World Scientific
Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×
Our website is made possible by displaying certain online content using javascript.
In order to view the full content, please disable your ad blocker or whitelist our website www.worldscientific.com.

System Upgrade on Mon, Jun 21st, 2021 at 1am (EDT)

During this period, the E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 6 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.
No Access

EFFICIENCY DIVERGENCE BETWEEN FORMAL AND INFORMAL MICROENTERPRISES DURING THE TRADE LIBERALIZATION OF MEXICO

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946722500121Cited by:0
    Previous
    Next

    Abstract

    Efficiency is a crucial determinant of economic development, especially among microenterprises, which tend to be the prevalent economic units. This article estimates the efficiency of both formal and informal microenterprises in Mexico in the context of NAFTA (North American Free Trade). The Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method is used to explain the factors behind the observed differences. Additionally, a detailed analysis with a decomposition by quantiles is provided. Formal microenterprises are found to be more efficient than their informal counterparts, with a narrow difference in 1994 widening by 2012. At the same time, the efficiency level declined for both groups of microenterprises over time. Two main conclusions are derived. First, microenterprise size distribution and the characteristics of the private sector influence the success of trade liberalization policies. Second, the overall decrease in efficiency, regardless of whether microenterprises are formal or informal, supports recent studies suggesting that economic, institutional and social constraints limit firm performance.

    References

    • Abou-Ali, H and R Rizk (2015, May). MSEs informality and productivity: Evidence from Egypt. In Economic Research Forum Working Paper Series No (Vol. 916). Google Scholar
    • Akoten, JE, Y Sawada and K Otsuka (2006). The determinants of credit access and its impacts on micro and small enterprises: The case of garment producers in Kenya. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(4), 927–44. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Amin, M and C Okou (2020). Casting a shadow: Productivity of formal firms and informality. Review of Development Economics, 24(4), 1610–30. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Ayele, AB (2021). Efficiency of micro and small enterprises in Ethiopia: Evidence from data envelope analysis model. Preprints, 2021100180. [10.20944/preprints202110.0180.v1]. Google Scholar
    • Benjamin, NC and AA Mbaye (2012). The informal sector, productivity and enforcement in West Africa: A firm-level analysis. Review of Development Economics, 16(4), 664–80. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Blinder, AS (1973). Wage discrimination: Reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 436–55. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • De la Rosa, D, D Ortiz and R Otero (2017). Use of accounting and the efficiency of microenterprises in Mexico. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 17(9). [https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v17i9.898]. Google Scholar
    • Diao, X, J Kweka and M McMillan (2018). Small firms, structural change and labor productivity growth in Africa: Evidence from Tanzania. World Development, 105, 400–15. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Fan, H, H Gao, YA Li and TA Luong (2018). Trade liberalization and markups: Micro evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(1), 103–30. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Firpo, S, NM Fortin and T Lemieux (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3), 953–73. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Fortin, N, T Lemieux and S Firpo (2011). Decomposition methods in economics. In Handbook of Labor Economics (4), 1–102). Elsevier. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Fugazza, M and NM Fiess (2010). Trade liberalization and informality: New stylized facts. UN Policy Issues in International Trade and Commodities Study Series, (43). Google Scholar
    • Hart, J, D Miljkovic and S Shaik (2015). The impact of trade openness on technical efficiency in the agricultural sector of the European Union. Applied Economics, 47(12), 1230–47. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Huchet, M, CLM Le Mouël and M Vijil (2011). The relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. In XIIIème Congrès de l’Association Européenne des Economistes Agricoles (EAAE), August. Google Scholar
    • Hernández-Trillo, F, JA Pagán and J Paxton (2005). Start-up capital, microenterprises and technical efficiency in Mexico. Review of Development Economics, 9(3), 434–47. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Khobai, H and N Mavikela (2017). The causal linkage between trade openness and economic growth in Argentina: Evidence from the ARDL and VECM techniques. Munich Personal RePec Paper N.82463. Google Scholar
    • Liu, G, X Liu and Y Wei (2002). Openness and efficiency of India and China relative to the world economy: A comparative study. Department of Economics and Finance, Working Paper 02–18, Brunel University. Google Scholar
    • La Porta, R and A Shleifer (2014). Informality and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3), 109–26. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Maloney, WF (2004). Informality revisited. World Development, 32(7), 1159–78. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Mazumdar, D (2001). Small-medium enterprise development in equitable growth and poverty alleviation. Asian Development Bank, 29. Google Scholar
    • McKenzie, DJ and C Woodruff (2006). Do entry costs provide an empirical basis for poverty traps? Evidence from Mexican microenterprises. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55(1), 3–42. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • McKenzie, DJ and C Woodruff (2008). Experimental evidence on returns to capital and access to finance in Mexico. The World Bank Economic Review, 22(3), 457–82. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Miljkovic, D, SH Miranda and S Shaik (2013). Trade openness and technical efficiency in Brazilian agriculture. Applied Economics Letters, 20(2), 103–06. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Nataraj, S (2011). The impact of trade liberalization on productivity: Evidence from India’s formal and informal manufacturing sectors. Journal of International Economics, 85(2), 292–301. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Oaxaca, R (1973). Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 693–709. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • OECD (2017). Mexico policy brief. Economía. Incrementar la productividad en las pequeñas empresas tradicionales. OECD Better Policies Series. [www.oecd.org/policy-briefs/mexico-incrementar-la-productividad-en-las-pequenas-empresas-tradicionales.pdf]. Google Scholar
    • OECD (2022). Productivity statistics. OECD Stat. [www.oecd.org/sdd/productivity-stats/]. Google Scholar
    • Ordonez, JCL (2014). Tax collection, the informal sector and productivity. Review of Economic Dynamics, 17(2), 262–86. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Otero, R, J Pagán and S Lovett (2013). Microenterprise origins and efficiency in Mexico. International Journal of Business and Economics, 12(1), 73. Google Scholar
    • Porta, RL and A Shleifer (2014). Informality and development. National Bureau of Economic Research, (20205), 1–30. Google Scholar
    • Rhyne, E and M Otero (1992). Financial services for microenterprises: Principles and institutions. World Development, 20(11), 1561–71. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Silajdzic, S and E Mehic (2018). Trade openness and economic growth: Empirical evidence from transition economies. In Trade and Global Market. IntechOpen. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Sun, H, P Hone and H Doucouliago (1999). Economic openness and technical efficiency: A case study of Chinese manufacturing industries. Economics of Transition, 7(3), 615–36. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Sundaram, A (2015). The impact of trade liberalization on micro enterprises: Do banks matter? Evidence from Indian manufacturing. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(6), 832–53. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Shu, P and C Steinwender (2019). The impact of trade liberalization on firm productivity and innovation. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 19(1), 39–68. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • Topalova, P and A Khandelwal (2011). Trade liberalization and firm productivity: The case of India. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(3), 995–1009. Google Scholar
    • Trinh, LQ and HTT Doan (2018). Internationalization and the growth of Vietnamese micro, small, and medium sized enterprises: Evidence from panel quantile regressions. Journal of Asian Economics, 55, 71–83. Crossref, Google Scholar
    Published: July 2022