World Scientific
  • Search
  •   
Skip main navigation

Cookies Notification

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to the use of our cookies. Learn More
×

System Upgrade on Tue, May 28th, 2024 at 2am (EDT)

Existing users will be able to log into the site and access content. However, E-commerce and registration of new users may not be available for up to 12 hours.
For online purchase, please visit us again. Contact us at [email protected] for any enquiries.

A Novel Nature-Inspired Improved Grasshopper Optimization-Tuned Dual-Input Controller for Enhancing Stability of Interconnected Systems

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218126621501346Cited by:8 (Source: Crossref)

    Power system often experiences the problem of low-frequency electromechanical oscillations which leads the system to unstable condition. The problem can be corrected by implementing power system stabilizers (PSSs) in the excitation control system of alternator. This paper provides a novel and efficient approach to design an Improved Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (IGOA)-based dual-input controller to damp the inter-area-mode power system oscillations. A three-fold optimization criterion has been formulated to calculate the optimum values of the controllers required for power system stability. The damping performance of the proposed controller is compared with conventional PSS and genetic algorithm-based controllers to validate the better performance of the proposed IGOA-based controller under various system loading conditions and disturbances.

    This paper was recommended by Regional Editor Tongquan Wei.

    References

    • 1. B. Dasu, M. Sivakumar and R. Srinivasarao, Interconnected multi-machine power system stabilizer design using whale optimization algorithm, Prot. Control Mod. Power Syst. 4 (2019) 2:1–2:11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Md. Shafiullah, Md. Juel Rana, Md. Shafiul and M. A. Abido, Online tuning of power system stabilizer employing genetic programming for stability enhancement, J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol. 5 (2018) 287–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 3. M. Rahmatian and S. Seyedtabaii, Multimachine optimal power system stabilizers design based on system stability and nonlinearity indices using hyper spherical search method, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 105 (2019) 729–740. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 4. K. Tang and G. Venayagamoorthy, Damping Inter-area oscillations using virtual generator-based power system stabilizer, Electr. Power Syst. Res. 129 (2015) 126–141. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 5. R. Krishnan, A. Verma and S. Mishra, Design of multimachine power system stabilizers with forecast uncertainties in load-generation, IETE J. Res. 65 (2019) 44–57. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 6. G. Shahgholian, Review of power system stabilizer: Application, modeling, analysis and control strategy, Int. J. Tech. Phys. Probl. Eng. 5 (2013) 41–52. Google Scholar
    • 7. M. A. Abido, Robust design of power system stabilizers for multimachine power systems using differential evolution, Computational Intelligence in Power Engineering, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 302 (Springer, Berlin, 2010), pp. 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 8. J. A. L. Barreiros et al., A neural power system stabilizer trained using local linear controllers in a gain scheduling scheme, Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 27 (2005) 473–479. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 9. M. A. Abido and Y. L. Abdel-Magid, Adaptive tuning of power system stabilizers using radial basis function networks, Electr. Power Syst. Res. 49 (1999) 21–29. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 10. K. B. Meziane and B. Ismail, An interval type-2 fuzzy logic PSS with the optimal H8 tracking control for multi-machine power system, Int. J. Intell. Eng. Inform. 4 (2016) 286–304. Google Scholar
    • 11. M. Dubey and N. Mastorakis, Tuning of fuzzy logic power system stabilizers using genetic algorithm in multimachine power system, WSEAS Trans. Power Syst. 4 (2009) 105–114. Google Scholar
    • 12. M. Shibendu, K. Rajib and D. Mandal, Comparative study of nature-inspired algorithms to design (1+α) and (2+α)-order filters using a frequency-domain approach, Swarm Evol. Comput. 55 (2020) 100685. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 13. K. S. Simhadri and B. Mohanty, Performance analysis of dual mode PI controller using quasi oppositional whale optimization algorithm for load frequency control, Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 30 (2019) e12159. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 14. W. Zhang, W. Shi and J. Zhuo, Shipboard power system stabilizer optimization using GA and QPSO algorithm, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Appl. 16 (2017) 1750015. Link, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 15. H. Shayeghi, A. Safari and H. A. Shayanfar, Multimachine power system stabilizers design using PSO algorithm, Int. J. Energy Power Eng. 2 (2008) 934–941. Google Scholar
    • 16. S. Rangasamy, Implementation of an innovative cuckoo search optimizer in multimachine power system stability analysis, Control Eng. Appl. Inform. 16 (2014) 98–105. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 17. T. Guesmi and B. M. Alshammari, An improved artificial bee colony algorithm for robust design of power system stabilizers, Eng. Comput. 34 (2017) 2131–2153. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 18. A. Fathy and O. El-baksawi, Grasshopper optimization algorithm for extracting maximum power from wind turbine installed in Al-Jouf region, J Renew. Sustain. Energy 11 (2019) 3:1–3:13. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 19. H. Feng, H. Ni, R. Zhao and X. Zhu, An enhanced grasshopper optimization algorithm to the bin packaging problem, J. Control Sci. Eng. 2020 (2020) 3894987. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 20. S. Rangasamy and P. Manickam, Stability analysis of multimachine thermal power systems using the nature-inspired modified cuckoo search algorithm, Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 22 (2014) 1099–1115. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 21. D. Mondal, A. Chakrabarti and A. Sengupta, Power System Small Signal Stability Analysis and Control (Academic Press, 2020). Google Scholar
    • 22. IEEE Computer Society, Standard 421.5-2016: IEEE recommended practice for excitation system models for power system stability studies (2016), https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=7553419. Google Scholar
    • 23. H. Setiadi, N. Mithulanantham, A. U. Krismanto and I. Kamwa, Optimization based design of dual input PSS for improving small signal stability of power system with RESs, Int. J. Electr. Eng. Inform. 11 (2019) 778–795. Google Scholar
    • 24. S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, Grasshopper optimization algorithm: Theory and application, Adv. Eng. Softw. 105 (2017) 30–47. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 25. A. Neve, G. Kakandikar and O. Kulkarni, Application of grasshopper optimization algorithm for constrained and unconstrained test functions, Int. J. Swarm Intell. Evol. Comput. 6 (2017) 1000165. Google Scholar
    • 26. H. Jia, C. Lang, D. Oliva, W. Song and X. Peng, Hybrid grasshopper optimization algorithm and differential evolution for multilevel satellite image segmentation, Remote Sens. 11 (2019) 1134. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 27. J. Wu, H. Wang, N. Li, Y. Huang, Z. Su and Y. Yu, Distributed trajectory optimization for multiple solar-powered UAVs target tracking in urban environment by adaptive grasshopper optimization algorithm, Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 70 (2017) 497–510. Crossref, Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
    • 28. Md. Shafullah, Md. J. Rana, Md. S. Alam, M. A. Abido, Online tuning of power system stabilizer employing genetic programming for stability enhancement, J Electr. Syst Infor Tech. 5(3) (2018) 287–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 29. M. J. Gibbard, P. Pouebeik and D. J. Vowles, Small Signal Stability, Control and Dynamic Performance of Power Systems (University of Adelaide Press, Australia, 2015). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 30. D. Asija, P. Choudekar, Ruchira and M. Chouhan, Performance evaluation and improvement in transient stability of IEEE 9 bus system using exciter and governor control, Procedia Comput. Sci. 70 (2005) 733–739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar