World Scientific
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Fri, Jun 26th, 2020 at 5pm (ET)

During this period, our website will be offline for less than an hour but the E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 4 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

GROUNDWATER MONITORING DESIGN: A CASE STUDY COMBINING EPSILON DOMINANCE ARCHIVING AND AUTOMATIC PARAMETERIZATION FOR THE NSGA-II

    Abstract:

    The monitoring design problem is extremely challenging because it requires environmental engineers to capture an impacted system's governing processes, elucidate human and ecologic risks, limit monitoring costs, and satisfy the interests of multiple stakeholders (e.g., site owners, regulators, and public advocates). Evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) has tremendous potential to help resolve these issues by providing environmental stakeholders with a direct understanding of their monitoring tradeoffs. This chapter demonstrates the use of the Nondom-inated Sorted Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) to optimize groundwater monitoring networks for conflicting objectives. Additionally, this chapter demonstrates how ε-dominance archiving and automatic parameterization techniques for the NSGA-II can be used to significantly improve the algorithm's ease-of-use and efficiency for computationally intensive applications. Results are presented for a 2-objective groundwater monitoring case study in which the archiving and parameterization techniques for the NSGA-II combined to reduce computational demands by greater than 70-percent relative to prior published results. The methods of this chapter can be easily generalized to other multiobjective applications to minimize computational times as well as trial-and-error EMO parameter analysis.