World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Fri, Jun 26th, 2020 at 5pm (ET)

During this period, our website will be offline for less than an hour but the E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 4 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

LEAST STRATIFICATIONS AND CELL-STRUCTURED OBJECTS IN GEOMETRIC MODELLING

    Results from the study of O-minimal structures are used to formalise fundamental objects and operations for geometric modelling kernels. O-minimal structures provide a more general setting than the traditional semialgebraic sets; they allow semianalytic sets such as screw-threads to be modelled accurately. O-minimality constrains the class of sets to ensure the retention of the key finitary properties necessary for many geometric operations. The formalism is independent of internal representations and implementations, in the spirit of the mixed-dimension cellular objects of the Djinn API (Application Programming Interface) [2].

    Topological stratification is used to provide an object with a cellular structure consisting of a finite set of piecewise-smooth manifold cells. The main contribution of the paper is an existence proof for least stratifications (of sets in O-minimal structures). Set-like combination of two cell-structured objects requires a common partition of space from which a cell-structured result can be obtained. The existence of least stratifications facilitates the definition of combination operators that provide unique results.

    References

    • F. Arbab, IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 10(11), 76 (1990). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • C.   Armstrong et al. , Djinn: a geometric interface for solid modelling ( Information Geometers Ltd. , Winchester, UK , 2000 ) . Google Scholar
    • A. Gabrielov, Funct. Anal. Appl. 2, 282 (1968). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • H. Hironaka, Number Theory, Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, eds. Y. Kusunokiet al. (Kinokuniya Book-Store Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, 1973) pp. 453–493. Google Scholar
    • S. Lojasiewicz, Annali Della Scuola Normale de Pisa 18, 449 (1964). Google Scholar
    • J.   Mather , Lecture Notes ( Harvard University , 1970 ) . Google Scholar
    • A. Middleditch. Cellular models of mixed dimension. Technical Report BRU/CAE/92:3, Department of Computer Science, Brunei University, West London, 1992 . Google Scholar
    • A. Middleditch and C. Reade, International Journal of Shape Modeling 6(1), 79 (2000). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • A. Middleditch, C. Reade, and A. Gomes. Rationale and formal definitions for the objects of the Djinn API to a geometric modelling kernel. Technical Report BRU/CAE/98:2, Brunel University, September 1998 . Google Scholar
    • A. Middleditch, C. Reade and A. Gomes, Computer Aided Design 31, 683 (1999). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. Middleditch, C. Reade and A. J. Gomes, International Journal of Shape Modeling 6(2), 175 (2000). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • C. Reade and A. Middleditch. Partitioning and departitioning mixed dimension cellular objects of the djinn api. (Submitted for publication), 2001 . Google Scholar
    • A. Requicha. Mathematical models of rigid solid objects. Production Automation Project Tech. Memo 28, University of Rochester, 1977 . Google Scholar
    • A. Requicha, ACM Computing Surveys 12(4), 437 (1980). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • J. Rossignac and M. O'Connor, Geometric Modeling for Product Engineering, eds. M. Wozny, J. Turner and K. Preiss (IFIP, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), 1990) pp. 145–180. Google Scholar
    • J. Rossignac and A. Requicha, Computer Aided Design 23(2), 21 (1991). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • V. Shapiro, Computer Aided Geometric Design 11(2), 153 (1994). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • V. Shapiro, International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications 7(4), 383 (1997). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • L. van den Dries, Bulletin of the AMS 15(2), 189 (1986). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • L.   van den Dries , Tame Topology and O-minimal Structures , LMS Lecture Note Series   248 ( Cambridge University Press , 1998 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • L. van den Dries and C. Miller, Duke Math 84, 497 (1996). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • C. Wall, Dynamical Systems, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, eds. A. Dold and B. Eckman (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975) pp. 332–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • H. Whitney, Annals of Mathematics 66(3), 545 (1957). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • A. Wilkie, Journal of the AMS 9, 1051 (1996). Google Scholar