World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Special Issue on Technology Management in Healthcare Service OrganizationsNo Access

SUPPORTING ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY FOR KNOWLEDGE BROKERS: EVIDENCE OF CANADIAN HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877013400142Cited by:8 (Source: Crossref)

    The importance of using healthcare evidence by policy-makers is widely recognized [Lavis (2006), Ward et al. (2009)]. For over a decade, several strategies to improve the use of knowledge by policy-makers have been promoted [Landry et al. (2006); Amara et al. (2004)]. Among them, the use of individuals called "intermediaries" or "knowledge brokers" is presented as a potential strategy [Hargadon (2002); Lomas (2007)]. Situated at the organizational interface, these actors benefit from a strategic position allowing easier access to external knowledge [Cohen and Levinthal (1990)]. Therefore, they must develop good skills to be able to properly enjoy all opportunities to create value for their organization. In fact, many authors consider brokers as true knowledge integrators that assess, interpret, synthesize, exploit and transfer pertinent knowledge. Despite the presence of several studies that stress the importance of the multifaceted role of brokers, few have explored how these actors concretely integrate or absorb knowledge and especially, what skills are necessary for the success of their activities. The aims of this paper are: to propose a new conceptual model on research integration by knowledge brokers and to provide an empirical testing of this proposed model. The conceptual framework to be presented in this study builds on recent theoretical developments on the concept of knowledge absorptive capacity [Todorova and Durisin (2007)]. To test the conceptual framework, we collected survey data. The sample of 297 respondents was composed of professionals and managers involved at different levels of health services in Canada. To be eligible, respondents had to be engaged in knowledge brokering activities. Data analysis allowed presenting a first portrait of the profile of knowledge brokers working in health organizations in Canada. In this perspective, several descriptive analyses, such as the distribution of knowledge brokers according to their membership organizations, their status, education, experience, etc., were completed. Other confirmatory analyses with EQS were completed to confirm the theoretical validity of the dimensions of the broker's absorptive capacity. Finally, bivariate analyses were used with these dimensions to compare knowledge brokers regarding their absorptive capacity and the explanatory variables documented in the literature. In the last part of this paper, we discuss the implications of the results on the role of knowledge brokers regarding the use of evidence in health organizations and public policy.

    References

    • S. L. Ahire and S. Devaray, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48(3), 319 (2001). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • N. Amara, M. Ouimet and R. Landry, Science Communication 26(1), 75 (2004). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • O. Belkhodjaet al., Science Communication 28(3), 377 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • B.   Byrne (ed.) , Structural Equation Modeling with EQS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 2nd edn. ( Psychology Press , USA , 2008 ) . Google Scholar
    • CHSRF (2004). The third community: Knowledge brokers, research, and policy: Report on the Third Annual National Knowledge Brokering Workshop and Professional Development Day of the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Vancouver, Canada, October 25–26. Available at www.chsrf.ca/brokering/pdf/National_Workshop_Report_2004_f.pdf [accessed on 26 March 2008] . Google Scholar
    • P. Cillo, European Management Journal 23(4), 404 (2005). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1), 128 (1990). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M. Dobbinset al., Implementation Science 4(23), (2009). Google Scholar
    • A. Fosfuri and J. A. Tribo, Omega 36(2), 173 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. N. Garmanet al., Journal of Healthcare Management 51(2), 81 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • I. D. Grahamet al., Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9(2), 195 (2003). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. B.   Hargadon , Research in Organizational Behaviour   24 , 41 ( 2002 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. B.   Hargadon (ed.) , How Breakthroughs Happen, The Surprising Truth about How Companies Innovate ( Harvard Business School Press , Boston, Massachusetts , 2003 ) . Google Scholar
    • A. B. Hargadon and R. Sutton, Building an innovation factory, Harvard Business Review 78 (2000) pp. 157–166. Google Scholar
    • L. A.   Hayduk (ed.) , Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances ( Johns Hopkins University Press , Baltimore , 1987 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. Howells, Research Policy 35(5), 715 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • O. Jones, Management Learning 37(3), 355 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • K. G.   Jöreskog and D.   Sörbom (eds.) , Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Xtensions ( Thousand Oaks. CA , 2004 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. Landry, M. Lamari and N. Amara, Public Administration Review 63(2), 192 (2003). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. Landry, N. Amara and M. Ouimet, Journal of Technological Transfer 32(6), 561 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. Landryet al., Bulletin of the World Health Organization 84(8), 597 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Landry, R., Amara, N. and Jbilou, J. (2007). Knowledge Management in Health Service Organizations: The Role of Knowledge Brokers, Paper presented at presented at the 4th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning — University of Stellenbosch Business School, Cape Town, South Africa hold on the 15–16 October, 2007 . Google Scholar
    • P. J. Laneet al., The Academy of Management Review 31(4), 833 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Laroche, E. and Amara, N. (2008). How to create an economy supported by research knowledge? Evidence from Canadian Researchers in Occupational Safety and Health. Paper presented at the International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT), Dubaï: 6-10 avril 2008 . Google Scholar
    • J. N. Lavis, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions 26(1), 37 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Lomas, British Medical Journal 334(7585), 129 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M. Ouimetet al., Evidence and Policy, A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 5(4), 331 (2009). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J.-H. Parket al., Information and Management 44(3), 300 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. D. Pawlowski and D. Robey, MIS Quarterly 28(4), 645 (2004). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • D. Pratim, Journal of the Association for Information, Systems 8(5), 287 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • K. Rollset al., Australian Critical Care 21(1), 29 (2008). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • G. Szulanski, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82(1), 9 (2000). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • G. Todorova and B. Durisin, The Academy of Management Review 32(3), 774 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Van Kammen et al. , Bull World Health Organization   84 , 608 ( 2006 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Van Kammen et al. , International Journal Technology Assessment Health Care   22 , 302 ( 2006 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. L. Vinding, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15(5), 507 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • V. Ward et al. , Journal Heath Services Research and Policy   14 , 156 ( 2009 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. A. Zahra and G. George, The Academy of Management Review 27(2), 185 (2002). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Ziam, S., Landry, R. and Amara, N. (2009). Knowledge brokers: A winning strategy for improving transfer and use of knowledge in the health field. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5, 4: 491–505 . Google Scholar