World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

THE AGGREGATION DILEMMA IN CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY EVALUATION

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007818500082Cited by:7 (Source: Crossref)

    We show that a policy maker who ignores regional data and instead relies on aggregated integrated assessment models is likely underestimating the carbon price and thus the required climate policy. Based on a simple theoretical model, we give conditions under which the Aggregation Dilemma is expected to play a role in climate change cost-benefit analysis. We then study the importance of the Aggregation Dilemma with the integrated assessment model RICE [Nordhaus and Boyer, (2000) Warning the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. MA: MIT Press]. Aggregating all regions of the RICE-99 model into one region yields a 40% lower social cost of carbon than the RICE model itself predicts. Based on extrapolating the results, a country-level integrated assessment model would give a more than eight times higher social cost of carbon compared to a fully aggregated model. We suggest that these tentative results require researchers to rethink the aggregation level used in integrated assessment models and to develop models at much lower levels of aggregation than currently available.

    JEL: Q54, Q58

    References

    • Acemoglu, D [2009] Introduction to Modern Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
    • Anthoff, D (2011). Optimal global dynamic carbon abatement. University of California, Berkeley. Google Scholar
    • Bosetti, V, C Carraro and M Galeotti [2006] The dynamics of carbon and energy intensity in a model of endogenous technical change. The Energy Journal, (1), 191–206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Bosetti, V, C Carraro, M Galeotti, E Massetti and M Tavoni [2006] A world induced technical change hybrid model. The Energy Journal, 27, 13–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Botzen, WJW and JCJM van den Bergh [2014] Specifications of social welfare in economic studies of climate policy: Overview of criteria and related policy insights. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58 (1), 1–33, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • d’Arge, RC, WD Schulze and DS Brookshire [1982] Carbon dioxide and intergenerational choice. The American Economic Review, 72 (2), 251–256. Google Scholar
    • Dennig, F, MB Budolfson, M Fleurbaey, A Siebert and RH Socolow [2015] Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112 (52), 15827–15832. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Edenhofer, O, N Bauer and E Kriegler , The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: Insights from the model MIND. Ecological Economics, 54 (2), 277–292. Google Scholar
    • Fankhauser, S, RSJ Tol and DW Pearce [1997] The aggregation of climate change damages: A welfare theoretic approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 10 (3), 249–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Fezzi, C and I Bateman [2015] The impact of climate change on agriculture: Nonlinear effects and aggregation bias in Ricardian models of farmland values. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 2 (1), 57–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Gerlagh, R [2006] ITC in a global growth-climate model with CCS: The value of induced technical change for climate stabilization. The Energy Journal, 27, 55–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Hassler, J and P Krusell [2012] Economics and climate change: Integrated assessment in a multi-region world. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10 (5), 974–1000. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Kirman, AP [1992] Whom or what does the representative individual represent? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6 (2), 117–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Krusell, P and AA Smith (2009). Macroeconomics and global climate change: Transition for a many-region economy. Working Papers 2009. Google Scholar
    • Kurosawa, A [2004] Carbon concentration target and technological choice. Energy Economics, 26, 675–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Llavador, H, JE Roemer and J Silvestre [2010] Intergenerational justice when future worlds are uncertain. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 46 (5), 728–761. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Llavador, H, JE Roemer and J Silvestre [2011] A dynamic analysis of human welfare in a warming planet. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (11–12), 1607–1620. Special Issue: International Seminar for Public Economics on Normative Tax Theory. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Llavador, H, JE Roemer and J Silvestre (2011). Sustainability in the Presence of Global Warming: Theory and Empirics. Human Development Research Papers (2009 to present) HDRP-2011-05, Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) November. Google Scholar
    • Llavador, H, JE Roemer and J Silvestre (2013). Should we sustain? And if so, sustain what? Consumption or the quality of life?, Working Papers 1222, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics September. Google Scholar
    • Manne, AS and RG Richels [2005] MERGE: An integrated assessment model for global climate change. In Energy and Environment, R Loulou, J-P Waaub and G Zaccour (eds.), New York: Springer, pp. 175–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Masui, T, T Hanaoka, S Hikita and M. Kainuma [2006] Assessment of CO2 reductions and economic impacts considering energy-saving investments. The Energy Journal, 30, 175–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Nordhaus, WD [1993] Optimal greenhouse-gas reductions and tax policy in the DICE model. The American Economic Review, 83 (2), 313–317. Google Scholar
    • Nordhaus, WD [2010] Economic aspects of global warming in a post-Copenhagen environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107 (26), 11721–11726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Nordhaus, WD and J Boyer [2000] Warning the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Nordhaus, WD and P Sztorc [2013] DICE 2013R: Introduction and User’s Manual (Cowles Found, New Haven, CT). Google Scholar
    • Nordhaus, WD and Z Yang [1996] A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. The American Economic Review, 86 (4), 741–765. Google Scholar
    • Nordhaus, WD [2007] A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45 (3), 686–702. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Nordhaus, WD [2017] Revisiting the social cost of carbon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (7), 1518–1523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Orcutt, GH, HW Watts and JB Edwards [1968] Data aggregation and information loss. The American Economic Review, 58 (4), 773–787. Google Scholar
    • Parry, ML, OF Canziani, JP Palutikof, PJ van der Linden and CE Hanson (eds) [2007] Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Vol. 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Peck, SC and TJ Teisberg [1999] CO2 emissions control agreements: Incentives for regional participation. The Energy Journal, 20, 367–390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Popp, D [2006] ENTICE-BR: The effects of backstop technology R&D on climate policy models. Energy Economics, 28 (2), 188–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Sandmo, A [2006] Global public economics: Public goods and externalities. Économie publique/Public Economics, 18–19, 3–21. Google Scholar
    • Schumacher, I (2014). The aggregation dilemma. Working Papers 2014-224, Department of Research, Ipag Business School, April. Google Scholar
    • Stanton, EA, F Ackerman and S Kartha [2009] Inside the integrated assessment models: Four issues in climate economics. Climate and Development, 1 (2), 166–184. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Stanton, EA [2011] Negishi welfare weights in integrated assessment models: the mathematics of global inequality. Climatic Change, 107 (3–4), 417–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Stern, NH [2007] The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Tol, RSJ [1997] On the optimal control of carbon dioxide emissions: An application of FUND. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2 (3), 151–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Tol, RSJ [1999] Time discounting and optimal control of climate change — an application of FUND. Climatic Change, 41 (3–4), 351–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Tol, RSJ [2001] Equitable cost-benefit analysis of climate change policies. Ecological Economics, 36 (1), 71–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Tol, RSJ [2001] Welfare specifications and optimal control of climate change: An application of fund. Energy Economics, 24 (4), 367–376. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Weitzman, ML [2014] Fat tails and the social cost of carbon. The American Economic Review, 104 (5), 544–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • Weitzman, ML [2007] A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45 (3), 703–724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar