INTRODUCTION TO THE EMF 32 STUDY ON U.S. CARBON TAX SCENARIOS

References

• Arora, V, D Daniels, I Mead and R Traver [2018] EMF32 Results from NEMS: Revenue recycling. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840014. Link, Google Scholar
• Barron, A, A Fawcett, M Hafstead, J McFarland and A Morris [2018] Policy insights from the EMF 32 study on U.S. carbon tax scenarios. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840003. Link, Google Scholar
• Böhringer, CE BalistreriT Rutherford (eds.) [2012] The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: Results from EMF 29. Energy Economics, 34(Supplement 2), S95–S250. Google Scholar
• Bovenberg, AL and LH Goulder [2002] Environmental taxation and regulation. In Handbook of Public Economics, Alan J. AuerbachMartin Feldstein (eds.), Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
• Caron, J, S Cohen, J Reilly and M Brown [2018] Exploring the impacts of a national U.S. CO₂ tax and revenue recycling options with a coupled electricity-economy model. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840015. Link, Google Scholar
• Caron, J, J Cole, R Goettle, C Onda, J McFarland and J Woollacott [2018] Distributional implications of a national CO₂ tax in the U.S. across income classes and regions: A multi-model overview. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840004. Link, Google Scholar
• Chen, Y, LH Goulder and MAC Hafstead [2018] Quantifying the determinants of future CO₂ emissions. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840012. Link, Google Scholar
• Clarke, L, C Bohringer and TF Rutherford (eds.) (2009). International, U.S., and E.U. climate change control scenarios: Results from EMF 22. Energy Economics, 31(2), S63–S306. Google Scholar
• de la Chesnaye, F and J Weyant (eds.) (2006). Multi-greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy. The Energy Journal, (Special Issue), 1–520. Google Scholar
• Fawcett, AA, LE Clarke and JP Weyant (eds.) (2014). The EMF 24 sudy on U.S. technology and climate policy strategies. The Energy Journal, 35(Special Issue 1), 1–247. Google Scholar
• Fullerton, DC Wolfram (eds.) [2012] The Design and Implementation of Climate Policy. Michigan: Na. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaskins, DW and JP Weyant [1993] Model comparisons of the costs of reducing CO₂ emissions. American Economic Revue, 83 (2), 318–323. Google Scholar
• Haites, E, I Bashmakov, W McKibbin and P Shukla (1997). The economic impacts of annex I actions on all countries. Report on an IPCC Workshop held in Oslo, Norway, 18–20 August, 1997. Google Scholar
• Huntington, H and E Smith (eds.) (2011). Strategies for mitigating climate change through energy efficiency: A multi-model perspective. The Energy Journal, 35(Special Issue 1), 1–260. Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, DW, RJ Goettle, MS Ho and PJ Wilcoxen [2018] The welfare consequences of taxing carbon. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840013. Link, Google Scholar
• Macaluso, N, S Tuladhar, J Woollacott, J McFarland, J Creason and J Cole [2018] The impact of carbon taxation and revenue recycling on U.S. industries. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840005. Link, Google Scholar
• McFarland, J, A Fawcett, A Morris, J Reilly and P Wilcoxen [2018] Overview of economy-wide U.S. carbon tax strategies: Results from EMF 32. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840002. Link, Google Scholar
• McKibbin, WJ, AC Morris, PJ Wilcoxen and W Liu [2018] The role of border carbon adjustments in a U.S. carbon tax. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840011. Link, Google Scholar
• Murray, BC, J Bistline and J Creason (eds.) (2018). The EMF 32 study on technology and climate policy strategies for greenhouse gas reductions in the U.S. electric power sector. https://emf.stanford.edu/projects/emf-32-us-ghg-and-revenue-recycling-scenarios. Google Scholar
• Parry, IA MorrisRC Williams (eds.) [2015] Implementing a US Carbon Tax. UK: Routledge. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pigou, AC [1920] The Economics of Welfare. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
• Rauch, S and H Yonezawa [2018] The intergenerational incidence of green tax reform. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840007. Link, Google Scholar
• Ross [2018] Regional implications of carbon taxes. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840008. Link, Google Scholar
• Sands, R [2018] U.S. Carbon tax scenarios and bioenergy. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840010. Link, Google Scholar
• Weyant, JP [1993] Costs of reducing global carbon emissions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (4), 27–46. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.4.27. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weyant, J (ed.) [1999] The cost of the kyoto protocol: A multi-model evaluation. The Energy Journal, Special Issue, 1–398. Google Scholar
• Weyant, J (ed.) (2004). EMF 19 Alternative technology strategies for climate change policy. Energy Economics, 26(4), 501–755. Google Scholar
• Weyant, J, B Knopf, E de Cian, I Keppo and DP van Vuuren (eds.) (2013). The EMF 28 study on scenarios for transforming the european energy system. Climate Change Economics, 4(Suppl. 1), 1340001–1340007. Google Scholar
• Weyant, J, E Kriegler, G Blanford, V Krey, J Edmonds, K Riahi, R Richels and M Tavoni (eds.) (2014). The EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Climatic Change, 123(3–4), 345–783. Google Scholar
• Woollacott [2018] The economic costs and co-benefits of carbon taxation: A general equilibrium assessment. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840006. Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y, M Ghosh, D Luo, N Macaluso and J Rattray [2018] Revenue recycling and cost effective GHG abatement: An exploratory analysis using a global multi-sector multi-region CGE model. Climate Change Economics, 9(1), 1840009. Link, Google Scholar