Abstract
Adaptation gaps arise when observed adaptation to climate change is slower than perceived adaptation potential. Two common explanations for adaptation gaps are (1) private parties failing to recognize that the climate is changing and (2) the cost of adaptation is higher than commonly believed. This paper shows how these two explanations are linked and that the likelihood and duration of adaptation gaps depend on whether climate change is characterized by stationary or non-stationary dynamics. Using an investment in water-saving irrigation in California’s Central Valley as an illustrative example, we find little evidence that failing to account for climate change would explain adaptation gaps. A more likely explanation for adaptation gaps is a failure to account for the adaptation option value that arises due to the possibility of maladaptation.
References
- 2013] Reversal and magnitude effects in long-term time preferences: Results from a field experiment. Economics Letters, 120, 108–111. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2008] Flood vs. Pivot irrigation for forage crops: What are the advantages and disadvantages? In Proceedings, California Alfalfa & Forage Symposium and Western Seed Conference,
San Diego, CA . Google Scholar [ - 2012] Farmer discount rates: Experimental evidence. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 94, 451–456. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1997] Adjusting to climate change: Implications of increased variability and asymmetric adjustment costs for investment in water reserves. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34, 207–227. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2000] Using consumption and asset return data to estimate farmers’ time preferences and risk attitudes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82, 934–947. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2014] Adaptation to climate change and climate variability: Do it now or wait and see? Climate Change Economics, 5, 1450013. Link, Google Scholar [
- 2004] Environmental uncertainty and the timing of environmental policy. Natural Resource Modeling, 17, 163–190. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2013] Survey of irrigation methods in California in 2010. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 139, 233–238. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2003] Climate variability, economic adaptation, and investment timing. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 3, 357–368. Crossref, Google Scholar [
References
- 2007] Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 717–743. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar . [
- 2016] Adapting to climate change: The remarkable decline in the US temperature-mortality relationship over the twentieth century. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 105–159. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1990] Reconciling the von Liebig and differentiable crop production functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(4), 985–996. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2014] Impacts of water supply uncertainty and storage on efficient irrigation technology adoption. Natural Resource Modeling, 27(1), 1–24. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2013] Reversal and magnitude effects in long-term time preferences: Results from a field experiment. Economics Letters, 120(1), 108–111. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2012] The danger of naturalizing water policy concepts: Water productivity and efficiency discourses from field irrigation to virtual water trade. Agricultural Water Management, 108, 16–26. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2010] Climate policy and the optimal balance between mitigation, adaptation and unavoided damage. Climate Change Economics, 1(2), 71–92. Link, Google Scholar [
- Brekke, L, B Thrasher, E Maurer and T Pruitt (2013). Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 climate and hydrology projections: Release of downscaled CMIP5 climate projections, comparison with preceding information, and summary of user needs. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Technical Services Center, Denver, Colorado, USA. Google Scholar
- Brown, P (2008). Flood vs. Pivot irrigation for Forage Crops: What are the Advantages and Disadvantages? Paper presented at the Proceedings, California Alfalfa & Forage Symposium and Western Seed Conference, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar
- 2016] Adaptation to climate change: Evidence from US agriculture. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 106–140. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2002] A model of investment under uncertainty: Modern irrigation technology and emerging markets in water. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(1), 171–183. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2016] Social and economic impacts of climate. Science, 353(6304), aad9837. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2016] The migration response to increasing temperatures. Journal of Development Economics, 122, 127–146. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2014]
Economics of adaptation . In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, CB FieldVR BarrosDJ DokkenKJ MachMD MastrandreaTE BilirM ChatterjeeKL EbiYO EstradaRC GenovaB GirmaES KisselAN LevyS MacCrackenPR MastrandreaLL White (eds.), pp. 945–977. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar . [ - 2015] Contribution of air conditioning adoption to future energy use under global warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(19), 5962–5967. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2009] AD-DICE: An implementation of adaptation in the DICE model. Climatic Change, 95(1), 63–81. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2009] Extreme weather events, mortality, and migration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 659–681. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2014] Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 867. Crossref, Google Scholar . [
- 2014] Understanding the adaptation deficit: Why are poor countries more vulnerable to climate events than rich countries? Global Environmental Change, 27, 9–18. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2010] Linkages among climate change, crop yields and Mexico–US cross-border migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32), 14257–14262. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1997] Adjusting to climate change: Implications of increased variability and asymmetric adjustment costs for investment in water reserves. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 34(3), 207–227. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2013] Climate change uncertainty: Building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure. Climatic Change, 116(2), 411–423. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2014] Uncertainty in integrated assessment models of climate change: Alternative analytical approaches. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 19(2), 99–109. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2014] Temperature and the allocation of time: Implications for climate change. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(1), 1–26. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2011] Designing Climate Change Adaptation Policies: An Economic Framework, The World Bank. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2019] The intersection between climate adaptation, mitigation, and natural resources: An empirical analysis of forest management. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(5), 893–926. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2015] Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA. Nature Climate Change, 5(6), 596. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2012] Adaptation to cyclone risk: Evidence from the global cross-section. Climate Change Economics, 3(2), 1250011. Link, Google Scholar [
- 2014] Does timing matter? A real options experiment to farmers’ investment and disinvestment behaviours. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 58(3), 430–452. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1998] Numerical Methods in Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar [
- 2005] The death toll from natural disasters: The role of income, geography, and institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(2), 271–284. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2013] Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 369–373. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Kurukulasuriya, P and RO Mendelsohn (2007). Endogenous irrigation: The impact of climate change on farmers in Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (4278). Google Scholar
- 2000] Using consumption and asset return data to estimate farmers’ time preferences and risk attitudes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(4), 934–947. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1991]
Crop-water production function and the problems of drainage and salinity . In The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture, pp. 209–227. New York: Springer. Crossref, Google Scholar [ - 2019] Climate change adaptation and international mitigation agreements with heterogeneous countries. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(3), 503–530. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 1995] Implementing option pricing models when asset returns are predictable. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 87–129. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2004] Spring onset in the Sierra Nevada: When is snowmelt independent of elevation? Journal of Hydrometeorology, 5(2), 327–342. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2010] Economics of adaptation to climate change: Synthesis report. World Bank Climate Change Synthesis Report. Google Scholar [
- 2010] The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(6), 1125–1138. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- McDermott, TK, F Barry and RS Tol (2013). Disasters and development: Natural disasters, credit constraints, and economic growth. Oxford Economic Papers, 66(3), 750–773. Google Scholar
- 2003] Climate, water, and agriculture. Land Economics, 79(3), 328–341. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2008] Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 319(5863), 573–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2002] Applied Computational Economics and Finance. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar [
- 2014] Adaptation to climate change and climate variability: Do it now or wait and see? Climate Change Economics, 5(4), 1450013. Link, Google Scholar [
- 2009] The macroeconomic consequences of disasters. Journal of Development Economics, 88(2), 221–231. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2016] Climate change effects on water allocations with season dependent water rights. Science of the Total Environment, 571, 943–954. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2010] Hydrologic response and watershed sensitivity to climate warming in California’s Sierra Nevada. PLoS One, 5(4), e9932. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2006] Questioning complacency: Climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in Norway. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 35(2), 50–56. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2011] Adapting North American wheat production to climatic challenges, 1839–2009. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(2), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008279108. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2008] Principal hydrologic responses to climatic and geologic variability in the Sierra Nevada, California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 6(1). Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Repetto, RC (2008). The climate crisis and the adaptation myth. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT. Google Scholar
- 2002] ENSO and cholera: A nonstationary link related to climate change? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(20), 12901–12906. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2004] Environmental uncertainty and the timing of environmental policy. Natural Resource Modeling, 17(2), 163–190. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2016] Faustmann vs. real options theory–An experimental investigation of foresters’ harvesting decisions. Journal of Forest Economics, 24, 1–20. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2013] US maize adaptability. Nature Climate Change, 3(8), 690. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2018] A forward-looking Ricardian approach: Do land markets capitalize climate change forecasts? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 89, 235–254. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Shrader, J (2017). Improving Climate Damage Estimates by Accounting for Adaptation (June 21, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3212073 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3212073. Google Scholar
- 2019] Climate forecasts and flood mitigation. Southern Economic Journal, 85(4), 1083–1107. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2017] Using an option pricing approach to evaluate strategic decisions in a rapidly changing climate: Black–Scholes and climate change. Climatic Change, 140(3-4), 437–449. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2016] Climate change and non-stationary population processes in fisheries management. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(5), 1297–1305. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2012] An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93(4), 485–498. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2013] Survey of irrigation methods in California in 2010. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 139(3), 233–238. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Treasury, H (2009). Accounting for the effects of climate change: Supplementary green book guidance. HM Treasury, London. Google Scholar
- 2013] Temporal investment in climate change adaptation and mitigation. Climate Change Economics, 4(2), 1350009. Link, Google Scholar [
- 2008] Water conservation in irrigation can increase water use. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(47), 18215–18220. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2016] Tapping Water Markets in California: Six Policy Reforms. Retrieved from Bozeman, Montana. Google Scholar [
- 2003] Climate variability, economic adaptation, and investment timing. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 3(4), 357–368. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- 2005] WEAP21—A demand-, priority-, and preference-driven water planning model: Part 1: model characteristics. Water International, 30(4), 487–500. Crossref, Google Scholar [
- Young, CA et al. (2009). Modeling the hydrology of climate change in California’s Sierra Nevada for subwatershed scale adaptation1. Wiley Online Library. Google Scholar
Remember to check out the Most Cited Articles! |
---|
Be inspired by these New titles in Energy, Resource & Environmental Economics today. |