World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Decision-Making in a Real-Time Business Simulation Game: Cultural and Demographic Aspects in Small Group Dynamics

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622017500171Cited by:5 (Source: Crossref)

    Simulated virtual realities offer a promising but currently underutilized source of data in studying cultural and demographic aspects of dynamic decision-making (DDM) in small groups. This study focuses on one simulated reality, a clock-driven business simulation game, which is used to teach operations management. The purpose of our study is to analyze the characteristics of the decision-making groups, such as cultural orientation, education, gender and group size, and their relationship to group performance in a real-time processed simulation game. Our study examines decision-making in small groups of two or three employees from a global manufacturing and service operations company. We aim at shedding new light on how such groups with diverse background profiles perform as decision-making units. Our results reveal that the profile of the decision-making group influences the outcome of decision-making, the final business result of the simulation game. In particular, the cultural and gender diversity, as well as group size seem to have intertwined effects on team performance.

    References

    • 1. R. Fortmüller, Learning through business games: Acquiring competences within virtual realities, Simulation & Gaming 40 (1) (2009) 68–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 2. A. Faria, D. Hutchinson, J. Wellington and S. Gold, Developments in business gaming: A review of the past 40 years, Simulation & Gaming 40 (4) (2009) 464–487. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 3. D. Good and B. Yeganeh, Cognitive agility. Adapting to real-time decision making at work, OD Practitioner 44 (2) (2012) 13–17. Google Scholar
    • 4. K. Katsaliaki, N. Mustafee and S. Kumar, A game-based approach towards facilitating decision making for perishable products: An example of blood supply chain, Expert Systems with Applications 41 (9) (2014) 4043–4059. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 5. J. Bragge, P. Thavikulwat and J. Töyli, Profiling 40 years of research in simulation & gaming, Simulation & Gaming 41 (6) (2010) 869–897. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 6. E. A. J. A. Rouwette, A. Größler and J. Vennix, Exploring influencing factors on rationality: A literature review of dynamic decision-making studies in system dynamics, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 21 (4) (2004) 351–370. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 7. C. Gonzalez, P. Vanyukov and M. K. Martin, The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making, Computers in Human Behavior 21 (2005) 273–286. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 8. M. Ghobakhloo, S. H. Tang, M. Sadegh Sabouri and N. Zulkifli, Impact of information system-enabled supply chain process integration on business performance: A resource-based analysis, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 13 (5) (2014) 1075–1113. Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 9. B. Chae and D. L. Olson, Business analytics for supply chain: A dynamic-capabilities framework, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 12 (1) (2013) 9–26. Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 10. B. Keys and J. Wolfe, The role of management games and simulations is education and research, Journal of Management 16 (2) (1990) 307–336. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 11. H. Simon, Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science, The American Economic Review 49 (3) (1959) 253–283. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 12. J. Wolfe and G. Guth, The case approach versus gaming in the teaching of business policy: An experimental evaluation, Journal of Business 48 (3) (1975) 349–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Y. Waern and J. Canas, Microworld task environments for conducting research on command and control, Cognition, Technology & Work 5 (3) (2003) 181–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 14. B. Kylesten and S. Nählinger, The effect of decision-making training: Results from a command-and-control training facility, Cognition, Technology & Work 13 (2) (2011) 93–101. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 15. J. Garcia, F. Borrajo and F. Fernandez, Reinforcement learning for decision-making in a business simulator, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 11 (5) (2012) 935–960. Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 16. G. H. Tompson and P. Dass, Improving students’ self-efficacy in strategic management: The relative impact of cases and simulations, Simulation & Gaming 31 (1) (2000) 22–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 17. F. J. Lerch and D. E. Harter, Cognitive support for real-time dynamic decision making, Information Systems Research 12 (1) (2001) 63–82. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 18. B. Brehmer, Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems, Acta Psychologica 81 (3) (1992) 211–241. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 19. B. Brehmer, Man as a stabiliser of systems: From static snapshots of judgement processes to dynamic decision making, Thinking & Reasoning 2 (2/3) (1996) 225–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 20. W. Edwards, Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing, Human Factors 4 (1962) 59–73. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 21. B. Brehmer and D. Dörner, Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study, Computers in Human Behavior 9 (2/3) (1993) 171–184. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 22. P. Thavikulwat, Activity driven time in computerized gaming simulations, Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning 21 (1994) 13–15. Google Scholar
    • 23. P. Thavikulwat, Activity-driven time in computerized gaming simulations, Simulation & Gaming 27 (1) (1996) 110–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 24. A. H. Feinstein, S. Mann and D. L. Corsun, Charting the experiential territory: Clarifying definitions and uses of computer simulation, games, and role play, Journal of Management Development 21 (10) (2002) 732–744. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 25. A. L. Patz, Open system simulation, in Guide to Business Gaming and Experiential Learning, ed. J. W. Gentry (Nichols/GP, London, 1990), pp. 159–176. Google Scholar
    • 26. N. E. Chiesl, Interactive real time simulation, in Guide to Business Gaming and Experiential Learning, ed. J. W. Gentry (Nichols/GP, London, 1990), pp. 141–158. Google Scholar
    • 27. C. Gray, The analysis and design of a synchronous groupware simulation for the teaching of cost accounting, in The Simulation & Gaming Workbook, Vol. 3, Games and Simulations for Business, ed. D. Saunders (Kogan Page, London, 1995), pp. 126–142. Google Scholar
    • 28. S. Pillutla, Issues in porting a LAN-based total enterprise simulation game to a web-based environment, Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning 35 (2008) 238–245. Google Scholar
    • 29. M. E. Porter, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (The Free Press, New York, 2008). Google Scholar
    • 30. M. Pidd, Computer Simulation in Management Science, 4th edn. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998). Google Scholar
    • 31. L. L. Greer, Group cohesion: Then and now, Small Group Research 43 (6) (2012) 655–661. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 32. S. K. Horwitz and I. B. Horwitz, The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography, Journal of Management 33 (6) (2007) 987–1015. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 33. D. Byrne, The Attraction Paradigm (Academic Press, New York, 1971). Google Scholar
    • 34. C. C. Miller, L. M. Burke and W. H. Glick, Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes, Strategic Management Journal 19 (1998) 39–58. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 35. F. J. Milliken and L. L. Martins, Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups, Academy of Management Review 21 (1996) 402–433. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 36. K. Y. Williams and C. A. O’Reilly, Demography and diversity in organizations, Research in Organizational Behavior. A Review of 40 Years of Research, Vol. 20, eds. B. M. Staw and R. M. Cummings (Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, 1998), pp. 77–140. Google Scholar
    • 37. G. Hofstede and P. Pedersen, Synthetic cultures: Intercultural learning through simulation games, Simulation & Gaming 30 (4) (1999) 415–440. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 38. S. M. Fowler and M. D. Pusch, Intercultural simulation games: A review (of the United States and Beyond), Simulation & Gaming 41 (1) (2010) 94–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 39. I. D. Steiner, Group Process and Productivity (Academic Press, San Diego, 1972). Google Scholar
    • 40. P. Thavikulwat and J. Chang, Hybrid methods of organizing groups for a business game, Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning 42 (2015) 91–101. Google Scholar
    • 41. H. C. Triandis and E. M. Suh, Cultural influences on personality, Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1) (2002) 133–160. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 42. G. Hofstede and R. R. McCrae, Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture, Cross-Cultural Research 38 (1) (2004) 52–88. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 43. R. R. McCrae, Personality profiles of cultures: Patterns of ethos, European Journal of Personality 23 (3) (2009) 205–227. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 44. E. Hudlicka, Modeling cultural and personality biases in decision-making, in Advances in Cross-Cultural Decision-making, eds. D. Schmorrow and D. Nicholson (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 45. D. Strutton and W. Carter, Reducing biases in cross-cultural top management team decision-making processes, International Journal of Business Administration 4 (3) (2013) 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 46. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic and A. Tversky, Judgment Under Uncertainty (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 47. C. D. Güss, Planning in Brazil, India, and Germany: A cross-cultural study, a cultural study, and a model, in Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, Unit 4, Chap. 2, eds. W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes and D. N. Sattler (Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington USA, 2002). Google Scholar
    • 48. J. S. Yi and S. Park, Cross-cultural differences in decision-making styles: A study of college students in five countries, Social Behavior and Personality 31 (1) (2003) 35–48. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 49. D. W. Sue, Multicultural organizational consultation: A social justice perspective, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 60 (2) (2008) 157–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 50. L. Mann, P. Burnett, M. Radford and S. Ford, The melbourne decision-making questionnaire: An instrument for measuring pattern for coping with decisional conflict, Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making 10 (1) (1997) 1–19. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 51. T. M. Singelis, H. C. Triandis, D.-P. S. Bhawuk and M. J. Gelfand, Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement, Cross-Cultural Research 29 (3) (1995) 240–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 52. H. C. Triandis, Individualism and Collectivism (Westview, Boulder, CO, 1995). Google Scholar
    • 53. H. C. Triandis, C. McCusker and C. H. Hui, Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (1990) 1006–1020. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 54. H. Helfrich, I. W. Arzhenowskij and N. T. Romanova, Soziale Handlungsmuster in Russland im Vergleich zu Deutschland, Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 33 (2002) 261–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 55. C. D. Güss, Decision-making in individualistic and collectivistic cultures, in Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, Unit 4, Chap. 3, eds. W. J. Lonner, D. L. Dinnel, S. A. Hayes and D. N. Sattler (Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington, USA, 2002). Google Scholar
    • 56. W. E. Watson, K. Kumar and L. K. Michaelsen, Cultural diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups, The Academy of Management Journal 36 (3) (1993) 590–602. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 57. W. Watson, L. Johnson, K. Kumar and J. Critelli, Process gain and process loss: Comparing interpersonal processes and performance of culturally diverse and non-diverse teams across time, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 2 (4) (1998) 409–430. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 58. M. L. Sanz de Acedo Lizarraga, M. T. Sanz de Acedo Baquedano and M. Cardelle-Elewar, Factors that affect decision-making: Gender and age differences, International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 7 (3) (2007) 381–391. Google Scholar
    • 59. S. Gill, J. Stockard, M. Johnson and S. Williams, Measuring gender differences: The expressive dimension and critique of androgyny scales, Sex Roles 17 (1987) 375–400. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 60. K. K. Reiter, Gender differences in decision making when faced with multiple options, Poster presented at Scholarship & Creativity Day (Saint John’s University, Collegeville, 2013). Google Scholar
    • 61. K. A. Byrne and D. A. Worthy, Gender differences in reward sensitivity and information processing during decision-making, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 50 (1) (2015) 55–71. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 62. J. T. Wood, Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1990). Google Scholar
    • 63. J. Apesteguia, G. Azmat and N. Iriberri, The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field, Management Science 58 (1) (2012) 78–93. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 64. S. Hoogendoorn, H. Oosterbeek and M. van Praag, The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment, Management Science 59 (7) (2013) 1514–1528. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 65. G. Azmat and P. Petrongolo, Gender and the labor market: What have we learned from field and lab experiments?, Labour Economics 30 (2014) 32–40. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 66. B. Frick, A. Kolle and A. Rose, Gender diversity is detrimental to team performance: Evidence from five consecutive years of an undergraduate business strategy game, German Economic Association of Business Administration, Discussion paper DP 14-08 (2014), pp. 1–46. Google Scholar
    • 67. G. Stasser and W. Titus, Pooling of unshared information in group decision-making: Biased information sampling during discussion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (6) (1985) 1467–1478. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 68. G. M. Wittenbaum, A. B. Hollingshead and I. C. Botero, From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm, Communication Monographs 71 (3) (2004) 286–310. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 69. L. Lu, Y. Yuan and P. L. McLeod, Twenty-five years of hidden profile studies: A meta-analysis, Personality and Social Psychology Review 16 (2004) 54–75. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 70. M. G. Cruz, F. J. Boster and J. I. Rodrígues, The impact of group size and proportion of shared information on the exchange and integration of information in groups, Communication Research 24 (3) (1997) 291–313. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 71. G. Stasser, L. A. Taylor and C. Hanna, Information sampling in structured discussions of three- and six-person groups, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 (1) (1989) 57–67. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 72. B. E. Mennecke, Using group support systems to discover hidden profiles: An examination of the influence of group size and meeting structures on information sharing and decision quality, International Journal of Human Computer Studies 47 (3) (1997) 387–405. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 73. J. Wolfe and T. I. Chacko, Team size effects on business game performance and decision-making behaviors, Decision Sciences 14 (1) (1983) 121–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 74. D. Stieger, K. Matzler, S. Chatterje and F. Ladstaetter-Fussenegger, Democratizing strategy: How crowdsourcing can be used for strategy dialogues, California Management Review 54 (4) (2012) 44–68. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 75. J. W. Gentry, Group size and attitudes toward the simulation experience, Simulation & Games 11 (4) (1980) 451–460. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 76. T. Hsu, Leadership as a medium: Its emergence and effect on performance in small leaderless groups, Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning 21 (1994) 137–142. Google Scholar
    • 77. P. Thavikulwat and J. Chang, Pick your group size: A better procedure to resolve the free-rider problem in a business simulation, Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning 37 (2010) 14–22. Google Scholar
    • 78. A. B. Hollingshead, Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making, Human Communication Research 23 (2) (1996) 193–219. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 79. J. R. Larson Jr., C. Christensen, T. M. Franz and A. S. Abbott, Diagnosing groups: The pooling, management, and impact of shared and unshared case information in team-based medical decision making, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (1) (1998) 93–108. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 80. G. M. Wittenbaum, The bias toward discussing shared information: Why are high status members immune?, Communication Research 27 (3) (2000) 379–401. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 81. T. Cox and S. Blake, Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness, Academy of Management Executive 5 (3) (1991) 45–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 82. W. M. Cohen and D. A. Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1990) 128–152. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 83. G. Box and D. Cox, An analysis of transformations, Journal of the Royal Statistics Society, Series B 26 (2) (1964) 211–234. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 84. A. Hussein, The use of triangulation in social science research: Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined?, Journal of Comparative Social Work 1 (1) (2009) 1–12. Google Scholar
    • 85. G. Kass, An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data, Applied Statistics 29 (2) (1980) 119–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 86. J. R. Quinlan, Probabilistic decision trees, in Machine Learning: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, Vol. III, eds. Y. Kodratoff and R. Michalski (Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, 1990), pp. 140–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 87. L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen and C. J. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees (Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Monterey, CA, 1984). Google Scholar
    • 88. L. Rokach and O. Maimon, Data Mining with Decision Trees: Theory and Applications (World Scientific Publishing Company 2008). Google Scholar
    • 89. J. R. Quinlan, Learning with continuous classes, Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992), pp. 343–348. Google Scholar
    • 90. S. Murthy, Automatic construction of decision trees from data: A multi-disciplinary survey, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2 (4) (1998) 345–389. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 91. P. G. Neville, Decision Trees for Predictive Modeling (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1999). Google Scholar
    • 92. G. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (Sage, London, 2001). Google Scholar
    • 93. R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman and V. Gupta, Culture, Leadership, and Organizations, The Globe Study of 62 Societies (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2004). Google Scholar
    • 94. L. Mann, M. Radford, P. Burnett, S. Ford, M. Bond, K. Leon, H. Nakamura, G. Vaughan and K.-S. Yang, Cross-cultural differences in self-reported decision-making style and confidence, International Journal of Psychology 33 (5) (1998) 325–335. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 95. K.-I. Ohbuchi, O. Fukushima and J. T. Tedeschi, Cultural values in conflict management: Goal orientation, goal attainment, and tactical decision, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 30 (1999) 51–71. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 96. H. C. Triandis, Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of collectivism and individualism, in Individualism and Collectivism. Theory, Method and Applications, eds. U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S-C. Choi and G. Yoon (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994), pp. 41–51. Google Scholar
    • 97. J. Wielki, Implementation of the big data concept in organizations — possibilities, impediments and challenges, in Proc. Federated Conf. Computer Science and Information Systems, IEEE (Krakow, Poland, 2013), pp. 985–989. Google Scholar
    • 98. G. Kou, D. Ergu, C. Lin and Y. Chen, Pairwise comparison matrix in multiple criteria decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 22 (5) (2016) 738–765. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 99. G. Kou, D. Ergu and J. Shang, Enhancing data consistency in decision matrix: Adapting hadamard model to mitigate judgment contradiction, European Journal of Operational Research 236 (1) (2016) 261–271. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar