Open Access

Space–time Isogeometric flow analysis with built-in Reynolds-equation limit

Takashi Kuraishi

Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Ookubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan

Search for more papers by this author

Kenji Takizawa

Corresponding author

Department of Modern Mechanical Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Ookubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

and

Tayfun E. Tezduyar

Mechanical Engineering, Rice University – MS 321, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3-4-1 Ookubo, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202519410021Cited by:26

This article is part of the issue:

Special Issue on "Methods for Complex Unsteady Flow Problems 2019"; Guest Editors: Yuri Bazilevs, Kenji Takizawa and Tayfun E. Tezduyar

Abstract

We present a space–time (ST) computational flow analysis method with built-in Reynolds-equation limit. The method enables solution of lubrication fluid dynamics problems with a computational cost comparable to that of the Reynolds-equation model for the comparable solution quality, but with the computational flexibility to go beyond the limitations of the Reynolds-equation model. The key components of the method are the ST Variational Multiscale (ST-VMS) method, ST Isogeometric Analysis (ST-IGA), and the ST Slip Interface (ST-SI) method. The VMS feature of the ST-VMS serves as a numerical stabilization method with a good track record, the moving-mesh feature of the ST framework enables high-resolution flow computation near the moving fluid–solid interfaces, and the higher-order accuracy of the ST framework strengthens both features. The ST-IGA enables more accurate representation of the solid-surface geometries and increased accuracy in the flow solution in general. With the ST-IGA, even with just one quadratic NURBS element across the gap of the lubrication fluid dynamics problem, we reach a solution quality comparable to that of the Reynolds-equation model. The ST-SI enables moving-mesh computation when the spinning solid surface is noncircular. The mesh covering the solid surface spins with it, retaining the high-resolution representation of the flow near the surface, and the SI between the spinning mesh and the rest of the mesh accurately connects the two sides of the solution. We present detailed 2D test computations to show how the method performs compared to the Reynolds-equation model, compared to finite element discretization, at different circumferential and normal mesh refinement levels, when there is an SI in the mesh, and when the no-slip boundary conditions are weakly-enforced.

Communicated by Y. Bazilevs

Keywords:

AMSC: 65M60, 65N30

References

1. O. Reynolds, On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr. Beauchamp tower’s experiments including an experimental determination of the viscosity of olive oil, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 177 (1886) 157–234. Crossref, Google Scholar
2. G. Bayada and M. Chamba, The transition between the Stokes equations and the Reynolds equation: A mathematical proof, Appl. Math. Optim. 14 (1986) 73–93. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
3. D. Sfyris and A. Chasalevris, An exact analytical solution of the Reynolds equations for the finite journal bearing lubrication, Tribol. Int. 55 (2012) 46–58. Crossref, Google Scholar
4. K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Multiscale space–time fluid–structure interaction techniques, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0571-z Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
5. K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time fluid–structure interaction methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 22 (2012) 1230001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202512300013 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
6. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and T. Kuraishi, Multiscale ST methods for thermo-fluid analysis of a ground vehicle and its tires, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25 (2015) 2227–2255. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515400072 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
7. K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, A. Puntel, T. Spielman and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time computational techniques for the aerodynamics of flapping wings, J. Appl. Mech. 79 (2012) 010903. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005073 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
8. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, Y. Otoguro, T. Terahara, T. Kuraishi and H. Hattori, Turbocharger flow computations with the Space–Time Isogeometric Analysis (ST-IGA), Comput. Fluids 142 (2017) 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.02.021 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
9. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, H. Mochizuki, H. Hattori, S. Mei, L. Pan and K. Montel, Space–time VMS method for flow computations with slip interfaces (ST-SI), Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25 (2015) 2377–2406. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515400126 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
10. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, T. Kuraishi, S. Tabata and H. Takagi, Computational thermo-fluid analysis of a disk brake, Comput. Mech. 57 (2016) 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1272-4 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
11. T. E. Tezduyar, Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations, Adv. Appl. Mech. 28 (1992) 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70153-4 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
12. T. E. Tezduyar, Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 43 (2003) 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.505 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
13. T. E. Tezduyar and S. Sathe, Modeling of fluid–structure interactions with the space–time finite elements: Solution techniques, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 54 (2007) 855–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1430 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
14. A. N. Brooks and T. J. R. Hughes, Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 32 (1982) 199–259. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
15. T. J. R. Hughes, Multiscale phenomena: Green’s functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles and the origins of stabilized methods, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 127 (1995) 387–401. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
16. T. J. R. Hughes, A. A. Oberai and L. Mazzei, Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows by the variational multiscale method, Phys. Fluids 13 (2001) 1784–1799. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
17. Y. Bazilevs, V. M. Calo, J. A. Cottrell, T. J. R. Hughes, A. Reali and G. Scovazzi, Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197 (2007) 173–201. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
18. Y. Bazilevs and I. Akkerman, Large eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor–Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residual–based variational multiscale method, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010) 3402–3414. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
19. Y. Bazilevs, V. M. Calo, T. J. R. Hughes and Y. Zhang, Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction: Theory, algorithms and computations, Comput. Mech. 43 (2008) 3–37. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
20. K. Takizawa, Y. Bazilevs and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid–structure interaction modeling, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 19 (2012) 171–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-012-9071-3 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
21. Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid–structure interaction, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 22 (2012) 1230002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202512300025 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
22. Y. Bazilevs, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction: Methods and Applications (Wiley, February 2013). Crossref, Google Scholar
23. Y. Bazilevs, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Challenges and directions in computational fluid–structure interaction, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013) 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202513400010 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
24. Y. Bazilevs, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, New directions and challenging computations in fluid dynamics modeling with stabilized and multiscale methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25 (2015) 2217–2226. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515020029 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
25. V. Kalro and T. E. Tezduyar, A parallel 3D computational method for fluid–structure interactions in parachute systems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190 (2000) 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00204-8 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
26. Y. Bazilevs and T. J. R. Hughes, Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics, Comput. Fluids 36 (2007) 12–26. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
27. Y. Bazilevs, C. Michler, V. M. Calo and T. J. R. Hughes, Isogeometric variational multiscale modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows with weakly enforced boundary conditions on unstretched meshes, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199 (2010) 780–790. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
28. M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman and Y. Bazilevs, Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE-VMS: Validation and role of weakly enforced boundary conditions, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 499–511. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
29. Y. Bazilevs and T. J. R. Hughes, NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components, Comput. Mech. 43 (2008) 143–150. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
30. M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, Fluid–structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: Simulating the full machine, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 821–833. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
31. M. E. Moghadam, Y. Bazilevs, T.-Y. Hsia, I. E. Vignon-Clementel, A. L. Marsden, and M. of Congenital Hearts Alliance (MOCHA), A comparison of outlet boundary treatments for prevention of backflow divergence with relevance to blood flow simulations, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0599-0 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
32. Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman, S. Wright, K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, T. Spielman and T. E. Tezduyar, 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: Geometry modeling and aerodynamics, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 65 (2011) 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2400 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
33. Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, J. Kiendl, R. Wüchner and K.-U. Bletzinger, 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: Fluid–structure interaction modeling with composite blades, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 65 (2011) 236–253. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
34. M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman and Y. Bazilevs, High-performance computing of wind turbine aerodynamics using isogeometric analysis, Comput. Fluids 49 (2011) 93–100. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
35. Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu and M. A. Scott, Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations and with application to wind turbines, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 249–252 (2012) 28–41. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
36. M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman and Y. Bazilevs, Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: Validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment, Wind Ener. 17 (2014) 461–481. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
37. A. Korobenko, M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman, J. Tippmann and Y. Bazilevs, Structural mechanics modeling and FSI simulation of wind turbines, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013) 249–272. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
38. Y. Bazilevs, K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, M.-C. Hsu, N. Kostov and S. McIntyre, Aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines with the ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 21 (2014) 359–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9119-7 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
39. Y. Bazilevs, A. Korobenko, X. Deng and J. Yan, Novel structural modeling and mesh moving techniques for advanced FSI simulation of wind turbines, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 102 (2015) 766–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4738 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
40. A. Korobenko, J. Yan, S. M. I. Gohari, S. Sarkar and Y. Bazilevs, FSI simulation of two back-to-back wind turbines in atmospheric boundary layer flow, Comput. Fluids 158 (2017) 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.05.010 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
41. A. Korobenko, Y. Bazilevs, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Recent advances in ALE-VMS and ST-VMS computational aerodynamic and FSI analysis of wind turbines, in Frontiers in Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation: Research from Lead Investigators under Forty – 2018, ed. T. E. Tezduyar, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology (Springer, 2018), pp. 253–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_7 Crossref, Google Scholar
42. A. Korobenko, Y. Bazilevs, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Computer modeling of wind turbines: 1. ALE-VMS and ST-VMS aerodynamic and FSI analysis, to appear in Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., to appear, (2018), doi:10.1007/s11831-018-9292-1. Google Scholar
43. A. Korobenko, M.-C. Hsu, I. Akkerman and Y. Bazilevs, Aerodynamic simulation of vertical-axis wind turbines, J. Appl. Mech. 81 (2013) 021011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024415 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
44. Y. Bazilevs, A. Korobenko, X. Deng, J. Yan, M. Kinzel and J. O. Dabiri, FSI modeling of vertical-axis wind turbines, J. Appl. Mech. 81 (2014) 081006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027466 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
45. J. Yan, A. Korobenko, X. Deng and Y. Bazilevs, Computational free-surface fluid–structure interaction with application to floating offshore wind turbines, Comput. Fluids 141 (2016) 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.03.008 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
46. Y. Bazilevs, A. Korobenko, J. Yan, A. Pal, S. M. I. Gohari and S. Sarkar, ALE–VMS formulation for stratified turbulent incompressible flows with applications, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 25 (2015) 2349–2375. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202515400114 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
47. Y. Bazilevs, A. Korobenko, X. Deng and J. Yan, FSI modeling for fatigue-damage prediction in full-scale wind-turbine blades, J. Appl. Mech. 83 (2016) 061010. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
48. Y. Bazilevs, V. M. Calo, Y. Zhang and T. J. R. Hughes, Isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow, Comput. Mech. 38 (2006) 310–322. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
49. Y. Bazilevs, J. R. Gohean, T. J. R. Hughes, R. D. Moser and Y. Zhang, Patient-specific isogeometric fluid–structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198 (2009) 3534–3550. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
50. Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, D. Benson, S. Sankaran and A. Marsden, Computational fluid–structure interaction: Methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection, Comput. Mech. 45 (2009) 77–89. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
51. Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, Y. Zhang, W. Wang, X. Liang, T. Kvamsdal, R. Brekken, and J. Isaksen, A fully-coupled fluid–structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms, Comput. Mech. 46 (2010) 3–16. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
52. Y. Bazilevs, M.-C. Hsu, Y. Zhang, W. Wang, T. Kvamsdal, S. Hentschel, and J. Isaksen, Computational fluid–structure interaction: Methods and application to cerebral aneurysms, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 9 (2010) 481–498. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
53. M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid–structure interaction simulations, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 47 (2011) 593–599. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
54. C. C. Long, A. L. Marsden and Y. Bazilevs, Fluid–structure interaction simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices, Comput. Mech. 52 (2013) 971–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0858-3 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
55. C. C. Long, M. Esmaily-Moghadam, A. L. Marsden and Y. Bazilevs, Computation of residence time in the simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0931-y Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
56. C. C. Long, A. L. Marsden and Y. Bazilevs, Shape optimization of pulsatile ventricular assist devices using FSI to minimize thrombotic risk, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0967-z Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
57. M.-C. Hsu, D. Kamensky, Y. Bazilevs, M. S. Sacks and T. J. R. Hughes, Fluid–structure interaction analysis of bioprosthetic heart valves: Significance of arterial wall deformation, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 1055–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1059-4 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
58. M.-C. Hsu, D. Kamensky, F. Xu, J. Kiendl, C. Wang, M. C. H. Wu, J. Mineroff, A. Reali, Y. Bazilevs and M. S. Sacks, Dynamic and fluid–structure interaction simulations of bioprosthetic heart valves using parametric design with T-splines and Fung-type material models, Comput. Mech. 55 (2015) 1211–1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1166-x Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
59. D. Kamensky, M.-C. Hsu, D. Schillinger, J. A. Evans, A. Aggarwal, Y. Bazilevs, M. S. Sacks and T. J. R. Hughes, An immersogeometric variational framework for fluid-structure interaction: Application to bioprosthetic heart valves, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 284 (2015) 1005–1053. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
60. I. Akkerman, Y. Bazilevs, D. J. Benson, M. W. Farthing and C. E. Kees, Free-surface flow and fluid–object interaction modeling with emphasis on ship hydrodynamics, J. Appl. Mech. 79 (2012) 010905. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
61. I. Akkerman, J. Dunaway, J. Kvandal, J. Spinks and Y. Bazilevs, Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: Simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE-VMS, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 719–727. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
62. C. Wang, M. C. H. Wu, F. Xu, M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, Modeling of a hydraulic arresting gear using fluid–structure interaction and isogeometric analysis, Comput. Fluids 142 (2017) 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.12.004 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
63. M. C. H. Wu, D. Kamensky, C. Wang, A. J. Herrema, F. Xu, M. S. Pigazzini, A. Verma, A. L. Marsden, Y. Bazilevs and M.-C. Hsu, Optimizing fluid–structure interaction systems with immersogeometric analysis and surrogate modeling: Application to a hydraulic arresting gear, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. Published online (2017), doi:10.1016/j.cma.2016.09.032. Google Scholar
64. J. Yan, X. Deng, A. Korobenko and Y. Bazilevs, Free-surface flow modeling and simulation of horizontal-axis tidal-stream turbines, Comput. Fluids 158 (2017) 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.06.016 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
65. B. Augier, J. Yan, A. Korobenko, J. Czarnowski, G. Ketterman and Y. Bazilevs, Experimental and numerical FSI study of compliant hydrofoils, Comput. Mech. 55 (2015) 1079–1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1090-5 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
66. J. Yan, B. Augier, A. Korobenko, J. Czarnowski, G. Ketterman and Y. Bazilevs, FSI modeling of a propulsion system based on compliant hydrofoils in a tandem configuration, Comput. Fluids 141 (2016) 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.07.013 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
67. T. A. Helgedagsrud, Y. Bazilevs, K. M. Mathisen and O. A. Oiseth, Computational and experimental investigation of free vibration and flutter of bridge decks, Comput. Mech. Published online, doi:10.1007/s00466-018-1587-4. Google Scholar
68. T. A. Helgedagsrud, Y. Bazilevs, A. Korobenko, K. M. Mathisen and O. A. Oiseth, Using ALE-VMS to compute aerodynamic derivatives of bridge sections, Comput. Fluids Published online, doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.04.037. Google Scholar
69. T. A. Helgedagsrud, I. Akkerman, Y. Bazilevs, K. M. Mathisen and O. A. Oiseth, Isogeometric modeling and experimental investigation of moving-domain bridge aerodynamics, ASCE J. Eng. Mech. Accepted for publication. Google Scholar
70. D. Kamensky, J. A. Evans, M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, Projection-based stabilization of interface Lagrange multipliers in immersogeometric fluid–thin structure interaction analysis, with application to heart valve modeling, Comput. Math. Appl. 74 (2017) 2068–2088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2017.07.006 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
71. Y. Yu, D. Kamensky, M.-C. Hsu, X. Y. Lu, Y. Bazilevs and T. J. R. Hughes, Error estimates for projection-based dynamic augmented Lagrangian boundary condition enforcement, with application to fluid–structure interaction, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 28 (2018) 2457–2509. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202518500537 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
72. T. E. Tezduyar, K. Takizawa, C. Moorman, S. Wright and J. Christopher, Space–time finite element computation of complex fluid–structure interactions, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 64 (2010) 1201–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2221 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
73. J. Yan, A. Korobenko, A. E. Tejada-Martinez, R. Golshan and Y. Bazilevs, A new variational multiscale formulation for stratified incompressible turbulent flows, Comput. Fluids 158 (2017) 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.12.004 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
74. T. M. van Opstal, J. Yan, C. Coley, J. A. Evans, T. Kvamsdal and Y. Bazilevs, Isogeometric divergence-conforming variational multiscale formulation of incompressible turbulent flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 316 (2017) 859–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.10.015 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
75. F. Xu, G. Moutsanidis, D. Kamensky, M.-C. Hsu, M. Murugan, A. Ghoshal, and Y. Bazilevs, Compressible flows on moving domains: Stabilized methods, weakly enforced essential boundary conditions, sliding interfaces, and application to gas-turbine modeling, Comput. Fluids 158 (2017) 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.02.006 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
76. T. E. Tezduyar and K. Takizawa, Space–time computations in practical engineering applications: A summary of the 25-year history, Comput. Mech. published online, (2018), doi:10.1007/s00466-018-1620-7. Google Scholar
77. K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Computational methods for parachute fluid–structure interactions, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 19 (2012) 125–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-012-9070-4 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
78. K. Takizawa, M. Fritze, D. Montes, T. Spielman and T. E. Tezduyar, Fluid–structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes with disreefing and modified geometric porosity, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0761-3 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
79. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, J. Boben, N. Kostov, C. Boswell and A. Buscher, Fluid–structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity, Comput. Mech. 52 (2013) 1351–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0880-5 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
80. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, C. Boswell, Y. Tsutsui and K. Montel, Special methods for aerodynamic-moment calculations from parachute FSI modeling, Comput. Mech. 55 (2015) 1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1074-5 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
81. K. Takizawa, D. Montes, M. Fritze, S. McIntyre, J. Boben and T. E. Tezduyar, Methods for FSI modeling of spacecraft parachute dynamics and cover separation, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013) 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202513400058 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
82. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, C. Boswell, R. Kolesar and K. Montel, FSI modeling of the reefed stages and disreefing of the Orion spacecraft parachutes, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 1203–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1052-y Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
83. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, R. Kolesar, C. Boswell, T. Kanai and K. Montel, Multiscale methods for gore curvature calculations from FSI modeling of spacecraft parachutes, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1069-2 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
84. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and R. Kolesar, FSI modeling of the Orion spacecraft drogue parachutes, Comput. Mech. 55 (2015) 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1108-z Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
85. K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, T. E. Tezduyar, M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, Stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0589-2 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
86. K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, D. Montes, T. E. Tezduyar, M.-C. Hsu and Y. Bazilevs, Numerical-performance studies for the stabilized space–time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics, Comput. Mech. 48 (2011) 647–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-011-0614-5 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
87. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, S. McIntyre, N. Kostov, R. Kolesar and C. Habluetzel, Space–time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics, Comput. Mech. 53 (2014) 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0888-x Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
88. K. Takizawa, Y. Bazilevs, T. E. Tezduyar, M.-C. Hsu, O. Øiseth, K. M. Mathisen, N. Kostov and S. McIntyre, Engineering analysis and design with ALE-VMS and space–time methods, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 21 (2014) 481–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9113-0 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
89. K. Takizawa, Computational engineering analysis with the new-generation space–time methods, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-0999-z Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
90. K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, A. Puntel, N. Kostov and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time techniques for computational aerodynamics modeling of flapping wings of an actual locust, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0759-x Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
91. K. Takizawa, B. Henicke, A. Puntel, N. Kostov and T. E. Tezduyar, Computer modeling techniques for flapping-wing aerodynamics of a locust, Comput. Fluids 85 (2013) 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.11.008 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
92. K. Takizawa, N. Kostov, A. Puntel, B. Henicke and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time computational analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 761–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0758-y Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
93. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and N. Kostov, Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-0980-x Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
94. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, A. Buscher and S. Asada, Space–time interface-tracking with topology change (ST-TC), Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 955–971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0935-7 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
95. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and A. Buscher, Space–time computational analysis of MAV flapping-wing aerodynamics with wing clapping, Comput. Mech. 55 (2015) 1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1095-0 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
96. K. Takizawa, Y. Bazilevs, T. E. Tezduyar, C. C. Long, A. L. Marsden and K. Schjodt, ST and ALE-VMS methods for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid mechanics modeling, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 24 (2014) 2437–2486. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202514500250 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
97. K. Takizawa, K. Schjodt, A. Puntel, N. Kostov and T. E. Tezduyar, Patient-specific computer modeling of blood flow in cerebral arteries with aneurysm and stent, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0760-4 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
98. K. Takizawa, K. Schjodt, A. Puntel, N. Kostov and T. E. Tezduyar, Patient-specific computational analysis of the influence of a stent on the unsteady flow in cerebral aneurysms, Comput. Mech. 51 (2013) 1061–1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0790-y Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
99. H. Suito, K. Takizawa, V. Q. H. Huynh, D. Sze and T. Ueda, FSI analysis of the blood flow and geometrical characteristics in the thoracic aorta, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1017-1 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
100. H. Suito, K. Takizawa, V. Q. H. Huynh, D. Sze, T. Ueda and T. E. Tezduyar, A geometrical-characteristics study in patient-specific FSI analysis of blood flow in the thoracic aorta, in Advances in Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation: New Methods and Challenging Computations, eds. Y. BazilevsK. Takizawa, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology (Springer, 2016), pp. 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40827-9_29 Crossref, Google Scholar
101. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, H. Uchikawa, T. Terahara, T. Sasaki, K. Shiozaki, A. Yoshida, K. Komiya and G. Inoue, Aorta flow analysis and heart valve flow and structure analysis, in Frontiers in Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation: Research from Lead Investigators under Forty – 2018, ed. T. E. Tezduyar, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology (Springer, 2018), pp. 29–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_2 Crossref, Google Scholar
102. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, H. Uchikawa, T. Terahara, T. Sasaki, and A. Yoshida, Mesh refinement influence and cardiac-cycle flow periodicity in aorta flow analysis with isogeometric discretization, Comput. Fluids, published online, (2018), doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.05.025. Google Scholar
103. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, A. Buscher and S. Asada, Space–time fluid mechanics computation of heart valve models, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 973–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1046-9 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
104. K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, New directions in space–time computational methods, in Advances in Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation: New Methods and Challenging Computations, eds. Y. BazilevsK. Takizawa, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology (Springer, 2016), pp. 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40827-9_13 Crossref, Google Scholar
105. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, T. Terahara and T. Sasaki, Heart valve flow computation with the Space–Time Slip Interface Topology Change (ST-SI-TC) method and Isogeometric Analysis (IGA), in Biomed. Technology: Modeling, Experiments and Simulation, eds. P. WriggersT. Lenarz, Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics (Springer, 2018), pp. 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59548-1_6 Crossref, Google Scholar
106. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, T. Terahara and T. Sasaki, Heart valve flow computation with the integrated Space–time VMS, slip interface, topology change and isogeometric discretization methods, Comput. Fluids 158 (2017) 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.11.012 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
107. K. Takizawa, D. Montes, S. McIntyre and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time VMS methods for modeling of incompressible flows at high Reynolds numbers, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23 (2013) 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218202513400022 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
108. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and H. Hattori, Computational analysis of flow-driven string dynamics in turbomachinery, Comput. Fluids 142 (2017) 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.02.019 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
109. K. Komiya, T. Kanai, Y. Otoguro, M. Kaneko, K. Hirota, Y. Zhang, K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, M. Nohmi, T. Tsuneda, M. Kawai and M. Isono, Computational analysis of flow-driven string dynamics in a pump and residence time calculation, in Proc. 29th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Kyoto, Japan (2018). Google Scholar
110. T. Kanai, K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, K. Komiya, M. Kaneko, K. Hirota, M. Nohmi, T. Tsuneda, M. Kawai and M. Isono, Methods for computation of flow-driven string dynamics in a pump and residence time, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1142/S021820251941001X Link, Google Scholar
111. Y. Otoguro, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time VMS computational flow analysis with isogeometric discretization and a general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method, Comput. Fluids 158 (2017) 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.compfluid.2017.04.017 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
112. Y. Otoguro, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, A general-purpose NURBS mesh generation method for complex geometries, in Frontiers in Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation: Research from Lead Investigators under Forty — 2018, T. E. Tezduyar, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology (Springer, 2018), pp. 399–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_10 Crossref, Google Scholar
113. Y. Otoguro, K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, K. Nagaoka and S. Mei, Turbocharger turbine and exhaust manifold flow computation with the space–time variational multiscale method and isogeometric analysis, Comput. Fluids published online, (2018), doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.05.019. Google Scholar
114. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, S. Asada and T. Kuraishi, Space–time method for flow computations with slip interfaces and topology changes (ST-SI-TC), Comput. Fluids 141 (2016) 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.05.006 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
115. T. Kuraishi, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time computational analysis of tire aerodynamics with actual geometry, road contact and tire deformation, in Frontiers in Computational Fluid–Structure Interaction and Flow Simulation: Research from Lead Investigators under Forty–2018, ed. T. E. Tezduyar, Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology (Springer, 2018), pp. 337–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96469-0_8 Crossref, Google Scholar
116. T. Kuraishi, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Tire aerodynamics with actual tire geometry, road contact and tire deformation, Comput. Mech. published online, (2018), doi:10.1007/s00466-018-1642-1. Google Scholar
117. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and T. Terahara, Ram-air parachute structural and fluid mechanics computations with the space–time isogeometric analysis (ST-IGA), Comput. Fluids 141 (2016) 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.05.027 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
118. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and T. Kanai, Porosity models and computational methods for compressible-flow aerodynamics of parachutes with geometric porosity, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 27 (2017) 771–806. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202517500166 Link, ISI, Google Scholar
119. T. Kanai, K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar, T. Tanaka and A. Hartmann, Compressible-flow geometric-porosity modeling and spacecraft parachute computation with isogeometric discretization, Comput. Mech. 62 (2018) 301–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1595-4 Google Scholar
120. K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Space–time computation techniques with continuous representation in time (ST-C), Comput. Mech. 53 (2014) 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0895-y Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
121. T. E. Tezduyar, T. Cragin, S. Sathe and B. Nanna, FSI computations in arterial fluid mechanics with estimated zero-pressure arterial geometry, Marine 2007, eds. E. OnateJ. GarciaP. BerganT. Kvamsdal CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, (2007). Google Scholar
122. T. E. Tezduyar, S. Sathe, M. Schwaab and B. S. Conklin, Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space–time fluid–structure interaction technique, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 57 (2008) 601–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1633 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
123. K. Takizawa, J. Christopher, T. E. Tezduyar and S. Sathe, Space–time finite element computation of arterial fluid–structure interactions with patient-specific data, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 26 (2010) 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1241 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
124. K. Takizawa, C. Moorman, S. Wright, J. Purdue, T. McPhail, P. R. Chen, J. Warren and T. E. Tezduyar, Patient-specific arterial fluid–structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 65 (2011) 308–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2360 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
125. T. E. Tezduyar, K. Takizawa, T. Brummer and P. R. Chen, Space–time fluid–structure interaction modeling of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms, Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 27 (2011) 1665–1710. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.1433 Crossref, Google Scholar
126. K. Takizawa, H. Takagi, T. E. Tezduyar and R. Torii, Estimation of element-based zero-stress state for arterial FSI computations, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0919-7 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
127. K. Takizawa, R. Torii, H. Takagi, T. E. Tezduyar and X. Y. Xu, Coronary arterial dynamics computation with medical-image-based time-dependent anatomical models and element-based zero-stress state estimates, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 1047–1053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1049-6 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
128. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and T. Sasaki, Estimation of element-based zero-stress state in arterial FSI computations with isogeometric wall discretization, in Biomedical Technology: Modeling, Experiments and Simulation, eds. P. WriggersT. Lenarz, Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics, (Springer, 2018), pp. 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59548-1_7 Crossref, Google Scholar
129. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and T. Sasaki, Aorta modeling with the element-based zero-stress state and isogeometric discretization, Comput. Mech. 59 (2017) 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-016-1344-5 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
130. T. Sasaki, K. Takizawa and T. E. Tezduyar, Aorta zero-stress state modeling with T-spline discretization, Comput. Mech. published online, (2018), doi:10.1007/s00466-018-1651-0. Google Scholar
131. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and T. Sasaki, Isogeometric hyperelastic shell analysis with out-of-plane deformation mapping, Comput. Mech. published online, (2018), doi:10.1007/s00466-018-1616-3. Google Scholar
132. T. M. van Opstal, E. H. van Brummelen, R. de Borst and M. R. Lewis, A finite-element/boundary-element method for large-displacement fluid–structure interaction, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 779–788. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
133. T. M. van Opstal, E. H. van Brummelen and G. J. van Zwieten, A finite-element/boundary-element method for three-dimensional, large-displacement fluid–structure-interaction, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 284 (2015) 637–663. Crossref, Google Scholar
134. T. E. Tezduyar, S. K. Aliabadi, M. Behr and S. Mittal, Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 119 (1994) 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(94)00082-4 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
135. K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and Y. Otoguro, Stabilization and discontinuity-capturing parameters for space–time flow computations with finite element and isogeometric discretizations, Comput. Mech. 62 (2018), 1169–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-018-1557-x Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
136. T. E. Tezduyar and T. J. R. Hughes, Finite element formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the compressible Euler equations, in Proc. AIAA 21st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 83-0125, Reno, Nevada, (1983). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-125 Crossref, Google Scholar
137. T. J. R. Hughes and T. E. Tezduyar, Finite element methods for first-order hyperbolic systems with particular emphasis on the compressible Euler equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 45 (1984) 217–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(84)90157-9 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
138. T. E. Tezduyar and Y. J. Park, Discontinuity capturing finite element formulations for nonlinear convection-diffusion-reaction equations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 59 (1986) 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(86)90003-4 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
139. T. E. Tezduyar and D. K. Ganjoo, Petrov-Galerkin formulations with weighting functions dependent upon spatial and temporal discretization: Applications to transient convection-diffusion problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 59 (1986) 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(86)90023-X Crossref, Google Scholar
140. G. J. Le Beau, S. E. Ray, S. K. Aliabadi and T. E. Tezduyar, SUPG finite element computation of compressible flows with the entropy and conservation variables formulations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 104 (1993) 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(93)90033-T Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
141. T. E. Tezduyar and Y. Osawa, Finite element stabilization parameters computed from element matrices and vectors, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190 (2000) 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00211-5 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
142. T. E. Tezduyar, Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces, in Encyclopedia of Comput. Mech. Fluids, eds. E. SteinR. D. BorstT. J. R. Hughes, Vol. 3 (Wiley, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1002/0470091355.ecm069 Crossref, Google Scholar
143. T. E. Tezduyar, Finite elements in fluids: Stabilized formulations and moving boundaries and interfaces, Comput. Fluids 36 (2007) 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.02.011 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
144. T. E. Tezduyar and M. Senga, Stabilization and shock-capturing parameters in SUPG formulation of compressible flows, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195 (2006) 1621–1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2005.05.032 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
145. T. E. Tezduyar and M. Senga, SUPG finite element computation of inviscid supersonic flows with YZ $β$ shock-capturing, Comput. Fluids 36 (2007) 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.07.009 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
146. T. E. Tezduyar, M. Senga and D. Vicker, Computation of inviscid supersonic flows around cylinders and spheres with the SUPG formulation and YZ $β$ shock-capturing, Comput. Mech. 38 (2006) 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-005-0025-6 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
147. T. E. Tezduyar and S. Sathe, Enhanced-discretization selective stabilization procedure (EDSSP), Comput. Mech. 38 (2006) 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0056-7 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
148. A. Corsini, F. Rispoli, A. Santoriello and T. E. Tezduyar, Improved discontinuity-capturing finite element techniques for reaction effects in turbulence computation, Comput. Mech. 38 (2006) 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0045-x Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
149. F. Rispoli, A. Corsini and T. E. Tezduyar, Finite element computation of turbulent flows with the discontinuity-capturing directional dissipation (DCDD), Comput. Fluids 36 (2007) 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2005.07.004 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
150. T. E. Tezduyar, S. Ramakrishnan and S. Sathe, Stabilized formulations for incompressible flows with thermal coupling, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 57 (2008) 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1743 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
151. F. Rispoli, R. Saavedra, A. Corsini and T. E. Tezduyar, Computation of inviscid compressible flows with the V-SGS stabilization and YZ $β$ shock-capturing, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 54 (2007) 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1447 Crossref, Google Scholar
152. Y. Bazilevs, V. M. Calo, T. E. Tezduyar and T. J. R. Hughes, YZ $β$ discontinuity-capturing for advection-dominated processes with application to arterial drug delivery, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 54 (2007) 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1484 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
153. A. Corsini, C. Menichini, F. Rispoli, A. Santoriello and T. E. Tezduyar, A multiscale finite element formulation with discontinuity capturing for turbulence models with dominant reactionlike terms, J. Appl. Mech. 76 (2009) 021211. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3062967 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
154. F. Rispoli, R. Saavedra, F. Menichini and T. E. Tezduyar, Computation of inviscid supersonic flows around cylinders and spheres with the V-SGS stabilization and YZ $β$ shock-capturing, J. Appl. Mech. 76 (2009) 021209. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3057496 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
155. A. Corsini, C. Iossa, F. Rispoli and T. E. Tezduyar, A DRD finite element formulation for computing turbulent reacting flows in gas turbine combustors, Comput. Mech. 46 (2010) 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-009-0441-0 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
156. M.-C. Hsu, Y. Bazilevs, V. M. Calo, T. E. Tezduyar and T. J. R. Hughes, Improving stability of stabilized and multiscale formulations in flow simulations at small time steps, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199 (2010) 828–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.06.019 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
157. A. Corsini, F. Rispoli and T. E. Tezduyar, Stabilized finite element computation of NOx emission in aero-engine combustors, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 65 (2011) 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2451 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
158. A. Corsini, F. Rispoli and T. E. Tezduyar, Computer modeling of wave-energy air turbines with the SUPG/PSPG formulation and discontinuity-capturing technique, J. Appl. Mech. 79 (2012) 010910. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005060 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
159. A. Corsini, F. Rispoli, A. G. Sheard and T. E. Tezduyar, Computational analysis of noise reduction devices in axial fans with stabilized finite element formulations, Comput. Mech. 50 (2012) 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0789-4 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
160. P. A. Kler, L. D. Dalcin, R. R. Paz and T. E. Tezduyar, SUPG and discontinuity-capturing methods for coupled fluid mechanics and electrochemical transport problems, Comput. Mech. 51 (2013) 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0712-z Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
161. A. Corsini, F. Rispoli, A. G. Sheard, K. Takizawa, T. E. Tezduyar and P. Venturini, A variational multiscale method for particle-cloud tracking in turbomachinery flows, Comput. Mech. 54 (2014) 1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-1050-0 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
162. F. Rispoli, G. Delibra, P. Venturini, A. Corsini, R. Saavedra and T. E. Tezduyar, Particle tracking and particle–shock interaction in compressible-flow computations with the V-SGS stabilization and YZ $β$ shock-capturing, Comput. Mech. 55 (2015) 1201–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-015-1160-3 Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
163. T. E. Tezduyar, Adaptive determination of the finite element stabilization parameters, in Proc. ECCOMAS Computational Fluid Dynamics Conf. 2001 (CD-ROM), Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom (2001). Google Scholar

Published: 10 April 2019

Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!
View our Mathematical Modelling books Featuring authors Frederic Y M Wan, Gregory Baker and more!

Vol. 29, No. 05

Metrics

Downloaded 220 times

History

Received 21 November 2018

Revised 4 January 2019

Accepted 23 January 2019

Information

This is an Open Access article published by World Scientific Publishing Company. It is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY) License which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords

PDF download

System Upgrade on Mon, Jun 21st, 2021 at 1am (EDT)

Space–time Isogeometric flow analysis with built-in Reynolds-equation limit

Abstract

References

Recommended