World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

Structural Behaviors of Integrally-Jointed Plywood Columns with Knot Defects

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S021945542150022XCited by:4 (Source: Crossref)

    Modern factory automation is enabling the economic production of timber building components with sophisticated integral mechanical joints. This paper investigates the governing compressive failure mechanisms of full-length integrally-jointed plywood box columns, and in particular seeks to understand the interaction between localized material knot defects, integral box joint capacity, and column strength. A new critical failure mechanism is identified based on experimental observations and numerical analysis of sections with varying sizes of knot defect, with column capacity governed by defect-induced transverse loading of integral box joints. Column capacity was shown to improve with localized joint strengthening in knot-defective regions, or with a defect-adaptive fabrication procedure that avoids identified defects during component plate machining. The new failure mechanism was also combined with prior understanding of plate buckling and pop-off failure mechanisms to propose an overall failure process for integrally-jointed plywood columns. Results from this paper can also inform development of other types of integrally-jointed thin-walled structures.

    References

    • 1. K. Zwerger, Wood and Wood Joints: Building Traditions of Europe and Japan (Springer, Basel, London, 2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 2. K. Seike, The Art of Japanese Joinery (Weatherhill Tankosha Publ, New York, 1977). Google Scholar
    • 3. R. H. Sangree and B. Schafer, Experimental and numerical analysis of a halved and tabled traditional timber scarf joint, Constr. Build. Mater. 23(2) (2009) 615–624. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 4. R. H. Sangree and B. Schafer, Experimental and numerical analysis of a stop-splayed traditional timber scarf joint with key, Constr. Build. Mater. 23(1) (2009) 376–385. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 5. R. J. Schmidt and C. E. Daniels, Design considerations for mortise and tenon connections, Report for Timber Framers Guild (Becket, MA). Google Scholar
    • 6. J. D. Shanks and P. Walker, Experimental performance of mortice and tenon connections in green oak, J. Struct. Eng. 83(17) (2005) 40–45. Google Scholar
    • 7. J. D. Shanks, Developing rational design guidelines for traditional joints in oak frame construction, Ph.D. thesis, University of Bath (2005). Google Scholar
    • 8. J. D. Shanks, W.-S. Chang and K. Komatsu, Experimental study on mechanical performance of all-softwood pegged mortice and tenon connections, Biosyst. Eng. 100(4) (2008) 562–570. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 9. C. Robeller and Y. Weinand, Fabrication-aware design of timber folded plate shells with double through tenon joints, in Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2016 (Springer, 2016), pp. 166–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 10. S.-J. Pang, J.-K. Oh, J.-S. Park, C.-Y. Park and J.-J. Lee, Moment-carrying capacity of dovetailed mortise and tenon joints with or without beam shoulder, J. Struct. Eng. 137(7) (2010) 785–789. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 11. S.-J. Pang, J.-K. Oh, C.-Y. Park and J.-J. Lee, Influence of crossing-beam shoulder and wood species on moment-carrying capacity in a korean traditional dovetail joint, J. Wood Sci. 57(3) (2011) 195–202. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 12. C. Robeller and Y. Weinand, Interlocking folded plate–integral mechanical attachment for structural wood panels, Int. J. Space Struct. 30(2) (2015) 111–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 13. J.-M. Li and J. Knippers, Pattern and form-their influence on segmental plate shells, in Proc. IASS Annual Symp., Vol. 2015 (International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 2015), pp. 1–12. Google Scholar
    • 14. O. D. Krieg, K. Dierichs, S. Reichert, T. Schwinn and A. Menges, Performative architectural morphology: Robotically manufactured biomimetic finger-joined plate structures, Proc. eCAADe Conference 2011, 21–24 September 2011, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 573–580. Google Scholar
    • 15. L. Chen and L. Sass, Fresh press modeler: A generative system for physically based low fidelity prototyping, Comput. Graphic. 54 (2016) 157–165. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Z. Su, L. Chen, X. He, F. Yang and L. Sass, Planar structures with automatically generated bevel joints, Comput. Graphic. 72 (2018) 98–105. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 17. Y. Al-Qaryouti, K. Baber and J. M. Gattas, Computational design and digital fabrication of folded timber sandwich structures, Automat. Construct. 102 (2019) 27–44. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 18. S. Roche, G. Mattoni and Y. Weinand, Rotational stiffness at ridges of timber folded-plate structures, Int. J. Space Struct. 30(2) (2015) 153–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 19. M. Dedijer, S. N. Roche and Y. Weinand, Shear resistance and failure modes of edgewise multiple tab-and-slot joint (mtsj) connection with dovetail design for thin lvl spruce plywood kerto-q panels, in World Conf. Timber Engineering (Vienna, Austria, 2016). Google Scholar
    • 20. S. Roche, J. Gamerro and Y. Weinand, Multiple tab-and-slot joint: Improvement of the rotational stiffness for the connection of thin structural wood panels, in World Conf. Timber Engineering (Vienna, Austria, 2016). Google Scholar
    • 21. J. Gamerro, C. Robeller and Y. Weinand, Rotational mechanical behavior of wood-wood connections with application to double-layered folded timber-plate structure, Construct. Build. Mater. 165 (2018) 434–442. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 22. A. R. Rad, Y. Weinand and H. Burton, Experimental push-out investigation on the in-plane force-deformation behavior of integrally-attached timber through-tenon joints, Construct. Build. Mater. 215 (2019) 925–940. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 23. A. R. Rad, H. Burton and Y. Weinand, Performance assessment of through-tenon timber joints under tension loads, Construct. Build. Mater. 207 (2019) 706–721. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 24. J. Gamerro, J. F. Bocquet and Y. Weinand, Experimental investigations on the load-carrying capacity of digitally produced wood-wood connections, Eng. Struct. 213 (2020) 110576. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 25. A. Parvin, Architecture (and the other 99%): Open-source architecture and design commons, Architect. Design 83(6) (2013) 90–95, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ad.1680, https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1680. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 26. T. Schwinn, Landesgartenschau exhibition hall, in Advancing Wood Architecture: A Computational Approach (Routledge, Oxford, 2016), pp. 111–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 27. C. Robeller, J. Gamerro and Y. Weinand, Théâtre vidy lausanne-a double-layered timber folded plate structure, J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct. 58 (2017) 295–314, http://dx.doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2017.194.864, https://doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2017.194.864. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 28. S. Usai and H. Stehling, La seine musicale, in Humanizing Digital Reality (Springer, 2018), pp. 201–209, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6611-5_18, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6611-5_18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 29. P. Tarin, K. Overton, M. Sánchez-Solís, M. Rando and F. Ibáñez, Finansparken bjergsted: an innovative timber-framed office building, in Proc. IASS Annual Symp., Vol. 2019 (International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 2019), pp. 1–8. Google Scholar
    • 30. A. Brokans and L. Ozola, Behavior of creep of timber beams under natural environmental conditions, WIT Trans. Built Environ. 137 (2014) 479–489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 31. W.-S. Chang, M.-F. Hsu and K. Komatsu, Rotational performance of traditional nuki joints with gap I: theory and verification, J. Wood Sci. 52(1) (2006) 58–62. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 32. J. Gamerro, I. Lemaître and Y. Weinand, Mechanical characterization of timber structural elements using integral mechanical attachments, in World Conf. Timber Engineering (Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2018). Google Scholar
    • 33. R. Hassan, A. Ibrahim and Z. Ahmad, Shear capacity of dowelled mortise and tenon in tropical timber, in IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 17 (IOP Publishing, 2011), p. 012012. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 34. W.-S. Chang and M.-F. Hsu, Rotational performance of traditional nuki joints with gap II: The behavior of butted nuki joint and its comparison with continuous nuki joint, J. Wood Sci. 53(5) (2007) 401–407. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Y. Alqaryouti, D. Fernando and J. Gattas, Structural behavior of digitally fabricated thin-walled timber columns, Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dynam. 19(10) (2019) 1950126. Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 36. J. C. Walker, Primary Wood Processing: Principles and Practice (Springer Science & Business Media, 2006). Google Scholar
    • 37. Plywood-structural part 0: Specifications, Standard, Joint Technical Committee TM-008, Australia/New Zealand (Oct. 2012). Google Scholar
    • 38. D. Albright, V. Blouin, D. Harding, U. Heine, N. Huette and D. Pastre, Sim [ply]: Sustainable construction with prefabricated plywood componentry, Procedia Environment. Sci. 38 (2017) 760–764. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 39. L. Sass and M. Botha, The instant house: a model of design production with digital fabrication, Int. J. Architect. Comput. 4(4) (2006) 109–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 40. Y. Al-Qaryouti, J. Gattas, R. Shi and L. McCann, Digital fabrication strategies for timber thin-walled sections, High Performance and Optimum Design of Structures and Materials II, Vol. 166 (WIT Press, 2016), p. 415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 41. F. Arriaga-Martitegui, F. Peraza-Sánchez and L. García-Esteban, Characteristic values of the mechanical properties of radiata pine plywood and the derivation of basic values of the layers for a calculation method, Biosyst. Eng. 99(2) (2008) 256–266. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 42. A. Bedford and W. Fowler, in Engineering Mechanics Statics, 5th edn., Ch. 9 (Pearson, 2008), p. 432. Google Scholar
    • 43. A. Manuello, Semi-rigid connection in timber structure: Stiffness reduction and instability interaction, Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dynam. 20(7) (2020) 2050072. Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 44. Q. Yang, M. Lyu and X. Zhu, Nonlinear connection stiffness identification of heritage timber buildings using a temperature-driven multi-model approach, Int. J. Struct. Stabil. Dynam. 20(10), http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219455420420018, doi:10.1142/S0219455420420018. Google Scholar
    • 45. C. Robeller, P. Mayencourt and Y. Weinand, Snap-fit joints-cnc fabricated, integrated mechanical attachment for structural wood panels, in ACADIA 2014 Design Agency: Proc. 34th Annual Conf. Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (Riverside Architectural Press, 2014), pp. 189–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 46. A. Bukauskas, P. Shepherd, P. Walker, B. Sharma and J. Bregulla, Inventory-constrained structural design: new objectives and optimization techniques, in Proc. IASS Annual Symp., Vol. 2018 (International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 2018), pp. 1–8. Google Scholar
    • 47. Structuralwood Plywood brochure, https://www.ringwoodandply.com.au/assets/media/Structuralwood%20Plywood.pdf. Google Scholar
    • 48. Plastics — determination of tensile properties part 1: General principles, Standard, International Organization for Standardization (Geneva, CH, 2019). Google Scholar
    • 49. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials using a combined loading compression (clc) test fixture, Standard, American Society for Testing and Materials (West Conshohocken, 2001). Google Scholar
    • 50. Standard test methods for structural panels in tension, Standard, American Society for Testing and Materials (West Conshohocken, 1976). Google Scholar
    • 51. Standard test method for shear properties of composite materials by V-notched rail shear method, Standard, American Society for Testing and Materials (West Conshohocken, 2005). Google Scholar
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Remember to check out the structures