Update on the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) Scandal
Abstract
The Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) is an elusive bird that has repeatedly been feared extinct only to be rediscovered during the past hundred years. The most recent rediscovery, which took place in Arkansas, was announced in an article that was featured on the cover of Science in 2005. Despite published reports of sightings in Florida and Louisiana in the years that followed, the issue became controversial when nobody managed to obtain a clear photo and critics attacked relatively weak video evidence that was presented in the original article. The issue began to develop into a science scandal when the critics used specious arguments to delay the publication of the strongest evidence, which consists of three videos that were obtained during encounters with birds that were identified in the field as Ivory-billed Woodpeckers and that show field marks, body proportions, flights, and other behaviors that are consistent with that species but no other species of the region. The scandal culminated in a decision by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to declare the species extinct in 2021, which was made without addressing the strongest evidence. An update is given here on recent developments. The decision to declare the species extinct was based on a five-year review of evidence for persistence. During an interview, it came to light that the person who performed the review was unaware of basic facts about the strongest evidence. Evidence that was obtained at another site in Louisiana [Latta et al., “Multiple lines of evidence suggest the persistence of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) in Louisiana,” Ecology and Evolution (2023)] is discussed and compared with the strongest evidence. Videos obtained with a drone on a sunny day often show white markings that do not correspond to actual field marks. It is demonstrated that a video that was purported to show an Ivory-billed Woodpecker on the basis of apparent white markings is apparently a Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus). The bird in that video appears to have black trailing edges on the dorsal surfaces of the wings, which are consistent with the Pileated Woodpecker, not the Ivory-billed Woodpecker. The wingbeat frequency and an upward swooping landing also seem to be consistent with the Pileated Woodpecker but are not consistent with historical accounts of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker or flights appearing in videos that contain the strongest evidence.
References
- 1. , “ Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) persists in Continental North America,” Science 308 (2005) 1460–1462. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 2. , “ Evidence suggesting that Ivory-billed Woodpeckers (Campephilus principalis) exist in Florida,” Avian Conserv. Ecol. 1 (2006) 3. Google Scholar
- 3. , “ Putative audio recordings of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis),” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129 (2011) 1626–1630. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 4. , “ Video evidence and other information relevant to the conservation of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis),” Heliyon 3 (2017) e00230. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 5. , “ Periodic and transient motions of large woodpeckers,” Sci. Rep. 7 (2017) 12551. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 6. , “ Statistics, probability, and a failed conservation policy,” Statistics and Public Policy 6 (2019) 67–79. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 7. , “ Application of image processing to evidence for the persistence of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis),” Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 14616. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 8. , “ The role of acoustics in the conservation of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis),” J. Theor. Comp. Acoustic. 29 (2021) 2150020. Link, Google Scholar
- 9. , “ A science scandal that culminated in declaring the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) extinct,” J. Theor. Comp. Acoustic. 30 (2022) 2250007. Link, Google Scholar
- 10. , “ Gambling on a ghost bird,” Science 317 (2007) 888–892. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 11. , “ Still looking for that woodpecker,” Nature 463 (2010) 718–719. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 12. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants: Removal of 23 Extinct Species from the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. Federal Register 87, No. 187, (2021). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-09-30/pdf/2021-21219.pdf. Google Scholar
- 13. , “ Multiple lines of evidence suggest the persistence of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) in Louisiana,” Ecology and Evolution 13 (2023) e10017. Crossref, Google Scholar
- 14. , “
The Irresistible, Elusive Allure of the Ivorybill ,” Smithsonian (February 1974). Google Scholar - 15. Excerpt of a discussion of two photos of an apparent Ivory-billed Woodpecker by J. W. Fitzpatrick during a presentation on “Rediscovery of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker and Its Conservation Implications” at the 123rd Meeting of the American Ornithologists’ Union (Santa Barbara, August 2005): “Too much white in the wing. Greater secondary coverts actually appear to be white. Same exact posture in both [photos]. No bill visible. Virtually all ornithologists (I count myself among them) looking at these pictures in the 70s and 80s over and over again decided we cannot rule out the idea that these pictures coming out of Atchafalaya are a hoax.”. Google Scholar
- 16. B. Bowden, “National Aviary says new video appears to show ivory-billed woodpecker in flight,” (Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette) (August 12, 2022). Google Scholar
- 17. , Supplementary material, Zenodo (2023), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8221544. Google Scholar
- 18. , The Ivory-billed Woodpecker (National Audubon Society, New York, 1942). Google Scholar
- 19. , “
Search for the rare ivorybill ,” in Discovery: Great Moments in the Lives of Outstanding Naturalists, edited by J. K. Terres (Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1961). Google Scholar - 20. , Life Histories of North American Woodpeckers,
United States National Museum, Bulletin 174 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 1939). Google Scholar - 21. https://www.regulations.gov/comment/FWS-R4-ES-2020-0109-0210. Google Scholar
- 22. , “
How to tell the difference between Ivory-billed and Pileated Woodpeckers ,” Bird Watcher’s Digest (2005) September–October. Google Scholar
