ArticleOpen Access

BLOCKCHAIN-BASED IoFLT FEDERATED LEARNING IN A FUZZY/GAN ENVIRONMENT FOR A SMART TRADING BOT

Universidad del Istmo, Campus Tehuantepec, Ciudad Universitaria S/N Barrio Santa Cruz, 4a. Sección Santo Domingo Tehuantepec Oaxaca, C.P. 70760, OAX, Mexico

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

MIGUEL PATIÑO ORTIZ

Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, Av. Luis Enrique Erro S/N, Unidad Profesional “Adolfo López Mateos” Zacatenco, Alcaldía Gustavo A. Madero, C.P. 07738, CDMX, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author

VERÓNICA AGUILAR ESTEVA

Universidad del Istmo, Campus Tehuantepec, Ciudad Universitaria S/N Barrio Santa Cruz, 4a. Sección Santo Domingo Tehuantepec Oaxaca, C.P. 70760, OAX, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author

, and

DANIEL PACHECO BAUTISTA

Universidad del Istmo, Campus Tehuantepec, Ciudad Universitaria S/N Barrio Santa Cruz, 4a. Sección Santo Domingo Tehuantepec Oaxaca, C.P. 70760, OAX, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X23500056Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

A DAPP is performed with collaborative training, where “Federated Learning” uses each device client to work as a singular artificial intelligence model using machine learning. The purpose is to reduce the latency by using computing resources from all client devices and increase privacy since personal data does not leave the client’s devices. Applying machine learning massively in decentralized trading bots using blockchain seems to be a great solution. This learning solution can be improved using a fuzzy generative adversarial network environment to help the training. In this case, the expert system has a Python bot to interact with the Binance API to place buy/sell orders for the BTC–USD pair.

Keywords:

References

1. T. Liu et al., Towards fast and accurate federated learning with non-IID data for cloud-based IoT applications, J. Circuits Syst. Comput. 31 (2022) 2250235. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
2. B. Ghimire et al., Recent advances on federated learning for cybersecurity and cybersecurity for federated learning for Internet of Things, IEEE Internet Things J. 9 (2022) 8229–8249. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
3. K. M. Ahmed, Federated deep learning for heterogeneous edge computing, in Proceedings of the 2021 20th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (2021), pp. 2–4. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. P. K. Sharma, M.-Y. Chen and J. H. Park, A software-defined fog node based distributed blockchain cloud architecture for IoT, IEEE Access 6 (2017) 115–124. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
5. J. Sun et al., Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities, Financ. Innov. 2 (2016) 26. Crossref, Google Scholar
6. J. L. Zhao, Overview of business innovation and research opportunities in blockchain and introduction to the special issue, Financ. Innov. 3 (2017) 28. Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. T. Aste, P. Tasca and T. Di Matteo, Blockchain technologies: The foreseeable impact on society and industry, Computer 50 (2017) 18–28. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. C. Dewi, R.-C. Chen and Y.-T. Liu, Synthetic traffic sign image generation applying generative adversarial networks, Vietnam J. Comput. Sci. 09 (2022) 333–348. Link, Google Scholar
9. H. Bae et al., AnomiGAN: Generative adversarial networks for anonymizing private medical data, Pac. Symp. Biocomp. 25 (2020) 564–570. Google Scholar
10. R. Carreño et al., An IoT expert system shell in block-chain technology with ELM as inference engine, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 18 (2019) 87–104. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. W. Gu et al., Expert system for ice hockey game prediction: Data mining with human judgment, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 15 (2016) 763–789. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
12. N. J. Pizzi et al., Expert system approach to assessments of bleeding predispositions in tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy patients, in Advances in Artificial Intelligence, World Scientific Series in Computer Science, Vol. 27 (World Scientific, 1990), pp. 67–83. Link, Google Scholar
13. P. Agrawal, V. Madaan and V. Kumar, Fuzzy rule-based medical expert system to identify the disorders of eyes, ENT and liver, Int. J. Adv. Intell. Paradig. 7 (2015) 352–367. Crossref, Google Scholar
14. A. H. Dong, D. Shan, Z. Ruan, L. Y. Zhou and F. Zuo, The design and implementation of an intelligent apparel recommend expert system, Math. Probl. Eng. 2013 (2013) 343171. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
15. P. Som, R. Chitturi and A. J. G. Babu, Expert systems application in manufacturing, Proc. SPIE 786 (1987) 474–479. Crossref, Google Scholar
16. R. Carreño, A non-linear model for a smart semantic browser bot for a text attribute recognition, Fractals 28 (2020) 2050045. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. Binance, Buy, trade, and hold 350+ cryptoccurrencies on Binance (2022), https://www.binance.com/en. Google Scholar
18. M. Wu, Technical analysis of three stock oscillators testing MACD, RSI and KDJ rules in SH & SZ stock markets, in Proceedings of the 2015 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT) (2015), pp. 2–10. Crossref, Google Scholar
19. S. M. Ross, Introduction to probability theory, in Introduction to Probability Models, 11th edn. (Elsevier, 2014), pp. 1–12. Crossref, Google Scholar
20. V. S. Pugachev, Probability of events, in Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics for Engineers, 1st edn. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984), pp. 5–11. Crossref, Google Scholar
21. R. Jafari and W. Yu, Fuzzy control for uncertainty nonlinear systems with dual fuzzy equations, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 29 (2015) 1229–1240. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
22. Ericsson, Ericsson Mobility Report (2020), https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/reports-papers/mobility-report/documents/2020/november-2020-ericsson-mobility-report.pdf. Google Scholar
23. E. De la Rosa, W. Yu and X. Li, Nonlinear system modeling with deep neural networks and autoencoders algorithm, in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC16) (2016), pp. 2157–2162. Crossref, Google Scholar
24. S. Chowdhury et al., Universality and herd immunity threshold: Revisiting the SIR model for COVID-19, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 32 (2021) 2150128. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. Wolfram, Kermack–McKendrick model (2022), https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Kermack-McKendrickModel.html. Google Scholar
26. Kaggle, COVID-19 data with SIR model (2019), https://www.kaggle.com/lisphilar/covid-19-data-with-sir-model. Google Scholar
27. N. Ashraf, Extending the basics SIR model in R (2020), Towards Data Science, June, https://towardsdatascience.com/extending-the-basic-sir-model-b6b32b833d76. Google Scholar
28. J. Gonzalez and W. Yu, Non-linear system modeling using LSTM neural networks, in Proceedings of the 2nd IFAC Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control of Nonlinear Systems (MICNON18) (2018), pp. 485–490. Crossref, Google Scholar
29. W. Yu, J. Gonzalez and X. Li, Fast training of deep LSTM networks with guaranteed stability for nonlinear system modeling, Neurocomputing 422 (2021) 85–94. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
30. T. A. Patria et al., The influence of image of 10 new prioritized destinations on FOMO among tourism students, in Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech) (2020), pp. 93–96. Crossref, Google Scholar
31. Y. Zhou, J. Gerhart and A. Sacan, Reconstruction of gene regulatory networks by stepwise multiple linear regression from time-series microarray data, in Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW) (2011), pp. 1017–1019. Google Scholar
32. P. Kumari et al., Comprehensive investigation of structural, dielectric and local piezoelectric properties of KNN ceramics, J. Adv. Dielectr. 9 (2019) 1950016. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
33. OpenVINO, rfcn-resnet101-COCO-tf: Use case and high-level description (2022), https://docs.openvino.ai/latest/omz_models_model_rfcn_resnet101_coco_tf.html. Google Scholar
34. J. Dai et al., R-FCN: Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks, in Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2016), pp. 379–387. Google Scholar
35. B. Avelin et al., Neural ODEs as the deep limit of ResNets with constant weights, Anal. Appl. 19 (2021) 397–437. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
36. J. P. Ortiz et al., Seismic activity seen through evolution of the hurst exponent model in 3D, Fractals 24 (2016) 1650045. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
37. TradingView, Look first then leap (2022), https://es.tradingview.com. Google Scholar
38. CoinMarketCap, Global cryptocurrency charts: Total cryptocurrency market cap (2022), https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/. Google Scholar
39. E. Teo, Introduction to blockchain smart contracts and programming with solidity for Ethereum, in Blockchain and Smart Contracts, Singapore University of Social Sciences-World Scientific Future Economy Series, Vol. 4 (World Scientific, 2021), pp. 189–216. Link, Google Scholar
40. S. Kumar, An investigation into smart contract deployment on Ethereum platform using Web3.js and solidity using blockchain, in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Springer, 2021), pp. 549–561. Crossref, Google Scholar
41. H. Kim and M. Laskowski, A perspective on blockchain smart contracts: Reducing uncertainty and complexity in value exchange, in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN) (2019), pp. 265–278. Google Scholar
42. V. Y. Kemmoe et al., Recent advances in smart contracts: A technical overview and state of the art, IEEE Access 8 (2020) 117781–117801. Crossref, Web of Science, Google Scholar
43. S. X. Fang et al., Web content visualizer: A visualization system for search engines in semantic web, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 10 (2011) 913–931. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
44. S. Shirgave et al., Semantically enriched variable length Markov chain model for analysis of user web navigation, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 13 (2014) 721–753. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
45. P. C.-Y. Sheu et al., Semantic computing, cloud computing, and semantic search engine, in Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (2020), pp. 1–3. Google Scholar
46. M. Maxwell et al., Ambulance redeployment: An approximate dynamic programming, in Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) (2009), pp. 8–10. Crossref, Google Scholar

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!
Check out New & Notable Titles in Nonlinear Science Includes authors Leon O Chua, Bruce J West and more

Vol. 31, No. 01

Metrics

History

Received 11 September 2022

Accepted 15 November 2022

Published: December 24, 2022

Information

This is an Open Access article published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

PDF download

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

BLOCKCHAIN-BASED IoFLT FEDERATED LEARNING IN A FUZZY/GAN ENVIRONMENT FOR A SMART TRADING BOT

Abstract

References

Recommended