EXAMINING THE IMPACTS OF TRUST AND CREATIVITY ON INNOVATION FOCUSED PROMOTIVE VOICE

References

• Amabile, TM (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM (1988). From individual creativity to organizational innovation. In Innovation: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, K GronhaugG Kaufmann (Eds.), pp. 139–166. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian University Press. Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to “The Social Psychology of Creativity”. Routledge. New York, NY. Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM and MG Pratt (2017). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 157–183, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001. Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM, R Conti, H Coon, J Lazenby, and M Herron (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184, https://doi.org/10.5465/256995. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Amabile, TM, SG Barsade, JS Mueller and BM Staw (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403, https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Anderson, N, K Potočnik and J Zhou (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527128. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Ashton, MC and K Lee (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890902935878. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Axtell, CM, DJ Holman, KL Unsworth, TD Wall, PE Waterson and E Harrington (2000). Shop floor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 265–285, https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167029. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Babin, B, M Griffin and JF Hair (2016). Heresies and sacred cows in scholarly marketing publications. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3133–3138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.001. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Baer, M (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102–1119, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0470. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Baer, M and GR Oldham (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963–970, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Baer, M, GR Oldham and A Cummings (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 569–586, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00052-3. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Baker, R, JM Brick, NA Bates, M Battaglia, MP Cooper, JA Dever, KJ Gile and R Tourangeau (2013). Summary report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 1(2), 90–143, https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smt008. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Batey, MD (2007). A psychometric investigation of everyday creativity (publication no. U591819). Doctoral Dissertation, University of London. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Google Scholar
• Behrend, TS, DJ Sharek, AW Meade and E Wiebe (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3), 800–813, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Bethlehem, J (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Bidault, F and A Castello (2009). Trust and creativity: Understanding the role of trust in creativity-oriented joint developments. R&D Management, 39(3), 259–270, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00557.x. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Bindl, UK and SK Parker (2011). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and Developing Members for the Organization, pp. 567–598. American Psychological Association. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Birdi, K, D Leach and W Magadley (2016). The relationship of individual capabilities and environmental support with different facets of designers’ innovative behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12250. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Bock, GW, RW Zmud, YG Kim and JN Lee (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29, 87–111, https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Boss, RW (1980). The impact of the chief executive officer on an organization development effort. Southern Review of Public Administration, 4(2), 190–210. Google Scholar
• Brenton, B and D Levin (2012). The softer side of innovation: The people. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(3), 364–366, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00910.x. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M, T Kwang and SD Gosling (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6, 3–5, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2019a). Employment Status of the Civilian Noninstitutional Population by Age, Sex, and Race. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat03.htm. Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2019b). Employment by Major Industry Sector. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/employment-by-major-industry-sector.htm. Google Scholar
• Chiaburu, DS, SV Marinova and L Van Dyne (2008). Should I do it or not? An initial model of cognitive processes predicting voice behaviors. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2008(1), 1–6, https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2008.33663285. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clegg, C, K Unsworth, O Epitropaki and G Parker (2002). Implicating trust in the innovation process. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 409–422, https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902321119574. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Cohen, J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Routledge. New York, NY. Google Scholar
• Cohen, J (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Cook, J and T Wall (1980). New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), 39–52, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1980.tb00005.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, MA (2021). The effects of innovation climate on employee job satisfaction and affective commitment: Findings from public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X211043559. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Dirks, KT and DL Ferrin (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467, https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.450.10640. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Eftekhari, N and M Bogers (2015). Open for entrepreneurship: How open innovation can foster new venture creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 574–584, https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12136. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R, P Fasolo and V Davis-LaMastro (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• El Bassiti, L and R Ajhoun (2013). Toward an innovation management framework: A life-cycle model with an idea management focus. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 4(6), 551, https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIMT.2013.V4.460. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eling, K, A Griffin and F Langerak (2014). Using intuition in fuzzy front-end decision-making: A conceptual framework. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 956–972, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12136. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Feitosa, J, DL Joseph and DA Newman (2015). Crowdsourcing and personality measurement equivalence: A warning about countries whose primary language is not English. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 47–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.017. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Findlay, CS and CJ Lumsden (1988). The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. Journal of Biological and Social Structures, 11(1), 3–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1750(88)90025-5. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford, JB (2017). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A comment. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 156–158, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1277380. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Fornell, C and DF Larcker (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224378101800104. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Fulk, J, A Brief and S Barr (1985). Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 13(4), 301–313, https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(85)90003-7. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• George, JM and J Zhou (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 513–524, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Hair, JF, CM Ringle and M Sarstedt (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152, https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hair, JF, CM Ringle and M Sarstedt (2012). Partial least squares: The better approach to structural equation modeling? Long Range Planning, 45 (5–6), 312–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.011. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Hair, JF, GTM Hult, C Ringle and M Sarstedt (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA. Google Scholar
• Hair, JF, M Page and N Brunsveld (2020b). Essentials of Business Research Methods, 4th edn. Routledge. Google Scholar
• Hair, JF, WC Black, RE Anderson and BJ Babin (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th edn. Cengage Learning. United Kingdom. Google Scholar
• Hair, Jr., JF, MC Howard and C Nitzl (2020a). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069. New York, NY. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Hammond, M, C Cross, C Farrell and D Eubanks (2019). Burnout and innovative work behaviours for survivors of downsizing: An investigation of boundary conditions. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(3), 306–317, https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12327. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Hammond, MM, NL Neff, JL Farr, AR Schwall and X Zhao (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018556. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Hayes, AF (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press. New York, NY. Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, DD (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 11–34, https://doi.org/10.2307/3096941. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Henseler, J, CM Ringle and M Sarstedt (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Henseler, J, G Hubona and PA Ray (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20, https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage. Thousand Oaks, CA. Google Scholar
• Holt, TP and TM Loraas (2019). Using Qualtrics Panels to source external auditors: A replication study. Journal of Information Systems, 33(1), 29–41, https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51986. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Hosmer, LT (1994). Why be moral? A different rationale for managers. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(2), 191–204, https://doi.org/10.2307/3857491. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hosmer, LT (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403, https://doi.org/10.2307/258851. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Houtgraaf, G (2022). Public sector creativity: Triggers, practices and ideas for public sector innovations. A longitudinal digital diary study. Public Management Review, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2037015. ISI, Google Scholar
• Huck, SW (2012). Reading Statistics and Research, 6th edn. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA. Google Scholar
• Kanter, RM (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509–523, https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005001. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Khan, MS, RJ Breitenecker, V Gustafsson and EJ Schwarz (2015). Innovative entrepreneurial teams: The give and take of trust and conflict. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(4), 558–573, https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12152. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Klimoski, RJ and BL Karol (1976). The impact of trust on creative problem solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(5), 630–633, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.5.630. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Kock, N (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10, https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Kohtamäki, M, T Kekäle and R Viitala (2004). Trust and innovation: From spin-off idea to stock exchange. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(2), 75–88, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00296.x. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kottke, JL, KL Pelletier and MD Agars (2013). Measuring follower confidence in top leadership direction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(4), 292–307, https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2011-0062. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Li, G and L Xie (2022). The effects of job involvement and supervisor developmental feedback on employee creativity: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Current Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02901-w. ISI, Google Scholar
• Mansfeld, MN, K Hölzle and HG Gemünden (2010). Personal characteristics of innovators—An empirical study of roles in innovation management. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(6), 1129–1147, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919610003033. Link, Google Scholar
• Marcoulides, GA and WW Chin (2013). You write, but others read: Common methodological misunderstandings in PLS and related methods. In New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods, H AbdiWW ChinV Esposito VinziG RussolilloL Trinchera (Eds.), pp. 31–64. Springer. New York, NY. Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister, DJ (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59, https://doi.org/10.2307/256727. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• McGrath, JE (1982). The study of research choices and dilemmas. In Judgment Calls in Research, J E McGrathJ MartinRA Kulka (Eds.), pp. 69–102. Sage. Beverly Hills, CA. Google Scholar
• Mueller, J, S Melwani, J Loewenstein and JJ Deal (2018). Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: Towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 94–110, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0887. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Mukerjee, J and A Metiu (2021). Play and psychological safety: An ethnography of innovative work. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(3), 394–418, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12598. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Ng, TW, Y Shao, J Koopmann, M Wang, DY Hsu and FH Yim (2022). The effects of idea rejection on creative self-efficacy and idea generation: Intention to remain and perceived innovation importance as moderators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(1), 146–163, https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2567. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Oldham, GR and A Cummings (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634, https://doi.org/10.2307/256657. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, DM, T Meyvis and N Davidenko (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, JE and PV Mannucci (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53–79, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Preacher, KJ and AF Hayes (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891, https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Rank, J, VL Pace and M Frese (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 518–528, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00185.x. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Rasheed, MA, K Shahzad, C Conroy, S Nadeem and MU Siddique (2017). Exploring the role of employee voice between high-performance work system and organizational innovation in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(4), 670–688, https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-11-2016-0185. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Reio, Jr., TG (2016). Nonexperimental research: Strengths, weaknesses and issues of precision. European Journal of Training and Development, 40, 676–690, https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-07-2015-0058. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ringle, CM, S Wende and JM Becker (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt, DE: SmartPLS GmbH. Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D and S Tijoriwala (1999). What’s a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in promoting organizational change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 514–528, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.514. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Sarooghi, H, D Libaers and A Burkemper (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 714–731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.12.003. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M, JF Hair, Jr., C Nitzl, CM Ringle and MC Howard (2020). Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses! International Journal of Market Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320915686. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M, P Bengart, AM Shaltoni and S Lehmann (2017). The use of sampling methods in advertising research: A gap between theory and practice. International Journal of Advertising: The Review of Marketing Communications, 37(4), 650–663, https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348329. Google Scholar
• Schuberth, F, J Henseler and TK Dijkstra (2018). Confirmatory composite analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02541. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Scott, SG and RA Bruce (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607, https://doi.org/10.2307/256701. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Shalley, CE, J Zhou and GR Oldham (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G, M Sarstedt, JF Hair, JH Cheah, H Ting, S Vaithilingam and CM Ringle (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347, https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Silva, ND and GR Oldham (2012). Adopting employees’ ideas: Moderators of the idea generation–idea implementation link. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (2–3): 134–145, https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.677257. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Silvia, PJ, B Wigert, R Reiter-Palmon and JC Kaufman (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 19–34, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024071. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Silvia, PJ, EC Nusbaum, C Berg, C Martin and A O’Connor (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, higher-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1087–1090, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.015. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Smith, J and D Barclay (1997). The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 3–21, https://doi.org/10.2307/1252186. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Smith, SM, CA Roster, LL Golden and GS Albaum (2016). A multi-group analysis of online survey respondent data quality: Comparing a regular USA consumer panel to MTurk samples. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3139–3148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.002. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Stephan, U, P Andries and A Daou (2019). Goal multiplicity and innovation: How social and economic goals affect open innovation and innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(6), 721–743, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12511. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Tsai, W and S Ghoshal (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intra-firm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476, https://doi.org/10.2307/257085. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Tyler, T and P Degoey (1996). Trust in organizational authorities: The influence of motive attributions and willingness to accept decisions. In Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, RM KramerTR Tyler (Eds.). Sage Publications. Crossref, Google Scholar
• Unsworth, K (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 289–297, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378025. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, L and JA LePine (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119, https://doi.org/10.2307/256902. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Wanous, JP and AE Reichers (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252, https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Weiss, M, M Baer and M Hoegl (2022). The human side of innovation management: Bridging the divide between the fields of innovation management and organizational behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(3), 283–291, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12624. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• West, MAJL Farr (Eds.). (1990). Innovation and Creativity at Work: Psychological and Organizational Strategies. John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY. Google Scholar
• Wheeler, AR, KK Shanine, MR Leon and MV Whitman (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12042. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Winton, BG and MA Sabol (2021). A multi-group analysis of convenience samples: Free, cheap, friendly, and fancy sources. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1961187. ISI, Google Scholar
• Yan, Z, T Wang, Y Chen and H Zhang (2016). Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management, 53(5), 643–653, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.001. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
• Zhou, J and JM George (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 545–568, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00051-1. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar