Research ArticleNo Access

Comparing powers of edge ideals

Mike Janssen

Mathematics/Statistics Department, Dordt College, Sioux Center, IA 51250, USA

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

Thomas Kamp

Mathematics/Statistics Department, Dordt College, Sioux Center, IA 51250, USA

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Jason Vander Woude

Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0130, USA

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498819501846Cited by:5 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Given a nontrivial homogeneous ideal $I \subseteq k [x_{1}, x_{2}, \dots, x_{d}]$ , a problem of great recent interest has been the comparison of the $r$ th ordinary power of $I$ and the $m$ th symbolic power $I^{(m)}$ . This comparison has been undertaken directly via an exploration of which exponents $m$ and $r$ guarantee the subset containment $I^{(m)} \subseteq I^{r}$ and asymptotically via a computation of the resurgence $ρ (I)$ , a number for which any $m / r > ρ (I)$ guarantees $I^{(m)} \subseteq I^{r}$ . Recently, a third quantity, the symbolic defect, was introduced; as $I^{t} \subseteq I^{(t)}$ , the symbolic defect is the minimal number of generators required to add to $I^{t}$ in order to get $I^{(t)}$ . We consider these various means of comparison when $I$ is the edge ideal of certain graphs by describing an ideal $J$ for which $I^{(t)} = I^{t} + J$ . When $I$ is the edge ideal of an odd cycle, our description of the structure of $I^{(t)}$ yields solutions to both the direct and asymptotic containment questions, as well as a partial computation of the sequence of symbolic defects.

Communicated by T. H. Ha

Keywords:

AMSC: 13F20

References

1. C. Bocci, S. Cooper, E. Guardo, B. Harbourne, M. Janssen, U. Nagel, A. Seceleanu, A. Van Tuyl and T. Vu. The Waldschmidt constant for squarefree monomial ideals, J. Algebraic Combin. 44(4) (2016) 875–904. Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. C. Bocci, S. Cooper and B. Harbourne. Containment results for ideals of various configurations of points in $ℙ^{N}$ . J. Pure Appl. Algebra 218(1) (2014) 65–75. Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. C. Bocci and B. Harbourne, Comparing powers and symbolic powers of ideals, J. Algebraic Geom. 19(3) (2010) 399–417. Web of Science, Google Scholar
4. S. M. Cooper, R. J. D. Embree, H. T. Hà and A. H. Hoefel, Symbolic powers of monomial ideals, Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 60(1) (2017) 39–55. Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. H. Dao, A. De Stefani, E. Grifo, C. Huneke and L. Núñez-Betancourt, Symbolic powers of ideals, preprints (2017), arXiv:1708.03010. Google Scholar
6. A. Denkert and M. Janssen, Containment problem for points on a reducible conic in $ℙ^{2}$ , J. Algebra 394 (2013) 120–138. Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. M. Dumnicki, T. Szemberg and H. Tutaj-Gasińska, Counterexamples to the $I^{(3)} \subset I^{2}$ containment, J. Algebra 393 (2013) 24–29. Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. L. Ein, R. Lazarsfeld and K. Smith, Uniform bounds and symbolic powers on smooth varieties, Invent. Math. 144(2) (2001) 241–252. Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. S. W. Ellis and L. Wilson, Symbolic powers of edge ideals, Rose-Hulman Undergrad. Math. J. 5(2) (2004) 1–10. Google Scholar
10. F. Galetto, A. V. Geramita, Y.-S. Shin and A. Van Tuyl, The symbolic defect of an ideal, preprint (2016), arXiv:1610.00176. Google Scholar
11. M. Hochster and C. Huneke, Comparison of symbolic and ordinary powers of ideals, Invent. Math. 147(2) (2002) 349–369. Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. A. Simis, W. V. Vasconcelos and R. H. Villarreal, On the ideal theory of graphs, J. Algebra 167(2) (1994) 389–416. Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. A. Van Tuyl, A Beginner’s Guide to Edge and Cover Ideals (Springer, Berlin, 2013), pp. 63–94. Google Scholar
14. R. H. Villarreal, Cohen–Macaulay graphs, Manuscripta Math. 66(1) (1990) 277–293. Web of Science, Google Scholar