World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Evaluation of the Signal and Noise of Readout Electronics for Radiation Detector by Using MATLAB Simulation Program

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S021812662450258XCited by:0 (Source: Crossref)

    Within the frame of this work, a user-friendly MATLAB program for the simulation of signals and electronic noise at the nuclear radiation readout system was developed. Signal and noise in terms of equivalent noise charge (ENC) have been evaluated. Five noise sources were considered in order to have high simulation accuracy. The role and influence of different parameters of the readout circuits on the output signal and noise were predicted and illustrated. Moreover, the effect of all elementary parameters of each noise source on the ENC was taken into consideration. Since the energy resolution is affected by the electronic noise expressed by ENC, the obtained simulation results help to select the most feasible concept and parameters for a real system having a minimal noise effect. Using the program, several examples of the effect of those parameters on different ENC contributions related to the noise sources have been analyzed and discussed in detail. A comparison between the simulated results and experimental data was conducted.

    This paper was recommended by Regional Editor Giuseppe Ferri.

    References

    • 1. L. W. Nagel and D. O Pederson, SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis), Memorandum No. ERL-M382, University of California, Berkeley (1973). Google Scholar
    • 2. V. Andrei , SPICE – The third decade, Proc. 1990 IEEE Bipolar Circuits and Technology Meeting, Minneapolis, September 1990, pp. 96–101. Google Scholar
    • 3. A. Candelori, A. Paccagnella, F. Nardi, N. Bacchetta and D. Bisello , SPICE evaluation of the S/N ratio for Si microstrip detectors, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 46 (1999) 1261–1273. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 4. M. Auf der Maur, M. Povolotskyi, F. Sacconi, G. Romano, E. Petrolati and A. Di Carlo , Multiscale simulation of electronic and optoelectronic devices with TiberCAD, Simul. Semicond. Process. Dev. 12 (2007) 245–248. Google Scholar
    • 5. C. E. Aalseth and H. S. Miley , A simulation method for germanium pulse shapes, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp., Seattle, WA, USA, 24–30 October 1999, pp. 769–771. Google Scholar
    • 6. S. Bose and R. Bhattacharya , HPGe detector preamplifier output pulse simulator, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 277 (1989) 587–590. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 7. J. Assaf and B. Abdulghani , CPA simulator: A software tool to simulate nuclear front-end circuit response, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 624 (2010) 662–670. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 8. N. Bukharin and P. Vaidya , Simulation of charge sensitive preamplifier using multisim software, Int. J. Current Eng. Technol. l5 (2015) 1298–1302. Google Scholar
    • 9. A. Lynch, M. Ruat, G. Potter, D. Fitrio, M. Dimmock, A. Berry and S. Tjoa , Modeling and simulation of the entire detector system by using Matlab and Simulink, IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Med. Imag. Conf., Knoxville, TN, USA, 30 October - 06 November 2010, pp. 1168–1172. Google Scholar
    • 10. G. Lioliou and A. M. Barnett , Electronic noise in charge sensitive preamplifiers for X-ray spectroscopy and the benefits of a SiC input JFET, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 801 (2015) 36–72. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 11. T.-H. Lee and G. Chao , Monte Carlo based time-domain Hspice noise simulation for CSA-CRRC circuit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 505 (2003) 328–333. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 12. P. Grybos, Front-end electronics for multichannel semiconductor detector system, EuCARD Editorial Series on Accelerator Science and Technology, 8, Report number: EuCARD-BOO-2010-004 (2012), http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1473436. Google Scholar
    • 13. N. Randazzo, G. V. Russo, C. Caligiore, D. LoPresti and S. Panebianco , Low power, low noise, integrated preamplifier-shaper for large area silicon detector, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 420 (1999) 279–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 14. G. Bertuccio, A. Pullia and G. De Geronimo , Criteria of choice of the front-end transistor for low-noise preamplification of detector signals at sub-microsecond shaping times for X- and γ-ray spectroscopy, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 380 (1996) 301–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 15. P. D. Walker and M. M. Green , A tunable pulse-shaping filter for use in a nuclear spectrometer system, IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 31 (1996) 850–855. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 16. E. Gattiac, P. F. Manfredi, M. Sampietro and V. Spezialib , Suboptimal filtering of 1/f-noise in detector charge measurements, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 297 (1990) 467–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 17. M. Citterio, J. Kierstead, S. Rescia and V. Radeka , Si-JFET devices and related noise behavior under irradiation, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 61B (1998) 526–531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 18. D. Houcque, Introduction to MATLAB for Engineering students, Northwestern University, Version 1.2 (2005). Google Scholar
    • 19. T. Michalowski , Applications of MATLAB in Sciences and Engineering (IntechOpen, Poland, 2011). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 20. W. Karpinski, K. Lübelsmeyer, D. Pandoulas, G. Pierschel, C. Rente and F. Tenbusch , Characteristics of GaAs complementary heterojunction FETs and C-HFET based amplifiers exposed to high neutron fluences, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 361 (1995) 558–567. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 21. J. Assaf , Experimental study of the detector capacitance effect on the response of a typical nuclear electronics channel, Radiat. Meas. 42 (2007) 1521–1526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar