World Scientific
  • Search
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

THE STRATIFIED STRUCTURE OF SPACES OF SMOOTH ORBIFOLD MAPPINGS

    We consider four notions of maps between smooth C orbifolds , with compact (without boundary). We show that one of these notions is natural and necessary in order to uniquely define the notion of orbibundle pullback. For the notion of complete orbifold map, we show that the corresponding set of Cr maps between and with the Cr topology carries the structure of a smooth C Banach (r finite)/Fréchet (r = ∞) manifold. For the notion of complete reduced orbifold map, the corresponding set of Cr maps between and with the Cr topology carries the structure of a smooth C Banach (r finite)/Fréchet (r = ∞) orbifold. The remaining two notions carry a stratified structure: The Cr orbifold maps between and is locally a stratified space with strata modeled on smooth C Banach (r finite)/Fréchet (r = ∞) manifolds while the set of Cr reduced orbifold maps between and locally has the structure of a stratified space with strata modeled on smooth C Banach (r finite)/Fréchet (r = ∞) orbifolds. Furthermore, we give the explicit relationship between these notions of orbifold map. Applying our results to the special case of orbifold diffeomorphism groups, we show that they inherit the structure of C Banach (r finite)/Fréchet (r = ∞) manifolds. In fact, for r finite they are topological groups, and for r = ∞ they are convenient Fréchet Lie groups.

    AMSC: 57R18, 57S05, 22F50, 22E65

    References

    • R. Abraham, Lectures of Smale on differential topology, Lecture Notes, Columbia University (1962) . Google Scholar
    • A.   Adem , J.   Leida and Y.   Ruan , Orbifolds and Stringy Topology , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics   171 ( Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , 2007 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A.   Banyaga , The Structure of Classical Diffeomorphism Groups , Mathematics and its Applications   400 ( Kluwer Academic Publishers Group , Dordrecht , 1997 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J.   Boman , Math. Scand.   20 , 249 ( 1967 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. E.   Borzellino , Riemannian Geometry of Orbifolds ( University of California , Los Angeles , 1992 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. E. Borzellino, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 42(1), 37 (1993). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • J. E. Borzellino and V. Brunsden, Infinite Dimensional Lie Groups in Geometry and Representation Theory (World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ, 2002) pp. 116–137. LinkGoogle Scholar
    • J. E. Borzellino and V. Brunsden, J. Lie Theory 18(4), 979 (2008). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • J. P.   Bourguignon , Compositio Math.   30 , 1 ( 1975 ) . ISIGoogle Scholar
    • W. Chen, Commun. Contemp. Math. 8(5), 569 (2006). Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • W. Chen and Y. Ruan, Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics, Contemporary Mathematics 310 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002) pp. 25–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Eells Jr. , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.   72 , 751 ( 1966 ) . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • M.   Field , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.   76 , 1314 ( 1970 ) . Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • A. E. Fischer, Relativity (Plenum, New York, 1970) pp. 303–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Franks, Studies, in Analysis, Advances in Mathematics Supplementary Studies 4 (Academic Press, New York, 1979) pp. 271–290. Google Scholar
    • A. Frölicher, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 293(2), 125 (1981). Google Scholar
    • A.   Frölicher and A.   Kriegl , Linear Spaces and Differentiation Theory , Pure and Applied Mathematics ( Wiley , Chichester , 1988 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. S. Hamilton, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 7(1), 65 (1982). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • M. Kankaanrinta, Topology Appl. 159(5), 1489 (2012). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • H. H.   Keller , Differential Calculus in Locally Convex Spaces , Lecture Notes in Mathematics   417 ( Springer-Verlag , Berlin , 1974 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. Kriegl, Monatsh. Math. 95(4), 287 (1983). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • A.   Kriegl and P. W.   Michor , The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis , Mathematical Surveys and Monographs   53 ( American Mathematical Society , Providence, RI , 1997 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. A.   Leslie , Topology   6 , 263 ( 1967 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • P. W.   Michor , Manifolds of Differentiable Mappings , Shiva Mathematics Series   3 ( Shiva Publishing Ltd. , Nantwich , 1980 ) . Google Scholar
    • I. Moerdijk, Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics, Contemporary Mathematics 310 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002) pp. 205–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • I. Moerdijk and D. A. Pronk, K-Theory 12(1), 3 (1997). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Z.   Nitecki , Differentiable Dynamics. An Introduction to the Orbit Structure of Diffeomorphisms ( The MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 1971 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. S.   Palais , Foundations of Global Non-Linear Analysis ( W. A. Benjamin , New York , 1968 ) . Google Scholar
    • R.   Schmid , J. Geom. Symmetry Phys.   1 , 54 ( 2004 ) . Google Scholar
    • W.   Thurston , The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds , Lecture Notes ( Mathematics Department , Princeton University , 1978 ) . Google Scholar
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Be inspired by these NEW Mathematics books for inspirations & latest information in your research area!