World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Key indicators for assessing the design of geocollaborative applications

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622014500461Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

    A geocollaborative application integrates geographical information with collaboration support. Its implementation involves reasoning about the most adequate mix of technical features, human requirements and collaboration models. This paper proposes a framework for guiding and assessing the design of geocollaborative systems using a set of measurable indicators. We define five key indicators (KI): awareness, mobility, proximity, collaborative visualization and geographic relationships. These KI were derived from an extensive review of the state-of-the-art. The framework was validated in two case studies involving support to geologists working in the field and police agents evacuating crowded places. The case studies elucidate how the framework helps analyzing as-is and to-be collaborative scenarios, which constitute the design cycle posited by the design-science paradigm. This research is relevant to implementers in two ways: highlighting important qualities of geocollaboration systems and offering a structured mechanism to assess the design process.

    References

    • T. Ilda, B. Nuri and D. Tugrul, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 9(2), 195 (2010). Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • N. Yee, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, 309 (2006). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • P. Antuneset al., Analyzing the support for large group collaborations using google maps, Proceedings of 15th Int. Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) (IEEE, 2011) pp. 748–755. Google Scholar
    • A. MacEachrenet al., Cartographic Perspectives 54, 4 (2006). Google Scholar
    • G. Cai, Geographic Information Science 11(1), 4 (2005). Google Scholar
    • C. Rinner, Collaborative Geographic Information Systems (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2006) pp. 85–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • P. Antunes and P. André, Group Decision and Negotiation 15, 273 (2006). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • A. MacEachrenet al., Visually enabled geocollaboration to support data exploration and decision making, Proc. 21st Int. Cartographic Conf. (2003) pp. 10–16. Google Scholar
    • A. Capata, A. Marella and R. Russo, A geo-based application for the management of mobile actors during crisis situations, Proc. 5th Int. ISCRAM Conf. (2008) pp. 219–229. Google Scholar
    • W. Schafer, C. Ganoe and C. Caroll, Computer Supported Cooperative Work 16(5), 501 (2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • F.   Bergstrand and J.   Landgren , Information sharing using live video in emergency response work , Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management — ISCRAM '09 ( 2009 ) ,   http://www.iscramlive.org/ISCRAM2009/papers/ . Google Scholar
    • S. Ashgar and D. Alahakoon, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 7(1), 115 (2008). Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • G. Convertinoet al., A multiple view approach to support common ground in distributed and synchronous geo-collaboration, Proc. Third Int. Conf. Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (2005) pp. 121–132. Google Scholar
    • G. Convertinoet al., A role-based multiple view approach to distributed geo-collaboration, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007, LNCS (Springer, 2007) pp. 561–570. Google Scholar
    • A. MacEachrenet al., International Journal of Geographical Information Science 19, 293 (2005). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • X. Zhanget al., International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 8(2), 335 (2009). Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • A. Hevneret al., Management Information Systems Quarterly 28(1), 75 (2004). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • P. Vitruvius, The Ten Books on Architecture (circa 25 BC) . Google Scholar
    • Architecture, Encyclopaedia Britannica Online . Google Scholar
    • R. Monroeet al., IEEE Software 114(1), 43 (1997). Google Scholar
    • S. Harrison and P. Dourish, Re-space-ing place: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems, Proc. 1996 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2006) pp. 67–76. Google Scholar
    • R.   Johansen et al. , Leading Business Teams ( Addison-Wesley , 1991 ) . Google Scholar
    • A. MacEachren and I. Brewer, International Journal of Geographical Information Science 18(1), 1 (2004). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • S. Harrison and P. Dourish, The roles of place and space in collaborative systems, Proc. 1996 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (1996) pp. 67–76. Google Scholar
    • P. Dourish, Re-space-ing place: "Place" And "Space" Ten Years On, Proc. 2006 20th Anniversary Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2006) pp. 299–308. Google Scholar
    • S. Sharifi and K. Pawar, International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22(6), 656 (2002). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • T. Rodden and G. Blair, Cscw and distributed systems: The problem of control, Proc. Second Conf. European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (1991) pp. 49–64. Google Scholar
    • T. Kimet al., Meeting mediator: Enhancing group collaboration using sociometric feedback, Proc. ACM 2008 Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2008) pp. 457–466. Google Scholar
    • L. Takayama and C. Nass, Throwing voices: The psychological impact of the spatial height of projected voices, Proc. 2010 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2010) pp. 91–94. Google Scholar
    • A. Tanget al., Three's company: Understanding communication channels in three-way distributed collaboration, Proc. 2010 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2010) pp. 271–280. Google Scholar
    • R. Daft and R. Lengel, Management Science 32(5), 554 (1986). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • N. Kock, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications 48(2), 117 (2005). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • A. Dixet al., ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction TOCHI 7(3), 285 (2000). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • P.   Dourish , Where the Action Is ( The MIT Press , Cambridge, MS , 2001 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. Kristoffersen and F. Ljungberg, Your mobile computer is a stationary computer, Proceedings of CSCW'98 Workshop on Handheld CSCW, Institute for Telematics, University of Karlsruhe (University of Karlsruhe, Seattle, 1998) pp. 51–57. Google Scholar
    • G. Davis, Communications of ACM 45(12), 67 (2002). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M. Hazas, J. Scott and J. Krumm, Computer 37(2), 95 (2004). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • T. Rodden, Populating the application: A model of awareness for cooperative applications, Proc. 1996 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (1996) pp. 87–96. Google Scholar
    • D.   Snowdon and A.   Munro , Collaborative Virtual Environments: Digital Places and Spaces for Interaction ( Springer , New York , 2000 ) . Google Scholar
    • K. Grønbæk, P. Vestergaard and P. Ørbæk, Towards geo-spatial hypermedia: Concepts and prototype implementation, Proc. Thirteenth ACM Conf. Hypertext and hypermedia (2002) pp. 117–126. Google Scholar
    • I. Breweret al., Collaborative geographic visualization: Enabling shared understanding of environmental processes, Proc. IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (2000) p. 137. Google Scholar
    • S. Greenberg, M. Boyle and J. Laberge, Personal Technologies 3(2), 54 (1999). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • J. Brewer and P. Dourish, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66(12), 963 (2008). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • M. Koch and J. Koch, ACM Computing Surveys 32(1), (2000), http://dl.acm.org/citation.ctm?doid=351936.351964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • T. Nyergeset al., Transportation Research C 5(6), 349 (1997). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • M. Armstrong, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45(9), 669 (1994). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • O.   Liechti , Supporting Social Awareness on the World Wide Web with the Handheld CyberWindow , Proceedings of CSCW 2000 ( ACM Press , Philadelphia, USA , 2000 ) ,   http://www.teco.edu/hcscw/sub/106.liechti/106.liechti.pdf . Google Scholar
    • C. Gutwin and S. Greenberg, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 6(3), 243 (1999). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • M. Endsley, Human Factors 31(7), 32 (1995). Google Scholar
    • M.   Endsley , B.   Bolté and D.   Jones , Designing for Situation Awareness ( Taylor & Francis , London , 2003 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • G.   Cernosek and E.   Naiburg , The Value of Modeling ( IBM Software Group , 2004 ) . Google Scholar
    • M. Sandberg, P. Boart and T. Larsson, Concurrent Engineering 13, 331 (2005). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • A.   Sharp and P.   McDermott , Workflow Modeling: Tools for Process Improvement and Application Development ( Artech House , Norwood, MA , 2009 ) . Google Scholar
    • S. Gayialis and I. Tatsiopoulos, European Journal of Operational Research 152, 382 (2004). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • H.   Simon , The Sciences of the Artificial ( The MIT Press , Cambridge, USA , 1996 ) . Google Scholar
    • D. Gann, A. Salter and J. Whyte, Building Research & Information 31(5), 318 (2003). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • P. Folan and J. Browne, Computers in Industry 56(7), 663 (2005). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • A. Likierman, Public Money & Management 13(4), 15 (1993). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • J. Bansiya and C. Davis, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(1), 4 (2002). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • L. Pipino, Y. Lee and R. Wang, Communications of ACM 45, 211 (2002). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. E. I.   SEI , The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process ( Addison Wesley , 1994 ) . Google Scholar
    • G. Berengueret al., Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery (Springer, Berlin, 2005) pp. 95–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • C. Tang and S. Carpendale, Evaluating the deployment of a mobile technology in a hospital ward, Proc. 2008 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (2008) pp. 205–214. Google Scholar
    • T. Saaty and S. Mujgan, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 8(1), 7 (2009). Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • M. Barney, Motorola's second generation, Six Sigma Forum Magazine, May 2002 . Google Scholar
    • L. Guerrero and D. Fuller, Design patterns for collaborative systems, 1999 String Processing and Information Retrieval Symp. Int. Workshop on Groupware (1999) pp. 270–277. Google Scholar
    • T.   Schümmer and S.   Lukosch , Patterns for Computer-Mediated Interaction ( John Wiley & Sons Ltd. , Chichester, England , 2007 ) . Google Scholar
    • P. Avgeriou and P. Tandler, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 25(3), 86 (2006). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • R. Messegueret al., Communication and coordination patterns to support mobile collaboration, 12th Int. Conf. Computer, Supported Cooperative Work in Design (2008) pp. 565–570. Google Scholar
    • Y. Penget al., Omega 39(6), 677 (2011). Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar