World Scientific
  • Search
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Tue, Oct 25th, 2022 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

Elucidating the Effect of Bimodal Grain Size Distribution on Plasticity and Fracture Behavior of Polycrystalline Materials

    The refinement of grains in a polycrystalline material leads to an increase in strength but as a counterpart to a decrease in elongation to fracture. Different routes are proposed in the literature to try to overpass this strength-ductility dilemma, based on the combination of grains with highly contrasted sizes. In the simplest concept, coarse grains are used to provide relaxation locations for the highly stressed fine grains. In this work, a model bimodal polycrystalline system with a single coarse grain embedded in a matrix of fine grains is considered. Numerical full-field micro-mechanical analyses are performed to characterize the impact of this coarse grain on the stress-strain constitutive behavior of the polycrystal: the effect on plasticity is assessed by means of crystal plasticity finite element modeling [B. Flipon, C. Keller, L. Garcia de la Cruz, E. Hug and F. Barbe, Tensile properties of spark plasma sintered AISI 316L stainless steel with unimodal and bimodal grain size distributions, Mater. Sci. Eng. A729 (2018) 248–256] while the effect on intergranular fracture behavior is studied by using boundary element modeling [I. Benedetti and V. Gulizzi, A grain-scale model for high-cycle fatigue degradation in polycrystalline materials, Int. J. Fract.116 (2018) 90–105]. The analysis of the computational results, compared to the experimentally characterized tensile properties of a bimodal 316L stainless steel, suggests that the elasto-plastic interactions taking place prior to micro-cracking may play an important role in the mechanics of fracture of this steel.

    References

    • 1. B. Flipon, C. Keller, L. Garcia de la Cruz, E. Hug and F. Barbe, Tensile properties of spark plasma sintered AISI 316L stainless steel with unimodal and bimodal grain size distributions, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 729 (2018) 248–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 2. I. Benedetti and V. Gulizzi, A grain-scale model for high-cycle fatigue degradation in polycrystalline materials, Int. J. Fract. 116 (2018) 90–105. Google Scholar
    • 3. E. Hall, The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results, Proc. Phys. Soc. Sec. B 64 (1951) 747–753. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 4. N. Petch, The cleavage strength of polycrystals, J. Iron Steel Inst. 174 (1953) 25–28. Google Scholar
    • 5. M. Meyers, A. Mishra and D. Benson, Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials, Prog. Mater. Sci. 51 (2006) 427–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 6. A. Pineau, A. Benzerga and T. Pardoen, Failure of metals III: Fracture and fatigue of nanostructured metallic materials, Acta Mater. 107 (2016) 508–544. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 7. S. Ramtani, H. Bui and G. Dirras, A revisited generalized self-consistent polycrystal model following an incremental small strain formulation and including grain-size distribution effect, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 47 (2009) 537–553. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 8. S. Berbenni, V. Favier and M. Berveiller, Impact of the grain size distribution on the yield stress of heterogeneous materials, Int. J. Plasticity 23 (2007) 114–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 9. L. Zhu, S. Shi, K. Lu and J. Lu, A statistical model for predicting the mechanical properties of nanostructured metals with bimodal grain size distribution, Acta Mater 60 (2012) 5762–5772. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 10. B. Srinivasarao, K. Oh-ishi, T. Ohkubo, T. Mukai and K. Hono, Synthesis of high-strength bimodally grained iron by mechanical alloying and spark plasma sintering, Scripta Mater. 58 (2008) 759–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 11. G. Dirras, J. Gubicza, S. Ramtani, Q. Bui and T. Szilágyi, Microstructure and mechanical characteristics of bulk polycrystalline Ni consolidated from blends of powders with different particle size, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527 (2010) 1206–1214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Z. Zhang, S. Vajpai, D. Orlov and K. Ameyama, Improvement of mechanical properties in SUS304L steel through the control of bimodal microstructure characteristics, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 598 (2014) 106–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 13. D. Tingaud, P. Jenei, A. Krawczynska, F. Mompiou, J. Gubicza and G. Dirras, Investigation of deformation micro-mechanisms in nickel consolidated from a bimodal powder by spark plasma sintering, Mater. Character. 99 (2015) 118–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 14. B. Flipon, L. Garcia de la Cruz, E. Hug, C. Keller and F. Barbe, Elaboration of austenitic stainless steel with bimodal grain size distribution and investigation of their mechanical behavior, AIP Conf. Proc. 20th Int. ESAFORM Conf. on Material Forming, 26–28 April 2017, Dublin, Ireland, 1896. Google Scholar
    • 15. J. Pipard, N. Nicaise, S. Berbenni, O. Bouaziz and M. Berveiller, A new mean field micromechanical approach to capture grain size effects, Comput. Mater. Sci. 45 (2009) 604–610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 16. S. Ramtani, G. Dirras and H. Bui, A bimodal bulk ultra-fine-grained nickel: Experimental and micromechanical investigations, Mech. Mater. 42 (2010) 522–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 17. X. Wang, F. Cazes, J. Li, A. Hocini, K. Ameyama and G. Dirras, A 3d crystal plasticity model of monotonic and cyclic simple shear deformation for commercial-purity polycrystalline ti with a harmonic structure, Mech. Mater. 128 (2019) 117–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 18. A. Magee and L. Ladani, Representation of a microstructure with bimodal grain size distribution through crystal plasticity and cohesive interface modeling, Mech. Mater. 82 (2015) 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 19. F. Lavergne, R. Brenner and K. Sab, Effects of grain size distribution and stress heterogeneity on yield stress of polycrystals: A numerical approach, Comput. Mater. Sci. 77 (2013) 387–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 20. B. Flipon, C. Keller, R. Quey and F. Barbe, A full-field crystal-plasticity analysis of bimodal polycrystals, Int. J. Solids Struct. 184 (2020) 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.02.005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 21. G. Sfantos and M. Aliabadi, Multi-scale boundary element modelling of material degradation and fracture, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196 (2007) 1310–1329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 22. I. Benedetti and M. Aliabadi, A three-dimensional cohesive-frictional grain-boundary micromechanical model for intergranular degradation and failure in polycrystalline materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 265 (2013) 36–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 23. B. Flipon, L. Milhem, C. Keller, R. Quey and F. Barbe, Modelling of polycrystals using well-controlled voronoi-type tessellations and its applications to micromechanical analyses, Chap. 23, Physics and Mechanics of Random Media: From Morphology to Material Properties (Presse des Mines, 2018), pp. 187–198. Google Scholar
    • 24. Neper, Neper: Polycrystal generation and meshing, http://www.neper.info (2020). Google Scholar
    • 25. R. Quey, P. Dawson and F. Barbe, Large-scale 3-D random polycrystals for the finite element method: Generation, meshing and remeshing, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200 (2011) 1729–1745. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 26. L. Méric and G. Cailletaud, Single crystal modeling for structural calculations. Part 2: Finite element implementation, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 113 (1991) 171–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 27. M. H. Aliabadi, The Boundary Element Method, Volume 2: Applications in Solids and Structures, Vol. 2 (John Wiley & Sons, 2002) Google Scholar
    • 28. V. Gulizzi, A. Milazzo and I. Benedetti, An enhanced grain-boundary framework for computational homogenization and micro-cracking simulations of polycrystalline materials, Comput. Mech. 56 (2015) 631–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 29. V. Gulizzi and I. Benedetti, Micro-cracking of brittle polycrystalline materials with initial damage, Eur. J. Comput. Mech. 25 (2016) 38–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 30. V. Gulizzi, C. Rycroft and I. Benedetti, Modelling intergranular and transgranular micro-cracking in polycrystalline materials, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 329 (2018) 168–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 31. I. Benedetti, V. Gulizzi and V. Mallardo, A grain boundary formulation for crystal plasticity, Int. J. Plasticity 83 (2016) 202–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 32. I. Benedetti, V. Gulizzi and A. Milazzo, Grain-boundary modelling of hydrogen assisted intergranular stress corrosion cracking, Mech. Mater. 117 (2018) 137–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 33. I. Benedetti, V. Gulizzi and A. Milazzo, A microstructural model for homogenisation and cracking of piezoelectric polycrystals, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 357 (2019) 112595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 34. I. Benedetti and M. Aliabadi, Multiscale modeling of polycrystalline materials: A boundary element approach to material degradation and fracture, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 289 (2015) 429–453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar