World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

THE ROLE OF SCENARIOS AND DEMONSTRATORS IN PROMOTING SHARED UNDERSTANDING IN INNOVATION PROJECTS

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987701440001XCited by:14 (Source: Crossref)

    It can be challenging for people in an innovation project to develop a shared understanding of the project's overall vision and of what they need to do practically—especially if the project is organized as networked innovation and follows a designerly approach. Yet shared understanding is critical for success. Based on an explorative study of one innovation project, in which ICT applications are developed, we discuss the ways in which the development and evaluation of scenarios and demonstrators can help the people involved to develop a shared understanding. Furthermore, we propose several recommendations for managers of innovation projects for effectively organizing the development and evaluation of scenarios and demonstrators.

    References

    • I.   Alexander and N.   Maiden , Scenarios, Stories, Use Cases ( John Wiley and Sons , Hoboken, NJ , 2004 ) . Google Scholar
    • T.   Brown , Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation ( Harper Business , New York, NY , 2009 ) . Google Scholar
    • L.   Bucciarelli , Designing Engineers ( MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 1994 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. Buchanan, Design Issues 8(2), 5 (1992), DOI: 10.2307/1511637. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. A. Buijs, Bringing the World into Culture: Comparative Methodologies in Architecture, Art, Design and Science, ed. P. Lombarde (Academic and Scientific Publishers, Brussels, Belgium, 2009) pp. 209–225. Google Scholar
    • P. R. Carlile, Organization Science 13(4), 442 (2002), DOI: 10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. M.   Carroll , Scenario-Based Design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development ( John Wiley and Sons , New York, NY , 1995 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. Carroll, Interacting with Computers 13, 43 (2000), DOI: 10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00023-0. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • H. W.   Chesbrough , Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from New Technology ( Harvard Business School Press , Boston, MA , 2003 ) . Google Scholar
    • A.   Cooper , The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity ( SAMS Publishing , Indianapolis, IN , 1999 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A.   Cooper and R. M.   Reimann , About Face 2.0: The Essentials of Interaction Design ( John Wiley and Sons , Indianapolis, IN , 2003 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. Coyne, Design Studies 26(1), 5 (2004), DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • N.   Cross , Designerly Ways of Knowing ( Springer-Verlag , London, UK , 2006 ) . Google Scholar
    • N.   Cross , Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work ( Berg Publishers , Oxford, UK , 2011 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M.   Easterby-Smith , R.   Thorpe and A.   Lowe , Management Research: An Introduction ( Sage , London, UK , 2002 ) . Google Scholar
    • I. R. Floyd, M. C. Jones and M. B. Twidale, Artifact 2(1), 12 (2008), DOI: 10.1080/17493460802276836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J.   Greenbaum and M.   Kyng (eds.) , Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems ( Lawrence Erlbaum , Hillsdale, NJ , 1991 ) . Google Scholar
    • Gupta, M., Stollenmayer, P. and Williams, D. (2010). TA2 project: D1.3 management of complex collaborative R&D projects. http://www.ta2-project.eu . Google Scholar
    • ISO 13407 (1999). Human-centered design processes for interactive systems. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland . Google Scholar
    • P. Jarzabkowski, A. S. Mohrman and A. G. Scherer, Organization Studies 31(10), 1189 (2010), DOI: 10.1177/0170840610374394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kleinsmann, M. (2006). Understanding collaborative design. Ph.D. dissertation. Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands . Google Scholar
    • M. Kleinsmann, R. Valkenburg and J. Buijs, CoDesign 3(1), 59 (2007), DOI: 10.1080/15710880601170875. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M. Kleinsmann and R. Valkenburg, Design Studies 29(4), 369 (2008), DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.003. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kort, J., Steen, M., Schultz, S., Huveneers, S., Ljungstrand, P., Bergström, K., Eriksson, M., Gower, A. and Williams, D. (2010). TA2 Project: D8.4 evaluations of TA2 concepts. http://www.ta2-project.eu . Google Scholar
    • M.   Kyng and L.   Mathiassen (eds.) , Computers and Design in Context ( MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 1997 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • B. Lawson, How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified, 4th edn. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S.   Parker and J.   Heapy , The Journey to the Interface: How Public Service Design can Connect Users to Reform ( DEMOS , London, UK , 2006 ) . Google Scholar
    • J.   Pruitt and T.   Adlin , The Persona Life Cycle: Keeping People in Mind throughout Product Design ( Morgan Kaufmann , San Francisco, CA , 2006 ) . Google Scholar
    • E. B. N. Sanders and P. J. Stappers, CoDesign 4(1), 5 (2008), DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • D. A.   Schön , The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action ( Basic Books , New York, NY , 1983 ) . Google Scholar
    • D.   Schuler and A.   Namioka (eds.) , Participatory Design: Principles and Practices ( Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , Hillsdale, NJ , 1993 ) . Google Scholar
    • M. Steen, CoDesign 7(1), 45 (2011), DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2011.563314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M. Steen, Design Issues 28(1), 72 (2012), DOI: 10.1162/DESI_a_00125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Steen, M. (2013). Co-design as a process of joint inquiry and imagination. Design Issues, 29, 2: 16–28. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/DESI_a_00207 . Google Scholar
    • M. Steen, M. Manschot and N. De Koning, International Journal of Design 5(2), 53 (2011). Google Scholar
    • TA2 (2008). TA2 Project Brochure. http://www.ta2-project.eu . Google Scholar
    • Van der Lugt, R. (2001). Sketching in design idea generation meetings. PhD dissertation, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands . Google Scholar
    • R.   Yin , Case Study Research , 2nd edn. ( Sage , Thousand Oaks, CA , 1994 ) . Google Scholar