Research PapersNo Access

Mathematical models for phase transitions in biogels

Ayse Humeyra Bilge

Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Kadir Has University, Fatih, Istanbul 34083, Turkey

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

Arif Selcuk Ogrenci

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-3019

Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Kadir Has University, Fatih, Istanbul 34083, Turkey

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Corresponding author.

Search for more papers by this author

, and

Onder Pekcan

Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Kadir Has University, Fatih, Istanbul 34083, Turkey

E-mail Address: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984919501112Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)

Abstract

It has been shown that reversible and irreversible phase transitions of biogels can be represented by epidemic models. The irreversible chemical sol–gel transitions are modeled by the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Removed (SEIR) or Susceptible-Infected-Removed (SIR) epidemic systems whereas reversible physical gels are modeled by a modification of the Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (SIS) system. Measured sol–gel and gel–sol transition data have been fitted to the solutions of the epidemic models, either by solving the differential equations directly (SIR and SEIR models) or by nonlinear regression (SIS model). The gel point is represented as the “critical point of sigmoid,” defined as the limit point of the locations of the extreme values of its derivatives. Then, the parameters of the sigmoidal curve representing the gelation process are used to predict the gel point and its relative position with respect to the transition point, that is, the maximum of the first derivative with respect to time. For chemical gels, the gel point is always located before the maximum of the first derivative and moves backward in time as the strength of the activation increases. For physical gels, the critical point for the sol–gel transition occurs before the maximum of the first derivative with respect to time, that is, it is located at the right of this maximum with respect to temperature. For gel–sol transitions, the critical point is close to the transition point; the critical point occurs after the maximum of the first derivative for low concentrations whereas the critical point occurs after the maximum of the first derivative for higher concentrations.

Keywords:

References

1. P. G. De Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1979). Google Scholar
2. D. De Rossi, K. Kajiwara, Y. Osada and A. Yamauchi, Polymer Gels (Plenum Press, New York, 1991). Google Scholar
3. W. H. Carothers, T. Faraday Soc. 32 (1936) 39. Google Scholar
4. C. Webb, G. M. Black and B. Atkinson, Process Engineering Aspects of Immobilized Cell Systems (Institution of Chemical Engineers, Warwickshire, 1986). Google Scholar
5. N. F. Stanley, Agars, in Food Science and Technology, eds. A. M. Stephen, G. O. Phillips and P. A. Williams (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2006), pp. 217–238. Google Scholar
6. I. C. M. Dea, A. A. McKinnon and D. A. Rees, J. Mol. Biol. 68 (1972) 153. Web of Science, Google Scholar
7. N. Fatin-Rouge, A. Milon and J. Buffle, J. Phys. Chem. B 107 (2003) 12126. Web of Science, Google Scholar
8. T. Singh, R. Meena and A. Kumar, J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (2009) 2519. Web of Science, Google Scholar
9. L. Piculell and S. Nilsson, J. Phys. Chem. 93 (1989) 5596. Web of Science, Google Scholar
10. P. Aymard, D. R. Martin, K. Plucknett, T. J. Foster, A. H. Clark and I. T. Norton, Biopolymers 59 (2001) 131. Web of Science, Google Scholar
11. J. Narayanan, J. Y. Xiong and X. Y. Liu, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 28 (2006) 83. ADS, Google Scholar
12. J. Y. Xiong, J. Narayanan, X. Y. Liu, T. K. Chong, S. B. Chen and T. S. Chung, J. Phys. Chem. B 109 (2005) 5638. Web of Science, Google Scholar
13. M. Tako and S. Nakamura, Carbohyd. Res. 180 (1988) 277. Web of Science, Google Scholar
14. K. T. Nijenhuis, Adv. Polym. Sci. 130 (1997) 1. Google Scholar
15. G. A. Evingur, F. Tezcan, F. B. Erim and O. Pekcan, Phase Transit. 85 (2012) 530. Web of Science, Google Scholar
16. A. H. Bilge and O. Pekcan, Int. J. Mod. Phy. C 24 (2013) 1. Link, Web of Science, Google Scholar
17. A. H. Bilge, O. Pekcan, S. Kara and A. S. Ogrenci, Phase Transit. 90 (2017) 905. Web of Science, Google Scholar
18. A. S. Ogrenci, O. Pekcan, S. Kara and A. H. Bilge, J. Macromol. Sci. B 57 (2018) 364. Google Scholar
19. A. H. Bilge, O. Pekcan and V. Gürol, Phase Transit. 85 (2012) 1009. Web of Science, Google Scholar
20. O. Okay, D. Kaya and O. Pekcan, Polymer 40 (1999) 6179. Web of Science, Google Scholar
21. A. H. Bilge and Y. Ozdemir, The critical point of a sigmodal curve: The generalized logistic equation example, arXiv:1407.4839 [math.CA]. Google Scholar
22. A. H. Bilge and Y. Ozdemir, The Fourier transform of the first derivative of the generalized logistic growth curve, arXiv:1502.07182 [math.CA]. Google Scholar
23. S. Nilsson and L. Piculell, Macromolecules 24 (1991) 3804. Web of Science, ADS, Google Scholar
24. S. Ikeda, V. J. Morris and K. Nishinari, Biomacromolecules 2 (2001) 1331. Web of Science, Google Scholar
25. O. Pekcan and S. Kara, J. Biomat. Sci.-Polym. E 16 (2005) 317. Web of Science, Google Scholar
26. E. Arda, S. Kara and O. Pekcan, Food Hydrocolloids 23 (2009) 451. Web of Science, Google Scholar
27. S. Kara, E. Arda, B. Kavzak and O. Pekcan, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 102 (2006) 3007. Web of Science, Google Scholar