World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Mon, Jun 21st, 2021 at 1am (EDT)

During this period, the E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 6 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

ADHESION FORMATION AFTER FLEXOR TENDON REPAIR: COMPARISON OF TWO- AND FOUR-STRAND REPAIR WITHOUT EPITENDINOUS SUTURE

    Increased handling, increased bulk at the repair site and an increase in external suture material may affect adhesion formation and gliding after tendon repair. A previous study1 showed no significant difference in biomechanical or histopathological measurement of adhesion formation in two- and four-strand repairs combined with an epitendinous suture in the chicken model. In the present study, the flexor digitorum profundus tendon of the middle toe of 47 broiler chickens was cut and repaired with either a single (two-strand) or double (four-strand) modified Kessler core suture without epitendinous suture and immobilised for four weeks. Adhesion formation was measured by biomechanical testing or quantitative and qualitative histopathology. Biomechanical and histological data showed no differences between two- and four-strand repairs. Results did not differ from the previous study which used an epitendinous suture. Adhesion formation is not necessarily increased when multi-strand techniques are used, nor by the placement of an epitendinous suture if care is taken with surgical technique. Individual healing response introduces more variability than an increase in tendon handling by an experienced surgeon.

    References