World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Examining Implicit Price Variation for Lake Water Quality

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X22400057Cited by:0 (Source: Crossref)
    This article is part of the issue:

    Hedonic price models are commonly used to estimate implicit prices for lake water quality across small geographic regions that might be assumed to be a part of a common real estate market. Yet recent studies expand the geographic scale of the hedonic model potentially obscuring important differences in implicit prices across markets. We estimate implicit prices for lake water quality across multiple states in the northeast and upper Midwest in the United States of America at three different geographic scales: substate, state, and multistate. We find implicit price estimates are heterogeneous at both the substate and state-levels, which is not accounted for in state-level or multistate hedonic models. Our results show that estimates across a broad geographic scale can be driven by a single subregion within the defined area. Overall, the study demonstrates that using a single hedonic model over a large geographic area may obscure important heterogeneity in implicit prices used to estimate potential benefits for water-quality improvements.

    References

    • Artell, J [2014] Lots of value? A spatial hedonic approach to water quality valuation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(6), 862–882. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bastian, CT, DM McLeod, MJ Germino, WA Reiners and BJ Blasko [2002] Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: A hedonic model using geographic information systems data. Ecological Economics, 40(3), 337–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bernstein, A, MT Gustafson and R Lewis [2019] Disaster on the horizon: The price effect of sea level rise. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(2), 253–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bin, O, J Czajkowski, J Li and G Villarini [2017] Housing market fluctuations and the implicit price of water quality: Empirical evidence from a South Florida housing market. Environmental and Resource Economics, 68(2), 319–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bishop, KC, NV Kuminoff, HS Banzhaf, KJ Boyle, K von Gravenitz, JC Pope, VK Smith and CD Timmins [2020] Best practices for using hedonic property value models to measure willingness to pay for environmental quality. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 14(2), 260–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Boyle, KJ and LO Taylor [2001] Does the measurement of property and structural characteristics affect estimated implicit prices for environmental amenities in a hedonic model? The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 22(2), 303–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Calderón-Arrieta, D, SB Caudill and FG Mixon [2019] Valuing recreational water clarity and quality: Evidence from hedonic pricing models of lakeshore properties. Applied Economics Letters, 26(3), 237–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Corona, J, T Doley, C Griffiths, M Massey, C Moore, S Muela, B Rashleigh, W Wheeler, SD Whitlock and J Hewitt [2020] An integrated assessment model for valuing water quality changes in the United States. Land Economics, 96(4), 478–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Ekeland, I, JJ Heckman and L Nesheim [2004] Identification and estimation of hedonic models. Journal of Political Economy, 112(S1), S60–S109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Gibbs, JP, JM Halstead, KJ Boyle and J-C Huang [2002] An hedonic analysis of the effects of lake water clarity on New Hampshire lakefront properties. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 31(1), 39–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Goodman, AC and TG Thibodeau [2003] Housing market segmentation and hedonic prediction accuracy. Journal of Housing Economics, 12(3), 181–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Goodman, AC and TG Thibodeau [2007] The spatial proximity of metropolitan area housing submarkets. Real Estate Economics, 35(2), 209–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Greene, WH [2003] 5.4 instrumental variables and two stage least squares estimation. In Econometric Analysis. India: Pearson Education. Google Scholar
    • Griffiths, C, H Klemick, M Massey, C Moore, S Newbold, D Simpson, P Walsh and W Wheeler [2012] U.S. environmental protection agency valuation of surface water quality improvements. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6(1), 130–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Islam, KS and Y Asami [2009] Housing market segmentation: A review. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 21(2–3), 93–109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Jones, C [2002] The definition of housing market areas and strategic planning. Urban Studies, 39(3), 549–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Jordahl, K, JV den Bossche, M Fleischmann, J Wasserman, J McBride, J Gerard, J Tratner, M Perry, AG Badaracco, C Farmer, GA Hjelle, AD Snow, M Cochran, S Gillies, L Culbertson, M Bartos, N Eubank, maxalbert, A Bilogur, S Rey, C Ren, D Arribas-Bel, L Wasser, LJ Wolf, M Journois, J Wilson, A Greenhall, C Holdgraf, Filipe and F Leblanc (2020). geopandas/geopandas: v0.8.1. Zenodo. Google Scholar
    • Kashian, R, ME Eiswerth and M Skidmore [2006] Lake rehabilitation and the value of shoreline real estate: Evidence from Delavan, Wisconsin. Review of Regional Studies, 36(2), 221–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Keiser, DA [2019] The missing benefits of clean water and the role of mismeasured pollution. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(4), 669–707. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kuminoff, NV, CF Parmeter and JC Pope [2010] Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(3), 145–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kuwayama, Y, S Olmstead and J Zheng [2022] A more comprehensive estimate of the value of water quality. Journal of Public Economics, 207, 104600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Leonard, T, X Yang and L Zhang [2021] The impact of land use regulation across the conditional distribution of home prices: An application of quantile regression for group-level treatments. The Annals of Regional Science, 66(3), 655–676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Liao, FH, FM Wilhelm and M Solomon [2016] The effects of ambient water quality and Eurasian watermilfoil on lakefront property values in the Coeur d’Alene area of Northern Idaho, USA. Sustainability, 8(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Liu, H, S Gopalakrishnan, D Browning and G Sivandran [2019] Valuing water quality change using a coupled economic-hydrological model. Ecological Economics, 161, 32–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Liu, T, JJ Opaluch and E Uchida [2017] The impact of water quality in Narragansett Bay on housing prices. Water Resources Research, 53(8), 6454–6471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Michael, HJ, KJ Boyle and R Bouchard (1996). Water quality affects property prices: A case study of selected Maine Lakes. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Report 398. Google Scholar
    • Michael, HJ, KJ Boyle and R Bouchard [2000] Does the measurement of environmental quality affect implicit prices estimated from hedonic models? Land Economics, 76(2), 283–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Moore, MR, JP Doubek, H Xu and BJ Cardinale [2020] Hedonic price estimates of lake water quality: Valued attribute, instrumental variables, and ecological-economic benefits. Ecological Economics, 176, 106692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Murfin, J and M Spiegel [2020] Is the risk of sea level rise capitalized in residential real estate? The Review of Financial Studies, 33(3), 1217–1255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Newbold, SC, P Walsh, DM Massey and J Hewitt [2018] Using structural restrictions to achieve theoretical consistency in benefit transfers. Environmental & Resource Economics, 69(3), 529–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Nicholls, S and J Crompton [2018] A comprehensive review of the evidence of the impact of surface water quality on property values. Sustainability, 10, 500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Poor, PJ, KJ Boyle, LO Taylor and R Bouchard [2001] Objective versus subjective measures of water clarity in hedonic property value models. Land Economics, 77(4), 482–493. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Reitz, K (2020). Requests: HTTP for Humans. Google Scholar
    • Richardson, L (2020). Beautiful Soup 4. Google Scholar
    • Saha, S, S Moorthi, H-L Pan, X Wu, J Wang, S Nadiga, P Tripp, R Kistler, J Woollen, D Behringer, H Liu, D Stokes, R Grumbine, G Gayno, J Wang, Y-T Hou, H Chuang, H-MH Juang, J Sela, M Iredell, R Treadon, D Kleist, P Van Delst, D Keyser, J Derber, M Ek, J Meng, H Wei, R Yang, S Lord, H van den Dool, A Kumar, W Wang, C Long, M Chelliah, Y Xue, B Huang, J-K Schemm, W Ebisuzaki, R Lin, P Xie, M Chen, S Zhou, W Higgins, C-Z Zou, Q Liu, Y Chen, Y Han, L Cucurull, RW Reynolds, G Rutledge and M Goldberg [2010] The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91(8), 1015–1058. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Seabold, S and J Perktold [2010] Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with python. In 9th Python in Science Conference. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Shen, X, P Liu, Y Qiu, A Patwardhan and P Vaishnav [2021] Estimation of change in house sales prices in the United States after heat pump adoption. Nature Energy, 6(1), 30–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Sheppard, K, B Lewis, Guangyi, K Wilson, X RENE-CORAIL and vikjam (2021). bashtage/linearmodels: Release 4.19. Zenodo. Google Scholar
    • Singh, A, J-D Saphores and T Bruckner [2018] A spatial hedonic analysis of the housing market around a large, failing desert lake: The case of the Salton Sea in California. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(14), 2549–2569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Software Freedom Conservancy (2021). The Selenium Browser Automation Project. Google Scholar
    • Soranno, PA, LC Bacon, M Beauchene, KE Bednar, EG Bissell, CK Boudreau, MG Boyer, MT Bremigan, SR Carpenter, JW Carr, KS Cheruvelil, ST Christel, M Claucherty, SM Collins, JD Conroy, JA Downing, J Dukett, CE Fergus, CT Filstrup, C Funk, MJ Gonzalez, LT Green, C Gries, JD Halfman, SK Hamilton, PC Hanson, EN Henry, EM Herron, C Hockings, JR Jackson, K Jacobson-Hedin, LL Janus, WW Jones, JR Jones, CM Keson, KBS King, SA Kishbaugh, J-F Lapierre, B Lathrop, JA Latimore, Y Lee, NR Lottig, JA Lynch, LJ Matthews, WH McDowell, KEB Moore, BP Neff, SJ Nelson, SK Oliver, ML Pace, DC Pierson, AC Poisson, AI Pollard, DM Post, PO Reyes, DO Rosenberry, KM Roy, LG Rudstam, O Sarnelle, NJ Schuldt, CE Scott, NK Skaff, NJ Smith, NR Spinelli, JJ Stachelek, EH Stanley, JL Stoddard, SB Stopyak, CA Stow, JM Tallant, P-N Tan, AP Thorpe, MJ Vanni, T Wagner, G Watkins, KC Weathers, KE Webster, JD White, MK Wilmes and S Yuan (2017). LAGOS-NE: A multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of US lakes. GigaScience, 6(gix101). Google Scholar
    • Soranno, PA, EG Bissell, KS Cheruvelil, ST Christel, SM Collins, CE Fergus, CT Filstrup, J-F Lapierre, NR Lottig, SK Oliver, CE Scott, NJ Smith, S Stopyak, S Yuan, MT Bremigan, JA Downing, C Gries, EN Henry, NK Skaff, EH Stanley, CA Stow, P-N Tan, T Wagner and KE Webster (2015). Building a multi-scaled geospatial temporal ecology database from disparate data sources: Fostering open science and data reuse. GigaScience, 4(1). Google Scholar
    • Soranno, PA and KS Cheruvelil (2017a). LAGOS-NE-LOCUS v1.01: A module for LAGOS-NE, a multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of U.S. Lakes: 1925–2013 ver 4. Environmental Data Initiative, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/0c23a789232ab4f92107e26f70a7d8ef. Google Scholar
    • Soranno, PA and KS Cheruvelil (2017b). LAGOS-NE-LIMNO v1.087.1: A module for LAGOS-NE, a multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of U.S. Lakes: 1925–2013 ver 2. Environmental Data Initiative, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/08c6f9311929f4874b01bcc64eb3b2d7. Google Scholar
    • Soranno, PA and KS Cheruvelil (2017c). LAGOS-NE-GIS v1.0: A module for LAGOS-NE, a multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of U.S. Lakes: 2013–1925 ver 4. Environmental Data Initiative, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/4b04db93c53be4b65937d0fedd0fcf4b. Google Scholar
    • Soranno, PA and KS Cheruvelil (2017d). LAGOS-NE-GEO v1.05: A module for LAGOS-NE, a multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database of lake ecological context and water quality for thousands of U.S. Lakes: 1925–2013 ver 5. Environmental Data Initiative, https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/16f4bdaa9607c845c0b261a580730a7a. Google Scholar
    • Stachelek, J, SK Oliver and F Masrour (2019). LAGOSNE: Interface to the lake multi-scaled geospatial and temporal database. R package version 2.0.2. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=LAGOSNE. Accessed on August 1, 2020. Google Scholar
    • Stock, JH and M Yogo [2005] Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • USEPA (2009). National Lakes Assessment: A Collaborative Survey of the Nation’s Lakes. EPA 841-R-09-001, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
    • USEPA (2016). National Lakes Assessment 2012: A Collaborative Survey of Lakes in the United States. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
    • Walsh, PJ and JW Milon [2016] Nutrient standards, water quality indicators, and economic benefits from water quality regulations. Environmental and Resource Economics, 64(4), 643–661. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Walsh, PJ, JW Milon and DO Scrogin [2011] The spatial extent of water quality benefits in urban housing markets. Land Economics, 87(4), 628–644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Weng, W, KJ Boyle, KJ Farrell, CC Carey, KM Cobourn, HA Dugan, PC Hanson, NK Ward and KC Weathers [2020] Coupling natural and human models in the context of a lake ecosystem: Lake Mendota, Wisconsin, USA. Ecological Economics, 169, 106556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Wolf, D, S Gopalakrishnan and HA Klaiber (2022). Staying afloat: The effect of algae contamination on Lake Erie housing prices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, forthcoming. Google Scholar
    • Wolf, D and T Kemp [2021] Convergent validity of satellite and Secchi disk measures of water clarity in hedonic models. Land Economics, 104(5), 1701–1723. Google Scholar
    • Wolf, D and HA Klaiber [2017] Bloom and bust: Toxic algae’s impact on nearby property values. Ecological Economics, 135, 209–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Zhang, J, DJ Phaneuf and BA Schaeffer [2022] Property values and cyanobacterial algal blooms: Evidence from satellite monitoring of Inland Lakes. Ecological Economics, 199, 107481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar