World Scientific
  • Search
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Co-existence of a Period Annulus and a Limit Cycle in a Class of Predator–Prey Models with Group Defense by:4 (Source: Crossref)

    For a family of two-dimensional predator–prey models of Gause type, we investigate the simultaneous occurrence of a center singularity and a limit cycle. The family is characterized by the fact that the functional response is nonanalytical and exhibits group defense. We prove the existence and uniqueness of the limit cycle using a new theorem for Liénard systems. The new theorem gives conditions for the uniqueness of a limit cycle which surrounds a period annulus. The results of this paper provide a mechanism for studying the global behavior of solutions to Gause systems through bifurcation of an integrable system which contains a center and a limit cycle.


    • Andrews, J. F. [1968] “ A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates,” Biotechnol. Bioeng. 10, 707–723. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Andronov, A. A., Leontovich, E. A., Gordon, I. I. & Maier, A. G. [1973] Theory of Bifurcation of Dynamical Systems on the Plane (Translated by John Wiley and Sons, NY). Google Scholar
    • Cheng, K. [1981] “ Uniqueness of a limit cycle for a predator–prey system,” SIAM J. Math. Anal. 12, 541–548. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Cherkas, L. A. & Zhilevich, L. I. [1970] “ Some tests for the absence or uniqueness of limit cycles,” Differentsial’nye Uravneniya 6, 1170–1178 (in Russian). Google Scholar
    • Ding, S. [1982] “ On the existence of exact n limit cycles of Liénard equation in finite interval,” Sci. China Ser. A 25, 1156–1158. Google Scholar
    • Freedman, H. I. & Wolkowicz, G. S. K. [1986] “ Predator–prey systems with group defence: The paradox of enrichment revisited,” Bull. Math. Biol. 48, 493–508. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Gause, G. F. [1934] The Struggle for Existence (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Holling, C. [1959a] “ The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly,” Can. Entomol. 91, 293–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Holling, C. [1959b] “ Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism,” Can. Entomol. 91, 385–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Holling, C. [1965] “ The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation,” Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 45, 3–60. Google Scholar
    • Huang, J. & Xiao, D. [2004] “ Analyses of bifurcations and stability in a predator–prey system with Holling type-IV functional response,” Acta Math. Appl. Sin. 20, 167–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kooij, R. E. & Zegeling, A. [2019] “ Predator–prey models with non-analytical functional response,” Chaos Solit. Fract. 123, 163–172. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Liu, N. [1988] “ Limit cycles for a predator–prey model with functional response of Holling type I,” Chin. Ann. Math. 9a, 421–427 (in Chinese). Google Scholar
    • Lotka, A. J. [1925] Elements of Physical Biology (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore). Google Scholar
    • Rosenzweig, M. L. & McArthur, R. H. [1963] “ Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator–prey interactions,” Am. Nat. 47, 209–223. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Rothe, F. & Shafer, D. S. [1992] “ Multiple bifurcation in a predator–prey system with nonmonotonic predator response,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 120, 313–347. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Ruan, S. & Xiao, D. [2001] “ Global analysis in a predator–prey system with nonmonotonic functional response,” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 61, 1445–1472. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Sohrab, H. [2003] Basic Real Analysis (Birkäuser, Boston). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Volterra, V. [1927] “ Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d’individui in specie animali conviventi,” Mem. R. Com. Tolassogr. Ital. 131, 1–142 (in Italian). Google Scholar
    • Wolkowicz, G. S. K. [1988] “ Bifurcation analysis of a predator–prey system involving group defence,” SIAM J. Appl. Math. 48, 592–606. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Yang, K. & Freedman, H. I. [1988] “ Uniqueness of limit cycles in Gause type models of predator–prey systems,” Math. Biosci. 88, 67–84. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Zegeling, A. & Kooij, R. E. [2020] “ Singular perturbations of the Holling I predator–prey system with a focus,” J. Diff. Eqs. 269, 5434–5462. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Zeng, X., Zhang, Z. & Gao, S. [1994] “ On the uniqueness of the limit cycle of the generalized Liénard equation,” Bull. London Math. Soc. 26, 213–247. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Zhang, Z. [1958] “ On the uniqueness of limit cycles of certain equations of nonlinear oscillations,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 119, 659–662 (in Russian). Google Scholar
    • Zhang, Z. [1986] “ Proof of the uniqueness theorem of limit cycles of generalized Liénard equations,” Appl. Anal. 23, 63–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles!

    Check out our Bifurcation & Chaos