World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Mon, Jun 21st, 2021 at 1am (EDT)

During this period, the E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 6 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

RANKING-BASED KERNELS IN APPLIED BIOMEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS USING A SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE

    This paper presents some essential findings and results on using ranking-based kernels for the analysis and utilization of high dimensional and noisy biomedical data in applied clinical diagnostics. We claim that presented kernels combined with a state-of-the-art classification technique — a Support Vector Machine (SVM) — could significantly improve the classification rate and predictive power of the wrapper method, e.g. SVM. Moreover, the advantage of such kernels could be potentially exploited for other kernel methods and essential computer-aided tasks such as novelty detection and clustering. Our experimental results and theoretical generalization bounds imply that ranking-based kernels outperform other traditionally employed SVM kernels on high dimensional biomedical and microarray data.

    References

    • Y. Yang and B. L. Lu, International Journal of Neural Systems 20(1), 13 (2010). Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • V. Jumutc and P. Zayakin, On the power of topological kernel in microarray-based detection of cancer, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning — IDEAL6283, Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp. 70–77. Google Scholar
    • A. Rakotomamonjyet al., Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 2491 (2008). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • Z. Kalninaet al., Current Cancer Therapy Reviews 4(2), 149 (2008), DOI: 10.2174/157339408784310160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Z. Kalninaet al., Journal of Immunological Methods 334(2), 37 (2008). Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • V.   Vapnik , The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory ( Springer-Verlag , New-York , 1995 ) . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • S. Sonnenburget al., Journal of Machine Learning Research 7(1), 1531 (2006). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • G. Lanckrietet al., Journal of Machine Learning Research 5, 27 (2004). ISIGoogle Scholar
    • F. Bachet al., Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning (Montreal, Canada, 2004) pp. 41–48. Google Scholar
    • V. N. Vapnik and A. Y. Chervonenkis, Theory of Probability and its Applications 16(2), 264 (1971), DOI: 10.1137/1116025. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • P. L. Bartlett and S. Mendelson, Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 463 (2002). Google Scholar
    • O. Chapelleet al., Machine Learning 46, 131 (2002), DOI: 10.1023/A:1012450327387. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • M. Futschik, Introduction to OLIN package, [http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.3/bioc/vignettes/OLIN/inst/doc/OLIN.pdf] (2010) . Google Scholar
    • A. Frank and A. Asuncion, UCI Machine Learning Repository [http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml]. Irvine, CA: University of California, School of Information and Computer Science (2010) . Google Scholar
    • F. Chu and L. Wang, International Journal of Neural Systems 15(6), 475 (2005). Link, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • D. Glotsoset al., International Journal of Neural Systems 15(2), 1 (2005). LinkGoogle Scholar
    • D. T. Lin and D. C. Lin, Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 16(1), 61 (2009). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • E. D. Wandekokemet al., Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering 18(1), 61 (2011). Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar