World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.
Special Issue: Dutch National IT Architecture ConferenceNo Access

ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE: ENABLING INTEGRATION, AGILITY AND CHANGE

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S021884300400095XCited by:100 (Source: Crossref)

    Three core imperatives are essential for modern businesses and organizations: seamless integration of customer and operational processes, agility, and the ability to change. These imperatives are relevant in view of successfully executing strategic choices, but all too often not satisfied.

    Businesses and organizations are complex adaptive socio-technical systems and can be viewed from two fundamentally different perspectives: the functional (black-box) perspective and the constructional (white-box) perspective. Management and governance of businesses and organizations regard the functional, black-box perspective, which is inherently ill-suited for addressing the imperatives mentioned. It will be argued that establishing system integration, agility and change requires a focus on the system's design, hence necessitates the constructional perspective.

    The concept of architecture is considered fundamental for operationalizing the constructional perspective. Next to the more familiar notion of technology architecture, the concepts of business, organizational and information architecture are formally introduced and elucidated. Various domains within these architectures will be highlighted, whereby the importance of coherence and consistency is stressed, especially in view of the ability to change. Collectively, the four architectures are labeled Enterprise Architecture. Finally, enterprise architecture will be positioned as a crucial means for linking strategy development and execution.

    References

    • C.   Argyris and D.   Schön , Organizational Learning ( Addison-Wesley , Reading, MA , 1978 ) . Google Scholar
    • M. Beer, R. A. Eisenbach and B. Spector, Harvard Business Review 158 (1990). Google Scholar
    • W. G.   Bennis , On Becoming a Leader ( Addison-Wesley , Reading, MA , 1989 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. Buchanan, Best Practices and Principles for Enterprise Information Architecture (Meta Group, Enterprise Planning and Architecture Strat., May, 2002) . Google Scholar
    • R. T.   Burlton , Business Process Management ( Sams Publishing , Indianapolis , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. M.   Burns , Leadership ( Harper , New York , 1979 ) . Google Scholar
    • T. H.   Davenport and L.   Prusak , Working Knowledge ( Harvard Business School Press , Boston , 1998 ) . Google Scholar
    • T. E.   Deal and A. A.   Kennedy , Corporate Cultures ( Addison-Wesley , Reading, MA , 1982 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. L. G.   Dietz , Van informatietechnologie naar organisatietechnologie , Introductie tot DEMO ( Samson , Alphen aan de Rijn , 1996 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. L. G. Dietz, Informatie 40, 22 (1998). Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • Y.   Doz and H.   Thanheiser , Strategic Thinking: Leadership and the Management of Change , Regaining competitiveness: A process of organizational renewal , eds. J.   Hendry , G.   Johnson and J.   Newton ( Wiley , Chichester , 1993 ) . Google Scholar
    • P.   Drucker , Management ( Harper , New York , 1985 ) . Google Scholar
    • G.   Eckes , The Six-Sigma Revolution ( Wiley , New York , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • H.   Fayol , Organization Theory , General principles of management (1916) , ed. D. S.   Pugh ( Penguin Books , London , 1990 ) . Google Scholar
    • R.   Fritz , Corporate Tides ( Berret-Koehler , San Francisco , 1996 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. D.   Galliers and W. R.   Baets (eds.) , Information Technology and Organizational Transformation ( Wiley , Chichester , 1998 ) . Google Scholar
    • S.   Ghoshal and C. A.   Bartlett , The Individualized Corporation ( Harper Business , New York , 1997 ) . Google Scholar
    • G.   Hamel and C. K.   Prahalad , Competing for the Future ( Harvard Business School Press , Boston , 1994 ) . Google Scholar
    • G.   Hofstede , Cultures and Organizations ( McGraw-Hill , London , 1991 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. A. P.   Hoogervorst , Quality and Customer Oriented Behavior. Towards a Coherent Approach for Improvement ( Eburon , Delft , 1998 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. A. P. Hoogervorst, H. van der Flier and P. L. Koopman, Tijdschrift voor HRM 31 (1999). Google Scholar
    • J. A. P. Hoogervorst, P. L. Koopman and H. van der Flier, Int. J. Human Resource Management 13(8), 1245 (2002), DOI: 10.1080/09585190210149501. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • A. Huizing and W. Bouwman, Management en Informatie 4(1), 4 (1996). Google Scholar
    • P. Jagersma, P. van der Pijl and M. Raaijmakers, Holland Management Review 76, 51 (2001). Google Scholar
    • R.   Kalakota and M.   Robinson , E-business: Roadmap for Success ( Addison-Wesley , Reading, MA , 1999 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. S.   Kaplan and D. P.   Norton , The Strategy-Focussed Organization ( Harvard Business School Press , Boston , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. S. Kaufman, Sloan Management Review 34(1), 83 (1992). Google Scholar
    • J.   Kirby , Implementing CRM: Business Change Program, Not Project ( Gartner Research , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. P.   Kotter , The Leadership Factor ( The Free Press , New York , 1988 ) . Google Scholar
    • J. P. Kotter, Harvard Business Review 71(2), 59 (1995). Google Scholar
    • R.   Likert , New Patterns of Management ( McGraw-Hill , New York , 1965 ) . Google Scholar
    • Y.   Malhotra , Enterprise Architecture: An Overview ( Brint Institute , 1996 ) ,   www.brint.com/papers . Google Scholar
    • C.   Marcus , CRM Deployment Can Focus on Most Valued Customers ( Gartner Research , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • D. M.   McGregor , The Human Side of Enterprise ( McGraw-Hill , New York , 1960 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. E. Miles and C. C. Snow, California Management Review 26(3), 128 (1984). Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • H.   Mintzberg , Mintzberg on Management ( Free Press , New York , 1989 ) . Google Scholar
    • H.   Mintzberg , The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning ( The Free Press , New York , 1994 ) . Google Scholar
    • H.   Mintzberg , B.   Ahlstrand and J.   Lampel , Strategic Safari ( Prentice Hall , London , 1998 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. M.   Kanter , eVolve! ( Harvard Business School Press , Boston , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • D. A.   Nadler and M. L.   Tushman , Competing by Design ( Oxford University Press , New York , 1997 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • P.   Osterman , The Corporation of the 1990s , Impact of IT on jobs and skills , ed. M. S.   Scott-Morton ( Oxford University Press , New York , 1991 ) . Google Scholar
    • C.   Overby , Orchestrating Service Providers ( Forrester Research , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • A.   Pettigrew , Information Technology and Organizational Transformation , Success and failure in corporate transformation initiatives , eds. R. D.   Galliers and W. R.   Baets ( Wiley , Chichester , 1998 ) . Google Scholar
    • T.   Pohlmann , Building eBusiness Leadership ( Forrester Research , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • R. P. Rumelt, Holland Management Review 45, 14 (1995). Google Scholar
    • E. H.   Schein , Organizational Culture and Leadership ( Jossey-Bass , San Francisco , 1985 ) . Google Scholar
    • M. S.   Scott Morton , The Corporation of the 1990s ( Oxford University Press , New York , 1991 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • H.   Smith , D.   Neal and N.   Green , Business Process Management — An Enabler for Organizational Agility ( CSC Research , 2001 ) . Google Scholar
    • R.   Stacey , Complexity and Creativity in Organizations ( Berrett-Koehler , San Francisco , 1996 ) . Google Scholar
    • D. A.   Stevenson , Enterprise Architecture ( University of Capetown, Department of Information Systems , 1995 ) . Google Scholar
    • H. Strikwerda, Holland Management Review 77, 8 (2001). Google Scholar
    • F. W.   Taylor , Organization Theory , Scientific management (1912) , ed. D. S.   Pugh ( Penguin Books , London , 1990 ) . Google Scholar
    • M.   Treacy and F.   Wiersema , The Discipline of Market Leaders: Choose Your Customers, Narrow Your Focus, Dominate Your Market ( Addison-Wesley , Reading, MA , 1995 ) . Google Scholar
    • J.   Turner , Information Technology and Organizational Transformation , The role of IT in organizational transformation , eds. R. D.   Galliers and W. R.   Baets ( Wiley , Chichester , 1998 ) . Google Scholar
    • P.   Vervest and A.   Dunn , How to Win Customers in the Digital World ( Springer , Berlin , 2000 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • T.   Peters , De Architectura , ed.   Vitruvius ( Atheneum , Amsterdam , 1998 ) . Google Scholar
    • M.   Weber , Organization Theory , Legitimate authority and bureaucracy (1924) , ed. D. S.   Pugh ( Penguin Books , London , 1990 ) . Google Scholar
    • L. Woolridge and F. Hayden, CRS Research Journal  (2002). Google Scholar
    • S.   Zuboff , In the Age of the Smart Machine ( Basic Books , New York , 1989 ) . Google Scholar
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Check out these titles in digital security!