World Scientific
  • Search
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Quantum Fuzzy Game Simulation

    This article studies quantum games with imprecise payoffs simulated by means of fuzzy numbers. Three two-person game-types are scrutinized via the iterated confronting of a large number of players laying in a two-dimensional lattice. In every iteration, every player interacts with his nearest neighbours and adopts the strategy of his best paid mate. Variable degree of quantum entanglement and of optimism in the fuzzy payoffs are taken into consideration in the study.

    References

    • 1. R. Alonso-Sanz, On collective quantum games, Quantum Information Processing 18(3) (2019) 64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 2. R. Alonso-Sanz, On the effect of quantum noise in a quantum prisoner’s dilemma cellular automaton, Quantum Information Processing 16 (2017) 161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 3. R. Alonso-Sanz, Spatial correlated games, Royal Society Open Science 4(11) (2017) 171361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 4. R. Alonso-Sanz, Variable entangling in a quantum battle of the sexes cellular automaton, ACRI-2014, Vol. 8751, LNCS (2014), pp. 125–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 5. R. Alonso-Sanz, On a three-parameter quantum battle of the sexes cellular automaton, Quantum Information Processing 12(5) (2013) 1835–1850. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 6. R. Alonso-Sanz, A quantum battle of the sexes cellular automaton, Proc. R. Soc. A 468 (2012) 3370–3383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 7. K. Binmore, Just Playing: Game Theory and the Social Contract II (MIT Press, 1998). Google Scholar
    • 8. S. C. Benjamin and P. M. Hayden, Comment on “Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 069801. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 9. S. C. Benjamin and P. M. Hayden, Multiplayer quantum games, Phys. Rev. A 64, 030301 (2001). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 10. K. Binmore, Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 11. L. M. de Campos Ibañez and A. G. Muñoz, A subjective approach for ranking fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 29(2) (1989) 145–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 12. A. Chakeri, N. Sadati and G. A. Dumont, Nash equilibrium strategies in fuzzy games, in Game Theory Relaunched (InTechOpen, 2013), pp. 309–324. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 13. S. H. Chen, Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17(2) (1985) 113–129. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 14. C. H. Cheng, A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 95(3) (1998) 307–317. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 15. L. Cunlin and Z. Qiang, Nash equilibrium strategy for fuzzy non-cooperative games, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 176(1) (y2011) 46–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 16. J. F. Du et al., Phase-transition-like behaviour of quantum games, J. Phys. A: Math. and Gen. 36(23) (2003) 6551–6562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 17. J. Eisert, M. Wilkens and M. Lewenstein, Quantum games and quantum strategies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(15) (1999) 3077–3080. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 18. J. Eisert, M. Wilkens and M. Lewenstein, Comment on “Quantum games and quantum strategies”– Reply, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 069802. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 19. J. Eisert and M. Wilkens, Quantum games, J. Mod. Optics 47(14–15) (2000) 2543–2556. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 20. G. Ellison, Learning, local interaction, and coordination, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(5) (1993) 1047–1071. Google Scholar
    • 21. A. Iqbal, J. M. Chappell and D. Abbott, On the equivalence between non-factorizable mixed-strategy classical games and quantum games, Royal Society Open Science 3 (2016) 150477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 22. F. S. Khan et al., Quantum games: A review of the history, current state, and interpretation, Quantum Information Processing 17 (2018) 309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 23. T. S. Liou and M. J. J. Wang, Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 50(3) (1992) 247–255. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 24. A. Li and X. Yong, Emergence of super cooperation of prisoner’s dilemma games on scale-free networks, PloS one 10(2) (2015) e0116429. Google Scholar
    • 25. A. Li and X. Yong, Entanglement guarantees emergence of cooperation in quantum prisoner’s dilemma games on networks, Scientific Reports 4 (2014) 6286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 26. T. Maeda, On characterization of equilibrium strategy of two-person zero-sum games with fuzzy payoffs, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 139 (2003) 283–296. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 27. T. Maeda, On characterization of equilibrium strategy of bi-matrix games with fuzzy payoffs, J. Math. Analysis and Applications 251 (2000) 885–896. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 28. D. A. Meyer, Quantum strategies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82(5) (1999) 1052. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 29. G. Owen, Game Theory (Academic Press, 1995). Google Scholar
    • 30. J. L. Schiff, Cellular Automata: A Discrete View of the World (Wiley, 2008). Google Scholar
    • 31. K. Tanaka, An Introduction to Fuzzy Logic for Practical Applications (Springer, 1997). Google Scholar