World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

MAPPING THE NETWORKED CONTEXT OF COPERNICUS, MICHELANGELO, AND DELLA MIRANDOLA IN WIKIPEDIA

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525922400100Cited by:2 (Source: Crossref)
    This article is part of the issue:

    To discern the role social and cultural networks play in the emergence of preeminent historical figures and ideas in History, we use a method based on complex networks analysis to reveal emergent interactions in Wikipedia. We built a network constituted by derivative links, where nodes are connected if they are co-linked by other papers or co-link other papers within Wikipedia. We apply this method, focused on the structural distance, to three significant individuals associated with the Italian Renaissance: Copernicus, Michelangelo, and Pico della Mirandola. The results point to the effectiveness of this approach for discovering new knowledge about the interdisciplinary transactions between people and ideas coming from artistic, scientific and philosophical domains during this period. The emergent network reflects the apparently strong network-level interactions between Michelangelo and Mirandola’s clusters; the importance of Hermeticism across the three clusters; and how the so-called “knowledge dealers” related to Neoplatonism contribute to the depiction of the period by future historians. Finally, we advance the notion of “focus reading”, in which complex networks analysis allows us to build bridges between close and distant forms of reading historical evidence.

    References

    • 1. Basov, N. and Kholodova, D., Networks of context: Three-layer socio-cultural mapping for a Verstehende network analysis, Soc. Netw. 69 (2021) 84–101. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Bode, K., The equivalence of “Close” and “Distant” reading; or, toward a new object for data-rich literary history, Mod. Lang. Quart. 78 (2017) 77–106. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Cilibrasi, R. L. and Vitanyi, P. M. B., The Google similarity distance, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 19 (2007) 370–383. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Eom, Y.-H., Aragón, P., Laniado, D., Kaltenbrunner, A., Vigna, S. and Shepelyansky, D. L., Interactions of cultures and top people of Wikipedia from ranking of 24 language editions, PLoS One 10 (2015) e0114825. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Farmer, S. A., Syncretism in the West: Pico’s 900 Theses (1486). The Evolution of Traditional Religious and Philosophical Systems (ACMRS Publications, Tempe, 1998). Google Scholar
    • 6. Fortunato, S., Community detection in graphs, Phys. Rep. 486 (2010) 75–174. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Freitas, R., Cultural mapping as a development tool, City Cult. Soc. 7 (2016) 9–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Fruchterman, T. M. J. and Reingold, E. M., Graph drawing by force-directed placement, Softw. Pract. Exp. 21 (1991) 1129–1164. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Gabella, M., Cultural structures of knowledge from wikipedia networks of first links, IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 6 (2019) 249–252. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Goldfarb, D., Merkl, D. and Schich, M., Quantifying cultural histories via person networks in Wikipedia, (2015). Google Scholar
    • 11. Goldstone, A., The doxa of reading, PMLA, Publ. Mod. Lang. Assoc. Am. 132 (2017) 636–642. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 12. Guimerà, R. and Amaral, L. A. N., Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks, Nature 433 (2005) 895–900. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 13. Henry, J., The Scientific Revolution and the Origins of Modern Science (Macmillan, New York, 1997). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 14. Hutchison, K., An angel’s view of heaven: The mystical heliocentricity of medieval geocentric cosmology, Hist. Sci. 50 (2012) 33–74. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 15. Kraye, J., Philologists and Philosophers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 16. Kuhn, T. S., The Copernican Revolution (Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1957). Google Scholar
    • 17. Kuhn, T. S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970). Google Scholar
    • 18. Moretti, F., Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History (Verso, New York, 2005). Google Scholar
    • 19. Moretti, F., Distant Reading (Verso, New York, 2013). Google Scholar
    • 20. Newman, M. E. J., The structure and function of complex networks, SIAM Rev. 45 (2003) 167–256. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 21. Panofsky, E., Meaning in the Visual Arts (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1955). Google Scholar
    • 22. Pérez, C. M., Sobre las Revoluciones (Tecnos, Madrid, 1987). Google Scholar
    • 23. Ravetz, J. R., Astronomy and Cosmology in the Achievement of Nicolaus Copernicus (Ossolineum, Wroclaw-Warszawa-Kraków, 1965). Google Scholar
    • 24. Restivo, S., Einstein’s Brain (Springer Nature, Berlin, 2019). Google Scholar
    • 25. Robb, N. A., Neoplatonism of the Italian Renaissance (Octagon, New York, 1968). Google Scholar
    • 26. Robert, S., Context (Oxford Academic, 2014). Google Scholar
    • 27. Rodríguez, T., El aristotelismo de Giovanni Pico della Mirandola y la concordia entre Platón y Aristóteles, Prax. Filos. 49 (2019) 39–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Sawyer, R. K., Explaining Creativity (OUP, USA, 2012). Google Scholar
    • 29. M. Schich et al., A network framework of cultural history, Science 345 (2014) 558–562. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 30. Schwartz, G. A., Complex networks reveal emergent interdisciplinary knowledge in Wikipedia, Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 8 (2021) 127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 31. Scott, W., Hermetica. The Ancient Greek and Latin Writings which Contain Religious or Philosophic Teachings Ascribed to Hermes Trismegistus (Shambhala, Boston, 1993). Google Scholar
    • 32. Shrimplin, V., Michelangelo, Copernicus and the Sistine chapel, Proc. Int. Astron. Union 5 (2009) 333–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 33. Stirling, A., A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society, R. Soc. Publ.Org. 4 (2007) 707–719. Google Scholar
    • 34. Underwood, T., Distant Horizons (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2019). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 35. Wagner, C., Garcia, D., Jadidi, M. and Strohmaier, M., It’s a man’s Wikipedia? Assessing gender inequality in an online encyclopedia, Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Social Media, Vol. 9 (2021), pp. 454–463. Google Scholar
    • 36. Wagner, C., Graells- Garrido, E., Garcia, D. and Menczer, F., Women through the glass ceiling: Gender asymmetries in Wikipedia, EPJ Data Sci. 5 (2016) 5. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 37. Wallis, C. G., Miller, P. J. W. and Carmichael, D., On the Dignity of Man, On Being and the One (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1977). Google Scholar
    • 38. Westman, R. S., The astronomer’s role in the sixteenth-century: A preliminary survey, Hist. Sci. 18 (1980) 105–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 39. Whitehead, A. N., Science and the Modern World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1953). Google Scholar
    • 40. Yates, F., Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1964). Google Scholar
    • 41. Zant, S. E., Jaffrès-Runser, K., Frahm, K. M. and Shepelyansky, D. L., Interactions and influence of world painters from the reduced Google matrix of Wikipedia networks, IEEE Access 6 (2018) 47735–47750. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 42. Zhirov, A. O., Zhirov, O. V. and Shepelyansky, D. L., Two-dimensional ranking of Wikipedia articles, Eur. Phys. J. B 77 (2010) 523–531. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar