No Access

Optimal Redundancy and Maintenance Strategy Decisions for Offshore Wind Power Converters

Cranfield University, College Road, Cranfield, Bedfordshire MK43 0AL, United Kingdom

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author

Ann-Brith Strömberg

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg, Göteborg SE-412 96, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Lina Bertling Tjernberg

School of Electrical Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm SE-100 44, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218539315500151Cited by:6 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

Analysis of field failure data collected from various wind farm databases indicates that the power converters are among the most critical components in offshore wind turbines, since they suffer from a high failure rate. One efficient approach to enhance the reliability and availability of the wind power systems is through using a redundant converter design, in which a set of power converters is placed together in parallel. The main advantage of a multiple parallel converter system is that the failure of one converter will not necessarily lead to the failure of the entire system. It may however increase the wind turbine's acquisition cost, volume, and weight. In this paper, we propose an approach of joint redundancy and maintenance strategy optimization for offshore wind power converters, aiming to simultaneously determine the "optimal allocation of redundant converters" and the "optimal threshold number of converters that are allowed to fail before sending a maintenance crew to the offshore platform". The optimal solution under various system-level constraints (such as reliability, weight, and the available space in nacelle) is derived and the conditions required to make using a redundant system beneficial are discussed. The proposed design is applied to an offshore wind turbine system and its performance is evaluated using a Monte-Carlo simulation technique. Finally, the results are compared with the conventional power converter system and a sensitivity analysis is conducted in order to make the proposed approach applicable for the next generation of wind turbines.

Keywords:

References

Renewable UK, Available at http://www.renewableuk.com/en/renewable-energy/wind-energy/offshore-wind/(accessed on 7 May 2015) . Google Scholar
European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), The European offshore wind industry — key trends and statistics (2014), Available at http://www.ewea.org . Google Scholar
M. Shafiee , Renew. Energy 77 , 182 ( 2015 ) . Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
K. Fischer, F. Besnard and L. Bertling, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 27(1), 184 (2012). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Shafiee and S. Chukova, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 229(3), 561 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Shafieeet al., A redundancy optimization model applied to offshore wind turbine power converters, IEEE PowerTech Conf. (2013) pp. 1–6. Google Scholar
E. Byon, L. Ntaimo and Y. Ding, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 59(2), 393 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
E. Byon and Y. Ding, IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25(4), 1823 (2010). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Z. Tian et al. , Renew. Energy 36 , 1502 ( 2011 ) . Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. J. Nielsen and J. D. Sørensen , Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 , 218 ( 2011 ) . Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. Ding and Z. Tian, Int. J. Reliab., Qual. Saf. Eng. 18(5), 463 (2011). Link, Google Scholar
Z. Hameed and J. Vatn, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. O, J. Risk Reliab. 226(6), 584 (2012). Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Shafiee , M. Patriksson and A.-B. Strömberg , Adv. Oper. Res. ( 2013 ) , DOI: 10.1155/2013/205847 . Google Scholar
F. Besnard, K. Fischer and L. Bertling, IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 4(2), 443 (2013). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. Carlos et al. , Math. Comput. Model. 57 , 1884 ( 2013 ) . Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Shafiee and M. Finkelstein , Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 134 , 230 ( 2015 ) . Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
M. Shafiee, M. Finkelstein and C. Bérenguer, An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.001 . Google Scholar
R.-D. Klug and M. Griggs, Reliability and availability of megawatt drive concepts, Proc. Int. Conf. Power System Technology (PowerCon) (2004) pp. 665–671. Google Scholar
P. J. Tavner, G. J. W. van Bussel and F. Spinato, Machine and converter reliabilities in wind turbines, Proc. 3rd IET Int. Conf. Power Electronics, Machine & Drives (2006) pp. 127–130. Google Scholar
J. Ribrant and L. Bertling, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 22(1), 167 (2007). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
J. Birk and B. Andresen, Parallel-connected converters for optimizing efficiency, reliability and grid harmonics in a wind turbine, Proc. 12th European Conf. Power Electronics and Applications (2007) pp. 1–7. Google Scholar
C. H. Nget al., IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 23(3), 1062 (2008). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. Spinatoet al., IET Renew. Power Gen. 3(4), 387 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
P. Zhuet al., Offshore wind converter reliability evaluation, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Power Electronics — ECCE Asia (2011) pp. 966–971. Google Scholar
F. Blaabjerg, M. Liserre and K. Ma, Power electronics converters for wind turbine systems, Proc. IEEE 3rd Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE) (2011) pp. 281–290. Google Scholar
K. Xie, IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 27(1), 96 (2012). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
E. E. Kostandyan and K. Ma, Microelectron. Reliab. 52(10), 2403 (2012). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
R. Kumaret al., Comput. & Ind. Eng. 57(1), 169 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
Z. Tian, G. Levitin and M. J. Zuo, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(10), 1568 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
S. Wang and J. Watada, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 232(2), 539 (2009). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
D. W. Coit and A. Konak, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 55(3), 551 (2006). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
D. Salazar, C. M. Rocco and B. J. Galvan, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91(1), 1057 (2006). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
K. B. Misra and U. Sharma, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40(1), 81 (1991). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
W.-C. Yeh and T.-J. Hsieh, Comput. Oper. Res. 38(11), 1465 (2011). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
T. C. Chen, Appl. Math. Comput. 182(2), 1556 (2006). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
H. Pham and H. Z. Wang, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 94(3), 425 (1996). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
F. F. Ding, Comparative study of maintenance strategies for wind turbine systems, M.Sc. Thesis, Concordia University, Canada (2010) . Google Scholar
S. M. Ross , Applied Probability Models with Optimization Applications ( Holden-Day , San Francisco, CA, USA , 1970 ) . Google Scholar
A. Karyotakis, On the optimization of operation and maintenance strategies for offshore wind farms, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London (2011) . Google Scholar
E. Zio , The Monte Carlo Simulation Method for System Reliability and Risk Analysis ( Springer , London , 2013 ) . Crossref, Google Scholar
M. Shafiee and F. Dinmohammadi, Energies 7(2), 619 (2014). Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar