World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.
MAFIN 2010: Managing Financial Instability in Capitalist EconomiesNo Access

HETEROGENEITY, CORRELATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONTAGION

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525912500580Cited by:83 (Source: Crossref)

    We consider a model of contagion in financial networks recently introduced in Gai, P. and Kapadia, S. [Contagion in financial networks, Proc. R. Soc. A466(2120) (2010) 2401–2423], and we characterize the effect of a few features empirically observed in real networks on the stability of the system. Notably, we consider the effect of heterogeneous degree distributions, heterogeneous balance sheet size and degree correlations between banks. We study the probability of contagion conditional on the failure of a random bank, the most connected bank and the biggest bank, and we consider the effect of targeted policies aimed at increasing the capital requirements of a few banks with high connectivity or big balance sheets. Networks with heterogeneous degree distributions are shown to be more resilient to contagion triggered by the failure of a random bank, but more fragile with respect to contagion triggered by the failure of highly connected nodes. A power law distribution of balance sheet size is shown to induce an inefficient diversification that makes the system more prone to contagion events. A targeted policy aimed at reinforcing the stability of the biggest banks is shown to improve the stability of the system in the regime of high average degree. Finally, disassortative mixing, such as that observed in real banking networks, is shown to enhance the stability of the system.

    References

    • P. Gai and S. Kapadia, Proc. R. Soc. A 466(2120), 2401 (2010). Google Scholar
    • M. G. Crouhy, R. A. Jarrow and S. M. Turnbull, J. Derivatives 16(1), 81 (2008). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Iazzetta, C. and Manna, M., The topology of the interbank market: Developments in Italy since 1990, Banca d'Italia Working paper, no. 711 (2009) . Google Scholar
    • G. Ioriet al., J. Econ. Dyn. Control 32(1), 259 (2008). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • M. Bosset al., Quant. Finance 4, 677 (2005). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • e Santos, E. B. and Cont, R., The brazilian interbank network structure and systemic risk, Working Papers Series 219, Central Bank of Brazil, Research Department (Oct. 2010) . Google Scholar
    • E. Nieret al., J. Econ. Dyn. Control 31(6), 2033 (2007). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Cornand, C. and Moysan, G., Unstable financial networks, available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1494233 (2009) . Google Scholar
    • A. G. Haldane and R. M. May, Nature 469, 351 (2011). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Amini, H., Cont, R. and Minca, A., Resilience to contagion in financial networks, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1865997 (2010) . Google Scholar
    • F. Allen and D. Gale, J. Political Econ. 108, 1 (2001). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Georg, C.-P., The effect of the interbank network structure on contagion and financial stability, Global Financial Markets Working Paper Series 12-2010, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena (Oct. 2010) . Google Scholar
    • G. Iori, S. Jafarey and F. G. Padilla, J. Econ. Behav. Org. 61(4), 525 (2006). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • D. Watts, PNAS 99, 5766 (2002). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • S. N. Dorogovtsev, A. V. Goltsev and J. F. F. Mendes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1275 (2008). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • G. Bianconi, Phys. Lett. A 303, 166 (2002). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • F. Caccioli and L. Dall'Asta, J. Stat. Mech. P10004 (2009). Google Scholar
    • Chen, X. and Ghate, A., Financial contagion on power law networks, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1751143 (2011) . Google Scholar
    • D. J. Watts and P. S. Dodds, J. Consumer Res.: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 34(4), 441 (2007). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Int. Monetary Fund, Global financial stability report, Technical Report (2009) . Google Scholar
    • J. D. Noh, Phys. Rev. E 76, 026116 (2007). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • G. D'Agostinoet al., EPL 97(6), 68006 (2012). ISIGoogle Scholar
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Check out our titles in Complex Systems today!