch, C. and Dorsey, E. R. [2015] The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons. JAMA, 313, 2: 174–189. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S. and Olivastro, D. [1997] The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26, 3: 317–330. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neff, M. W. and Corley, E. A. [2009] 35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics, 80, 3: 6579–6824. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Negro, S. O., Alkemade, F. and Hekkert, M. P. [2012] Why does renewable energy diffuse so slowly: A review of innovation system problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 6: 3836–3846. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. [2003] Mode 2’ revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41: 179–194. Crossref, Google Scholar
• OECD/European Union [2014] Screening, survival and mortality for breast cancer. In Health at a Glance: Europe 2014. OECD Publishing, Paris. Google Scholar
• Ozcan, S. and Islam, N. [2013] Collaborative networks and technology clusters — The case of nanowire. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82: 155–131. Google Scholar
• Porter, A. and Cunningham, S. W. [2005] Tech Mining. Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey. Google Scholar
• Qiu, J. P., Dong, K. and Yu, H. Q. [2014] Comparative study on structure and correlation among author co-occurrence networks in bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 101, 2: 1345–1360. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramlogan, R. and Consoli, D. [2014] Dynamics of collaborative research medicine: The case of glaucoma. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39: 544–566. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ravikumar, S., Agrahari, A. and Singh, S. N. [2015] Mapping the intellectual structure of scientometrics: A co-word analysis of the journal Scientometrics (2005–2010). Scientometrics, 102, 1: 929–955. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schneider, W. H. [2014] The origin of the medical research grant in the United States: The Rockefeller Foundation and the NIH extramural funding program. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 70, 2: 279–311. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siqueiros-García, J. M., Hernández-Lemus, E., García-Herrera, R. and Robina-Galatas, A. [2014] Mapping the structure and dynamics of genomics-related MESH terms complex networks. PLoS ONE, 9, 4: 1–15. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sogaard, M., Kjaer, S. K. and Gayther, S. [2006] Ovarian cancer and genetic susceptibility in relation to the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Occurrence, clinical importance and intervention. Acta Obstetricia and Gynecologica, 85: 93–105. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. [2007] A general framework for analysing diversity in science. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4, 15: 707–719. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suominen, A. [2014] Phases of growth in a green tech research network: A bibliometric evaluation of fuel cell technology from 1991 to 2010. Scientometrics, 100, 1: 51–72. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutherland, W. J., Bellingan, L., Bellingham, J. R., Blackstock, J. J., Bloomfield, R. M., Bravo, M., Cadman, V. M., Cleevely, D. D., Clements, A., Cohen, A. S., Cope, D. R., Daemmrich, A. A., Devecchi, C., Anadon, L. D., Denegri, S., Doubleday, R., Dusic, N. R., Evans, R. J., Feng, W. Y., Godfray, H. C. J., Harris, P., Hartley, S. E., Hester, A. J., Holmes, J., Hughes, A., Hulme, M., Irwin, C., Jennings, R. C., Kass, G. S., Littlejohns, P., Marteau, T. M., McKee, G., Millstone, E. P., Nuttall, W. J., Owens, S., Parker, M. M., Pearson, S., Petts, J., Ploszek, R., Pullin, A. S., Reid, G., Richards, K. S., Robinson, J. G., Shaxson, L., Sierra, L., Smith, B. G., Spiegelhalter, D. J., Stilgoe, J., Stirling, A., Tyler, C. P., Winickoff, D. E. and Zimmern, R. L. [2012] A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda. PLoS ONE, 7, 3: 1–5. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swar, B. and Khan, G. F. [2014] Mapping ICT knowledge infrastructure in South Asia. Scientometrics, 99: 117–137. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tahmooresnejad, L., Beaudry, C. and Schiffauerova, A. [2014] The role of public funding in nanotechnology scientific production: Where Canada stands in comparison to the United States. Scientometrics, 102, 1: 753–787. Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J. and Waltman, L. [2010] Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84: 523–538. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vanderelst, D. and Speybroeck, N. [2013] Scientometrics reveals funding priorities in medical research policy. Journal of Informetrics, 7: 240–247. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. [1962] Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva, 1, 2: 158–171. Google Scholar
• Yu, C., Davis, C. and Dijkema, G. P. J. [2013] Understanding the evolution of industrial symbiosis research a bibliometric and network analysis (1997–2012). Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18, 2: 280–293. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Yu, Q., Fan, Q. and Duan, Z. [2013] Research collaboration in health management research communities. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, 52: 1–13. Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Xie, J., Hou, W., Tu, X., Xu, J., Song, F., Wang, Z. and Lu, Z. [2012] Mapping the knowledge structure of research on patient adherence: Knowledge domain visualization-based co-word analysis and social network analysis. PLoS ONE, 7, 4: 1–7. Google Scholar
• Zhou, P. and Tian, H. [2014] Funded collaboration research in mathematics in China. Scientometrics, 99: 695–715. Crossref, Google Scholar